View previous topic :: View next topic |
Author |
Message |
martyn_bannister
Joined: 23 May 2010 Posts: 1151
|
Posted: Sun Oct 17, 2010 8:49 pm Post subject: Cheap mirror 500mm |
|
|
martyn_bannister wrote:
Most of these, apart from #3, have been sharpened a lot. Hand held is always a problem with late afternoon light and fixed f8.
#1
#2
#3
#4
#5
|
|
Back to top |
|
|
aoleg
Joined: 22 Feb 2008 Posts: 1387 Location: Berlin, DE
|
Posted: Sun Oct 17, 2010 11:41 pm Post subject: |
|
|
aoleg wrote:
Which mirror is that? I had similar results from a Japanese no-name lens (Hanimex? Focal? don't remember), and much worse from the Korean mirror, Samyang 500/8 (also sold as Vivitar, Opteka etc.) Russian mirrors are typically better. _________________ List of lenses |
|
Back to top |
|
|
fatdeeman
Joined: 13 Jun 2009 Posts: 780 Location: UK
|
Posted: Sun Oct 17, 2010 11:51 pm Post subject: |
|
|
fatdeeman wrote:
Worst mirror lens I ever used was an Opteka 500mm F/8 but the 500mm f/6.3 and 800mm f/8 from the same maker are quite reasonable.
That Opteka was really terrible, one of the only lenses I ever used that didn't even look sharp in the viewfinder! _________________ - Dave
www.lensporn.net
www.flickr.com/photos/fatdeeman/
DSLR: Canon EOS 60D, Samsung GX-1S (Pentax *ist DS2)
Mirrorless: Panasonic DMC-G1, Sony NEX-5N
Compact: Canon PowerShot G3
Lenses:
Wide: Tokina RMC 28mm F/2.8, Tamron Adaptall 2 28mm F/2.5, Sun Optical 28mm F/2.5, Super paragon 28mm F/2.8, Sigma filtermatic 24mm F/2.8, Fujinon 35mm F/2.8, Sun Optical 35mm F/2.8
Standard: Industar 50-2, Helios 44-2, Helios 44M, Helios 44M-3, Pentax-M 50mm F/1.4, Pentax-M 50mm F/1.7, Pentax-M 50mm F/2, Ricoh 50mm F/1.7, Chinon 50mm F/1.7
Tele: Pentacon 135mm F/2.8, Pentacon 200mm F/3.5, Optomax 200mm f/3.5, Sun Optical 135mm F/3.5, Soligor 350mm F/5.6
Zoom: Tokina 28-70mm f/3.5-4.5 SZ-X270 SD, Sigma Zoom Pi 35-200mm F4-5.6, Sun Optical 28-80mm F/3.5-4.5, Sunagor 80-205mm F/3.8, Tokina RMC 80-200mm F/4, Vivitar 70-150mm F/3.8, Tamron 95-205mm F/6.3, Tamron Adaptall 28-200mm F/3.8-5.6 LD Aspherical, Tokina RMC 70-210mm F/3.5
Mirror: Falcon (Samyang) 800mm F/8, MTO-11CA 1000mm F/10, Tamron Adaptall 2 500mm F/8
|
|
Back to top |
|
|
Attila
Joined: 24 Feb 2007 Posts: 57865 Location: Hungary
Expire: 2025-11-18
|
Posted: Mon Oct 18, 2010 2:10 am Post subject: |
|
|
Attila wrote:
Pretty good results! Last ones especially cute _________________ -------------------------------
Items on sale on Ebay
Sony NEX-7 Carl Zeiss Planar 85mm f1.4, Minolta MD 35mm f1.8, Konica 135mm f2.5, Minolta MD 50mm f1.2, Minolta MD 250mm f5.6, Carl Zeiss Sonnar 180mm f2.8
|
|
Back to top |
|
|
aoleg
Joined: 22 Feb 2008 Posts: 1387 Location: Berlin, DE
|
Posted: Mon Oct 18, 2010 6:16 am Post subject: |
|
|
aoleg wrote:
fatdeeman wrote: |
Worst mirror lens I ever used was an Opteka 500mm F/8
...
