View previous topic :: View next topic |
Author |
Message |
iangreenhalgh1
Joined: 18 Mar 2011 Posts: 15679
Expire: 2014-01-07
|
Posted: Tue Apr 12, 2011 6:55 am Post subject: Praktica Pentacon 1.8 50mm modified to fit EOS |
|
|
iangreenhalgh1 wrote:
Hi folks
I own a lovely Praktica Pentacon 1.8 50mm in PB mount but sadly it wouldn't hit infinity on my EOS 10d with an adapet. Also, the aperture mechanism seemed to sometimes stick wide open.
So I took it apart, fixed the aperture and machined the adapter down so it would fit in place where the PB mount had been. Sadly my repair on the aperture was a failure and it's now stuck wide open forever with epoxy.
Takes a nice pic though, I like the sharpness and contrast for wide open, these were taken late afternoon with the sun low in the sky. Seems sharper than my Helios 44-2 wide open.
_________________ I don't care who designed it, who made it or what country it comes from - I just enjoy using it! |
|
Back to top |
|
|
iangreenhalgh1
Joined: 18 Mar 2011 Posts: 15679
Expire: 2014-01-07
|
Posted: Tue Apr 12, 2011 6:58 am Post subject: |
|
|
iangreenhalgh1 wrote:
Sadly, infinity as marked on the barrel is still not in focus, I think the lens maybe now be sitting slightly too close to the sensor and is focusing past infinity.
This is why I think it may be focusing past infinity, it's not quick in focus but is closer, I had focused a fair bit closer than infinity so perhaps I can work out where infinity now is for this lens and mark it on the barrel?
_________________ I don't care who designed it, who made it or what country it comes from - I just enjoy using it! |
|
Back to top |
|
|
iangreenhalgh1
Joined: 18 Mar 2011 Posts: 15679
Expire: 2014-01-07
|
Posted: Tue Apr 12, 2011 6:55 pm Post subject: |
|
|
iangreenhalgh1 wrote:
No comments at all? _________________ I don't care who designed it, who made it or what country it comes from - I just enjoy using it! |
|
Back to top |
|
|
Lloydy
Joined: 02 Sep 2009 Posts: 7788 Location: Ironbridge. UK.
Expire: 2022-01-01
|
Posted: Tue Apr 12, 2011 9:32 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Lloydy wrote:
I tried to get a PB mount lens to fit my Pentax, getting the register distance right was a nightmare, and one I haven't gone back to yet.
My problem is, I turned the body down in the lathe to what I thought was right - it wasn't - and I've lost the bit of paper with my calculations and measurements on it, so I have no idea what I've done!
Perhaps it's easier to just buy the right lens ? _________________ LENSES & CAMERAS FOR SALE.....
I have loads of stuff that I have to get rid of, if you see me commenting about something I have got and you want one, ask me.
My Flickr https://www.flickr.com/photos/mudplugga/
My ipernity -
http://www.ipernity.com/home/294337 |
|
Back to top |
|
|
iangreenhalgh1
Joined: 18 Mar 2011 Posts: 15679
Expire: 2014-01-07
|
Posted: Tue Apr 12, 2011 9:40 pm Post subject: |
|
|
iangreenhalgh1 wrote:
Lloydy wrote: |
I tried to get a PB mount lens to fit my Pentax, getting the register distance right was a nightmare, and one I haven't gone back to yet.
My problem is, I turned the body down in the lathe to what I thought was right - it wasn't - and I've lost the bit of paper with my calculations and measurements on it, so I have no idea what I've done!
Perhaps it's easier to just buy the right lens ? |
Aye, I've bought a M42 version of this lens because I think it has very nice IQ when working right. I only paid 4 quid for the PB version and the same now for an M42 version so it was worth trying a conversion as I spent 9 quid on the PB-EOS adapter with AF confirm chip!
The focus is a bit off in most of the test shots but you can see it is quite sharp where it is in focus, the contrast is good for wide open too.
