View previous topic :: View next topic |
Author |
Message |
dnhkng
Joined: 27 Oct 2009 Posts: 74
|
Posted: Mon Mar 15, 2010 10:44 am Post subject: Unusual, rebranded 7mm Fisheye, know anything about it? |
|
|
dnhkng wrote:
Hi,
I just bought a fisheye off the 'bay, because its missing from my lens lineup.
I wanted a Canon 7.5mm f5.6, but it is pretty expensive, at over $500 for an ok-ish FD lens.
Anyway I just impulse bought a Hanimex 7mm, f5.6 for $105, but I have no idea what its like, and I can't seem to find any information of it. there are some pictures of it on the ebay page:
http://cgi.ebay.de/ws/eBayISAPI.dll?ViewItem&item=350319512817&ssPageName=STRK:MEWNX:IT#ht_6955wt_1167
Does anyone know much about the hanimex brand? I have never heard of them before, and I don't know much about fisheye lenses either.
Last edited by dnhkng on Mon Mar 15, 2010 11:16 am; edited 1 time in total |
|
Back to top |
|
|
JWH
Joined: 26 Aug 2009 Posts: 120 Location: Netherlands
|
Posted: Mon Mar 15, 2010 10:49 am Post subject: |
|
|
JWH wrote:
That thing looks pretty funky, don't know it but I sure am curious about the performance! Keep us posted. |
|
Back to top |
|
|
dnhkng
Joined: 27 Oct 2009 Posts: 74
|
Posted: Mon Mar 15, 2010 10:56 am Post subject: |
|
|
dnhkng wrote:
I just found a history of Hanimex at www.camerapedia.org.
Quote: |
Hanimex was founded after WWII to import European cameras to Australia. It was founded by Jack Hannes who gave it its name which was an abbreviation for Hannes Import Export. It sold cameras that were made by Tōkyō Kōgaku and Sedic in Japan, by Finetta, Montanus, Vredeborch and Dacora in West Germany, by Pentacon in East Germany, by Chinese and other manufacturers. Hanimex distributed SLR lenses for several different lens mounts of renowned camera systems. The lenses were also just branded as Hanimex. Nowadays the website of Fujifilm Australia appears behind the web-address www.hanimex.com.au. |
So, pretty much anybody could have made the lens. Does anyone recognize its shape? Its a third party lens, so maybe there were a variety of lens mounts available.
|
|
Back to top |
|
|
dnhkng
Joined: 27 Oct 2009 Posts: 74
|
Posted: Tue Mar 16, 2010 11:50 am Post subject: |
|
|
dnhkng wrote:
ahhh, looks like its a spiratone:
http://goods.ruten.com.tw/item/show?11090408561185 |
|
Back to top |
|
|
wilson.c
Joined: 18 Jan 2010 Posts: 364 Location: Hong Kong
|
Posted: Tue Mar 16, 2010 3:08 pm Post subject: |
|
|
wilson.c wrote:
It's got a Canon FD mount. I suspect that the image circle would be smaller than other 8mm's out there on FF. _________________ Wilson
DSLR: Canon 5DMkII, 500D + Panasonic GF-1
SLR: Canon T90, Canon F1, Canon A1, Canon AE1 + Rolleiflex SL66 + Bronica ETRs
R'finder: Contax G1, G2 + Leica M6, M3 + Contax II
Lenses
M42: Angenieaux 90/1.8
Canon: FD 50/3.5 Macro, FD 80/1.8, FD 80-200L/4
Contax G: CZ Hologon 16/8, CZ Biogon 21/2.8, CZ Biogon 28/2.8, CZ Planar 45/2.0, CZ Sonnar 90/2.8
P-Six: CZJ Sonnar 180/2.8, CZJ Biometar 120/2.8
Contax: Distagon 28/2.8, Distagon 28/2, Planar 85/1.4, Makro-Planar 100/2.8
Others: CZ Sonnar 135/3.5 (Hasselblad V mount)
More little ones to be documented.
|
|
Back to top |
|
|
visualopsins
Joined: 05 Mar 2009 Posts: 10960 Location: California
Expire: 2025-04-11
|
Posted: Tue Mar 16, 2010 4:12 pm Post subject: |
|
|
visualopsins wrote:
Looks like it may be a T-mount lens with FD-T adapter, but more likely it is CS-mount with CS-FD adapter. The T and CS mounts are only slightly different, same thread M42x0.75, but CS mount is thinner, thus T adapter will act as thin extension tube, lens will not reach infinity focus.
