View previous topic :: View next topic |
Author |
Message |
KarelDH
Joined: 24 Mar 2011 Posts: 169 Location: Belgium
|
Posted: Mon Jun 27, 2011 9:59 am Post subject: tricks for long telephoto lenses ? vivtar 600mm f8 |
|
|
KarelDH wrote:
Hi,
My brother bought me a vivitar 600mm f8 for a tiny amount of money
Serial number starts whit 37 so Tokina ?
So it looks like a bazooka, it actually has a aiming pin.
Now are there any hinds or tricks for using these monsters ?
i have a tripod but not a good one.
(If i use live view on 100% it looks pretty sharp bit of ca)
Thank u.
|
|
Back to top |
|
|
martyn_bannister
Joined: 23 May 2010 Posts: 1151
|
Posted: Mon Jun 27, 2011 10:23 am Post subject: |
|
|
martyn_bannister wrote:
FWIW, my experience with this length of lens is that a SOLID tripod is mandatory. Mirror lock up and remote release also. And plenty of light/ISO to get the fastest shutter speed you can
You will only find out if yours is solid enough by trying it. I did an interesting shoot of the sun the other day. I was using a reflective solar filter on the front of such a 500mm lens, with a 2x teleconverter. The sunlight was reflecting off the filter and onto an adjacent window frame. I thought my tripod was pretty solid. I was using a remote release and mirror lock up on my 5D. Every time the shutter fired, the reflection off the filter moved! I tried everything to stop it. No joy!
Apparently one trick, which I didn't try, is to hang several kilos of weight off the tripod centre post to give it some stability.
Good luck |
|
Back to top |
|
|
fuzzywuzzy
Joined: 18 Dec 2010 Posts: 1258 Location: Down East, Canada, eh?
Expire: 2013-11-30
|
Posted: Mon Jun 27, 2011 11:46 am Post subject: |
|
|
fuzzywuzzy wrote:
I hear beanbags work well for big long heavy gear like that. _________________ I welcome C&C, editing my pics and reposting them on the forum is fine.
NEX-F3
~~~~~~~~~
CZJ Sonnar 135/4, Biotar 58/2, Pancolar 50/2, Tessar 50/2.8, Flek 35/2.8, Flek 25/4
Super Takumar 135/2.5, 135/3.5, 100/4 bellows, 50/1.4, 28/3.5
Helios 58/2, 3M-5A 500/8, Mir 20M
Vivitar Series 1 70-210 - - - - - - - - Nikkor 200/4
Rikenon 28/2.8 - - - - - - - - Zeiss 50/1.7 Planar
PB 50/2.4, 135/2.8
Yashica 50/1.9, 28/2.8, 135/2.8
Hexanon 28/3.5, 50/1.4 |
|
Back to top |
|
|
martyn_bannister
Joined: 23 May 2010 Posts: 1151
|
Posted: Mon Jun 27, 2011 1:01 pm Post subject: |
|
|
martyn_bannister wrote:
fuzzywuzzy wrote: |
I hear beanbags work well for big long heavy gear like that. |
I agree.
However, the long lenses of this type that I own are NOT heavy. I have a couple of russian mirrors which are built like battleships and I think they would work very well with a beanbag. These long light lenses just don't have the inertia to damp out sudden shocks like mirror slap, more's the pity |
|
Back to top |
|
|
RioRico
Joined: 12 Mar 2010 Posts: 1120 Location: California or Guatemala or somewhere
|
Posted: Mon Jun 27, 2011 2:32 pm Post subject: |
|
|
RioRico wrote:
Yes, such a long tube needs substantial support. I can use long lenses handheld if:
1) the day is bright enough for a fast-enough shutter, and/or
2) I have SR active on my Pentax (Sony bodies work too), and/or
3) the definition of 'handheld' includes a shoulder stock.
Tripods can be stabilized. My travel tripod has a hook under the head, upon which I hang my camera bag -- but not on windy days! Tripod legs can be staked-down to the ground. Bungee cords may help. Sandbags may help. Prayer may help, but probably won't. Maybe you can find an old surveyor's tripod cheap somewhere. But a wobbly tripod under a long lens just SUCKS. _________________ Too many film+digi cams+lenses, oh my -- Pentax K20D, K-1000, M42s, more
The simple truth is this: There are no neutral photographs. --F-Stop Fitzgerald |
|
Back to top |
|
|
luisalegria
Joined: 07 Mar 2008 Posts: 6602 Location: San Francisco, USA
Expire: 2018-01-18
|
Posted: Mon Jun 27, 2011 4:01 pm Post subject: |
|
|
luisalegria wrote:
This is indeed the very nice Tokina version of the Vivitar 600mm
These were sold under many brands as usual, including some camera-makers.
The other common 600/8 was made by Kawanon. The Tokina looks like a better lens, it certainly was better equipped. The "gunsight" should be useful in aiming this, as the field of view is of course extremely narrow. BTW - you may be missing a knob or post that screws on the focus ring.
As for using this - because the focus ring is behind the point of balance this will be very difficult to hand-hold even if your camera has IS. The use of a long lens on a DSLR is best done by holding the focus ring as a point of balance as well as to track your subject. Because the focus ring is behind the point of balance this can't be done on this lens.
My experience is that on a DSLR with IS the tripod is mainly useful as a prop for the front end, to solve the balance problem, so it doesn't really matter what sort of tripod you have. Most of the use of such a lens is for close-up pictures of animals and birds, and its almost impossible to use a tripod to steady the lens, because you need to keep the lens moving to track the creatures. _________________ I like Pentax DSLR's, Exaktas, M42 bodies of all kinds, strange and cheap Japanese lenses, and am dabbling in medium format/Speed Graphic work. |
|
Back to top |
|
|
KarelDH
Joined: 24 Mar 2011 Posts: 169 Location: Belgium
|
Posted: Mon Jun 27, 2011 5:44 pm Post subject: |
|
|
KarelDH wrote:
hi,
Quote: |
BTW - you may be missing a knob or post that screws on the focus ring. |
luisalegria there indeed is missing something, only there are 3 of these screw in holes.
two on the focusing ring and one in the middle of the focusing scale indicator on the top.
no idea what is missing tho
Quote: |
As for using this - because the focus ring is behind the point of balance this will be very difficult to hand-hold even if your camera has IS. |
I agree tried and failed big time (use 3/4 whit IS, found better to turn of IS on tripod).
Quote: |
However, the long lenses of this type that I own are NOT heavy. |
Its weight is 2.2kg so not a big lug but to heavy to handhold for a while
I had some tries today but its to hot outside, seems to be alot of ca but resolves alot of detail.
I hope there will be a moon tonight |
|
Back to top |
|
|
luisalegria
Joined: 07 Mar 2008 Posts: 6602 Location: San Francisco, USA
Expire: 2018-01-18
|
Posted: Mon Jun 27, 2011 5:59 pm Post subject: |
|
|
luisalegria wrote:
I believe the two holes in the focus ring are
1. For metal post to make it easier to do fine focus.
2. A focus lock knob
The one on the back of the focus scale is for the rear sight - another metal post. _________________ I like Pentax DSLR's, Exaktas, M42 bodies of all kinds, strange and cheap Japanese lenses, and am dabbling in medium format/Speed Graphic work. |
|
Back to top |
|
|
|
|
You cannot post new topics in this forum You cannot reply to topics in this forum You cannot edit your posts in this forum You cannot delete your posts in this forum You cannot vote in polls in this forum
|