| View previous topic :: View next topic |
| Author |
Message |
polarhei
Joined: 29 Dec 2011
Posts: 29
Location: Hong Kong,PRC
|
 Posted: Fri Dec 30, 2011 2:48 pm Post subject: Nikon F55 |
 |
|
polarhei wrote:
Production Year: 2002
Type: Nikon F mount (46.50mm)
Requiring 2 CR2 batteries to operate
Shutter speed: 1/2000s-30s (Over 30s will be set in B mode)
Function: P,A,S,M, some program function and continuous shooting (I only know F6 can perform 8(Full-frame) fps, this is only performing 3 fps)
including basic flashlight
Supported lens : Nikon AF,AF-D,AF-G,AI (Tamron and other related can work well,just need to know the format,If you like to use the function Completely,You only are able to select AF,AF-D)
user Manual still exist,fresh as new,you can go to Nikon to search out (N55 is the state model)
This is what i am currently considering since only few people are able to wield the true 'rifle' to do the task. Loading film manually, Setting the ASA manually, Manual focusing with TTL function, Setting the Shutter and aperture very accurately.
You know, this steps are very considerable even automated,just reduce the wasted.
Now,the automated can be in bargained price, only the body,not the lens, the lens are still available in at least 2 selections and some used, I have read something about TAMRON still has AF-D LENS,codenamed Di available, Due to some considerations of my preferred CMOS and the usages(You know, DSLR Sigma SD1,you know the price, if Full-framed, then the price is extremely considerable! ), Film one with Digital Scanner (2400DPI Real) is a currently option for at least 5 years.
About the conditions, Shutter speed is only at 1/2000s, I think it is enough for general to professional use although Nikon said that model is entry level,professional is at least 1/4000s since they may not like to set aperture too often, this is the F series, one of the noticeable functions.
In real, you only target one target, this one is able to target three, I think this one is well-balanced since some problem can be dealt with your AF-D Lens because of AF era. It does not care about which material your are using, The film, or the CCD.
Why I think this, This starts from When I got Canon Powershot G5 few years ago. It looks like 1/2000s with a AF-G len equipped. I know AF-D can do more than this, f/16 is a typical value that AF-D can do, although I will not get anything lower than f/2.8 when I select 28-200mm lens.
Now, I will need to phone some people about the obtaining, I know I may get the fully-worked, truly bargained when I have got the AF Lens to work although the shape may get degraded.
_________________
http://zeruleanzhu.wordpress.com/
F70: Primary weapon for the respectful of the art, while the others for instant fun savers. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Attila
Joined: 24 Feb 2007
Posts: 57865
Location: Hungary
Expire: 2025-11-18
|
| Posted: Fri Dec 30, 2011 5:14 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Attila wrote:
What is this ?  Do you want to sell it here ? I couldn't get you..
_________________
-------------------------------
Items on sale on Ebay
Sony NEX-7 Carl Zeiss Planar 85mm f1.4, Minolta MD 35mm f1.8, Konica 135mm f2.5, Minolta MD 50mm f1.2, Minolta MD 250mm f5.6, Carl Zeiss Sonnar 180mm f2.8
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
adent
Joined: 06 Oct 2011
Posts: 304
Location: United States
|
| Posted: Sat Dec 31, 2011 12:50 am Post subject: |
|
|
adent wrote:
Wow! I am so confused now. I seemed to have completely missed the point.  |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
berraneck
Joined: 24 May 2009
Posts: 972
Location: prague, czech republic
|
| Posted: Sat Dec 31, 2011 1:10 am Post subject: |
|
|
berraneck wrote:
it´s so crazy and dumb post I would say it´s a spambot.. but where are the advertisements to some "trustful" sites??
_________________
equipment doesn´t count, good photographs do |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
mo
Joined: 27 Aug 2009
Posts: 8979
Location: Australia
Expire: 2016-07-30
|
| Posted: Sat Dec 31, 2011 1:43 am Post subject: |
|
|
mo wrote:
I would be careful,I think it may be bad Google translating.
polarhei what is your native language?
