Home

Please support mflenses.com if you need any graphic related work order it from us, click on above banner to order!

SearchSearch MemberlistMemberlist RegisterRegister ProfileProfile Log in to check your private messagesLog in to check your private messages Log inLog in

Virginia Woolf and the Soviets
View previous topic :: View next topic  


PostPosted: Tue Jun 07, 2011 4:14 pm    Post subject: Virginia Woolf and the Soviets Reply with quote

FED2, Industar 26m, Ilford XP2 Super.

I was trying the XP2 but I think I prefer the Kodak BW400CN.









Kris.


PostPosted: Tue Jun 07, 2011 11:53 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Nice result I like them! This is a very good combo, still my favorite cam.


PostPosted: Wed Jun 08, 2011 1:42 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

Love the angle of picture number 2. What did you not like with this film?


PostPosted: Wed Jun 08, 2011 1:53 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

mmelvis wrote:
Love the angle of picture number 2. What did you not like with this film?


It doesn't seem to have quite the latitude of BW400CN, or even of the original XP1 which I remember shooting quite happily at ISO1600 back in the 80s. Somehow the prints don't have the tonal qualities of the Kodak film. Hard for me to describe what I mean but it seems harsher somehow.

K.


PostPosted: Wed Jun 08, 2011 3:06 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Is that Tavistock Square? Looks oddly familiar.

Nice and crisp photos.


PostPosted: Wed Jun 08, 2011 4:43 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Cistron wrote:
Is that Tavistock Square? Looks oddly familiar.


Well spotted. Very Happy

K.


PostPosted: Fri Jun 10, 2011 3:50 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

#4 is my favourite.

Did you do the development yourself or get it done by a commercial processor? Reason I ask is the last XP-2 I had done at a local processor was a disaster - I think they used mud in one of the baths!!!


PostPosted: Sun Jun 12, 2011 3:18 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

bazza59 wrote:
#4 is my favourite.

Did you do the development yourself or get it done by a commercial processor? Reason I ask is the last XP-2 I had done at a local processor was a disaster - I think they used mud in one of the baths!!!


It was a commercial dev but a high end good quality one. The negs look fine although the scans weren't as good as usual.

K.


PostPosted: Fri Jun 17, 2011 2:41 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

xp2 blacks can get really inky. a little more exposure next time, say at 320?