Home

Please support mflenses.com if you need any graphic related work order it from us, click on above banner to order!

SearchSearch MemberlistMemberlist RegisterRegister ProfileProfile Log in to check your private messagesLog in to check your private messages Log inLog in

Panny 7-14mm f4 or Voigtlander 12mm F5.6 + NEX-3?
View previous topic :: View next topic  


PostPosted: Sun Feb 20, 2011 5:17 pm    Post subject: Panny 7-14mm f4 or Voigtlander 12mm F5.6 + NEX-3? Reply with quote

Which would you go for if you are going WA? Confused

I have a G1 already. I was thinking about saving up for a Panny 7-14mm f4 lens. But it is quiet expensive - £700.

I have seen some results in the post on using the Voigtlander 12mm F5.6 + Sony NEX. The price would be around the same I guess for a used body only + Voigtlander super WA lens.

http://www.ffordes.com/product/11021616443981
http://www.camerapricebuster.co.uk/cat22.html

http://www.photozone.de/sony-alpha-aps-c-lens-tests/544-voigtlander12f56nex

Or back to owning Canon 5D as I already have a 17mm f3.5 Tammy MF lens? I had already, may be should not have sold it Sad


Thanks


PostPosted: Sun Feb 20, 2011 6:01 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

What's the design of this Voigtlander 12 mm ?
if it's simmilar to biogon you will get a vigneting with a strong colour cast.

PS:
Actually it's not that bad - there is a strong vigneting but the colour cast almost doesn't exist.

check this here
http://www.photozone.de/sony-alpha-aps-c-lens-tests/544-voigtlander12f56nex


PostPosted: Sun Feb 20, 2011 9:08 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

without doubt 12mm + nex-3 friend of mine have it, he has lot of $$$ equipment and he said this is a stunning perfect combo. 18mm ... without distortion and it is deliver sharp result from corner to corner. He is very happy with it.


PostPosted: Sun Feb 20, 2011 11:16 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

The olympus 9-18mm is another option worth looking at. It's cheaper than the 7-14mm.


PostPosted: Sun Feb 20, 2011 11:37 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

I have the Panny and think it's good Wink



PostPosted: Mon Feb 21, 2011 7:24 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

Cool,
This Panny looks really good .. and it's automatically corrected in the body.

I know that maybe the correction is easy to do with cornerfix (after you make a profile of the lens) but i found myself not bothering to do so. It requires some more time to do conversion from raw to Adobe dng, then fix it and then play again..


PostPosted: Mon Feb 21, 2011 8:00 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

I went with the 9-18 and it is surprisingly tiny, takes filter too. Waiting for the inevitable NEX-7 and skipping the NEX3/5 Laughing


PostPosted: Mon Feb 21, 2011 9:50 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

The main advantage of the 7-14 on the G1 is the zoom and the wider angle.
The main advantage of the 12mm + NEX is the sensor and the size.
You decide...

(And if you want to go wider some day with a NEX, there is the Sigma 8-16 that can be adapted. Doesn't work really well, but hey Sigma does have the E-mount specifications and they perhaps take this lens to the NEX system.)


PostPosted: Mon Feb 21, 2011 6:39 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

What about Sigma 10-20mm in Nikon mount as I have a D2H already? Lost of AF on the Panny is not a problem to me.