View previous topic :: View next topic |
Author |
Message |
Big Dawg
Joined: 28 Jan 2009 Posts: 2530 Location: Thach Alabama
|
Posted: Sat Jun 04, 2011 11:41 pm Post subject: Hasselblad lenses for use on a Pentax K7 |
|
|
Big Dawg wrote:
A lot of nice Zeiss lenses out there for a Hasselblad C and CF mount. I've found a Brass adapter for Hasselblad C-CF to P/K mount adapter. Any known problems with this adaptation? Will the lens function normally? The ad for the adapter states it will give infinity focus. Any problems with manual stop down of the Aperture or problems with the mount? Size doesn't put me off so a large lens is just one that fits me well!! LOL
http://cgi.ebay.com/ws/eBayISAPI.dll?ViewItem&item=280573964584&ssPageName=STRK:MEWAX:IT _________________ Big Dawg |
|
Back to top |
|
|
Pancolart
Joined: 04 Feb 2008 Posts: 3704 Location: Slovenia, EU
Expire: 2013-11-18
|
Posted: Sun Jun 05, 2011 8:34 am Post subject: |
|
|
Pancolart wrote:
Hey Dawg, wouldn't you rather try them on m4/3 ? _________________ ---------------------------------
The Peculiar Apparatus Of Victorian Steampunk Photography: 100+ Genuine Steampunk Camera Designs https://www.amazon.com/dp/B0B92829NS |
|
Back to top |
|
|
Big Dawg
Joined: 28 Jan 2009 Posts: 2530 Location: Thach Alabama
|
Posted: Sun Jun 05, 2011 2:14 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Big Dawg wrote:
Pancolart wrote: |
Hey Dawg, wouldn't you rather try them on m4/3 ? |
HAHA!! No my friend. I'm Pentax to the bone!! LOL
Well...since I got no answer's to the question...I'll just go on my own. _________________ Big Dawg |
|
Back to top |
|
|
mo
Joined: 27 Aug 2009 Posts: 8979 Location: Australia
Expire: 2016-07-30
|
Posted: Sun Jun 05, 2011 9:51 pm Post subject: |
|
|
mo wrote:
let us know how you go with the adapter.
I don't venture past M42 or k-mount lenses...although I did buy the Industar M39 mount and kodak signet 80 lens... _________________ Moira, Moderator
Fuji XE-1,Pentax K-01,Panasonic G1,Panasonic G5,Pentax MX
Ricoh Singlex TLS,KR-5,KR-5Super,XR-10
Lenses
Auto Rikenon's 55/1.4, 1.8, 2.8... 50/1.7 Takumar 2/58 Preset Takumar 2.8/105 Auto Takumar 2.2/55, 3.5/35 Super Takumar 1.8/55...Macro Takumar F4/50... CZJ Biotar ALU M42 2/58 CZJ Tessar ALU M42 2.8/50
CZJ DDR Flektogon Zebra M42 2.8/35 CZJ Pancolar M42 2/50 CZJ Pancolar Exakta 2/50
Auto Mamiya/Sekor 1.8/55 ...Auto Mamiya/Sekor 2/50 Auto Mamiya/Sekor 2.8/50 Auto Mamiya/Sekor 200/3.5 Tamron SP500/8 Tamron SP350/5.6 Tamron SP90/2.5
Primoplan 1.9/58 Primagon 4.5/35 Telemegor 5.5/150 Angenieux 3.5/28 Angenieux 3,5/135 Y 2
Canon FL 58/1.2,Canon FL85/1.8,Canon FL 100/3.5,Canon SSC 2.8/100 ,Konica AR 100/2.8, Nikkor P 105/2.5
|
|
Back to top |
|
|
Big Dawg
Joined: 28 Jan 2009 Posts: 2530 Location: Thach Alabama
|
Posted: Mon Jun 06, 2011 4:26 am Post subject: |
|
|
Big Dawg wrote:
mo wrote: |
let us know how you go with the adapter.
