| View previous topic :: View next topic |
| Author |
Message |
fermy
Joined: 17 Feb 2012
Posts: 1974
|
 Posted: Sat Jul 28, 2012 1:16 pm Post subject: Canon FD 24mm f2.8 |
 |
|
fermy wrote:
Mostly HDRs on NEX-5...
#1
#2
#3
#4
#5
#6
#7
#8
#9
#10
_________________
Many lenses and some film bodies for sale here: http://forum.mflenses.com/canon-fd-minolta-md-c-mounts-m42-pentax-and-more-t50465.html
Flickr http://www.flickr.com/photos/96060788@N06/ |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Lightshow
Joined: 04 Nov 2011
Posts: 3666
Location: Calgary
|
| Posted: Sat Jul 28, 2012 5:47 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Lightshow wrote:
Nice shots, I really like mine.
_________________
A Manual Focus Junky...
One photographers junk lens is an artists favorite tool.
My lens list
http://www.flickr.com/photos/lightshow-photography/ |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
martinsmith99
Joined: 31 Aug 2008
Posts: 6950
Location: S Glos, UK
Expire: 2013-11-18
|
| Posted: Sat Jul 28, 2012 7:01 pm Post subject: |
|
|
martinsmith99 wrote:
I like the B&Ws but I am never a fan of the horrid colours (imo) HDR images have.
_________________
Casual attendance these days |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
fermy
Joined: 17 Feb 2012
Posts: 1974
|
| Posted: Sat Jul 28, 2012 7:59 pm Post subject: |
|
|
fermy wrote:
Yeah, HDRs are always controversial ans I have doubts about colors in some of them too. But are all of the colored ones horrid though or is it just HDR apprehension? What if I said that some of them are colored infrareds?
_________________
Many lenses and some film bodies for sale here: http://forum.mflenses.com/canon-fd-minolta-md-c-mounts-m42-pentax-and-more-t50465.html
Flickr http://www.flickr.com/photos/96060788@N06/ |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
Attila
Joined: 24 Feb 2007
Posts: 57865
Location: Hungary
Expire: 2025-11-18
|
| Posted: Sat Jul 28, 2012 8:15 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Attila wrote:
I love them all, great work!
_________________
-------------------------------
Items on sale on Ebay
Sony NEX-7 Carl Zeiss Planar 85mm f1.4, Minolta MD 35mm f1.8, Konica 135mm f2.5, Minolta MD 50mm f1.2, Minolta MD 250mm f5.6, Carl Zeiss Sonnar 180mm f2.8
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
fermy
Joined: 17 Feb 2012
Posts: 1974
|
| Posted: Sat Jul 28, 2012 9:23 pm Post subject: |
|
|
fermy wrote:
Thanks Attila and Lightshow!
C&C is OK, so go ahead and blast away those HDR colors though  , I am actually quite curious which ones of them seems acceptable and which ones are completely out of whack.
_________________
Many lenses and some film bodies for sale here: http://forum.mflenses.com/canon-fd-minolta-md-c-mounts-m42-pentax-and-more-t50465.html
Flickr http://www.flickr.com/photos/96060788@N06/ |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
Attila
Joined: 24 Feb 2007
Posts: 57865
Location: Hungary
Expire: 2025-11-18
|
| Posted: Sat Jul 28, 2012 11:05 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Attila wrote:
| fermy wrote: |
Thanks Attila and Lightshow!
C&C is OK, so go ahead and blast away those HDR colors though , I am actually quite curious which ones of them seems acceptable and which ones are completely out of whack. |
Matter of taste only , some people hate it , some people love it . I am on lover side, HDR is an art tool I can't paint , but I can paint with HDR I like colorful unrealistic HDR, other people not they like to see as normal photograph. Somebody use photography is technical tool , makes captures perfect as possible. Somebody use it as art tool and impression is better than pixel peeping. I am on this side also, who care pixels, sharpness etc if picture is good to hang on my wall and I love it.
_________________
-------------------------------
Items on sale on Ebay
Sony NEX-7 Carl Zeiss Planar 85mm f1.4, Minolta MD 35mm f1.8, Konica 135mm f2.5, Minolta MD 50mm f1.2, Minolta MD 250mm f5.6, Carl Zeiss Sonnar 180mm f2.8
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
walter g
Joined: 20 Feb 2010
Posts: 2463
Location: NC, USA
|
| Posted: Sat Jul 28, 2012 11:17 pm Post subject: |
|
|
walter g wrote:
I'm not a big fan of HDR, but out of these I like 10 the best.  The reason I do, is it brings out the intensity of the upcoming storm, and makes the image more dramatic.