ref: http://photo.net/classic-cameras-forum/00QGou _________________ ☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮ like attracts like! ☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮
Cameras: Sony ILCE-7RM2, Spotmatics II, F, and ESII, Nikon P4
Lenses:
M42 Asahi Optical Co., Takumar 1:4 f=35mm, 1:2 f=58mm (Sonnar), 1:2.4 f=58mm (Heliar), 1:2.2 f=55mm (Gaussian), 1:2.8 f=105mm (Model I), 1:2.8/105 (Model II), 1:5.6/200, Tele-Takumar 1:5.6/200, 1:6.3/300, Macro-Takumar 1:4/50, Auto-Takumar 1:2.3 f=35, 1:1.8 f=55mm, 1:2.2 f=55mm, Super-TAKUMAR 1:3.5/28 (fat), 1:2/35 (Fat), 1:1.4/50 (8-element), Super-Multi-Coated Fisheye-TAKUMAR 1:4/17, Super-Multi-Coated TAKUMAR 1:4.5/20, 1:3.5/24, 1:3.5/28, 1:2/35, 1:3.5/35, 1:1.8/85, 1:1.9/85 1:2.8/105, 1:3.5/135, 1:2.5/135 (II), 1:4/150, 1:4/200, 1:4/300, 1:4.5/500, Super-Multi-Coated Macro-TAKUMAR 1:4/50, 1:4/100, Super-Multi-Coated Bellows-TAKUMAR 1:4/100, SMC TAKUMAR 1:1.4/50, 1:1.8/55
M42 Carl Zeiss Jena Flektogon 2.4/35
Contax Carl Zeiss Vario-Sonnar T* 28-70mm F3.5-4.5
Pentax K-mount SMC PENTAX-A ZOOM 1:3.5 35~105mm, SMC PENTAX ZOOM 1:4 45~125mm
Nikon Micro-NIKKOR-P-C Auto 1:3.5 f=55mm, NIKKOR-P Auto 105mm f/2.5 Pre-AI (Sonnar), Micro-NIKKOR 105mm 1:4 AI, NIKKOR AI-S 35-135mm f/3,5-4,5
Tamron SP 17mm f/3.5 (51B), Tamron SP 17mm f/3.5 (151B), SP 500mm f/8 (55BB), SP 70-210mm f/3.5 (19AH)
Vivitar 100mm 1:2.8 MC 1:1 Macro Telephoto (Kiron)
|
|
Back to top |
|
|
justtorchit
Joined: 12 Oct 2009 Posts: 269 Location: St. Louis, MO
|
Posted: Tue Mar 16, 2010 5:37 pm Post subject: |
|
|
justtorchit wrote:
My guess is this is a relative to the Spiratone auxiliary fisheye attachments of the 70's. I did a short write up on those here with some sample images:
http://makingnottaking.blogspot.com/search/label/Auxiliary%20fisheye
Although the lens you bought does not need a "base" lens to attach to, I would believe it will yield similar image quality. Considerable softness at the edges as well as CA. Nevertheless, you save hundreds and still get a great 180 degree perspective! I have had the auxiliary attachments for a few years and love them! _________________ David
www.davidkovaluk.com - personal website
www.instagram.com/davidkovaluk
http://makingnottaking.blogspot.com/ - photoblog |
|
Back to top |
|
|
mfkita
Joined: 29 Jul 2007 Posts: 222
|
Posted: Sat Nov 26, 2011 7:33 am Post subject: Spiratone fisheye |
|
|
mfkita wrote:
I picked up this new toy for pocket change...Came in Nikon mount and since I had Nikon adapters for the Canon Dslr...well....
Searched and found this old thread so thought I'd update it with some photos....
It appears to be soft with a lot of CA on one side...well both sides, but moreso at the right (bottom) of frame...will try another adapter, though I doubt I'll see any improvement...it didn't....oh well....
still, a nice toy...
shot at 1 yd from bush...
IMG_3855Rs by kitaflix, on Flickr
Working with the Spiratone 7mm fisheye....still trying to figure it out....
Each time I use it and look at the results I see more to correct....next time I'm going to try to straighten the horizon...
