View previous topic :: View next topic |
Author |
Message |
Sven
Joined: 02 Aug 2008 Posts: 818 Location: Linköping Sweden
Expire: 2011-12-29
|
Posted: Sat Mar 19, 2011 5:21 pm Post subject: IR |
|
|
Sven wrote:
I have been considering an IR thread for a while. I bought an IR filter (720 nm) last year and have taken some shots now and then. This thread may contain traces of AF, I’m not sure of a couple of shots.
There is a great difference between cameras. The D200 is pretty useless for IR but my Pentax * Ist Dl is quite sensitive without any modifications. I have also modified a D100 by taking away the IR blocking filter. This makes it very sensitive. I can use it handheld in most situations.
Snow might not be the typical IR motive. It doesn't look that different from visible light. I think it gets a bit more grain and contrast though. This should be a Nikkor 1.8/50 on the D100
This is a more typical IR image with light foilage, dark water and high contrast between clouds and sky. Taken with the Pentax (might be AF)
This one is with the D200. The only advantage with the long exposure is that it can be used to flatten out the water surface. The lens is a 3.5/28
I prefeer B/W but it can be fun to experiment with the colours. On this one (from my window) I have switched the blue and red channel in PS. Makes the sky blue but otherwise unrealistic compared to visual. D100 and 2.8/24
Night sky in IR. This one is with a Nikkor Q 4/200
Pretty severe light conditions taken with the 3.5/28. Obviously some gosting and flare.
Another snow capture. The darks sky reveals it for being IR. 3.5/28
My son is interested in astro-photography. He told me that certain objects can be easier to capture in IR. This is the M42 nebula in Orion captured with a 2.8/180. Obviously nothing like what the big guys in astro photo can acieve, but taken from a fixed tripod with multiple 3 s exposures.
Another blue sky attempt
This is how the un-processed pictures usually look. Can sometimes be useable, but most often not.
An arcitecture shot. Not very dramatic. Also a bit more contrast than visible light I think.
_________________ DSLR: Nikon D200, Pentax *istDL, Nikon D100 IR converted
SLR: Pentax Spotmatic, Pentax ME,
Nikkor:N 2.8/24 H 3.5/28, 2/35, 2/50, 1.4/50 1.8/85, 3.5/50-135, E 2.8/100, P C 2.5/105, 2.8/135, 2.8/180 ED, 4/200,
M42: Pentacon 4/200, S Takumar 1.8/55, Meyer Orestor 2.8/135, CZJ Flektogon 2.4/35, CZJ Pancolar 1.8/50, CZJ Sonnar 3.5/135
AF Lenses: Nikkor 1.8/50, Pentax 18-55
Flickr http://www.flickr.com/photos/29261959@N08/
Website http://www.hundbilder.nu/ |
|
Back to top |
|
|
Attila
Joined: 24 Feb 2007 Posts: 57865 Location: Hungary
Expire: 2025-11-18
|
Posted: Sat Mar 19, 2011 5:48 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Attila wrote:
WOW So many excellent images here!!! Hard to pickup wich one is my favorite I love them all. _________________ -------------------------------
Items on sale on Ebay
Sony NEX-7 Carl Zeiss Planar 85mm f1.4, Minolta MD 35mm f1.8, Konica 135mm f2.5, Minolta MD 50mm f1.2, Minolta MD 250mm f5.6, Carl Zeiss Sonnar 180mm f2.8
|
|
Back to top |
|
|
Sven
Joined: 02 Aug 2008 Posts: 818 Location: Linköping Sweden
Expire: 2011-12-29
|
Posted: Sat Mar 19, 2011 6:19 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Sven wrote:
Thanks Attila!
IR tend to make most pictures more dramatic, so it's a bit of cheating i guess. Motives that might have been quite plain in visible light can somtimes look more exotic in near IR.
I think it's fun to experiment with anyhow. _________________ DSLR: Nikon D200, Pentax *istDL, Nikon D100 IR converted
SLR: Pentax Spotmatic, Pentax ME,
Nikkor:N 2.8/24 H 3.5/28, 2/35, 2/50, 1.4/50 1.8/85, 3.5/50-135, E 2.8/100, P C 2.5/105, 2.8/135, 2.8/180 ED, 4/200,
M42: Pentacon 4/200, S Takumar 1.8/55, Meyer Orestor 2.8/135, CZJ Flektogon 2.4/35, CZJ Pancolar 1.8/50, CZJ Sonnar 3.5/135
AF Lenses: Nikkor 1.8/50, Pentax 18-55
Flickr http://www.flickr.com/photos/29261959@N08/
Website http://www.hundbilder.nu/ |
|
Back to top |
|
|
Attila
Joined: 24 Feb 2007 Posts: 57865 Location: Hungary
Expire: 2025-11-18
|
Posted: Sat Mar 19, 2011 6:25 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Attila wrote:
Sven wrote: |
Thanks Attila!