I don't venture past M42 or k-mount lenses...although I did buy the Industar M39 mount and kodak signet 80 lens... |
I have 2 lenses with the Pentacon 6 to P/K adapter and they work fine. I just wanted to know if the Hasselblad lenses had issues when adapted to other brands of cameras. I'll let you know after I try one. Looking at either a 80mm f/2.8 Planar T* lens right now. _________________ Big Dawg |
|
Back to top |
|
|
Big Dawg
Joined: 28 Jan 2009 Posts: 2530 Location: Thach Alabama
|
Posted: Tue Jun 07, 2011 4:41 am Post subject: |
|
|
Big Dawg wrote:
Bump!! Still waiting on more info. _________________ Big Dawg |
|
Back to top |
|
|
iangreenhalgh1
Joined: 18 Mar 2011 Posts: 15679
Expire: 2014-01-07
|
Posted: Tue Jun 07, 2011 4:45 am Post subject: |
|
|
iangreenhalgh1 wrote:
There are some other really good medium format lenses apart from Zeiss to consider, some of the Russian ones made for the Salut/Kiev 88 are great like the Vega-12, some of the MF Mirs are highly regarded too.
If you're Pentax to the bone, why not get a Pentax 6x7 and shoot some film with the MF glass?
Other cheap but excellent lenses for MF/LF include things like the British Pentac 2.9 8inch and Ross Xpress f4 5inch and the Kodak Aero-Ektars.
I have two copies of the Ross and it's nearer to f3 that f4 wide open and is very sharp even wide open, which I believe it was optimised for. Has no coatings so needs a nice deep hood but it's a lot of fun and can be had for peanuts.
Certainly the Ross, Pentac and Aero-Ektar would rate alongside the Zeiss MF/LF glass of the same vintage in quality. _________________ I don't care who designed it, who made it or what country it comes from - I just enjoy using it! |
|
Back to top |
|
|
Big Dawg
Joined: 28 Jan 2009 Posts: 2530 Location: Thach Alabama
|
Posted: Tue Jun 07, 2011 2:04 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Big Dawg wrote:
Thanks Ian. I'll look into some of those. _________________ Big Dawg |
|
Back to top |
|
|
SVP
Joined: 15 Jan 2009 Posts: 665 Location: Greece
Expire: 2017-12-17
|
Posted: Tue Jun 07, 2011 2:12 pm Post subject: |
|
|
SVP wrote:
No experience with Hassy-P/K adapters as such, but plenty with Hassy-Nikon F and Hassy-Leica R ones (mainly of Eastern origin, also including a legacy -Hasselblad- one). No issues so far, however I only own (and use these with) Hasselblad F lenses, not C or CF. |
|
Back to top |
|
|
Big Dawg
Joined: 28 Jan 2009 Posts: 2530 Location: Thach Alabama
|
Posted: Tue Jun 07, 2011 2:16 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Big Dawg wrote:
SVP wrote: |
No experience with Hassy-P/K adapters as such, but plenty with Hassy-Nikon F and Hassy-Leica R ones (mainly of Eastern origin, also including a legacy -Hasselblad- one). No issues so far, however I only own (and use these with) Hasselblad F lenses, not C or CF. |
Thank you for that answer. How do the lenses do on your camera? Sharp? Good color? Any mechanical issues? _________________ Big Dawg |
|
Back to top |
|
|
SVP
Joined: 15 Jan 2009 Posts: 665 Location: Greece
Expire: 2017-12-17
|
Posted: Tue Jun 07, 2011 2:32 pm Post subject: |
|
|
SVP wrote:
The Zeiss ones (50f/2.8 Distagon, 80f/2.8 & 110f/2 Planar, 150f/2.8 Sonnar) most certainly live up to the expectations (incl. sharpness & colour rendition).
I also use many modified older Astro-Berlin lenses - mainly for b&w, not so for colour.
No mechanical issues with any of the above.
PS: strangely (or maybe not so strangely?), I do find all these performing better with film than on digital (that goes for my Kodak DCS Pro SLR/n & 14n bodies)... |
|
Back to top |
|
|
Big Dawg
Joined: 28 Jan 2009 Posts: 2530 Location: Thach Alabama
|
Posted: Tue Jun 07, 2011 2:38 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Big Dawg wrote:
SVP wrote: |
The Zeiss ones (50f/2.8 Distagon, 80f/2.8 & 110f/2 Planar, 150f/2.8 Sonnar) most certainly live up to the expectations (incl. sharpness & colour rendition).
