| View previous topic :: View next topic |
| Author |
Message |
ForenSeil
Joined: 15 Apr 2011
Posts: 2726
Location: Kiel, Germany.
|
 Posted: Thu Feb 16, 2012 12:24 am Post subject: Another 85/1.5 Cyclop!? |
 |
|
ForenSeil wrote:
Look at that:
http://www.flickr.com/photos/zarago-go/6883112533/
http://www.flickr.com/photos/zarago-go/6883112765/
http://www.flickr.com/photos/zarago-go/6883113167/
Is that a Cyclop? I has another focusing ring and the most important a much longer rear element!
_________________
I'm not a collector, I'm a tester 
My camera: Sony A7+Zeiss Sonnar 55/1.8
Current favourite lenses (I have many more):
A few macro-Tominons, Samyang 12/2.8, Noritsu 50.7/9.5, Rodagon 105/5.6 on bellows, Samyang 135/2, Nikon ED 180/2.8, Leitz Elmar-R 250/4, Celestron C8 2000mm F10
Most wanted: Samyang 24/1.4, Samyang 35/1.4, Nikon 200/2 ED
My Blog: http://picturechemistry.own-blog.com/
(German language) |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Kathmandu
Joined: 09 Dec 2009
Posts: 1479
Location: (Kathmandu,Nepal. Currently)Pacific Northwest, USA
Expire: 2012-04-08
|
| Posted: Thu Feb 16, 2012 12:35 am Post subject: |
|
|
Kathmandu wrote:
That looks just like the 1.2 with the protuding nipple, interesting. Wonder if the owner of that lens converted it for use?
_________________
kathmandu
Sony α 700 DSLR
 |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
ForenSeil
Joined: 15 Apr 2011
Posts: 2726
Location: Kiel, Germany.
|
| Posted: Sun Mar 11, 2012 3:23 pm Post subject: |
|
|
ForenSeil wrote:
Update
In the meanwhile the author did cut off the rear element and he got suprisingly good results:
cyclop 85 mm F 1.5 von elzaragogo auf Flickr
Wow that's weird that it's still working
_________________
I'm not a collector, I'm a tester
My camera: Sony A7+Zeiss Sonnar 55/1.8
Current favourite lenses (I have many more):
A few macro-Tominons, Samyang 12/2.8, Noritsu 50.7/9.5, Rodagon 105/5.6 on bellows, Samyang 135/2, Nikon ED 180/2.8, Leitz Elmar-R 250/4, Celestron C8 2000mm F10
Most wanted: Samyang 24/1.4, Samyang 35/1.4, Nikon 200/2 ED
My Blog: http://picturechemistry.own-blog.com/
(German language) |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
Pancolart
Joined: 04 Feb 2008
Posts: 3704
Location: Slovenia, EU
Expire: 2013-11-18
|
| Posted: Sun Mar 11, 2012 5:29 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Pancolart wrote:
| ForenSeil wrote: |
Update
In the meanwhile the author did cut off the rear element and he got suprisingly good results... |
But come on  ?
_________________
---------------------------------
The Peculiar Apparatus Of Victorian Steampunk Photography: 100+ Genuine Steampunk Camera Designs https://www.amazon.com/dp/B0B92829NS |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
std
Joined: 09 Feb 2010
Posts: 1826
Location: Bulgaria
|
| Posted: Sun Mar 11, 2012 5:47 pm Post subject: |
|
|
std wrote:
Interesting, on my m42 cyclop there is no such element on the back.
_________________
Stefan
My lens list:
SLR MD: Rokkor 1,7/50 Exakta: Kilfitt-Makro-Kilar E 3.5/4cm; CZJ 2/50 Pancolar;M42: CZJ 2.8/50 Tessar; Mir-1B 2.8/37; Jupiter-9 2/85 T-mount: Tamron 5.9/200; Tamron 6.9/300; Tamron 7.5/400 C-mount: Cosmicar 1.8/50 Y/S: Sun 3.5/38-90, Sun 4/70-210 RF Contax RF: Jupiter-8 2/50; Contax G:CZ 2,8/21 Biogon T; CZ 2,8/28 Biogon T; CZ 2/35 Planar T; CZ 2/45 Planar T; CZ 2,8/90 Sonnar T |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
|
|
|
You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot vote in polls in this forum
|
Search
Memberlist
Register
Profile
Log in to check your private messages
Log in
