Posted: Sun Feb 05, 2012 12:30 am Post subject: |
|
|
ForenSeil wrote:
johnboy wrote: |
I use this lens on my A580 and I think its optically fantastic, I see no reason why it wouldnt be as good on a Nex, indeed I plan to pick up an adapter soon, probably just one of the cheap adapters on ebay with an aperture ring. |
I would say not "fantastic" but good.
My copy had a little low contrast and a little vignetting and was a little soft at F1.8
Still usable but in comparision with the 50mm F1.8 from Sony I was a little disappointet, because I bought the lens for avaible light indoor use. But the quality improves a lot when stopped down a tack and I guess this lens is better than anything else in this price- and aperture range (incl. used manual focus lenses).
I sold mine for a Minolta AF 24mm F2.8, which is very good
Now I'm draming of a CZ Planar 35/2 or a Voigtländer 35/1.2 _________________ I'm not a collector, I'm a tester
My camera: Sony A7+Zeiss Sonnar 55/1.8
Current favourite lenses (I have many more):
A few macro-Tominons, Samyang 12/2.8, Noritsu 50.7/9.5, Rodagon 105/5.6 on bellows, Samyang 135/2, Nikon ED 180/2.8, Leitz Elmar-R 250/4, Celestron C8 2000mm F10
Most wanted: Samyang 24/1.4, Samyang 35/1.4, Nikon 200/2 ED
My Blog: http://picturechemistry.own-blog.com/
(German language) |