View previous topic :: View next topic |
Author |
Message |
bhargav
Joined: 24 Nov 2011 Posts: 938 Location: Helsinki, Finland
Expire: 2014-11-24
|
Posted: Sun Apr 01, 2012 4:25 pm Post subject: Canon 35-70 3.5-4.5 Macro or Sigma Miniwide 24/2.8 for Macro |
|
|
bhargav wrote:
I find myself experimenting more and more with my NEX 5 and macro tubes around the garden for Macro stuff. So I thought I should look into getting a dedicated Macro lens. To begin with I only have limited budget having just bought an EP-2. The lens will be used with both the NEX and Oly.
I can get the above mentioned Canon for £20 and Sigma for £25. I already have a Canon 35-70 f4 which is a pretty good sharp lens. Anyone have any experience with it? I could find some pictures for Sigma here but none for the Canon. Or are there any other cheap (range being £30 max) alternatives?
Thanks,
Bhargav |
|
Back to top |
|
|
Excalibur
Joined: 19 Jul 2009 Posts: 5017 Location: UK
Expire: 2014-04-21
|
Posted: Sun Apr 01, 2012 9:54 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Excalibur wrote:
Erm is that a typo and it should be 28mm mini wide? Anyway I've only got the mini wide II so any shots (from a film camera) are not much use to you. _________________ Canon A1, AV1, T70 & T90, EOS 300 and EOS300v, Chinon CE and CP-7M. Contax 139, Fuji STX-2, Konica Autoreflex TC, FS-1, FT-1, Minolta X-700, X-300, XD-11, SRT101b, Nikon EM, FM, F4, F90X, Olympus OM2, Pentax S3, Spotmatic, Pentax ME super, Praktica TL 5B, & BC1, , Ricoh KR10super, Yashica T5D, Bronica Etrs, Mamiya RB67 pro AND drum roll:- a Sony Nex 3
.........past gear Tele Rolleiflex and Rollei SL66.
Many lenses from good to excellent. |
|
Back to top |
|
|
Tedat
Joined: 08 Nov 2011 Posts: 800 Location: Berlin/Germany
|
Posted: Mon Apr 02, 2012 7:14 am Post subject: Re: Canon 35-70 3.5-4.5 Macro or Sigma Miniwide 24/2.8 for M |
|
|
Tedat wrote:
bhargav wrote: |
Or are there any other cheap (range being £30 max) alternatives?
Thanks,
Bhargav |
I got a Konica Hexanon 3.5/55 (1:1 with macroadapter) for 36 Euro and a friend bought his Vivitar 2.8/55mm (1:1) for 40 Euro.. another one just sold for 33.50 Euro:
Click here to see on Ebay
With some luck and if you can wait those are in your pricerange. _________________ Regards
Jan
flickr
Sony A7RM2
Contax T*: Distagon 4/18, Distagon 2/28, Distagon 1.4/35, PC-Distagon 2.8/35, Planar 1.4/50, Planar 1.4/85, Planar 2/100, Planar 2/135, S-Planar 2.8/60, Tessar 2.8/45, Mirotar 8/500, Vario Sonnar 3.4/35-70, Vario Sonnar 4.5-5.6/100-300
Carl Zeiss for Rollei QBM: F-Distagon 2.8/16 HFT, Distagon 2.8/25, Planar 1.4/50 HFT, Sonnar 2.8/85
Konica Hexanon AR: 2.8/21, 1.2/57
Other: Minolta F2.8 [T4.5] 135mm STF, Meopta Meostigmat 1.4/70, Tokina AT-X 2.5/90.. and lots of early M42 Yashinon, Rikenon and Mamiya lenses |
|
Back to top |
|
|
Ramon
Joined: 01 May 2007 Posts: 71 Location: Kent, UK
|
Posted: Mon Apr 02, 2012 1:03 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Ramon wrote:
There seems to be some confusion as to whether we are discussing the sigma 24 or 28.
If it is the first version 24 (manual focus) then watch out for cracked lens elements. I have found 2 of these each with one of the internal lenses cracked, so there seems to a design problem there. I have never tried a good one.
The first and second versions of the 28mm (both manual focus) are excellent and possibly some of the best 28s I've used but suffer with a plasticky aperture ring that distorts if you hold it too tight and this makes changing the aperture a bit stiff.
I've used the Canon 35-70 but not for macro so cannot comment on that, anyway a zoom lens is never going to get as good results as a prime lens so you would be much better off looking at primes only if you want a lens for macro.
But why 28mm, I would look at a 50mm lens which gives you a better working distance and a wide variety of low price lenses to choose from. |
|
Back to top |
|
|
bhargav
Joined: 24 Nov 2011 Posts: 938 Location: Helsinki, Finland
Expire: 2014-11-24
|
Posted: Mon Apr 02, 2012 1:59 pm Post subject: |
|
|
bhargav wrote:
First of all apologies for getting the name wrong. It is not mini but Super-Wide. So it is Sigma 24/2.8 Super Wide Angle Macro.
