View previous topic :: View next topic |
Author |
Message |
enzodm
Joined: 11 Sep 2010 Posts: 350 Location: Italy
|
Posted: Sat Jan 21, 2012 5:10 pm Post subject: Vest Pocket Kodak Meniscus |
|
|
enzodm wrote:
I finally received my first 2012 lens... one century later, more or less . Very good conditions, all functioning, lens like new.
Only some sample, made removing the front hood as suggested on the net. With some pp. I will attempt something better tomorrow.
_________________
Canon 60D, Tamron 17-50VC, Canon 55-250IS, Sigma 50-150/2.8 plus:
Wide: Mir 20/3.5, Kenlock 24/2.8, Tamron 28/2.5, Yashikor 35/2.8, Mir 37/2.8
Fifties: Voigtländer Color Ultron 50/1.8, Pentacon 50/1.8, Zenitar 50/1.9, Leica Summicron 50/2, CZJ Pancolar 50/2, CZJ Tessar 50/2.8, Industar 50/3.5 , Rikenon 55/1.4, Petri 55/1.8, Helios 58/2
In the middle: Cyclop 85/1.5, Nikon 100/2.8
135s: Tamron 135/2.5, CZJ Sonnar 135/3.5, Jupiter 135/3.5, CZJ Triotar 135/4, Tamron Twin Tele 135-225
Tele: Soligor 200/2.8, Pentax Super Takumar 200/4, Hanimex 400/6.3, Makinon 500/8
Various: Schneider-Kreuznach Componar 135/4.5, Tominon 105/4.5, Vest Pocket Kodak meniscus, Wray Supar 2"/4.5
Sony Nex 6 plus:
Industar 69 28/2.8, Fujian 35/1.7, Rokkor 50/1.4, Jupiter 50/2, Cosmicar 50/2.8, Industar-22 50/3.5, Leitz Elmar 90/4, Canon Serenar 100/4
|
|
Back to top |
|
|
stingOM
Joined: 27 Sep 2007 Posts: 3168 Location: Ireland
Expire: 2012-12-27
|
Posted: Sat Jan 21, 2012 5:17 pm Post subject: |
|
|
stingOM wrote:
Very interesting rendering of image. I have one too, but I never got the chance to adapt it yet on my camera.
http://forum.mflenses.com/unknown-kodak-folding-camera-lens-t34324,highlight,%2Bkodak.html
|
|
Back to top |
|
|
luisalegria
Joined: 07 Mar 2008 Posts: 6602 Location: San Francisco, USA
Expire: 2018-01-18
|
Posted: Sat Jan 21, 2012 7:48 pm Post subject: |
|
|
luisalegria wrote:
Veijo had some I think. _________________ I like Pentax DSLR's, Exaktas, M42 bodies of all kinds, strange and cheap Japanese lenses, and am dabbling in medium format/Speed Graphic work. |
|
Back to top |
|
|
martinsmith99
Joined: 31 Aug 2008 Posts: 6950 Location: S Glos, UK
Expire: 2013-11-18
|
Posted: Sat Jan 21, 2012 8:22 pm Post subject: |
|
|
martinsmith99 wrote:
Not a bad result. I have one and it's pretty much just blur. _________________ Casual attendance these days |
|
Back to top |
|
|
martinsmith99
Joined: 31 Aug 2008 Posts: 6950 Location: S Glos, UK
Expire: 2013-11-18
|
Posted: Sat Jan 21, 2012 8:38 pm Post subject: |
|
|
martinsmith99 wrote:
This was one of the better ones from a 1st test (sorry for the boring subject).
#1
_________________ Casual attendance these days |
|
Back to top |
|
|
Lloydy
Joined: 02 Sep 2009 Posts: 7794 Location: Ironbridge. UK.
Expire: 2022-01-01
|
Posted: Sat Jan 21, 2012 10:25 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Lloydy wrote:
martinsmith99 wrote: |
This was one of the better ones from a 1st test (sorry for the boring subject).
#1
|
I kinda like that, I would class that as soft rather than blurred. And although the pylon and cables are something we see with crisp edges the 'softness' adds a new dimension to the image. I'd be pleased with that for that reason. _________________ LENSES & CAMERAS FOR SALE.....
I have loads of stuff that I have to get rid of, if you see me commenting about something I have got and you want one, ask me.
