View previous topic :: View next topic |
Author |
Message |
Himself
Joined: 01 Mar 2007 Posts: 3242 Location: Montreal
Expire: 2013-05-30
|
Posted: Mon Mar 12, 2012 2:50 pm Post subject: Getting parallels |
|
|
Himself wrote:
It`s a question that I`d like to find the answer.
How to get the camera parallel with the object. I`m talking table/product photography.
The verticals should be easy: a hot shoe level for the camera a level for the object.
How do we determine whether the sides are parallel? Same question applies when shooting the famous brick test. _________________ Moderator Himself |
|
Back to top |
|
|
LucisPictor
Joined: 26 Feb 2007 Posts: 17633 Location: Oberhessen, Germany / Maidstone ('95-'96)
Expire: 2013-12-03
|
Posted: Mon Mar 12, 2012 2:54 pm Post subject: |
|
|
LucisPictor wrote:
With a brick wall you can simply measure it. With a table object that deosn't work as well. _________________ Personal forum activity on pause every now and again (due to job obligations)!
Carsten, former Moderator
Things ON SALE
Carsten = "KAPCTEH" = "Karusutenu" | T-shirt?.........................My photos from Emilia: http://www.schouler.net/emilia/emilia2011.html
My gear: http://retrocameracs.wordpress.com/ausrustung/
Old list: http://forum.mflenses.com/viewtopic.php?t=65 (Not up-to-date, sorry!) | http://www.lucispictor.de | http://www.alensaweek.wordpress.com |
http://www.retrocamera.de |
|
Back to top |
|
|
poilu
Joined: 26 Aug 2007 Posts: 10472 Location: Greece
Expire: 2019-08-29
|
Posted: Mon Mar 12, 2012 3:09 pm Post subject: |
|
|
poilu wrote:
I think I read it in the test procedure of photozone.de
put a mirror at the center of the target
place your dslr to see yourself at the center
you are parallel _________________ T* |
|
Back to top |
|
|
Himself
Joined: 01 Mar 2007 Posts: 3242 Location: Montreal
Expire: 2013-05-30
|
Posted: Mon Mar 12, 2012 4:06 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Himself wrote:
LucisPictor wrote: |
With a brick wall you can simply measure it. With a table object that deosn't work as well. |
It leaves plenty of room for errors.
Say that you test a f/1.4 or f/1.2 lens. The DOF is thin so you have to very accurate with measurement. I`m thinking mm.
Laser beam?
@love that poilu! _________________ Moderator Himself |
|
Back to top |
|
|
Himself
Joined: 01 Mar 2007 Posts: 3242 Location: Montreal
Expire: 2013-05-30
|
Posted: Tue Mar 13, 2012 6:28 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Himself wrote:
Nobody? Anybody? _________________ Moderator Himself |
|
Back to top |
|
|
poilu
Joined: 26 Aug 2007 Posts: 10472 Location: Greece
Expire: 2019-08-29
|
Posted: Tue Mar 13, 2012 6:44 pm Post subject: |
|
|
poilu wrote:
Himself wrote: |
Nobody? Anybody? |
didn't find any mirror? look in wife bag _________________ T* |
|
Back to top |
|
|
Himself
Joined: 01 Mar 2007 Posts: 3242 Location: Montreal
Expire: 2013-05-30
|
Posted: Wed Mar 14, 2012 3:17 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Himself wrote:
Wait, just wait and I`ll get back to you.
Unexpectedly of course. Stealth mod(e) _________________ Moderator Himself |
|
Back to top |
|
|
fuzzywuzzy
Joined: 18 Dec 2010 Posts: 1258 Location: Down East, Canada, eh?
Expire: 2013-11-30
|
Posted: Wed Mar 14, 2012 11:01 pm Post subject: |
|
|
fuzzywuzzy wrote:
Hopefully you're not shooting on the kitchen table?
If your tabletop is perfectly square, you could use a draftsman's T-square to line things up.
I can't explain in words, does this sketch make sense to anyone but me?
You'd sight the camera using the line of the square, align it to the live view grid or the focusing dots in the finder.
A macro rail or something would probably help make those fine adjustments accurately. _________________ I welcome C&C, editing my pics and reposting them on the forum is fine.
NEX-F3
~~~~~~~~~
CZJ Sonnar 135/4, Biotar 58/2, Pancolar 50/2, Tessar 50/2.8, Flek 35/2.8, Flek 25/4
Super Takumar 135/2.5, 135/3.5, 100/4 bellows, 50/1.4, 28/3.5
Helios 58/2, 3M-5A 500/8, Mir 20M
Vivitar Series 1 70-210 - - - - - - - - Nikkor 200/4
Rikenon 28/2.8 - - - - - - - - Zeiss 50/1.7 Planar
PB 50/2.4, 135/2.8
Yashica 50/1.9, 28/2.8, 135/2.8
Hexanon 28/3.5, 50/1.4 |
|
Back to top |
|
|
Himself
Joined: 01 Mar 2007 Posts: 3242 Location: Montreal
Expire: 2013-05-30
|
Posted: Wed Mar 14, 2012 11:12 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Himself wrote:
Thanks bud.
It makes sense. And I have a T-square too.
The table doesn't have to be square. Any rectangle should do it. _________________ Moderator Himself |
|
Back to top |
|
|
|
|
You cannot post new topics in this forum You cannot reply to topics in this forum You cannot edit your posts in this forum You cannot delete your posts in this forum You cannot vote in polls in this forum
|