_________________
Moira, Moderator 
Fuji XE-1,Pentax K-01,Panasonic G1,Panasonic G5,Pentax MX
Ricoh Singlex TLS,KR-5,KR-5Super,XR-10
Lenses
Auto Rikenon's 55/1.4, 1.8, 2.8... 50/1.7 Takumar 2/58 Preset Takumar 2.8/105 Auto Takumar 2.2/55, 3.5/35 Super Takumar 1.8/55...Macro Takumar F4/50... CZJ Biotar ALU M42 2/58 CZJ Tessar ALU M42 2.8/50
CZJ DDR Flektogon Zebra M42 2.8/35 CZJ Pancolar M42 2/50 CZJ Pancolar Exakta 2/50
Auto Mamiya/Sekor 1.8/55 ...Auto Mamiya/Sekor 2/50 Auto Mamiya/Sekor 2.8/50 Auto Mamiya/Sekor 200/3.5 Tamron SP500/8 Tamron SP350/5.6 Tamron SP90/2.5
Primoplan 1.9/58 Primagon 4.5/35 Telemegor 5.5/150 Angenieux 3.5/28 Angenieux 3,5/135 Y 2
Canon FL 58/1.2,Canon FL85/1.8,Canon FL 100/3.5,Canon SSC 2.8/100 ,Konica AR 100/2.8, Nikkor P 105/2.5
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
polarhei
Joined: 29 Dec 2011
Posts: 29
Location: Hong Kong,PRC
|
| Posted: Sat Dec 31, 2011 4:27 am Post subject: |
|
|
polarhei wrote:
| mo wrote: |
I would be careful,I think it may be bad Google translating.
polarhei what is your native language? |
Chinese,But I better to do very independent. There is no Translating.
Some preparation is bad, and there's one point which is very confusing. Since I used to get some measurement from others, it is called FFD,Flange Focal Distance . Nikon is 1.04 mm longer than I'm current use (M-42 is 45.46mm)
Canon (and Sigma SA) is 44.00mm
This 1mm issues is very complex, and the cost will be too great for because of FFD (Although I have read a bargained list,the body with two lens, one is 100-300mm and Nikon Given(AF-G,18-55mm) , the lens's performance is not so good because of AF-G, the cost is nearly US$200.00 which I have to consider carefully. I am consulting with this for the time being ).
There is no Real-frame Foveon(R) X3 cmos for the time being, and I need to use new lens in order to shut some people up (Idiots with large sum of money can be very serious), so AF body with AF lens is the system to do.
I think some people are using this model,so i post this out including my opinion. If you are puzzled, I apologize for this.
_________________
http://zeruleanzhu.wordpress.com/
F70: Primary weapon for the respectful of the art, while the others for instant fun savers. |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
mo
Joined: 27 Aug 2009
Posts: 8979
Location: Australia
Expire: 2016-07-30
|
| Posted: Sat Dec 31, 2011 5:51 am Post subject: |
|
|
mo wrote:
Your English would be better than my Chinese... 
From what I can understand you are looking at buying this Nikon camera but are worried about the back of the lens distance to the sensor or the film..... between the systems....M42 to Nikon.I am sorry if I mis-understand...these technical details are not my strong point.