Thanks all of you for your comments. I should check that Konica out, but that means one more adapter
Ramon, I will check the 24mm for the cracked lens elements if I end up buying the 24mm. It seems a good price so might just buy it anyway even if not for Macro. |
|
Back to top |
|
|
Excalibur
Joined: 19 Jul 2009 Posts: 5017 Location: UK
Expire: 2014-04-21
|
Posted: Mon Apr 02, 2012 3:45 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Excalibur wrote:
bhargav wrote: |
First of all apologies for getting the name wrong. It is not mini but Super-Wide. So it is Sigma 24/2.8 Super Wide Angle Macro.
|
Ah missed again as I have the 24mm super wide II assuming the 2nd version is an improvement on the first, then I would say at macro it's only good (but excellent at other settings). _________________ Canon A1, AV1, T70 & T90, EOS 300 and EOS300v, Chinon CE and CP-7M. Contax 139, Fuji STX-2, Konica Autoreflex TC, FS-1, FT-1, Minolta X-700, X-300, XD-11, SRT101b, Nikon EM, FM, F4, F90X, Olympus OM2, Pentax S3, Spotmatic, Pentax ME super, Praktica TL 5B, & BC1, , Ricoh KR10super, Yashica T5D, Bronica Etrs, Mamiya RB67 pro AND drum roll:- a Sony Nex 3
.........past gear Tele Rolleiflex and Rollei SL66.
Many lenses from good to excellent. |
|
Back to top |
|
|
iangreenhalgh1
Joined: 18 Mar 2011 Posts: 15679
Expire: 2014-01-07
|
Posted: Mon Apr 02, 2012 4:14 pm Post subject: |
|
|
iangreenhalgh1 wrote:
Look for a Micro-Nikkor 3.5/55, they are very common on ebay and are only about 30 quid, it's a laser-sharp lens for Macro and normal shooting. _________________ I don't care who designed it, who made it or what country it comes from - I just enjoy using it! |
|
Back to top |
|
|
Tedat
Joined: 08 Nov 2011 Posts: 800 Location: Berlin/Germany
|
Posted: Tue Apr 03, 2012 10:12 am Post subject: |
|
|
Tedat wrote:
bhargav wrote: |
I should check that Konica out, but that means one more adapter
|
yes but a very useful adapter.. there are so many nice Hexanons _________________ Regards
Jan
flickr
Sony A7RM2
Contax T*: Distagon 4/18, Distagon 2/28, Distagon 1.4/35, PC-Distagon 2.8/35, Planar 1.4/50, Planar 1.4/85, Planar 2/100, Planar 2/135, S-Planar 2.8/60, Tessar 2.8/45, Mirotar 8/500, Vario Sonnar 3.4/35-70, Vario Sonnar 4.5-5.6/100-300
Carl Zeiss for Rollei QBM: F-Distagon 2.8/16 HFT, Distagon 2.8/25, Planar 1.4/50 HFT, Sonnar 2.8/85
Konica Hexanon AR: 2.8/21, 1.2/57
Other: Minolta F2.8 [T4.5] 135mm STF, Meopta Meostigmat 1.4/70, Tokina AT-X 2.5/90.. and lots of early M42 Yashinon, Rikenon and Mamiya lenses |
|
Back to top |
|
|
declan
Joined: 17 Dec 2009 Posts: 162 Location: Indonesia
|
Posted: Tue Apr 03, 2012 2:51 pm Post subject: |
|
|
declan wrote:
Excalibur wrote: |
bhargav wrote: |
First of all apologies for getting the name wrong. It is not mini but Super-Wide. So it is Sigma 24/2.8 Super Wide Angle Macro.
|
Ah missed again as I have the 24mm super wide II assuming the 2nd version is an improvement on the first, then I would say at macro it's only good (but excellent at other settings). |
Yrs, you can go wrong with this sigma for sharp not macro imho _________________ Owning a DSLR does not make you a photographer. It makes you a DSLR owner." - Anonymous
Evolt E-3|ZD 50-200 MK I|OM 65-200/f4|Tamron SP 90/f2.5|Tamron 2xtcon 18F|01F|OM 50/1.4
EP-L 2+EVF2|MMF-2|ZD 14-54 MK2|OM 50/1.8|Mal-1|Metz 44-af1
NX300|nx18-55|sef-8a
Mono-TriPod|Slingshot200AW|Compuday150|Mini Trekker AW|sling
Ebay : declan_79 |
|
Back to top |
|
|
|
|
You cannot post new topics in this forum You cannot reply to topics in this forum You cannot edit your posts in this forum You cannot delete your posts in this forum You cannot vote in polls in this forum
|