IR tend to make most pictures more dramatic, so it's a bit of cheating i guess. Motives that might have been quite plain in visible light can somtimes look more exotic in near IR.
I think it's fun to experiment with anyhow. |
I agree , IR is a great tool and best of in IR it works when weather is crap and hard to shoot 'normal images' _________________ -------------------------------
Items on sale on Ebay
Sony NEX-7 Carl Zeiss Planar 85mm f1.4, Minolta MD 35mm f1.8, Konica 135mm f2.5, Minolta MD 50mm f1.2, Minolta MD 250mm f5.6, Carl Zeiss Sonnar 180mm f2.8
|
|
Back to top |
|
|
danikatia
Joined: 13 Nov 2009 Posts: 653 Location: Cernobbio Italy
Expire: 2013-10-26
|
Posted: Sat Mar 19, 2011 6:39 pm Post subject: |
|
|
danikatia wrote:
Attila wrote: |
WOW So many excellent images here!!! Hard to pickup wich one is my favorite I love them all. |
+1 _________________ Daniele |
|
Back to top |
|
|
Sven
Joined: 02 Aug 2008 Posts: 818 Location: Linköping Sweden
Expire: 2011-12-29
|
Posted: Sat Mar 19, 2011 6:54 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Sven wrote:
Attila wrote: |
Sven wrote: |
Thanks Attila!
IR tend to make most pictures more dramatic, so it's a bit of cheating i guess. Motives that might have been quite plain in visible light can somtimes look more exotic in near IR.
I think it's fun to experiment with anyhow. |
I agree , IR is a great tool and best of in IR it works when weather is crap and hard to shoot 'normal images' |
Thats true, and it also give me a chance to re-visit places and capture them a bit differently _________________ DSLR: Nikon D200, Pentax *istDL, Nikon D100 IR converted
SLR: Pentax Spotmatic, Pentax ME,
Nikkor:N 2.8/24 H 3.5/28, 2/35, 2/50, 1.4/50 1.8/85, 3.5/50-135, E 2.8/100, P C 2.5/105, 2.8/135, 2.8/180 ED, 4/200,
M42: Pentacon 4/200, S Takumar 1.8/55, Meyer Orestor 2.8/135, CZJ Flektogon 2.4/35, CZJ Pancolar 1.8/50, CZJ Sonnar 3.5/135
AF Lenses: Nikkor 1.8/50, Pentax 18-55
Flickr http://www.flickr.com/photos/29261959@N08/
Website http://www.hundbilder.nu/ |
|
Back to top |
|
|
Sven
Joined: 02 Aug 2008 Posts: 818 Location: Linköping Sweden
Expire: 2011-12-29
|
Posted: Sat Mar 19, 2011 6:55 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Sven wrote:
danikatia wrote: |
Attila wrote: |
WOW So many excellent images here!!! Hard to pickup wich one is my favorite I love them all. |
+1 |
Thanks _________________ DSLR: Nikon D200, Pentax *istDL, Nikon D100 IR converted
SLR: Pentax Spotmatic, Pentax ME,
Nikkor:N 2.8/24 H 3.5/28, 2/35, 2/50, 1.4/50 1.8/85, 3.5/50-135, E 2.8/100, P C 2.5/105, 2.8/135, 2.8/180 ED, 4/200,
M42: Pentacon 4/200, S Takumar 1.8/55, Meyer Orestor 2.8/135, CZJ Flektogon 2.4/35, CZJ Pancolar 1.8/50, CZJ Sonnar 3.5/135
AF Lenses: Nikkor 1.8/50, Pentax 18-55
Flickr http://www.flickr.com/photos/29261959@N08/
Website http://www.hundbilder.nu/ |
|
Back to top |
|
|
kds315*
Joined: 12 Mar 2008 Posts: 16661 Location: Weinheim, Germany
Expire: 2021-03-09
|
Posted: Sat Mar 19, 2011 7:21 pm Post subject: |
|
|
kds315* wrote:
VERY well done Sven!! Great processing also. _________________ Klaus - Admin
"S'il vient a point, me souviendra" [Thomas Bohier (1460-1523)]
http://www.macrolenses.de for macro and special lens info
http://www.pbase.com/kds315/uv_photos for UV Images and lens/filter info
https://www.flickr.com/photos/kds315/albums my albums using various lenses