I also use many modified older Astro-Berlin lenses - mainly for b&w, not so for colour.
No mechanical issues with any of the above.
PS: strangely (or maybe not so strangely?), I do find all these performing better with film than on digital (that goes for my Kodak DCS Pro SLR/n & 14n bodies)... |
I'm looking at some Zeiss 80mm f/2.8 T* Planars. Your experience gives me hope they will work well on my K7. The Adapter costs 34 dollars US but it can be used with many lenses so that cost would be one time. _________________ Big Dawg |
|
Back to top |
|
|
Frogfish
Joined: 06 Apr 2010 Posts: 57 Location: Shanghai
|
Posted: Tue Jun 07, 2011 2:49 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Frogfish wrote:
Very interesting thread now that my Voigtlander purchase has triggered another bout of LBA !
I was trying to find a way to get the Zeiss Heliar 15mm into my K5 but that's not going to happen it seems so now looking for other options / lenses and that Ross, Pentac, Aero-Ektarand and the Hasselblads look very tempting ! _________________ http://frogfish.smugmug.com/
Nikon D800E, D600, Zeiss Distagon 21/2.8, Zeiss Distagon 35/2, Nikon 300/2.8 VRII, Sigma 500/4.5 (for sale), Sigma 120-300/2.8, Nikon 85/1.8G, Sigma 50/1.4, Nikon TC20EIII, Nikon TC14EII, Sigma DG x2.0 |
|
Back to top |
|
|
iangreenhalgh1
Joined: 18 Mar 2011 Posts: 15679
Expire: 2014-01-07
|
Posted: Tue Jun 07, 2011 3:10 pm Post subject: |
|
|
iangreenhalgh1 wrote:
The Ross and Pentac can be had very cheap if you are lucky, my first Ross cost me 30ukp in mint condition, I just got a second one for 10ukp that is in excellent condition.
Some shots with my first copy mounted on my EOS 10D:
I think those are all wide open, the last one definitely is.
I'm no great shakes as a photog but someone more experienced and skilfull could certainly get great use from these lenses, they are popular among the LF crowd and those guys are really anal about centre and edge sharpness, lpm figures etc... _________________ I don't care who designed it, who made it or what country it comes from - I just enjoy using it! |
|
Back to top |
|
|
Big Dawg
Joined: 28 Jan 2009 Posts: 2530 Location: Thach Alabama
|
Posted: Tue Jun 07, 2011 3:25 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Big Dawg wrote:
iangreenhalgh1 wrote: |
The Ross and Pentac can be had very cheap if you are lucky, my first Ross cost me 30ukp in mint condition, I just got a second one for 10ukp that is in excellent condition.
Some shots with my first copy mounted on my EOS 10D:
I think those are all wide open, the last one definitely is.
I'm no great shakes as a photog but someone more experienced and skilfull could certainly get great use from these lenses, they are popular among the LF crowd and those guys are really anal about centre and edge sharpness, lpm figures etc... |
Very nicely done Ian. _________________ Big Dawg |
|
Back to top |
|
|
Big Dawg
Joined: 28 Jan 2009 Posts: 2530 Location: Thach Alabama
|
Posted: Tue Jun 07, 2011 3:27 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Big Dawg wrote:
Frogfish wrote: |
Very interesting thread now that my Voigtlander purchase has triggered another bout of LBA !
I was trying to find a way to get the Zeiss Heliar 15mm into my K5 but that's not going to happen it seems so now looking for other options / lenses and that Ross, Pentac, Aero-Ektarand and the Hasselblads look very tempting ! |
Some of the Hasselblads are very inexpensive compared to M42 mounts. Also the Ross and others are less expensive. Good glass is good glass no matter the mount. _________________ Big Dawg |
|
Back to top |
|
|
iangreenhalgh1
Joined: 18 Mar 2011 Posts: 15679
Expire: 2014-01-07
|
Posted: Tue Jun 07, 2011 3:40 pm Post subject: |
|
|
iangreenhalgh1 wrote:
Cheers man, I appreciate that coming from you!