That Opteka was really terrible, one of the only lenses I ever used that didn't even look sharp in the viewfinder! |
Yep, that's the one. Mine was branded Samyang, but honestly the firm should be ashamed to put its brand onto such piece of crap. Sold it as a "soft-focus, special effect" lens. On the other hand, Yashica ML 500/8, Olympus Zuiko 500/8, and Rubinar MC 500/8 are all extremely nice. _________________ List of lenses |
|
Back to top |
|
|
martyn_bannister
Joined: 23 May 2010 Posts: 1151
|
Posted: Mon Oct 18, 2010 7:37 am Post subject: |
|
|
martyn_bannister wrote:
Yes, you guessed it, it's an OPTEKA f8 |
|
Back to top |
|
|
martyn_bannister
Joined: 23 May 2010 Posts: 1151
|
Posted: Mon Oct 18, 2010 7:39 am Post subject: |
|
|
martyn_bannister wrote:
Attila wrote: |
Pretty good results! Last ones especially cute |
Thank you Attila. Getting my daughter to smile naturally when she knows a camera is pointing at her is extremely difficult, so really pleased to have got this one |
|
Back to top |
|
|
pat donnelly
Joined: 19 Jan 2010 Posts: 666 Location: Brisbane, Australia
|
Posted: Mon Oct 18, 2010 11:13 am Post subject: Mirrors rock! |
|
|
pat donnelly wrote:
As the cost difference between good and great mirrors is so low, please do yourself a favour!
There are superlative mirrors that I will eventually acquire, once I sell of those lenses I dislike or find inadequate. Zeiss Mirotar sounds good!
The sheer usability of any mirror makes it possible to take photos that are not possible without tripods etc.
Glad to see a portrait with a mirror too! Very rare, but why not? The ultimate stealth lens, although slowish at f8, it does present challenges and opportunities.
More power to all who use them! _________________ ---------------------------------
EP-1, E-410, E-300, D100, D1,
C-Mt: 25mm 1.9, 75mm 1.4, 75mm 1.3, 75mm 1.9, Ultra wides, one inch sensor, 20+ c-mount zooms
OM 350mm f2.8, Nikkor 180 f2.8, Exa 180 f2.8,
Tamrons: 90mm f2.5, 500mm f8 x3, 135 f2.5, 200 f3.5, 24mm 2.5, 28mm 2.5 x8,
FD 500mm mirror lens |
|
Back to top |
|
|
martyn_bannister
Joined: 23 May 2010 Posts: 1151
|
Posted: Mon Oct 18, 2010 4:50 pm Post subject: Re: Mirrors rock! |
|
|
martyn_bannister wrote:
pat donnelly wrote: |
As the cost difference between good and great mirrors is so low, please do yourself a favour!
There are superlative mirrors that I will eventually acquire, once I sell of those lenses I dislike or find inadequate. Zeiss Mirotar sounds good!
|
This one only cost £35, so which ones are the "greats"?
pat donnelly wrote: |
The sheer usability of any mirror makes it possible to take photos that are not possible without tripods etc.
Glad to see a portrait with a mirror too! Very rare, but why not? The ultimate stealth lens, although slowish at f8, it does present challenges and opportunities.
More power to all who use them! |
+1 on that. You have to go for the light mirrors though. I have a couple of the russian ones and they are battleship build. Walkabout? No! |
|
Back to top |
|
|
RioRico
Joined: 12 Mar 2010 Posts: 1120 Location: California or Guatemala or somewhere
|
Posted: Mon Oct 18, 2010 6:09 pm Post subject: Re: Mirrors rock! |
|
|
RioRico wrote:
martyn_bannister wrote: |
pat donnelly wrote: |
As the cost difference between good and great mirrors is so low, please do yourself a favour!
|
This one only cost £35, so which ones are the "greats"? |
A whole 35 quid? You overpaid! My Japanese-made Sakar 500/8 (450g) cost me all of US$13 including shipping. It's worth every pfennig, too! Actually it's pretty decent for what it is, and much easier to haul around than the AF Lil'Bigma 170-500 (1270g, US$1k) or the Rubinar Makpo 1000/10 mirror (1760g, US$225). The Sakar is good for street shooting and stealth portraits on sunny days, although if I was shooting a Mafiya funeral I'd prefer the Rubinar. I tend to use Catch-In-Focus to assist my delaminating eyeballs. It's a great surveillance tool. Every blackmailer should have one. _________________ Too many film+digi cams+lenses, oh my -- Pentax K20D, K-1000, M42s, more
The simple truth is this: There are no neutral photographs. --F-Stop Fitzgerald |
|
Back to top |
|
|
cooltouch
Joined: 15 Jan 2009 Posts: 9096 Location: Houston, Texas
|
Posted: Mon Oct 18, 2010 6:22 pm Post subject: Re: Mirrors rock! |
|
|
cooltouch wrote:
martyn_bannister wrote: |
This one only cost £35, so which ones are the "greats"?
