View previous topic :: View next topic |
Author |
Message |
wilco
Joined: 15 Mar 2009 Posts: 135
|
Posted: Mon Mar 19, 2012 7:27 pm Post subject: advice needed for 500mm and above |
|
|
wilco wrote:
Hi,
I am lucker most of the time in the forum. I have Nikon body with AFS300mm f/4, TCEII 1.4 and 1.7. I get satisfactory result with 1.4 but not with 1.7. Without breaking the bank, which manual lens should I get for 400~500 and above. I don't mind manual but I want to get same IQ as AFS300mm f/4.
Thanks _________________ http://mycasualsnaps.blogspot.com |
|
Back to top |
|
|
Tervueren
Joined: 18 May 2011 Posts: 1177 Location: West Sussex, United Kingdom
Expire: 2014-11-08
|
Posted: Mon Mar 19, 2012 8:09 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Tervueren wrote:
The 300/4 AFS is a marvelous lens, you don't say whether or not you are using a full frame or crop camera, have you considered giving the newer Nikon TC-20E III a try, may be worth popping along to your local camera shop to try one out. |
|
Back to top |
|
|
Rolf
Joined: 02 May 2009 Posts: 4123 Location: NRW/Germany
Expire: 2015-12-26
|
Posted: Mon Mar 19, 2012 8:15 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Rolf wrote:
Hi Wilco,
nice to see you here. Have you seen the samples with the Leica MR-Telyt-R 8/500mm mirror ?
BTW Have sent you a PM. Have a CZ Planar 1.4/50mm for you here on my desk.
_________________ Rolf |
|
Back to top |
|
|
wilco
Joined: 15 Mar 2009 Posts: 135
|
Posted: Mon Mar 19, 2012 8:45 pm Post subject: |
|
|
wilco wrote:
Thanks Rolf. I will check it out.
@Tervueren I am using DX but planning to upgrade to FX pretty soon. _________________ http://mycasualsnaps.blogspot.com |
|
Back to top |
|
|
Tervueren
Joined: 18 May 2011 Posts: 1177 Location: West Sussex, United Kingdom
Expire: 2014-11-08
|
Posted: Mon Mar 19, 2012 9:01 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Tervueren wrote:
wilco wrote: |
Thanks Rolf. I will check it out.
@Tervueren I am using DX but planning to upgrade to FX pretty soon. |
Then obviously when you upgrade you'll 'lose' the extra length provided with the crop factor so worth bearing that in mind when considering what to buy, you could look out for a Takumar 500 but they don't come around that often. I'd try the newer tc route if I were you, when I used nikon I had the 300/4 on a D3, I used the kenko 1.5 tc on it with no bother, think you'll struggle to beat the iq of your lens on the cheap but someone may come along to suggest something.
good luck
John |
|
Back to top |
|
|
ManualFocus-G
Joined: 29 Dec 2008 Posts: 6622 Location: United Kingdom
Expire: 2014-11-24
|
Posted: Mon Mar 19, 2012 10:33 pm Post subject: |
|
|
ManualFocus-G wrote:
To be honest, long lenses are where quality has improved in recent years. You are likely to see CA with older long lenses and lower resolution, and even vignetting. That said, you would probably find a newer manual Nikon lens at a better price than the AF versions. _________________ Graham - Moderator
Shooter of choice: Fujifilm X-T20 with M42, PB and C/Y lenses
See my Flickr photos at http://www.flickr.com/photos/manualfocus-g |
|
Back to top |
|
|
Attila
Joined: 24 Feb 2007 Posts: 57865 Location: Hungary
Expire: 2025-11-18
|
Posted: Mon Mar 19, 2012 10:39 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Attila wrote:
canon 500 vs tamron 500
http://www.bobatkins.com/photography/tutorials/mirror.html _________________ -------------------------------
Items on sale on Ebay
Sony NEX-7 Carl Zeiss Planar 85mm f1.4, Minolta MD 35mm f1.8, Konica 135mm f2.5, Minolta MD 50mm f1.2, Minolta MD 250mm f5.6, Carl Zeiss Sonnar 180mm f2.8
|
|
Back to top |
|
|
wilco
Joined: 15 Mar 2009 Posts: 135
|
Posted: Tue Mar 20, 2012 3:31 pm Post subject: |
|
|
wilco wrote:
Thanks for all your advice. _________________ http://mycasualsnaps.blogspot.com |
|
Back to top |
|
|
|
|
You cannot post new topics in this forum You cannot reply to topics in this forum You cannot edit your posts in this forum You cannot delete your posts in this forum You cannot vote in polls in this forum
|