| View previous topic :: View next topic |
| Author |
Message |
gearsNcogs
Joined: 20 Oct 2010
Posts: 215
|
 Posted: Wed May 11, 2011 6:08 am Post subject: Minolta/Sony A Mount -> Canon EOS Adapter |
 |
|
gearsNcogs wrote:
So I've been trying to find an adapter to use Minolta A mount lenses (my dad has a few old ones) on my Canon 7d, and I can't seem to find any. In my research (ie: wikipedia) i found that the EOS mount has a flange focal distance of 44mm, and the Minolta A mount has a flange focal distance of 44.5mm, so theoretically it should be possible? or are the flanges to close?
By that token, using a Minolta A mount lens on a Nikon body would be out of the question (while retaining IQ and infinity focus) right?
_________________
Stills: SLR: Asahi Pentax Spotmatic SP, DSLR: Canon EOS Rebel XTi, Canon EOS 7D
Cine: 16mm: Krasnogorsk-3 (M42 mount) 8mm: Revere Model 88 Super 8: Bell and Howell 1235 XL Filmosonic
MF Lenses: M42: Meteor 5-1 KMZ 17-69mm 1:1,9 (Cine Only), Asahi Super Takumar 50mm 1:1.4, Focal MC 28mm 1:2.8, Tele-Lentar 135mm 1:2.8, Helios-44 KMZ 58mm 1:2, Helios-44-2 KMZ 58mm 1:2 M39: Industar-26M 50mm 1:2.8 F: Nikon Nikkor 50mm 1:1.8 EF: Lensbaby Composer f2 w/Double Glass Optic, Rokinon 35mm 1:1.4 AS UMC, Rokinon 85mm T1.5 AS IF UMC
AF Lenses: EF-S: Canon EF-S 18-55mm 1:3.5-5.6 II, EF: Tamron AF 70-300mm 1:4-5.6 TELE-MACRO (1:2), Canon EF 50mm 1:1.8 II
Fixed-Focus Lenses: D: Elitar 6.5mm 1:1.9, Wollensak-Revere 13mm 1:2.5 Velostigmat |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
my_photography
Joined: 03 Nov 2008
Posts: 2772
Location: Pearl of the Orient
Expire: 2016-12-25
|
| Posted: Wed May 11, 2011 6:53 am Post subject: |
|
|
my_photography wrote:
As far as I know, the only other body that can use Minolta/Sony A mount lens is the NEX body. Don't even think there is any adapter for M4/3.
_________________
Zeiss: CJZ Flektogon 20/2.8, CJZ Flektogon 20/4, , CJZ Pentacon 29/2.8, CJZ Flektogon 35/2.4, CJZ Pancolar 50/1.8, Tessar 50/2.8, Biotar 7.5cm/1.5, CJZ Pancolar 80/1.8, CJZ Sonnar 135/3.5, CJZ Pentacon 135/2.8 CJZ Sonnar 200/2.8
Other Germany: Meyer Primoplan 50/1.8, Meyer Trioplan 100/2.8
Takumar: SMC 50/1.4 Super Tak 55/2, Super Tak 85/1.9, S-M-C 135/3.5, Super Tak 150/4
Russian: Zenith 16/2.8, Mir-24M 2/35, Volna-9 50/2.8, Helios 44M (58/2), Helios 44M-3 MC (58/2), Helios 40 (85/1.5), Tair 11A (135/2.8 )
Others: Sears 28/2.8, Sankor 35/2.8, Enna M�nchen Tele-Ennalyt 135/3.5
Zoom Sigma Zoom 28-85/3.5-4.5
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
gearsNcogs
Joined: 20 Oct 2010
Posts: 215
|
| Posted: Wed May 11, 2011 7:02 am Post subject: |
|
|
gearsNcogs wrote:
is it because of flange focal distances? or just the fact that they're AF lenses?
_________________
Stills: SLR: Asahi Pentax Spotmatic SP, DSLR: Canon EOS Rebel XTi, Canon EOS 7D
Cine: 16mm: Krasnogorsk-3 (M42 mount) 8mm: Revere Model 88 Super 8: Bell and Howell 1235 XL Filmosonic
MF Lenses: M42: Meteor 5-1 KMZ 17-69mm 1:1,9 (Cine Only), Asahi Super Takumar 50mm 1:1.4, Focal MC 28mm 1:2.8, Tele-Lentar 135mm 1:2.8, Helios-44 KMZ 58mm 1:2, Helios-44-2 KMZ 58mm 1:2 M39: Industar-26M 50mm 1:2.8 F: Nikon Nikkor 50mm 1:1.8 EF: Lensbaby Composer f2 w/Double Glass Optic, Rokinon 35mm 1:1.4 AS UMC, Rokinon 85mm T1.5 AS IF UMC
AF Lenses: EF-S: Canon EF-S 18-55mm 1:3.5-5.6 II, EF: Tamron AF 70-300mm 1:4-5.6 TELE-MACRO (1:2), Canon EF 50mm 1:1.8 II
Fixed-Focus Lenses: D: Elitar 6.5mm 1:1.9, Wollensak-Revere 13mm 1:2.5 Velostigmat |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
my_photography
Joined: 03 Nov 2008
Posts: 2772
Location: Pearl of the Orient
Expire: 2016-12-25
|
| Posted: Wed May 11, 2011 7:09 am Post subject: |
|
|
my_photography wrote:
| gearsNcogs wrote: |
| is it because of flange focal distances? or just the fact that they're AF lenses? |
Flange focal distance. I am not too sure about the detail but do remember the adapter will take up some space too.