My Flickr https://www.flickr.com/photos/mudplugga/
My ipernity -
http://www.ipernity.com/home/294337 |
|
Back to top |
|
|
enzodm
Joined: 11 Sep 2010 Posts: 350 Location: Italy
|
Posted: Sun Jan 22, 2012 8:34 am Post subject: |
|
|
enzodm wrote:
Actually, when closed down it becomes less interesting, i.e., less soft. To really see that glow I removed the front hood, as described here http://galactinus.net/vilva/retro/eos350d_meniscus.html (but in a less destructive way) and here: http://www.flickr.com/photos/arkku/sets/72157594568114439/comments/ . _________________
Canon 60D, Tamron 17-50VC, Canon 55-250IS, Sigma 50-150/2.8 plus:
Wide: Mir 20/3.5, Kenlock 24/2.8, Tamron 28/2.5, Yashikor 35/2.8, Mir 37/2.8
Fifties: Voigtländer Color Ultron 50/1.8, Pentacon 50/1.8, Zenitar 50/1.9, Leica Summicron 50/2, CZJ Pancolar 50/2, CZJ Tessar 50/2.8, Industar 50/3.5 , Rikenon 55/1.4, Petri 55/1.8, Helios 58/2
In the middle: Cyclop 85/1.5, Nikon 100/2.8
135s: Tamron 135/2.5, CZJ Sonnar 135/3.5, Jupiter 135/3.5, CZJ Triotar 135/4, Tamron Twin Tele 135-225
Tele: Soligor 200/2.8, Pentax Super Takumar 200/4, Hanimex 400/6.3, Makinon 500/8
Various: Schneider-Kreuznach Componar 135/4.5, Tominon 105/4.5, Vest Pocket Kodak meniscus, Wray Supar 2"/4.5
Sony Nex 6 plus:
Industar 69 28/2.8, Fujian 35/1.7, Rokkor 50/1.4, Jupiter 50/2, Cosmicar 50/2.8, Industar-22 50/3.5, Leitz Elmar 90/4, Canon Serenar 100/4
|
|
Back to top |
|
|
martinsmith99
Joined: 31 Aug 2008 Posts: 6950 Location: S Glos, UK
Expire: 2013-11-18
|
Posted: Sun Jan 22, 2012 1:00 pm Post subject: |
|
|
martinsmith99 wrote:
Mine also has the hood removed to open the lens up further. _________________ Casual attendance these days |
|
Back to top |
|
|
Arkku
Joined: 28 Feb 2007 Posts: 1416 Location: Helsinki, Finland
|
Posted: Sun Jan 22, 2012 2:37 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Arkku wrote:
As a sidenote, I suggest this non-destructive method of adapting this lens to (D)SLR cameras:
The camera has a port hole on the back for cleaning the rear element; just use 2-sided tape to attach a short extension tube around the hole. This way you don't need to remove the lens from the original camera, and as a bonus you can use the original bellows for focusing. =) |
|
Back to top |
|
|
enzodm
Joined: 11 Sep 2010 Posts: 350 Location: Italy
|
Posted: Sun Jan 22, 2012 4:24 pm Post subject: |
|
|
enzodm wrote:
Arkku: I also saw your "adapter", really nice. However, I bought the lens alone. _________________
Canon 60D, Tamron 17-50VC, Canon 55-250IS, Sigma 50-150/2.8 plus:
Wide: Mir 20/3.5, Kenlock 24/2.8, Tamron 28/2.5, Yashikor 35/2.8, Mir 37/2.8
Fifties: Voigtländer Color Ultron 50/1.8, Pentacon 50/1.8, Zenitar 50/1.9, Leica Summicron 50/2, CZJ Pancolar 50/2, CZJ Tessar 50/2.8, Industar 50/3.5 , Rikenon 55/1.4, Petri 55/1.8, Helios 58/2
In the middle: Cyclop 85/1.5, Nikon 100/2.8
135s: Tamron 135/2.5, CZJ Sonnar 135/3.5, Jupiter 135/3.5, CZJ Triotar 135/4, Tamron Twin Tele 135-225
Tele: Soligor 200/2.8, Pentax Super Takumar 200/4, Hanimex 400/6.3, Makinon 500/8
Various: Schneider-Kreuznach Componar 135/4.5, Tominon 105/4.5, Vest Pocket Kodak meniscus, Wray Supar 2"/4.5
Sony Nex 6 plus:
Industar 69 28/2.8, Fujian 35/1.7, Rokkor 50/1.4, Jupiter 50/2, Cosmicar 50/2.8, Industar-22 50/3.5, Leitz Elmar 90/4, Canon Serenar 100/4
|
|
Back to top |
|
|
Attila
Joined: 24 Feb 2007 Posts: 57865 Location: Hungary
Expire: 2025-11-18
|
Posted: Sun Jan 22, 2012 8:35 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Attila wrote:
These are too old lenses to my taste to use them on digital. _________________ -------------------------------
Items on sale on Ebay
Sony NEX-7 Carl Zeiss Planar 85mm f1.4, Minolta MD 35mm f1.8, Konica 135mm f2.5, Minolta MD 50mm f1.2, Minolta MD 250mm f5.6, Carl Zeiss Sonnar 180mm f2.8
|
|
Back to top |
|
|
Arkku
Joined: 28 Feb 2007 Posts: 1416 Location: Helsinki, Finland
|
Posted: Sun Jan 22, 2012 8:48 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Arkku wrote:
The more use for old lenses, the better, digital or film is insignificant, just a matter of personal preference or current mood. In my opinion the worst thing to do to an old lens is buy it and then just lock it up never used… And the easier it is to use on current cameras, the more likely it is to get used (by most people).
Edit: Also, this particular lens/camera combo is originally quite limited because of fixed focus; when converted to an SLR system (digital or otherwise), I think it makes more sense to use this today because one can do through-the-lens focusing. |
|
Back to top |
|
|
RioRico
Joined: 12 Mar 2010 Posts: 1120 Location: California or Guatemala or somewhere
|
Posted: Mon Jan 23, 2012 4:32 am Post subject: |
|
|
RioRico wrote:
I do not expect old and new lenses to perform similarly. I use ancient lenses when I wish images that don't look like those taken with modern lenses. _________________ Too many film+digi cams+lenses, oh my -- Pentax K20D, K-1000, M42s, more
The simple truth is this: There are no neutral photographs. --F-Stop Fitzgerald |
|
Back to top |
|
|
|
|
You cannot post new topics in this forum You cannot reply to topics in this forum You cannot edit your posts in this forum You cannot delete your posts in this forum You cannot vote in polls in this forum
|