IMG_4038Rs by kitaflix, on Flickr
IMG_4038RCsb by kitaflix, on Flickr
Having discussed/defended the idea that primes force one to look at framing and perspective more critically than one does with zooms, I am more convinced than ever of this, with this extreme FL at least.... _________________ I favor the simple shot...and uncomplicated technology that won't distract me from seeing it...
NIKON D610, Canon 30D/450D/s90/A570is: Canon 35/2, 50/1.8 MKI, 18-55IS, 28-105/3.5-4.5, 70-210/3.5-4.5; MF Nikkors 50/2K, 50/1.4AIS, 60/2.8 Micro, 85/1.8-K (AI'd), 135/2.8K, 135/2.8Q.C, 180/2.8ED, 200/4Q (AI-cut), 200/4AIS, 300/4.5-H (AI'd), Olympus 24/2.8, Vivitar 28/2, Vivitar S1 70-210/3.5 and S1 28-90;Tamron sp90/2.5; (and 28-85 AF nikkor), 35mm Nikon F, FM, FE2/MD12 drive |
|
Back to top |
|
|
Tervueren
Joined: 18 May 2011 Posts: 1177 Location: West Sussex, United Kingdom
Expire: 2014-11-08
|
Posted: Sat Nov 26, 2011 8:37 am Post subject: |
|
|
Tervueren wrote:
Can't help it but they remind me of deodorant roll ons |
|
Back to top |
|
|
mfkita
Joined: 29 Jul 2007 Posts: 222
|
Posted: Sat Nov 26, 2011 12:58 pm Post subject: |
|
|
mfkita wrote:
_________________ I favor the simple shot...and uncomplicated technology that won't distract me from seeing it...
NIKON D610, Canon 30D/450D/s90/A570is: Canon 35/2, 50/1.8 MKI, 18-55IS, 28-105/3.5-4.5, 70-210/3.5-4.5; MF Nikkors 50/2K, 50/1.4AIS, 60/2.8 Micro, 85/1.8-K (AI'd), 135/2.8K, 135/2.8Q.C, 180/2.8ED, 200/4Q (AI-cut), 200/4AIS, 300/4.5-H (AI'd), Olympus 24/2.8, Vivitar 28/2, Vivitar S1 70-210/3.5 and S1 28-90;Tamron sp90/2.5; (and 28-85 AF nikkor), 35mm Nikon F, FM, FE2/MD12 drive |
|
Back to top |
|
|
John Shriver
Joined: 24 Dec 2009 Posts: 198
|
Posted: Sun Dec 11, 2011 10:38 pm Post subject: |
|
|
John Shriver wrote:
It is interchangeable mount similar to T-2, but slightly larger thread diameter. Same fine (0.75mm) pitch. Same register. Many T-2 mounts can be machined out inside the take the inner threaded ring from the existing mount. That's how I put an Exakta mount on mine, I have the Haminex branded version.
It's possible that the Spiratone branded one is T-2 mount.
(No, it's not the same as a Komura Unidapter either. Yet another size of threaded interchangeable mount.)
Not a lens for pixel peepers, but there sure isn't much selection of fisheyes that will give you a fully circular image. |
|
Back to top |
|
|
mfkita
Joined: 29 Jul 2007 Posts: 222
|
Posted: Sun Dec 11, 2011 11:33 pm Post subject: spiratone mount |
|
|
mfkita wrote:
When I got it the short section at the rear was loose and I have had to retighten the set screws a few times....
I can see that the last section would come off and I imagined other mounts would have been available...
There are several versions under different "brand" names...
I"ve determined that F22 is better than F8, and that yes, this is not the sharpest knife in the drawer....not for pixel peepers
....but it is fun. _________________ I favor the simple shot...and uncomplicated technology that won't distract me from seeing it...
NIKON D610, Canon 30D/450D/s90/A570is: Canon 35/2, 50/1.8 MKI, 18-55IS, 28-105/3.5-4.5, 70-210/3.5-4.5; MF Nikkors 50/2K, 50/1.4AIS, 60/2.8 Micro, 85/1.8-K (AI'd), 135/2.8K, 135/2.8Q.C, 180/2.8ED, 200/4Q (AI-cut), 200/4AIS, 300/4.5-H (AI'd), Olympus 24/2.8, Vivitar 28/2, Vivitar S1 70-210/3.5 and S1 28-90;Tamron sp90/2.5; (and 28-85 AF nikkor), 35mm Nikon F, FM, FE2/MD12 drive |
|
Back to top |
|
|
mfkita
Joined: 29 Jul 2007 Posts: 222
|
Posted: Tue Dec 20, 2011 6:34 pm Post subject: |
|
|
mfkita wrote:
I'm still trying to figure out how to shoot with this puppy...to frame a shot that when cropped doesn't "look fishy"..wide yes, fisheye no...