_________________
Zeiss: CJZ Flektogon 20/2.8, CJZ Flektogon 20/4, , CJZ Pentacon 29/2.8, CJZ Flektogon 35/2.4, CJZ Pancolar 50/1.8, Tessar 50/2.8, Biotar 7.5cm/1.5, CJZ Pancolar 80/1.8, CJZ Sonnar 135/3.5, CJZ Pentacon 135/2.8 CJZ Sonnar 200/2.8
Other Germany: Meyer Primoplan 50/1.8, Meyer Trioplan 100/2.8
Takumar: SMC 50/1.4 Super Tak 55/2, Super Tak 85/1.9, S-M-C 135/3.5, Super Tak 150/4
Russian: Zenith 16/2.8, Mir-24M 2/35, Volna-9 50/2.8, Helios 44M (58/2), Helios 44M-3 MC (58/2), Helios 40 (85/1.5), Tair 11A (135/2.8 )
Others: Sears 28/2.8, Sankor 35/2.8, Enna M�nchen Tele-Ennalyt 135/3.5
Zoom Sigma Zoom 28-85/3.5-4.5
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
Toeteraar
Joined: 23 Jan 2009
Posts: 163
Location: Dronten Netherlands
|
| Posted: Wed May 11, 2011 8:08 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Toeteraar wrote:
| gearsNcogs wrote: |
| is it because of flange focal distances? or just the fact that they're AF lenses? |
Besides the flangedistance, the fact that you try to use an AF-lens on another brands AF-camera will not make things much easyer.
Neither Canon- or Minoltalenses have an aperture ring and i am afraid that you can not make a thing that fits between lens and body that will make the one brand's electrical contact to communicate with the contacts of the other brand.
The positive thing is that even without Minolta-AF, the remaining amount of lenses that can be adapted to a Canon is huge.
If you still want to use the Minolta AF-lenses (and specially the first generation Minolta AF is absolutely worth using) you could look for something as a Sony Alfa.
_________________
DSLR: EOS30D,EOS350D,K-M Dynax 5D, Sony Alfa500, Olympus E-330, Pentax K20D
LensesLoads of lenses, except that particular one
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
gearsNcogs
Joined: 20 Oct 2010
Posts: 215
|
| Posted: Thu May 12, 2011 5:46 am Post subject: |
|
|
gearsNcogs wrote:
| Toeteraar wrote: |
| gearsNcogs wrote: |
| is it because of flange focal distances? or just the fact that they're AF lenses? |
Besides the flangedistance, the fact that you try to use an AF-lens on another brands AF-camera will not make things much easyer.
Neither Canon- or Minoltalenses have an aperture ring and i am afraid that you can not make a thing that fits between lens and body that will make the one brand's electrical contact to communicate with the contacts of the other brand.
The positive thing is that even without Minolta-AF, the remaining amount of lenses that can be adapted to a Canon is huge.
If you still want to use the Minolta AF-lenses (and specially the first generation Minolta AF is absolutely worth using) you could look for something as a Sony Alfa. |
Yeah, that's kinda what i figured it would be. Granted, i have no problem using lenses wide-open (which is what i was thinking), it makes sense that there isn't any adapter or anything -- its just not very practical.
Thanks for all the help everyone!
_________________
Stills: SLR: Asahi Pentax Spotmatic SP, DSLR: Canon EOS Rebel XTi, Canon EOS 7D
Cine: 16mm: Krasnogorsk-3 (M42 mount) 8mm: Revere Model 88 Super 8: Bell and Howell 1235 XL Filmosonic
MF Lenses: M42: Meteor 5-1 KMZ 17-69mm 1:1,9 (Cine Only), Asahi Super Takumar 50mm 1:1.4, Focal MC 28mm 1:2.8, Tele-Lentar 135mm 1:2.8, Helios-44 KMZ 58mm 1:2, Helios-44-2 KMZ 58mm 1:2 M39: Industar-26M 50mm 1:2.8 F: Nikon Nikkor 50mm 1:1.8 EF: Lensbaby Composer f2 w/Double Glass Optic, Rokinon 35mm 1:1.4 AS UMC, Rokinon 85mm T1.5 AS IF UMC
AF Lenses: EF-S: Canon EF-S 18-55mm 1:3.5-5.6 II, EF: Tamron AF 70-300mm 1:4-5.6 TELE-MACRO (1:2), Canon EF 50mm 1:1.8 II
Fixed-Focus Lenses: D: Elitar 6.5mm 1:1.9, Wollensak-Revere 13mm 1:2.5 Velostigmat |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
|
|
|
You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot vote in polls in this forum
|
Search
Memberlist
Register
Profile
Log in to check your private messages
Log in