|
Typically, any lens made by a camera manufacturer is good quality, e.g., Canon FD, Nikon, Minolta MD, Olympus, etc. Those made by the major aftermarket manufacturers are also usually quite good, e.g., Tamron, Tokina, Sigma. The prices they sell for on eBay are usually a pretty good indication as to their quality, I've found.
Back in about 1984, I bought a Sigma 600mm f/8 for my Canon FD system. For the first several weeks that I owned that lens, I was convinced that it was a piece of crap. Then I learned more about how to take pix with a long telephoto, and improved my technique. All of a sudden that lens's quality improved by a huge amount!
Although I have a couple of long refractors that provide very sharp images -- a 500mm f/5.6 and a 650mm f/6.8 -- I still miss that old Sigma. And one of these days I'll get me another.
+1 on the Russian mirrors. Haven't seen a bad one yet.
Taken with the Sigma handheld, circa 1986. Canon F-1, Kodachrome 64. White balance is off in the dupe, but not the original.
_________________ Michael
My Gear List: http://michaelmcbroom.com/photo/gear.html
My Gallery: http://michaelmcbroom.com/gallery3/index.php/
My Flickr Page: https://www.flickr.com/photos/11308754@N08/albums
My Music: https://soundcloud.com/michaelmcbroom/albums
My Blog: http://michaelmcbroom.com/blogistan/ |
|
Back to top |
|
|
fatdeeman
Joined: 13 Jun 2009 Posts: 780 Location: UK
|
Posted: Mon Oct 18, 2010 7:08 pm Post subject: |
|
|
fatdeeman wrote:
That's a great shot, I love the sense of scale!
The Tamron adaptall 500mm is always a safe bet and can still be had for between £50 and £100 on ebay. _________________ - Dave
www.lensporn.net
www.flickr.com/photos/fatdeeman/
DSLR: Canon EOS 60D, Samsung GX-1S (Pentax *ist DS2)
Mirrorless: Panasonic DMC-G1, Sony NEX-5N
Compact: Canon PowerShot G3
Lenses:
Wide: Tokina RMC 28mm F/2.8, Tamron Adaptall 2 28mm F/2.5, Sun Optical 28mm F/2.5, Super paragon 28mm F/2.8, Sigma filtermatic 24mm F/2.8, Fujinon 35mm F/2.8, Sun Optical 35mm F/2.8
Standard: Industar 50-2, Helios 44-2, Helios 44M, Helios 44M-3, Pentax-M 50mm F/1.4, Pentax-M 50mm F/1.7, Pentax-M 50mm F/2, Ricoh 50mm F/1.7, Chinon 50mm F/1.7
Tele: Pentacon 135mm F/2.8, Pentacon 200mm F/3.5, Optomax 200mm f/3.5, Sun Optical 135mm F/3.5, Soligor 350mm F/5.6
Zoom: Tokina 28-70mm f/3.5-4.5 SZ-X270 SD, Sigma Zoom Pi 35-200mm F4-5.6, Sun Optical 28-80mm F/3.5-4.5, Sunagor 80-205mm F/3.8, Tokina RMC 80-200mm F/4, Vivitar 70-150mm F/3.8, Tamron 95-205mm F/6.3, Tamron Adaptall 28-200mm F/3.8-5.6 LD Aspherical, Tokina RMC 70-210mm F/3.5
Mirror: Falcon (Samyang) 800mm F/8, MTO-11CA 1000mm F/10, Tamron Adaptall 2 500mm F/8
|
|
Back to top |
|
|
Screamin Scott
Joined: 13 Oct 2007 Posts: 1014 Location: Dallas, Georgia USA
|
Posted: Mon Oct 18, 2010 8:15 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Screamin Scott wrote:
I've got a cheap 500 F8 Kalimr (Korean made) & the results I get leave a lot to be desired. Maybe my technique needs improvement as well. I rarely shoot with teles & got this for a song on eBay. It is in good shape & came with the case & filters....BTW, does it have to have the clear filter in place for good results?...I thought I read that somewhere before & I haven't shot it with any of the filters. _________________ Cameras-Nikon D300, D7100,D610,FE2,FTN ,FT2,N90s, Olympus Pen EP-3 & Olympus OM-D E-M10
Nikkor AF Zooms=28-105/3.5D,28-70/3.5D,35-135/3.5, et al
