| View previous topic :: View next topic |
| Author |
Message |
NikonD
Joined: 29 Jul 2008
Posts: 1922
Location: Slovenija
|
 Posted: Tue Aug 24, 2010 6:32 pm Post subject: My Nikkor collection so far |
 |
|
NikonD wrote:
here they are:
now I'm on a lookout for a nikkor 85/2 or 1.8  |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Attila
Joined: 24 Feb 2007
Posts: 57865
Location: Hungary
Expire: 2025-11-18
|
| Posted: Tue Aug 24, 2010 6:37 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Attila wrote:
1.8 black pre-ai  and 20mm any ...
_________________
-------------------------------
Items on sale on Ebay
Sony NEX-7 Carl Zeiss Planar 85mm f1.4, Minolta MD 35mm f1.8, Konica 135mm f2.5, Minolta MD 50mm f1.2, Minolta MD 250mm f5.6, Carl Zeiss Sonnar 180mm f2.8
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
justtorchit
Joined: 12 Oct 2009
Posts: 269
Location: St. Louis, MO
|
| Posted: Fri Dec 03, 2010 6:00 am Post subject: |
|
|
justtorchit wrote:
How is that 300/4.5? Didn't they also make an *ED version of that? I recently came into an older *ED Nikkor for a price I now see couldn't have been beaten and I am blown away by the capabilities!
_________________
David
www.davidkovaluk.com - personal website
www.instagram.com/davidkovaluk
http://makingnottaking.blogspot.com/ - photoblog |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
Andrew G.
Joined: 18 Jul 2010
Posts: 159
Location: Pennsylvania, USA
|
| Posted: Fri Dec 03, 2010 7:30 am Post subject: |
|
|
Andrew G. wrote:
| justtorchit wrote: |
| How is that 300/4.5? Didn't they also make an *ED version of that? I recently came into an older *ED Nikkor for a price I now see couldn't have been beaten and I am blown away by the capabilities! |
There are really three different 300mm f/4.5 variations. The version seen in this thread is the non-ED (and non-IF) version. There are two different *ED versions.. non-IF and IF (internal focus), respectively.
The non-ED version is generally considered to be very meh.
The first non-IF *ED version is considered to be the best of the three and also the rarest, as less than 2000 were produced before it was replaced with the IF version.
The latest *ED-IF version is quite good, but doesn't quite match up to its non-IF predecessor. |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
NikonD
Joined: 29 Jul 2008
Posts: 1922
Location: Slovenija
|
| Posted: Wed Jan 12, 2011 4:09 pm Post subject: |
|
|
NikonD wrote:
well... if anyone is interested, I'm selling 300/4.5 and 85/1.8  |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
Esox lucius
Joined: 26 Aug 2008
Posts: 2441
Location: Helsinki, Finland
Expire: 2011-11-18
|
| Posted: Wed Jan 12, 2011 4:57 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Esox lucius wrote:
Some classics here, and they seem in great condition (bar the ding on the 24/2.
_________________
Vilhelm
Nikon DSLR: D4, D800, Nikon D3, D70
Nikon SLR: Nikon F100, Nikon FM2n
Nikkor MF: 20/2.8 Ai-S, 24/2 Ai-S, 24/2.8 Ai-S, 28/2 Ai-S, 28/2.8 Ai-S, 35/1.4 AIS, 35/2 Ai-S, 45/2.8 GN, 50/1.2 Ai, 50/1.2 Ai-S, 50/1.4 Ai, 50/1.4 Ai-S, 50/1.8 AI-S "long", 50/1.8 AI-S "short", 55/1.2 Ai, 85/1.4 Ai-S, 85/1.8H, 105/2.5 Ai, 135/2.8Q, 135/3.5 Ai, 180/2.8 Ai-S ED
Nikkor AF/AF-S FX: 14-24/2.8G, 16/2.8D Fisheye, 16-35/4G VR, 17-35/2.8D, 24/1.4G, 24/3.5D PC-E, 24/2.8D, 24-70/2.8G, 28/1.4D, 28/1.8G, 35/1.4G, 35/2D, 50/1.4D, 50/1.4G, 50/1.8G, 60/2.8 Micro, 60/2.8G Micro, 70-200/2.8G VR, 70-200/2.8G VR II, 80-400/4.5-5.6D VR, 85/1.4G, 85/2.8D PC-E Micro, 105/2D DC, 105/2.8G VR Micro, 135/2D DC, 200/2G VR, 200-400/4G VR, 300/2.8G VR, 300/4D ED, 400/2.8G VR, 800/5.6E VR
Nikkor AF/AF-S DX: 10.5/2.8G Fisheye, 12-24/4G, 18-70/3.5-4.5G
Topcor: Auto-Topcor 58/1.4,
Voigtländer SL: 40/2 Ultron, 58/1.4 Nokton, 75/2.5 Color-Heliar, 90/3.5 APO-Lanthar, 125/2.5 APO-Lanthar, 180/4 APO-Lanthar
Zeiss ZF: Planar T* 85/1.4 ZF
M42 SLR: Voigtländer Bessaflex TM
M42: Flektogon 20/4, Flektogon 35/2.4, Tessar 50/2.8 T, Super-Takumar 55/1.8, Biotar 58/2 T, Pentacon 135/2.8, Sonnar 135/3.5
Medium format: several Zeiss Super Ikonta 532/16 Opton-Tessar 80mm f/2.8, Zeiss Ikonta 524/16 Opton-Tessar 75mm f/3.5
Leica: R7, M4, Super-Angulon-R 4/21, Elmarit-R 2.8/28, Summicron-R 2/35, Summicron-M 2/35, Summicron-M 2/50, Elmarit-R 2,8/180 |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
William
Joined: 26 Nov 2009
Posts: 489
Location: London
|
| Posted: Wed Jan 12, 2011 7:56 pm Post subject: |
|
|
William wrote:
Micro Nikkor?? That 55mm looks bigger than the 50mm 1.4 in height at least. |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
NikonD
Joined: 29 Jul 2008
Posts: 1922
Location: Slovenija
|
| Posted: Wed Mar 23, 2011 7:37 pm Post subject: |
|
|
NikonD wrote:
Updated collection... 300/4.5 was replaced with 80-200/4.5 and 50/1.4 joined the family... and PK13 ring for macro
 |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
|
|
|
You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot vote in polls in this forum
|
Search
Memberlist
Register
Profile
Log in to check your private messages
Log in
