Home

Please support mflenses.com if you need any graphic related work order it from us, click on above banner to order!

SearchSearch MemberlistMemberlist RegisterRegister ProfileProfile Log in to check your private messagesLog in to check your private messages Log inLog in

Vest Pocket Kodak Meniscus
View previous topic :: View next topic  


PostPosted: Sat Jan 21, 2012 5:10 pm    Post subject: Vest Pocket Kodak Meniscus Reply with quote

I finally received my first 2012 lens... one century later, more or less Smile . Very good conditions, all functioning, lens like new.



Only some sample, made removing the front hood as suggested on the net. With some pp. I will attempt something better tomorrow.


PostPosted: Sat Jan 21, 2012 5:17 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Very interesting rendering of image. I have one too, but I never got the chance to adapt it yet on my camera.
http://forum.mflenses.com/unknown-kodak-folding-camera-lens-t34324,highlight,%2Bkodak.html

Sad


PostPosted: Sat Jan 21, 2012 7:48 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Veijo had some I think.


PostPosted: Sat Jan 21, 2012 8:22 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Not a bad result. I have one and it's pretty much just blur.


PostPosted: Sat Jan 21, 2012 8:38 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

This was one of the better ones from a 1st test (sorry for the boring subject).


#1


PostPosted: Sat Jan 21, 2012 10:25 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

martinsmith99 wrote:
This was one of the better ones from a 1st test (sorry for the boring subject).


#1


I kinda like that, I would class that as soft rather than blurred. And although the pylon and cables are something we see with crisp edges the 'softness' adds a new dimension to the image. I'd be pleased with that for that reason.


PostPosted: Sun Jan 22, 2012 8:34 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

Actually, when closed down it becomes less interesting, i.e., less soft. To really see that glow I removed the front hood, as described here http://galactinus.net/vilva/retro/eos350d_meniscus.html (but in a less destructive way) and here: http://www.flickr.com/photos/arkku/sets/72157594568114439/comments/ .


PostPosted: Sun Jan 22, 2012 1:00 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

enzodm wrote:
Actually, when closed down it becomes less interesting, i.e., less soft. To really see that glow I removed the front hood, as described here http://galactinus.net/vilva/retro/eos350d_meniscus.html (but in a less destructive way) and here: http://www.flickr.com/photos/arkku/sets/72157594568114439/comments/ .
Mine also has the hood removed to open the lens up further.


PostPosted: Sun Jan 22, 2012 2:37 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

As a sidenote, I suggest this non-destructive method of adapting this lens to (D)SLR cameras:



The camera has a port hole on the back for cleaning the rear element; just use 2-sided tape to attach a short extension tube around the hole. This way you don't need to remove the lens from the original camera, and as a bonus you can use the original bellows for focusing. =)


PostPosted: Sun Jan 22, 2012 4:24 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Arkku: I also saw your "adapter", really nice. However, I bought the lens alone.


PostPosted: Sun Jan 22, 2012 8:35 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

These are too old lenses to my taste to use them on digital.


PostPosted: Sun Jan 22, 2012 8:48 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

The more use for old lenses, the better, digital or film is insignificant, just a matter of personal preference or current mood. In my opinion the worst thing to do to an old lens is buy it and then just lock it up never used… And the easier it is to use on current cameras, the more likely it is to get used (by most people).

Edit: Also, this particular lens/camera combo is originally quite limited because of fixed focus; when converted to an SLR system (digital or otherwise), I think it makes more sense to use this today because one can do through-the-lens focusing.


PostPosted: Mon Jan 23, 2012 4:32 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

I do not expect old and new lenses to perform similarly. I use ancient lenses when I wish images that don't look like those taken with modern lenses.