View previous topic :: View next topic |
Author |
Message |
muzza
Joined: 17 Aug 2012 Posts: 55
|
Posted: Sat Sep 08, 2012 6:22 pm Post subject: Actually can I edit??? |
|
|
muzza wrote:
So I have proclaimed I can edit.........
Actually I assume I can edit and assume just makes an ASS of U and ME!!!!!
So a pic with the original
What do you think?????
1 Original
2 Edited
I used the cameras bundled software Silky Pix.
Maybe a bit dark for some peoples tastes but have looked at loads of photos on here and prefer the slightly darker ones especially of people just makes them more interesting.
Muzza _________________ I have to accept that digital photography takes a bit of tweaking afterwards to remove haze and sharpen the images.
Wish it was different but I suppose its kinda like a darkroom???
Thanks for looking
Muzza |
|
Back to top |
|
|
DigiChromeEd
Joined: 29 Dec 2009 Posts: 3460 Location: Northern Ireland
|
Posted: Sat Sep 08, 2012 7:10 pm Post subject: |
|
|
DigiChromeEd wrote:
I like the b&w edited shot. Maybe a tad contrasty but still good. _________________ "I've got a Nikon camera, I like to take a photograph" - Paul Simon |
|
Back to top |
|
|
muzza
Joined: 17 Aug 2012 Posts: 55
|
Posted: Sat Sep 08, 2012 7:14 pm Post subject: |
|
|
muzza wrote:
Thank you, you are so kind. I guess it's just my taste or my moodiness that makes me like everything darker. _________________ I have to accept that digital photography takes a bit of tweaking afterwards to remove haze and sharpen the images.
Wish it was different but I suppose its kinda like a darkroom???
Thanks for looking
Muzza |
|
Back to top |
|
|
maxcastle
Joined: 14 Apr 2012 Posts: 492
|
Posted: Sat Sep 08, 2012 7:22 pm Post subject: |
|
|
maxcastle wrote:
I know nothing of photography but i always think motorcycles look better in black and white. _________________ my humble blog is
http://rolotomassi.blog.com/ |
|
Back to top |
|
|
muzza
Joined: 17 Aug 2012 Posts: 55
|
Posted: Sat Sep 08, 2012 7:26 pm Post subject: |
|
|
muzza wrote:
Thank you, I like you know nothing about photography but am having loads of fun. Have a friend who used to be a pro so gonna hook up with him when he gets back from the paralympics. Hopefully he'll be able to have enough patience to show me what to do. P.S paralympics £8.50 a pint!!! _________________ I have to accept that digital photography takes a bit of tweaking afterwards to remove haze and sharpen the images.
Wish it was different but I suppose its kinda like a darkroom???
Thanks for looking
Muzza |
|
Back to top |
|
|
SkedAddled
Joined: 19 Oct 2008 Posts: 1441 Location: Michigan, USA
Expire: 2021-08-12
|
Posted: Sun Sep 09, 2012 2:55 am Post subject: |
|
|
SkedAddled wrote:
I like both versions, for different aesthetic reasons, but I find the tight crop, which misses
a bit of the bike's tires, to be somewhat distracting or simply incomplete.
The full subject isn't complete, to my eye, but that's just my personal taste.
In both versions, I see either misfocus(soft) or a lack of sharpening. Hard to tell at these small sizes.
While misfocus issues can easily be improved upon, so can sharpening.
Misfocus should be simple enough to detect and learn to compensate for, while sharpening is a
postprocessing process which is almost universally necessary with digital imagery, so that
the images are presented with a sharpness that the photographer might have had while viewing
the scene. For whatever reasons, it is a commonly-accepted fact that most digital camera's
output of image files lacks proper sharpening for the overall scene unless worked over
by some form of post-processed sharpening.
These are purely my own observations and learnings.
I will readily admit that I may be wrong about some or all of this information,
in which case I will ask our other forum members to kindly rebut me with
their own expertise, which likely far exceeds my own. _________________ Craig
Of course I'm all right! Why? What have you heard!?
Canon Digital EOS 5D Mk IV, EOS 50D, Powershot S3 iS
Vivitar 28 f/2.8 OM - Zuiko 50 f/1.8 OM - Tamron SP 28-80 f/3.5 AD2[Favorite!] - Hanimar 135 f/3.5 M42 - Soligor 135 f/2.8 T4 - Tamron SP 60-300 f/3.8 AD2 - Soligor 75-260 f/4.5 M42 - Soligor 400 f/6.3 T4 - Soligor 500 f/8 T2 Cat + Matched 2X TC - Addiction Growing!
This is us -- We drive these -- We're named these |
|
Back to top |
|
|
muzza
Joined: 17 Aug 2012 Posts: 55
|
Posted: Sun Sep 09, 2012 8:33 am Post subject: |
|
|
muzza wrote:
Yeah Sorry about the shot need a wide angle lens, any suggestions for a cheap m42?? _________________ I have to accept that digital photography takes a bit of tweaking afterwards to remove haze and sharpen the images.
Wish it was different but I suppose its kinda like a darkroom???
Thanks for looking
Muzza |
|
Back to top |
|
|
propellor
Joined: 29 Apr 2010 Posts: 205 Location: Amsterdam
|
Posted: Sun Sep 09, 2012 10:08 am Post subject: |
|
|
propellor wrote:
muzza wrote: |
Yeah Sorry about the shot need a wide angle lens, any suggestions for a cheap m42?? |
A small step back could work as well in this case _________________ Distagon 3.5/15, Distagon 4/18, Distagon 2.8/21, Distagon 2.8/25, Distagon 2/28, Distagon 1.4/35, Planar 1.4/50, Planar 1.4/85, Makro Planar 2.8/100, Planar 2/135, Vario Sonnar 3,3-4,0/28-85, Vario Sonnar 4,5-5,6/100-300, Canon 5DMkII |
|
Back to top |
|
|
martinsmith99
Joined: 31 Aug 2008 Posts: 6950 Location: S Glos, UK
Expire: 2013-11-18
|
Posted: Sun Sep 09, 2012 10:56 am Post subject: |
|
|
martinsmith99 wrote:
muzza wrote: |
Yeah Sorry about the shot need a wide angle lens, any suggestions for a cheap m42?? |
Forget a cheap wide angle if you have a crop body as it's (IMO) not worth the expense and are not that wide when the crop factor is taken into account.
For the image, I'd say practice your focus technique, but on reflection, I don't see anything sharp in the image so it may be your lens. _________________ Casual attendance these days |
|
Back to top |
|
|
muzza
Joined: 17 Aug 2012 Posts: 55
|
Posted: Sun Sep 09, 2012 1:04 pm Post subject: |
|
|
muzza wrote:
After loads of advice, have to accept that I cannot post pictures just as is!!! It just doesn't work.... Have a quick look at my post edited pic please.
_________________ I have to accept that digital photography takes a bit of tweaking afterwards to remove haze and sharpen the images.
Wish it was different but I suppose its kinda like a darkroom???
Thanks for looking
Muzza |
|
Back to top |
|
|
|
|
You cannot post new topics in this forum You cannot reply to topics in this forum You cannot edit your posts in this forum You cannot delete your posts in this forum You cannot vote in polls in this forum
|