View previous topic :: View next topic |
Author |
Message |
saffersteve
Joined: 28 Jun 2011 Posts: 91 Location: London
|
Posted: Wed Jun 29, 2011 10:10 am Post subject: 50mm (Carl Z, Canon FD, Pentacon) opened to max power :) |
|
|
saffersteve wrote:
Hi All
From the previous post asking for lens rating...one suggestion that came up was that I should go out and test them and let you all know....yip.
Well this 30min test was fun but in no way conclusive as to which is best.
I guess all 3 are great...and all that I have learned is that this is not the way to compare lens....with differant speeds.
This is the flawed as it does not taking into account DOF.
Guess next time I will just try take the best image with correct settings for the condisions.
Setting:
ISO200
All opened wide (Carlz =2.8, Canon =2, Pentacon=1.
Sutter speed adjusted to control the exposure (some shots at 1/4000 and still over exposed)
3 Scenes to compare (Closeup, Midrange, Infinity)
Some conclusions:
1) Love Prime MF lenses
2) Carl and Pent have much closer range to the Canon.
Let me know if you see anything I missed....as I'm just getting started.
PS images have only been stacked on top of each other and reduced to 20% no other editing.
|
|
Back to top |
|
|
WolverineX
Joined: 19 Apr 2009 Posts: 1693 Location: Zagreb , Croatia , Europe
|
Posted: Wed Jun 29, 2011 1:27 pm Post subject: |
|
|
WolverineX wrote:
i think you should test them separately , not against each other.
test them alone to see if each lens produces satisfying results, not as a group.
group tests are for lenses with same or similar specs ( for example 50mm lenses with 1.8 maximum aperture) _________________ my tools:Oly E-M5 + 45mm/1.8 + Oly E-520 + 12-60 + 14-42 + 70-300 + Sigma 105mm + FL-50R + EC20 + SRF-11 ring flash
http://forum.mflenses.com/wolverinex-testing-my-lenses-series-link-list-t39524.html |
|
Back to top |
|
|
fuzzywuzzy
Joined: 18 Dec 2010 Posts: 1258 Location: Down East, Canada, eh?
Expire: 2013-11-30
|
Posted: Wed Jun 29, 2011 2:14 pm Post subject: |
|
|
fuzzywuzzy wrote:
Heh, getting that many lenses all at once is a mixed blessing, you'll be testing for weeks or months to get a feel for everything
Most nifty 50s are pretty darn good, you might have to work hard to pick a winner! On the plus side you'll probably get great pics from any of them so there's no downside to picking a 50mm at random and shooting away.
If you're comparing lenses against each other you might want to do a torture test, see which ones do better shooting against the sun, then you'll know which ones to take shooting outside. Which ones are sharpest at f/8, they're probably all real sharp to be honest but you might have a bad copy, buying used gear. Color rendition is subjective and frankly I can't think of a systematic way to comprehensively test, but take a stab at it and see what you get.
If that sounds too much like work... just pick a random lens and start shooting! Just remember which lens you used for what shots, I have a terrible habit of sitting down at the computer afterwards and not being able to remember. _________________ I welcome C&C, editing my pics and reposting them on the forum is fine.
NEX-F3
~~~~~~~~~
CZJ Sonnar 135/4, Biotar 58/2, Pancolar 50/2, Tessar 50/2.8, Flek 35/2.8, Flek 25/4
Super Takumar 135/2.5, 135/3.5, 100/4 bellows, 50/1.4, 28/3.5
Helios 58/2, 3M-5A 500/8, Mir 20M
Vivitar Series 1 70-210 - - - - - - - - Nikkor 200/4
Rikenon 28/2.8 - - - - - - - - Zeiss 50/1.7 Planar
PB 50/2.4, 135/2.8
Yashica 50/1.9, 28/2.8, 135/2.8
Hexanon 28/3.5, 50/1.4 |
|
Back to top |
|
|
saffersteve
Joined: 28 Jun 2011 Posts: 91 Location: London
|
Posted: Wed Jun 29, 2011 2:26 pm Post subject: |
|
|
saffersteve wrote:
Hi WolverineX
I agree, when I was half way though doing this test, it struck me how silly this was.....lens on off on off....shake em all about.