_________________
Main cameras
Panasonic G5,Nikon J1,Pentax Q10,Sony Nex 6
Minolta MC W SI 2.5/28, MD 2.8/28, MC W SG 3.5/28, MC Celtic 3.5/28, MC W HG 2.8/35, MD Celtic 2.8/35, QE 4/35, Rokkor X 2/45, MC Rokkor X PG 1.4/50, MC Rokkor X PG 1.7/50, MD Rokkor X 1.7/50, MD 2/50, MC Rokkor PF 1.7/55, MC Rokkor PF 1.9/55, Auto Tele Rokkor PG 2.8/135, MC Tele Rokkor QD 3.5/135, TC 4/135, MC Celtic 4/200, MC Tele Rokkor PE 4.5/200
MD 28-70 f3.5-4.8, MD Macro 35-70 f3.5, Md 70-210 f4, MD Rokkor X 75-200 f4.5, MD 100-200 f5.6
Nikon Nikkor 4/20, O Auto 2/35, S Auto 1.4/50..... Miranda Auto 2.8/28, Auto 2.8/35, Auto 1.4/50, Auto EC 1.4/50, Auto 1.8/50, Auto EC 1.8/50,Auto 1.9/50, Auto 3.5/135
Various Soligor,Sun,Fujita,Komura,Spitatone, etc. Lenses
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
pdccameras
Joined: 23 Aug 2009
Posts: 825
Location: Putnam, CT
Expire: 2014-08-11
|
| Posted: Sat Jul 28, 2012 11:45 pm Post subject: |
|
|
pdccameras wrote:
Nice images - threy really show off the quality of the Canon 24- and your photographic talents!
Are using the HDR feature right out of the 5n or are you using some additional post processing? Do youmind expounding on your workflow?
Best, Paul
_________________
Canon 5D Mii, Canon 40D, Canon 350D IR, Sony A7 Mii, Sony Alpha-6000, a ton of lenses: AF & MF and too many cameras to count, all formats: 110 - 4x5. |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
fermy
Joined: 17 Feb 2012
Posts: 1974
|
| Posted: Sun Jul 29, 2012 12:28 am Post subject: |
|
|
fermy wrote:
Attilla, my position is close to yours, I like different kind of photography, whatever works aesthetically is fine by me, HDR or not, sharp images, soft images, does not matter, photography does not need to be realistic. Still, I see the point when people criticize some HDRs as often they are a little too motley color-wise and that clashes with aesthetics, which is far worse than clashing with reality. On the other hand, taming the colors also destroys the drama, what's the point of doing HDR then? It's difficult to find a right balance...
Paul, thanks for compliments. This were shot with NEX-5 (not the 5n) built in HDR feature. This produces very flat image, but all the shadows and highlights are there. Then I process them in Lightroom with one of the presets that I have and finish up with global adjustments (shadows/highlights/vibrance/contrast/exposure etc). I've got quite a few free presets (not HDR specific) from different places (xEquals, LIDF, flickr) which are fun and give different looks.
_________________
Many lenses and some film bodies for sale here: http://forum.mflenses.com/canon-fd-minolta-md-c-mounts-m42-pentax-and-more-t50465.html
Flickr http://www.flickr.com/photos/96060788@N06/ |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
pdccameras
Joined: 23 Aug 2009
Posts: 825
Location: Putnam, CT
Expire: 2014-08-11
|
| Posted: Sun Jul 29, 2012 1:46 am Post subject: |
|
|
pdccameras wrote:
| fermy wrote: |
| Paul, thanks for compliments. This were shot with NEX-5 (not the 5n) built in HDR feature. This produces very flat image, but all the shadows and highlights are there. Then I process them in Lightroom with one of the presets that I have and finish up with global adjustments (shadows/highlights/vibrance/contrast/exposure etc). I've got quite a few free presets (not HDR specific) from different places (xEquals, LIDF, flickr) which are fun and give different looks. |
fermy,
Thanks for the info. I have not done a whole lot with the HDR function on my Nex yet, but i am now anxious to try. I have done some experimenting with faux infrared, however. I have a Canon digital Rebel that has been converted to IR, and it is really quite a lot of fun to use. Here are a few quick samples:
http://bene-gesserit.deviantart.com/gallery/?offset=96#/d1uwyac
http://bene-gesserit.deviantart.com/gallery/?offset=96#/d1uwy4o
http://bene-gesserit.deviantart.com/gallery/?offset=96#/d1uwxef
http://bene-gesserit.deviantart.com/gallery/?offset=96#/d1uwxup
Best,
Paul
_________________
Canon 5D Mii, Canon 40D, Canon 350D IR, Sony A7 Mii, Sony Alpha-6000, a ton of lenses: AF & MF and too many cameras to count, all formats: 110 - 4x5. |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
Lightshow
Joined: 04 Nov 2011
Posts: 3666
Location: Calgary
|
| Posted: Sun Jul 29, 2012 5:38 am Post subject: |
|
|
Lightshow wrote:
I prefer HDR's to be more realistic then the over cooked variety...
_________________
A Manual Focus Junky...
One photographers junk lens is an artists favorite tool.
My lens list
http://www.flickr.com/photos/lightshow-photography/ |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
|
|
|
You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot vote in polls in this forum
|
Search
Memberlist
Register
Profile
Log in to check your private messages
Log in
