View previous topic :: View next topic |
Author |
Message |
lulalake
Joined: 22 Apr 2007 Posts: 1191 Location: Near Austin Texas
Expire: 2011-11-18
|
Posted: Sun May 15, 2011 2:52 pm Post subject: Chinon 28mm f2.8 |
|
|
lulalake wrote:
A couple of years ago I bought a broken and older scanning back camera very inexpensively to play with. It had a Chinon 28 2.8 lens on it. At the time I didn’t pay it much attention but the other day I broke it out and saw that it is an M42 lens sooo of course I put it on my 40D just to see how it acted and was very surprised and pleased at the performance. Here are a few examples. Though it’s not a macro lens it can get fairly close.
The first is my daughter’s doll, “Princess Frioni”, perhaps an Italian princess.( No sharpening)
The next are a few finger puppets that live on the top of my CRT and
protect my PC from viruses (more or less). They are Gardua, Kali, Brahma, and Ganesha . .the Fab Four. (Downsize sharpening)
This is another very inexpensive lens worth adding to a collection IMO.
Jules |
|
Back to top |
|
|
Attila
Joined: 24 Feb 2007 Posts: 57865 Location: Hungary
Expire: 2025-11-18
|
Posted: Mon May 16, 2011 9:29 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Attila wrote:
Many thanks for this great tip! I think this is true in generally also on Chinon lenses, they are rare fetch higher prices and I never seen any bad one all of them at least good average lens. _________________ -------------------------------
Items on sale on Ebay
Sony NEX-7 Carl Zeiss Planar 85mm f1.4, Minolta MD 35mm f1.8, Konica 135mm f2.5, Minolta MD 50mm f1.2, Minolta MD 250mm f5.6, Carl Zeiss Sonnar 180mm f2.8
|
|
Back to top |
|
|
ManualFocus-G
Joined: 29 Dec 2008 Posts: 6622 Location: United Kingdom
Expire: 2014-11-24
|
Posted: Mon May 16, 2011 9:44 pm Post subject: |
|
|
ManualFocus-G wrote:
Yep, the Chinon 28/2.8 is good for close ups on a crop camera. It's not good at landscapes though and generally needs to be stopped down to f8 or so to be reasonably sharp (which may suit for depth of field purposes...). _________________ Graham - Moderator
Shooter of choice: Fujifilm X-T20 with M42, PB and C/Y lenses
See my Flickr photos at http://www.flickr.com/photos/manualfocus-g |
|
Back to top |
|
|
RioRico
Joined: 12 Mar 2010 Posts: 1120 Location: California or Guatemala or somewhere
|
Posted: Tue May 17, 2011 4:26 am Post subject: |
|
|
RioRico wrote:
I bought the 28/2.8 awhile back but haven't really used it, along with my other Chinons (45/2.8, Argus Cintar 55/1.7, Alpa 300/5.6), all nice and cheap. I need to put them on my lens-of-the-day schedule when I get home in a few weeks. My 28/2.8 passed my rough initial tests so I know it's not crap, but is it good? Yes, shoot and learn. _________________ Too many film+digi cams+lenses, oh my -- Pentax K20D, K-1000, M42s, more
The simple truth is this: There are no neutral photographs. --F-Stop Fitzgerald |
|
Back to top |
|
|
Blue
Joined: 26 Jul 2008 Posts: 304
|
Posted: Tue Jun 14, 2011 9:26 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Blue wrote:
RioRico wrote: |
I bought the 28/2.8 awhile back but haven't really used it, along with my other Chinons (45/2.8, Argus Cintar 55/1.7, Alpa 300/5.6), all nice and cheap. I need to put them on my lens-of-the-day schedule when I get home in a few weeks. My 28/2.8 passed my rough initial tests so I know it's not crap, but is it good? Yes, shoot and learn. |
Is the 45mm a pancake? _________________ Pentax: K, H2, H3, S3, SV (late & early), SV black, Spot F, K2 chrome, K2 black, ME F, SuperProgram, 6x7, Auto 110, Asahiflex IIB late
Pentax "modern": MZ-3, *istD, K200d, K20d
Mamiya: C3 TLR, NC1000
Canon: EOS 10s, AE-1
Chinon: CP-7m
IKON: Contax D, Praktiflex FX & Victar 50mm f2.9
Contessa-Nettel Piccolette - 7.5 cm Tessar & Compur shutter
Rangefinders: Argus C4 and Ricoh Five-One-Nine |
|
Back to top |
|
|
martinsmith99
Joined: 31 Aug 2008 Posts: 6950 Location: S Glos, UK
Expire: 2013-11-18
|
Posted: Wed Jun 15, 2011 6:10 am Post subject: |
|
|
martinsmith99 wrote:
My experience with Chinon lenses is quite positive. I have a 135 & 200 which are quite good. No obvious flaws and good IQ, not exceptional though.
I have heard the 28 is a good lens, though Graham disputes this. Of course it will depend on who actually made the lens, as Chinon are probably just a badge from what I can find out about them. Even my beloved CE-3 was made by Cosina. _________________ Casual attendance these days |
|
Back to top |
|
|
woodrim
Joined: 14 Jan 2010 Posts: 4060 Location: Charleston
|
Posted: Wed Jun 15, 2011 1:55 pm Post subject: |
|
|
woodrim wrote:
ManualFocus-G wrote: |
Yep, the Chinon 28/2.8 is good for close ups on a crop camera. It's not good at landscapes though and generally needs to be stopped down to f8 or so to be reasonably sharp (which may suit for depth of field purposes...). |
My experience too. _________________ Regards,
Woodrim |
|
Back to top |
|
|
|
|
You cannot post new topics in this forum You cannot reply to topics in this forum You cannot edit your posts in this forum You cannot delete your posts in this forum You cannot vote in polls in this forum
|