What I'm really trying to do is to choose a kit list that will fit a sling bag....I have quite a few 50's including a PB mount 50/2.4 and a Helios 44M 58/2.....and was hoping for an order of which is best optically.
I could then try my hand at first and second and see which I got on best with.
I'm slowly learning that I will just have to just try them one at a time....
From a newbie perspective there seems to be a lot of emphasis put on fast lens but does this make them better. (less optical distortion, better colour, etc)
Anyway thanks for the advise. |
|
Back to top |
|
|
saffersteve
Joined: 28 Jun 2011 Posts: 91 Location: London
|
Posted: Wed Jun 29, 2011 2:37 pm Post subject: |
|
|
saffersteve wrote:
fuzzywuzzy wrote: |
Heh, getting that many lenses all at once is a mixed blessing, you'll be testing for weeks or months to get a feel for everything
Most nifty 50s are pretty darn good, you might have to work hard to pick a winner! On the plus side you'll probably get great pics from any of them so there's no downside to picking a 50mm at random and shooting away.
If you're comparing lenses against each other you might want to do a torture test, see which ones do better shooting against the sun, then you'll know which ones to take shooting outside. Which ones are sharpest at f/8, they're probably all real sharp to be honest but you might have a bad copy, buying used gear. Color rendition is subjective and frankly I can't think of a systematic way to comprehensively test, but take a stab at it and see what you get.
If that sounds too much like work... just pick a random lens and start shooting! Just remember which lens you used for what shots, I have a terrible habit of sitting down at the computer afterwards and not being able to remember. |
Thank Fuzzywuzzy.....Some great advise there.....Will also look into this Torture test(somehow I keep thinking magnify glass and ants and don't want to kill the Sensor).....
Guess I'll just have to have fun playing with them all
Re- the remembering which lens was used ....would be good if the Firmware allowed one to input ones MF lens list and be able to select it so it tags the files........very easy one for them to code.... |
|
Back to top |
|
|
kuuan
Joined: 14 Jan 2008 Posts: 4569 Location: right now: Austria
Expire: 2014-12-26
|
Posted: Wed Jun 29, 2011 3:03 pm Post subject: |
|
|
kuuan wrote:
saffersteve wrote: |
Guess I'll just have to have fun playing with them all
|
YES!
while trying to find out which one is best optically..get a feel for which one 'handles' best, which is most convenient in 'use', which one you 'like' best _________________ my photos on flickr: https://www.flickr.com/photos/kuuan/collections |
|
Back to top |
|
|
WolverineX
Joined: 19 Apr 2009 Posts: 1693 Location: Zagreb , Croatia , Europe
|
Posted: Wed Jun 29, 2011 5:50 pm Post subject: |
|
|
WolverineX wrote:
saffersteve wrote: |
Hi WolverineX
I agree, when I was half way though doing this test, it struck me how silly this was.....lens on off on off....shake em all about.
What I'm really trying to do is to choose a kit list that will fit a sling bag....I have quite a few 50's including a PB mount 50/2.4 and a Helios 44M 58/2.....and was hoping for an order of which is best optically.
|
i use manual lenses for over 2 years and still haven't got a kit list that you are talking about...because that would mean neglecting my other babies _________________ my tools:Oly E-M5 + 45mm/1.8 + Oly E-520 + 12-60 + 14-42 + 70-300 + Sigma 105mm + FL-50R + EC20 + SRF-11 ring flash
http://forum.mflenses.com/wolverinex-testing-my-lenses-series-link-list-t39524.html |
|
Back to top |
|
|
|
|
You cannot post new topics in this forum You cannot reply to topics in this forum You cannot edit your posts in this forum You cannot delete your posts in this forum You cannot vote in polls in this forum
|