I think where I went wrong with this modification is in trimming down the thickness of the adapter I ground down in diamter to fit where the PB mount was. The EOS register is 44mm and I think the PB one is 45.2. I could sort this problem out byt removing the adapter and putting in some shims but the aperture would still be stuck wide open. The aperture itself is fine, it's a problem with the rod that connects the aperture mechanism to the aperture ring and only a very minor problem, it was working when I put it back together but after turnign it a couple of times it stuck again. _________________ I don't care who designed it, who made it or what country it comes from - I just enjoy using it! |
|
Back to top |
|
|
ManualFocus-G
Joined: 29 Dec 2008 Posts: 6622 Location: United Kingdom
Expire: 2014-11-24
|
Posted: Tue Apr 12, 2011 9:59 pm Post subject: |
|
|
ManualFocus-G wrote:
It looks soft wide open to me I'm afraid. But most shots are mis-focused so it's a bit tricky to tell...grab a cheap tripod and take a few shots while slowly focusing and keep the sharpest shot as a test. My 50/1.8 PB mount is terrible wide open BTW _________________ Graham - Moderator
Shooter of choice: Fujifilm X-T20 with M42, PB and C/Y lenses
See my Flickr photos at http://www.flickr.com/photos/manualfocus-g |
|
Back to top |
|
|
Lloydy
Joined: 02 Sep 2009 Posts: 7788 Location: Ironbridge. UK.
Expire: 2022-01-01
|
Posted: Tue Apr 12, 2011 10:50 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Lloydy wrote:
It is a lovely lens to use, I use mine a lot.
And even if you do FUBAR your lens mount, you can always use a reversing ring, it wouldn't be wasted. _________________ LENSES & CAMERAS FOR SALE.....
I have loads of stuff that I have to get rid of, if you see me commenting about something I have got and you want one, ask me.
My Flickr https://www.flickr.com/photos/mudplugga/
My ipernity -
http://www.ipernity.com/home/294337 |
|
Back to top |
|
|
Minolfan
Joined: 30 Dec 2008 Posts: 3438 Location: Netherlands
|
Posted: Wed Apr 13, 2011 12:29 am Post subject: |
|
|
Minolfan wrote:
The same lens you can buy a working one for peanuts in M42 - may be on a Praktica body. So why bother? |
|
Back to top |
|
|
iangreenhalgh1
Joined: 18 Mar 2011 Posts: 15679
Expire: 2014-01-07
|
Posted: Wed Apr 13, 2011 12:35 am Post subject: |
|
|
iangreenhalgh1 wrote:
ManualFocus-G wrote: |
It looks soft wide open to me I'm afraid. But most shots are mis-focused so it's a bit tricky to tell...grab a cheap tripod and take a few shots while slowly focusing and keep the sharpest shot as a test. My 50/1.8 PB mount is terrible wide open BTW |
When my M42 copy gets here i'll do a 50mm shootout test like that, I have these to test against each other:
Pentacon 1.8/50 modified/knackered
Pentacon 1.8/50 M42
Helios 44-2 2/58
Helios 44-4 2/58
Industar-50 2.5/50
Meyer Domiplan 2.8/50
I also have a Pentax-M 2/50 and a Petri CC 1.8/55 but no adapters for them to fit my cam.
I might not bother testing the Domiplan, well all now how good it is...
I suppose it boils down to the Pentacon vs the Helios, we knwo the Helios has good bokeh and is quite sharp, I like the Pentacon to use, like Lloydy and I suspect it has better coatings than the Helios. The Industar is slower and I like it cos it's a pancake and easy to carry around. it's pretty sharp though, I think a little sharper than the Helos but we shall see...
I'm hoping to modify the Petri to fit my EOS because I'm told it's a wonderful lens... _________________ I don't care who designed it, who made it or what country it comes from - I just enjoy using it! |
|
Back to top |
|
|
IAZA
Joined: 16 Apr 2010 Posts: 2587 Location: Indonesia
|
Posted: Wed Apr 13, 2011 2:27 am Post subject: |
|
|
IAZA wrote:
I had pentacon 50/1.8 PB mount. the plan was to converted to EOS. But I had no time to do it. I sold it for charity. That time I had other 50/1,8 ; CZ pancolar, pentacon M42, Nikon AI. The PB version is slight better to me than M42. I guess MC mean something.
Here's my shot in 1000D Canon handheld without adapter. No editing.
_________________ nex5, Olympus EPM1, yashica half 14, Canon eos 650 want to see samples of mine? please click My lenses
and My gallery
~Suat~ |
|
Back to top |
|
|
|
|
You cannot post new topics in this forum You cannot reply to topics in this forum You cannot edit your posts in this forum You cannot delete your posts in this forum You cannot vote in polls in this forum
|