_________________ I favor the simple shot...and uncomplicated technology that won't distract me from seeing it...
NIKON D610, Canon 30D/450D/s90/A570is: Canon 35/2, 50/1.8 MKI, 18-55IS, 28-105/3.5-4.5, 70-210/3.5-4.5; MF Nikkors 50/2K, 50/1.4AIS, 60/2.8 Micro, 85/1.8-K (AI'd), 135/2.8K, 135/2.8Q.C, 180/2.8ED, 200/4Q (AI-cut), 200/4AIS, 300/4.5-H (AI'd), Olympus 24/2.8, Vivitar 28/2, Vivitar S1 70-210/3.5 and S1 28-90;Tamron sp90/2.5; (and 28-85 AF nikkor), 35mm Nikon F, FM, FE2/MD12 drive
Last edited by mfkita on Tue Dec 20, 2011 8:36 pm; edited 1 time in total |
|
Back to top |
|
|
kds315*
Joined: 12 Mar 2008 Posts: 16628 Location: Weinheim, Germany
Expire: 2021-03-09
|
Posted: Tue Dec 20, 2011 6:54 pm Post subject: |
|
|
kds315* wrote:
We have a "bokeh monster" already, now we have a "CA monster" _________________ Klaus - Admin
"S'il vient a point, me souviendra" [Thomas Bohier (1460-1523)]
http://www.macrolenses.de for macro and special lens info
http://www.pbase.com/kds315/uv_photos for UV Images and lens/filter info
https://www.flickr.com/photos/kds315/albums my albums using various lenses
http://photographyoftheinvisibleworld.blogspot.com/ my UV BLOG
http://www.travelmeetsfood.com/blog Food + Travel BLOG
https://galeriafotografia.com Architecture + Drone photography
Currently most FAV lens(es):
X80QF f3.2/80mm
Hypergon f11/26mm
ELCAN UV f5.6/52mm
Zeiss UV-Planar f4/60mm
Zeiss UV-Planar f2/62mm
Lomo Уфар-12 f2.5/41mm
Lomo Зуфар-2 f4.0/350mm
Lomo ZIKAR-1A f1.2/100mm
Nikon UV Nikkor f4.5/105mm
Zeiss UV-Sonnar f4.3/105mm
CERCO UV-VIS-NIR f1.8/45mm
CERCO UV-VIS-NIR f4.1/94mm
CERCO UV-VIS-NIR f2.8/100mm
Steinheil Quarzobjektiv f1.8/50mm
Pentax Quartz Takumar f3.5/85mm
Carl Zeiss Jena UV-Objektiv f4/60mm
NYE OPTICAL Lyman-Alpha II f1.1/90mm
NYE OPTICAL Lyman-Alpha I f2.8/200mm
COASTAL OPTICS f4/60mm UV-VIS-IR Apo
COASTAL OPTICS f4.5/105mm UV-Micro-Apo
Pentax Ultra-Achromatic Takumar f4.5/85mm
Pentax Ultra-Achromatic Takumar f5.6/300mm
Rodenstock UV-Rodagon f5.6/60mm + 105mm + 150mm
|
|
Back to top |
|
|
mfkita
Joined: 29 Jul 2007 Posts: 222
|
Posted: Tue Dec 20, 2011 8:38 pm Post subject: |
|
|
mfkita wrote:
Hey, I'm just shooting pictures here, not doing a scientific evaluation of a $12 lens... _________________ I favor the simple shot...and uncomplicated technology that won't distract me from seeing it...
