| View previous topic :: View next topic |
| Author |
Message |
Nesster
Joined: 24 Apr 2008
Posts: 5883
Location: NJ, USA
Expire: 2014-02-20
|
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
kds315*
Joined: 12 Mar 2008
Posts: 16661
Location: Weinheim, Germany
Expire: 2021-03-09
|
 Posted: Mon Dec 19, 2011 11:45 am Post subject: |
 |
|
kds315* wrote:
Nice to have that, a bit outdated by newer models, but a good reference about those
older types lenses, still to be found today and quite useful for macro work!
_________________
Klaus - Admin
"S'il vient a point, me souviendra" [Thomas Bohier (1460-1523)]
http://www.macrolenses.de for macro and special lens info
http://www.pbase.com/kds315/uv_photos for UV Images and lens/filter info
https://www.flickr.com/photos/kds315/albums my albums using various lenses
http://photographyoftheinvisibleworld.blogspot.com/ my UV BLOG
http://www.travelmeetsfood.com/blog Food + Travel BLOG
https://galeriafotografia.com Architecture + Drone photography
Currently most FAV lens(es):
X80QF f3.2/80mm
Hypergon f11/26mm
ELCAN UV f5.6/52mm
Zeiss UV-Planar f4/60mm
Zeiss UV-Planar f2/62mm
Lomo Уфар-12 f2.5/41mm
Lomo Зуфар-2 f4.0/350mm
Lomo ZIKAR-1A f1.2/100mm
Nikon UV Nikkor f4.5/105mm
Zeiss UV-Sonnar f4.3/105mm
CERCO UV-VIS-NIR f1.8/45mm
CERCO UV-VIS-NIR f4.1/94mm
CERCO UV-VIS-NIR f2.8/100mm
Steinheil Quarzobjektiv f1.8/50mm
Pentax Quartz Takumar f3.5/85mm
Carl Zeiss Jena UV-Objektiv f4/60mm
NYE OPTICAL Lyman-Alpha II f1.1/90mm
NYE OPTICAL Lyman-Alpha I f2.8/200mm
COASTAL OPTICS f4/60mm UV-VIS-IR Apo
COASTAL OPTICS f4.5/105mm UV-Micro-Apo
Pentax Ultra-Achromatic Takumar f4.5/85mm
Pentax Ultra-Achromatic Takumar f5.6/300mm
Rodenstock UV-Rodagon f5.6/60mm + 105mm + 150mm
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
jjphoto
Joined: 17 Mar 2009
Posts: 414
|
| Posted: Mon Dec 19, 2011 12:55 pm Post subject: |
|
|
jjphoto wrote:
Nice. Thanks for that.
JJ |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
Excalibur
Joined: 19 Jul 2009
Posts: 5017
Location: UK
Expire: 2014-04-21
|
| Posted: Mon Dec 19, 2011 5:59 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Excalibur wrote:
erm my Ross 11cm resolux, el Nikkor 50mm f4 and Durst 80mm Neonon.....enlarging lenses are not there 
_________________
Canon A1, AV1, T70 & T90, EOS 300 and EOS300v, Chinon CE and CP-7M. Contax 139, Fuji STX-2, Konica Autoreflex TC, FS-1, FT-1, Minolta X-700, X-300, XD-11, SRT101b, Nikon EM, FM, F4, F90X, Olympus OM2, Pentax S3, Spotmatic, Pentax ME super, Praktica TL 5B, & BC1, , Ricoh KR10super, Yashica T5D, Bronica Etrs, Mamiya RB67 pro AND drum roll:- a Sony Nex 3
.........past gear Tele Rolleiflex and Rollei SL66.
Many lenses from good to excellent. |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
FluffPuppy
Joined: 11 Dec 2011
Posts: 365
|
| Posted: Mon Dec 19, 2011 6:00 pm Post subject: |
|
|
FluffPuppy wrote:
Although it's nice to see such a test, resolution numbers alone are hardly adequate as a measure of performance for such lens types. |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
jjphoto
Joined: 17 Mar 2009
Posts: 414
|
| Posted: Mon Dec 19, 2011 9:11 pm Post subject: |
|
|
jjphoto wrote:
| FluffPuppy wrote: |
| Although it's nice to see such a test, resolution numbers alone are hardly adequate as a measure of performance for such lens types. |
What else do you think should be tested in an enlarging lens test, aside from vignetting and flare, field flatness (although edge sharpness tells you that to some degree)?
JJ |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
luisalegria
Joined: 07 Mar 2008
Posts: 6602
Location: San Francisco, USA
Expire: 2018-01-18
|
| Posted: Tue Dec 20, 2011 4:52 pm Post subject: |
|
|
luisalegria wrote:
Thanks ! Great find.
The lesson here is - if you are looking at Schneiders, get the Componon.
Granted, these things may all be too sharp to distinguish between them on most DSLR's.
Considering that 50mm enlarging lenses in lots can be had at $2 apiece, if you want one hold out for the best.
_________________
I like Pentax DSLR's, Exaktas, M42 bodies of all kinds, strange and cheap Japanese lenses, and am dabbling in medium format/Speed Graphic work. |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
FluffPuppy
Joined: 11 Dec 2011
Posts: 365
|
| Posted: Tue Dec 20, 2011 4:59 pm Post subject: |
|
|
FluffPuppy wrote:
| jjphoto wrote: |
| FluffPuppy wrote: |
| Although it's nice to see such a test, resolution numbers alone are hardly adequate as a measure of performance for such lens types. |
What else do you think should be tested in an enlarging lens test, aside from vignetting and flare, field flatness (although edge sharpness tells you that to some degree)?
JJ |
The 'contrast' or tonal quality. |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
|
|
|
You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot vote in polls in this forum
|
Search
Memberlist
Register
Profile
Log in to check your private messages
Log in