I was a lttle nervous to suggest the old British lenses and Aero-Ektars to you as I know with your budget, experience and existing collection of superb glass, you need/demand the best, but I really think these old lenses are worth your consideration. _________________ I don't care who designed it, who made it or what country it comes from - I just enjoy using it! |
|
Back to top |
|
|
Big Dawg
Joined: 28 Jan 2009 Posts: 2530 Location: Thach Alabama
|
Posted: Tue Jun 07, 2011 6:07 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Big Dawg wrote:
iangreenhalgh1 wrote: |
Cheers man, I appreciate that coming from you!
I was a lttle nervous to suggest the old British lenses and Aero-Ektars to you as I know with your budget, experience and existing collection of superb glass, you need/demand the best, but I really think these old lenses are worth your consideration. |
I'm not one to turn down a good lens no matter the brand. Some of the older medium and large format lenses would wind up in the dust bin of history if we do not bring them to other's attention. _________________ Big Dawg |
|
Back to top |
|
|
indianadinos
Joined: 06 Jul 2008 Posts: 1310 Location: Toulouse, France
Expire: 2011-12-05
|
Posted: Tue Jun 07, 2011 6:35 pm Post subject: |
|
|
indianadinos wrote:
Big Dawg wrote: |
Some of the older medium and large format lenses would wind up in the dust bin of history if we do not bring them to other's attention. |
Well, i understand and agree with you about this point ...
Nevertheless, i hope only that those medium format lenses will not reach the stellar prices of a Flektogon 35/2.4 ,
i'm just starting to enjoy some P6 lenses on my DSLRs and would really like to grab some Hassy lenses at fair prices before it's too late ... _________________ Please visit my blogs Shooting with a Pentax K10D / FF Visions
Takumar: 24/3.5, 28/3.5, 35/2, 35/3.5, 50/1.4, 55/1.8, 85/1.8, 105/2.8, 120/2.8, 135/3.5, 150/4, 200/4
Pentax-K: M28/2.8, K28/3.5, M50/1.4, A50/1.7, M50/4 Macro, K85/1.8, K105/2.8, K135/2.5, M200/4, M70-150/4
Zeiss: Flektogon 20/2.8, 20/4, 35/2.4, 35/2.8, Tessar 50/2.8, Pancolar 50/1.8, Biotar 58/2, Sonnar 135/3.5, Sonnar 180/2.8
Meyer: Primagon 35/4.5, Domiplan 50/2.8, Oreston 50/1.8, Primoplan 58/1.9, Trioplan 100/2.8, Orestor 100/2.8, Orestor 135/2.8
Schacht/Steinheil: Travenar 90/2.8, Travenon 135/4.5, Quinar 135/2.8, Quinar 135/3.5
Russian: MIR 37B, Industar 50/3.5, Helios 44M & 44M-2, Jupiter 37A
P6: Flektogon 50/4, Biometar 80/2.8, Orestor 300/4
Nikkor: Nikkor-O 35/2, Micro 55/3.5, Nikkor-S 50/1.4, Nikkor-Q 135/2.8
Fuji: EBC 28/3.5, EBC 55/3.5 Macro, EBC 135/2.5
Misc Lenses: Kiron 105/2.8 Macro, Tamron SP90/2.5
... and a few other Vivitar, Tamron, Sigma and Soligor lenses ...
|
|
Back to top |
|
|
iangreenhalgh1
Joined: 18 Mar 2011 Posts: 15679
Expire: 2014-01-07
|
Posted: Tue Jun 07, 2011 8:10 pm Post subject: |
|
|
iangreenhalgh1 wrote:
Yes, good point, I often feel reticent about telling people about some of the nice lenses I have foud nthat are quite unknown to most.
However, there seems to be no shortage of the Ross and Pentac lenses, I expect a lot were made during the war for aerial reconaissance.
If I didn't need both my copies of the Ross (one I hav mounted for EOS, the other is for my 6x18 panoramic cam I'm working on, the Ross was originally intended to cover 6x18 so is perfect for the job) then I'd be happy to sell one on for what I paid, I don't have a problem with collectors but I do prefer to see old lenses put to good use, as Big Dawg says, they will just turn to dust if we don't... _________________ I don't care who designed it, who made it or what country it comes from - I just enjoy using it! |
|
Back to top |
|
|
|