NIKON D610, Canon 30D/450D/s90/A570is: Canon 35/2, 50/1.8 MKI, 18-55IS, 28-105/3.5-4.5, 70-210/3.5-4.5; MF Nikkors 50/2K, 50/1.4AIS, 60/2.8 Micro, 85/1.8-K (AI'd), 135/2.8K, 135/2.8Q.C, 180/2.8ED, 200/4Q (AI-cut), 200/4AIS, 300/4.5-H (AI'd), Olympus 24/2.8, Vivitar 28/2, Vivitar S1 70-210/3.5 and S1 28-90;Tamron sp90/2.5; (and 28-85 AF nikkor), 35mm Nikon F, FM, FE2/MD12 drive |
|
Back to top |
|
|
ForenSeil
Joined: 15 Apr 2011 Posts: 2726 Location: Kiel, Germany.
|
Posted: Tue Dec 20, 2011 11:04 pm Post subject: |
|
|
ForenSeil wrote:
mfkita wrote: |
I'm still trying to figure out how to shoot with this puppy...to frame a shot that when cropped doesn't "look fishy"..wide |
Try to shoot more "rectangular" to your object/lines in pictures or only shoot objects without straight lines so that the distortion does hurt so much _________________ I'm not a collector, I'm a tester
My camera: Sony A7+Zeiss Sonnar 55/1.8
Current favourite lenses (I have many more):
A few macro-Tominons, Samyang 12/2.8, Noritsu 50.7/9.5, Rodagon 105/5.6 on bellows, Samyang 135/2, Nikon ED 180/2.8, Leitz Elmar-R 250/4, Celestron C8 2000mm F10
Most wanted: Samyang 24/1.4, Samyang 35/1.4, Nikon 200/2 ED
My Blog: http://picturechemistry.own-blog.com/
(German language) |
|
Back to top |
|
|
mfkita
Joined: 29 Jul 2007 Posts: 222
|
Posted: Wed Dec 21, 2011 12:58 am Post subject: |
|
|
mfkita wrote:
ForenSeil wrote: |
mfkita wrote: |
I'm still trying to figure out how to shoot with this puppy...to frame a shot that when cropped doesn't "look fishy"..wide |
Try to shoot more "rectangular" to your object/lines in pictures or only shoot objects without straight lines so that the distortion does hurt so much |
....or no lines at all..... _________________ I favor the simple shot...and uncomplicated technology that won't distract me from seeing it...
NIKON D610, Canon 30D/450D/s90/A570is: Canon 35/2, 50/1.8 MKI, 18-55IS, 28-105/3.5-4.5, 70-210/3.5-4.5; MF Nikkors 50/2K, 50/1.4AIS, 60/2.8 Micro, 85/1.8-K (AI'd), 135/2.8K, 135/2.8Q.C, 180/2.8ED, 200/4Q (AI-cut), 200/4AIS, 300/4.5-H (AI'd), Olympus 24/2.8, Vivitar 28/2, Vivitar S1 70-210/3.5 and S1 28-90;Tamron sp90/2.5; (and 28-85 AF nikkor), 35mm Nikon F, FM, FE2/MD12 drive |
|
Back to top |
|
|
ForenSeil
Joined: 15 Apr 2011 Posts: 2726 Location: Kiel, Germany.
|
Posted: Wed Dec 21, 2011 1:27 am Post subject: |
|
|
ForenSeil wrote:
mfkita wrote: |
ForenSeil wrote: |
mfkita wrote: |
I'm still trying to figure out how to shoot with this puppy...to frame a shot that when cropped doesn't "look fishy"..wide |
Try to shoot more "rectangular" to your object/lines in pictures or only shoot objects without straight lines so that the distortion does hurt so much |
....or no lines at all..... |
Yes but it's very hard to find a nice object without any lines
And small lines lines or horizons are usually not looking distracting with fisheyes.
Here some examples where the fisheye-effect is not distracting (to my eyes):
And here with some more lines but still viewable
Or this which has many lines but is shot very rectangular
_________________ I'm not a collector, I'm a tester
My camera: Sony A7+Zeiss Sonnar 55/1.8
Current favourite lenses (I have many more):
A few macro-Tominons, Samyang 12/2.8, Noritsu 50.7/9.5, Rodagon 105/5.6 on bellows, Samyang 135/2, Nikon ED 180/2.8, Leitz Elmar-R 250/4, Celestron C8 2000mm F10
Most wanted: Samyang 24/1.4, Samyang 35/1.4, Nikon 200/2 ED
My Blog: http://picturechemistry.own-blog.com/
(German language)
Last edited by ForenSeil on Wed Dec 21, 2011 2:38 am; edited 1 time in total |
|
Back to top |
|
|
mfkita
Joined: 29 Jul 2007 Posts: 222
|
Posted: Wed Dec 21, 2011 2:38 am Post subject: |
|
|
mfkita wrote:
Well done.... _________________ I favor the simple shot...and uncomplicated technology that won't distract me from seeing it...