http://photographyoftheinvisibleworld.blogspot.com/ my UV BLOG
http://www.travelmeetsfood.com/blog Food + Travel BLOG
https://galeriafotografia.com Architecture + Drone photography
Currently most FAV lens(es):
X80QF f3.2/80mm
Hypergon f11/26mm
ELCAN UV f5.6/52mm
Zeiss UV-Planar f4/60mm
Zeiss UV-Planar f2/62mm
Lomo Уфар-12 f2.5/41mm
Lomo Зуфар-2 f4.0/350mm
Lomo ZIKAR-1A f1.2/100mm
Nikon UV Nikkor f4.5/105mm
Zeiss UV-Sonnar f4.3/105mm
CERCO UV-VIS-NIR f1.8/45mm
CERCO UV-VIS-NIR f4.1/94mm
CERCO UV-VIS-NIR f2.8/100mm
Steinheil Quarzobjektiv f1.8/50mm
Pentax Quartz Takumar f3.5/85mm
Carl Zeiss Jena UV-Objektiv f4/60mm
NYE OPTICAL Lyman-Alpha II f1.1/90mm
NYE OPTICAL Lyman-Alpha I f2.8/200mm
COASTAL OPTICS f4/60mm UV-VIS-IR Apo
COASTAL OPTICS f4.5/105mm UV-Micro-Apo
Pentax Ultra-Achromatic Takumar f4.5/85mm
Pentax Ultra-Achromatic Takumar f5.6/300mm
Rodenstock UV-Rodagon f5.6/60mm + 105mm + 150mm
|
|
Back to top |
|
|
Sven
Joined: 02 Aug 2008 Posts: 818 Location: Linköping Sweden
Expire: 2011-12-29
|
Posted: Sat Mar 19, 2011 9:07 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Sven wrote:
kds315* wrote: |
VERY well done Sven!! Great processing also. |
Thanks a lot!
I find processing to be the hard bit really. Sometimes an IR image can look promising in Raw, but I can't seem to get it right in PP. _________________ DSLR: Nikon D200, Pentax *istDL, Nikon D100 IR converted
SLR: Pentax Spotmatic, Pentax ME,
Nikkor:N 2.8/24 H 3.5/28, 2/35, 2/50, 1.4/50 1.8/85, 3.5/50-135, E 2.8/100, P C 2.5/105, 2.8/135, 2.8/180 ED, 4/200,
M42: Pentacon 4/200, S Takumar 1.8/55, Meyer Orestor 2.8/135, CZJ Flektogon 2.4/35, CZJ Pancolar 1.8/50, CZJ Sonnar 3.5/135
AF Lenses: Nikkor 1.8/50, Pentax 18-55
Flickr http://www.flickr.com/photos/29261959@N08/
Website http://www.hundbilder.nu/ |
|
Back to top |
|
|
Cistron
Joined: 25 Feb 2011 Posts: 238 Location: London/Vienna
|
Posted: Fri Mar 25, 2011 1:22 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Cistron wrote:
These are very nice. I've experimented a little with my D40 some time ago (http://www.flickr.com/photos/photoreceptor/sets/72157624317931692/). Are you using a 720nm high-pass filter like the Hoya R72? |
|
Back to top |
|
|
Sven
Joined: 02 Aug 2008 Posts: 818 Location: Linköping Sweden
Expire: 2011-12-29
|
Posted: Fri Mar 25, 2011 6:56 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Sven wrote:
Thanks!
I like your captures.
I'm using a no name 720nm filter. Blocks visual except for a small transmittace of some very deep red in the visual band. Shouldn't it be low-pass in terms of frequency or is it high pass with regards to wave lenght?
Is the D40 enough IR sensitive so that you can hand hold it? _________________ DSLR: Nikon D200, Pentax *istDL, Nikon D100 IR converted
SLR: Pentax Spotmatic, Pentax ME,
Nikkor:N 2.8/24 H 3.5/28, 2/35, 2/50, 1.4/50 1.8/85, 3.5/50-135, E 2.8/100, P C 2.5/105, 2.8/135, 2.8/180 ED, 4/200,
M42: Pentacon 4/200, S Takumar 1.8/55, Meyer Orestor 2.8/135, CZJ Flektogon 2.4/35, CZJ Pancolar 1.8/50, CZJ Sonnar 3.5/135
AF Lenses: Nikkor 1.8/50, Pentax 18-55
Flickr http://www.flickr.com/photos/29261959@N08/
Website http://www.hundbilder.nu/ |
|
Back to top |
|
|
|
|
You cannot post new topics in this forum You cannot reply to topics in this forum You cannot edit your posts in this forum You cannot delete your posts in this forum You cannot vote in polls in this forum
|