Nikkor AF //50/1.8,//Nikkor MF//50/2ai,50/1.8ais 50/1.4ai,24/2.8ais,28/2.8ai,28/3.5ai,55microAis/2.8,105/2.5ai,200/4ai,300/4.5ai35-135/3.5Ais,et al
Kiron /Kino made lenses//70-210/4ai,28-105/3.2ai,30-80/3.5ai,Viv 28/2ai,35-85/2.8aiVivS1,105/2.8Ais Dine,24-48/3.8ai VivS1,50-150/3.8aiViv,28-85/2.8aiViv,100/2.8Nai Viv,70-210/3.5Nai Viv,28/2.5ai Viv Komine made Viv//24/2Ais,135/2.8aiCF,28-50/3.5ai,28-90/2.8ai Viv S1,80-200/4.5aiCosina made Viv 19/3.8 Ais...Also Sigma 24/2.8 Ais Tokina made24/2.8ai VivAF Sigma 21-35/3.5,& other lenses... A link to some of my Flickr albums...
https://www.flickr.com/photos/screaminscott/albums |
|
Back to top |
|
|
cooltouch
Joined: 15 Jan 2009 Posts: 9096 Location: Houston, Texas
|
Posted: Mon Oct 18, 2010 10:01 pm Post subject: |
|
|
cooltouch wrote:
Many long telephotos are designed such that for optmum results they need that clear filter in their light path, so I'd leave it in. Of course, you could do a quick test, with and without, to see how necesary it is.
As for your Kalimar, if you have mirror lock-up or Live View capabilities with your DSLR, mount the lens on a tripod, set the self timer, and take a bunch of test shots. I find that, with my camera's dinky viewfinder, using it to tell best focus is difficult, so I'd recommend you use live view if you have it. I noticed with my old FD gear that my Sigma's performance improved substantially after I bought an eyepiece magnifier for my camera and used it to determine best focus. But the more I used the lens the more comfortable I became with it, to the point that I was using it handheld at air shows and auto races, and getting good results. As long as I was able to keep the shutter speed up around 1/500 (sunny f/16 rule says that at ISO 100, 1/500 is good at f/8 ) I was okay most of the time.
BTW, my experience with Kalimar is restricted to their 28-200mm zoom. I owned one about 20 years ago that I bought and sold as a camera dealer -- but I've always remembered it because it was the only 28-long tele zoom I've seen with a fixed aperture -- f/3.9 in its case. So recently I bought another. It's a well made lens and takes reasonably sharp photos. But I've come to discover that they were lying about it being an f/3.9 constant aperture optic. I can see the viewfinder dim and watch the shutter speed needle drop by a stop when I zoom from 28mm to 200mm. Oh well, it's still a well-made lens and takes good pics. So, anyway, if it's any indication, your Kalimar mirror might be decent too. _________________ Michael
My Gear List: http://michaelmcbroom.com/photo/gear.html
My Gallery: http://michaelmcbroom.com/gallery3/index.php/
My Flickr Page: https://www.flickr.com/photos/11308754@N08/albums
My Music: https://soundcloud.com/michaelmcbroom/albums
My Blog: http://michaelmcbroom.com/blogistan/ |
|
Back to top |
|
|
Attila
Joined: 24 Feb 2007 Posts: 57865 Location: Hungary
Expire: 2025-11-18
|
Posted: Mon Oct 18, 2010 11:19 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Attila wrote:
martyn_bannister wrote: |
Attila wrote: |
Pretty good results! Last ones especially cute |
Thank you Attila. Getting my daughter to smile naturally when she knows a camera is pointing at her is extremely difficult, so really pleased to have got this one |
I know I have two daughters not easy at all. _________________ -------------------------------
Items on sale on Ebay
Sony NEX-7 Carl Zeiss Planar 85mm f1.4, Minolta MD 35mm f1.8, Konica 135mm f2.5, Minolta MD 50mm f1.2, Minolta MD 250mm f5.6, Carl Zeiss Sonnar 180mm f2.8
|
|
Back to top |
|
|
|