NIKON D610, Canon 30D/450D/s90/A570is: Canon 35/2, 50/1.8 MKI, 18-55IS, 28-105/3.5-4.5, 70-210/3.5-4.5; MF Nikkors 50/2K, 50/1.4AIS, 60/2.8 Micro, 85/1.8-K (AI'd), 135/2.8K, 135/2.8Q.C, 180/2.8ED, 200/4Q (AI-cut), 200/4AIS, 300/4.5-H (AI'd), Olympus 24/2.8, Vivitar 28/2, Vivitar S1 70-210/3.5 and S1 28-90;Tamron sp90/2.5; (and 28-85 AF nikkor), 35mm Nikon F, FM, FE2/MD12 drive |
|
Back to top |
|
|
mfkita
Joined: 29 Jul 2007 Posts: 222
|
Posted: Wed Dec 21, 2011 8:33 am Post subject: a no lines shot |
|
|
mfkita wrote:
This scene lent itself to the lens I thought...
_________________ I favor the simple shot...and uncomplicated technology that won't distract me from seeing it...
NIKON D610, Canon 30D/450D/s90/A570is: Canon 35/2, 50/1.8 MKI, 18-55IS, 28-105/3.5-4.5, 70-210/3.5-4.5; MF Nikkors 50/2K, 50/1.4AIS, 60/2.8 Micro, 85/1.8-K (AI'd), 135/2.8K, 135/2.8Q.C, 180/2.8ED, 200/4Q (AI-cut), 200/4AIS, 300/4.5-H (AI'd), Olympus 24/2.8, Vivitar 28/2, Vivitar S1 70-210/3.5 and S1 28-90;Tamron sp90/2.5; (and 28-85 AF nikkor), 35mm Nikon F, FM, FE2/MD12 drive |
|
Back to top |
|
|
fuzzywuzzy
Joined: 18 Dec 2010 Posts: 1258 Location: Down East, Canada, eh?
Expire: 2013-11-30
|
Posted: Wed Dec 21, 2011 1:08 pm Post subject: Re: a no lines shot |
|
|
fuzzywuzzy wrote:
mfkita wrote: |
This scene lent itself to the lens I thought... |
Nice composition.
If you keep making shots like that you'll have to save up for a nicer fisheye lens
Have you tried converting to B+W, it might tame the CA somewhat? _________________ I welcome C&C, editing my pics and reposting them on the forum is fine.
NEX-F3
~~~~~~~~~
CZJ Sonnar 135/4, Biotar 58/2, Pancolar 50/2, Tessar 50/2.8, Flek 35/2.8, Flek 25/4
Super Takumar 135/2.5, 135/3.5, 100/4 bellows, 50/1.4, 28/3.5
Helios 58/2, 3M-5A 500/8, Mir 20M
Vivitar Series 1 70-210 - - - - - - - - Nikkor 200/4
Rikenon 28/2.8 - - - - - - - - Zeiss 50/1.7 Planar
PB 50/2.4, 135/2.8
Yashica 50/1.9, 28/2.8, 135/2.8
Hexanon 28/3.5, 50/1.4 |
|
Back to top |
|
|
mfkita
Joined: 29 Jul 2007 Posts: 222
|
Posted: Wed Dec 21, 2011 1:55 pm Post subject: |
|
|
mfkita wrote:
Good idea about the B/W look....I'll give it a try...thanks... _________________ I favor the simple shot...and uncomplicated technology that won't distract me from seeing it...
NIKON D610, Canon 30D/450D/s90/A570is: Canon 35/2, 50/1.8 MKI, 18-55IS, 28-105/3.5-4.5, 70-210/3.5-4.5; MF Nikkors 50/2K, 50/1.4AIS, 60/2.8 Micro, 85/1.8-K (AI'd), 135/2.8K, 135/2.8Q.C, 180/2.8ED, 200/4Q (AI-cut), 200/4AIS, 300/4.5-H (AI'd), Olympus 24/2.8, Vivitar 28/2, Vivitar S1 70-210/3.5 and S1 28-90;Tamron sp90/2.5; (and 28-85 AF nikkor), 35mm Nikon F, FM, FE2/MD12 drive |
|
Back to top |
|
|
|