Home

Please support mflenses.com if you need any graphic related work order it from us, click on above banner to order!

SearchSearch MemberlistMemberlist RegisterRegister ProfileProfile Log in to check your private messagesLog in to check your private messages Log inLog in

can you convert a m39/42 Helios 40 to leica R?
View previous topic :: View next topic  


PostPosted: Wed Jul 13, 2011 10:27 pm    Post subject: can you convert a m39/42 Helios 40 to leica R? Reply with quote

Hi all, i got an email frorwarded to me from a fellow I know on another forum as he knows I have a helios 40, here is the question/email in its entirety, any help would be wonderful, thanks

"Paul,
Great site! I really enjoy your bokeh discussion.

I have a few mechanical questions, since I've not handled this lens. Does the rear part of this lens, the knurled part that has the mounting threads unscrew from the barrel? The reason I am asking is that I would like to mount it on another camera which is not m39/m42 thread. I suppose that I could just get a Pentax screw mount body for it. I'd prefer to have it on my Leica-R, however.

Also, is the lens unit easily removable from the barrel?

Do you have any idea what the image circle is? I'm thinking of mounting it on my Sinar 4x5 for macro work!

Any information that you could share with me would be appreciated.
kind regards,
Van


PostPosted: Wed Jul 13, 2011 10:37 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

My message to him, he has enough money to buy a right lens, don't modify a great lens. Keep it in original shape or sell to somebody who has more respect about legacy gears. This lens is a valuable member of Russian lens history if he want to use it plenty of opportunity available on both film and digital to use it without butchering.


PostPosted: Wed Jul 13, 2011 10:48 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

On my silver Helios-40 the rear part is made from one piece of brass. So, I think, that only nondestructive way is to make completely new rear part with appropriate mount and replace the original one. The lens can be then put in the original condition.


PostPosted: Wed Jul 13, 2011 11:37 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Is there such a think as a M42 to Leica R adapter?

If not, do as Attila says and get a different lens, if he has the budget there are many alternatives.


PostPosted: Thu Jul 14, 2011 12:13 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

I've craved one these for a while, but you almost never see them in the states, and the cheapest out of e europe are a pretty penny.

I have an idea what it can do, but little about the production history and rarity.

I gave up today when I found a canon ltm 85/1.5 and blew my Helios fund.

I know they are unrelated but the samples from the canon I've seen show some nice swirls too Smile

Somebody fill me in.....


PostPosted: Thu Jul 14, 2011 12:39 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

Helios-40 rare in Europe too most of them what people find here goes to Ebay and not so many there. I saw locally perhaps 3-4 pieces under 5 yrs.


PostPosted: Thu Jul 14, 2011 1:24 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

Leica R register is 47mm, Zenit 39mm is 45.6mm register so whatever your friend decided on doing to go to Leica R would mean good bye infinity focus.


PostPosted: Thu Jul 14, 2011 2:36 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

xjjohnno wrote:
Leica R register is 47mm, Zenit 39mm is 45.6mm register so whatever your friend decided on doing to go to Leica R would mean good bye infinity focus.


And you can bet Leica made that register 47mm so people couldn't use M42 and other mount lenses on their R bodies.

Leica may be high quality but they make you pay through the arse for it...


PostPosted: Thu Jul 14, 2011 12:18 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

iangreenhalgh1 wrote:
xjjohnno wrote:
Leica R register is 47mm, Zenit 39mm is 45.6mm register so whatever your friend decided on doing to go to Leica R would mean good bye infinity focus.


And you can bet Leica made that register 47mm so people couldn't use M42 and other mount lenses on their R bodies.

...


No, no, no, for a start, in 1964 Leitz probably didn't even know there were such things as SLRs like Pentaxes or Prakticas, let alone Nikons and Canons. Mmm, well, maybe the Exakta, perhaps. With Leitz the reason would have been far, far more arcane. Like, that register distance probably let them use one of their many Visoflex lenses on one of their plethora of long-discontinued mount/focusing adapters on the R body in conjunction with yet another of their . . . etc etc etc. I sometimes think their company motto might have been "Thou shalt not keep it simple, at any price!"

Don't get me wrong, I like a Leica. Even a Leicaflex.


PostPosted: Thu Jul 14, 2011 12:35 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Aha, that makes sense, I didn't realise the R series had been around as long as 1964.