_________________
Moira, Moderator
Fuji XE-1,Pentax K-01,Panasonic G1,Panasonic G5,Pentax MX
Ricoh Singlex TLS,KR-5,KR-5Super,XR-10
Lenses
Auto Rikenon's 55/1.4, 1.8, 2.8... 50/1.7 Takumar 2/58 Preset Takumar 2.8/105 Auto Takumar 2.2/55, 3.5/35 Super Takumar 1.8/55...Macro Takumar F4/50... CZJ Biotar ALU M42 2/58 CZJ Tessar ALU M42 2.8/50
CZJ DDR Flektogon Zebra M42 2.8/35 CZJ Pancolar M42 2/50 CZJ Pancolar Exakta 2/50
Auto Mamiya/Sekor 1.8/55 ...Auto Mamiya/Sekor 2/50 Auto Mamiya/Sekor 2.8/50 Auto Mamiya/Sekor 200/3.5 Tamron SP500/8 Tamron SP350/5.6 Tamron SP90/2.5
Primoplan 1.9/58 Primagon 4.5/35 Telemegor 5.5/150 Angenieux 3.5/28 Angenieux 3,5/135 Y 2
Canon FL 58/1.2,Canon FL85/1.8,Canon FL 100/3.5,Canon SSC 2.8/100 ,Konica AR 100/2.8, Nikkor P 105/2.5
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
polarhei
Joined: 29 Dec 2011
Posts: 29
Location: Hong Kong,PRC
|
| Posted: Wed Jan 04, 2012 1:23 am Post subject: |
|
|
polarhei wrote:
| mo wrote: |
Your English would be better than my Chinese...
From what I can understand you are looking at buying this Nikon camera but are worried about the back of the lens distance to the sensor or the film..... between the systems....M42 to Nikon.I am sorry if I mis-understand...these technical details are not my strong point. |
It's okay, I am no so good at this. From every user manual, they have to specify the dimension so you are able to select the 3rd party lens, anyway.
_________________
http://zeruleanzhu.wordpress.com/
F70: Primary weapon for the respectful of the art, while the others for instant fun savers. |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
peterqd
Joined: 28 Feb 2007
Posts: 7448
Location: near High Wycombe, UK
Expire: 2014-01-04
|
| Posted: Wed Jan 04, 2012 8:48 am Post subject: |
|
|
peterqd wrote:
Néih hóu polarhei. (I am allowed to say this because my daughter-in-law and her family are from HK, but it's the only word I know in Cantonese!) 
A Nikon camera will severely limit the number of lenses you can use - only Nikon OEM lenses and other 3rd party brands with F mount. Any other kind of lens requires an optical adapter which degrade the image badly sometimes. There are some wonderful F mount lenses but mostly they are quite expensive.
_________________
Peter - Moderator |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
sichko
Joined: 20 Jun 2008
Posts: 2475
Location: South West UK
|
| Posted: Wed Jan 04, 2012 9:49 am Post subject: |
|
|
sichko wrote:
| peterqd wrote: |
A Nikon camera will severely limit the number of lenses you can use - only Nikon OEM lenses and other 3rd party brands with F mount. Any other kind of lens requires an optical adapter which degrade the image badly sometimes.
|
It's not true. What about Medium Format lenses - Pentacon 6, Kiev 88, Mamiya 645, Pentax 645, Hasselblad ? Adapters are available. They don't need an optical element. People do use these lenses on Nikon - and on other systems as well.
_________________
John |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
polarhei
Joined: 29 Dec 2011
Posts: 29
Location: Hong Kong,PRC
|
| Posted: Wed Jan 04, 2012 10:54 am Post subject: |
|
|
polarhei wrote:
I think it's enough! Please close this thread,please since F55 is finished. I own Fully-restored F70,which is stronger than That.
_________________
http://zeruleanzhu.wordpress.com/
F70: Primary weapon for the respectful of the art, while the others for instant fun savers. |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
peterqd
Joined: 28 Feb 2007
Posts: 7448
Location: near High Wycombe, UK
Expire: 2014-01-04
|
| Posted: Wed Jan 04, 2012 1:07 pm Post subject: |
|
|
peterqd wrote:
Yes, you're right John, I forgot about those MF lenses, but everything I said was correct.
Thread now closed on OP's request.
_________________
Peter - Moderator |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
|
|
|
You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot vote in polls in this forum
|
Search
Memberlist
Register
Profile
Log in to check your private messages
Log in
