| View previous topic :: View next topic |
| Author |
Message |
beat2beat
Joined: 12 Jan 2010
Posts: 10
|
 Posted: Thu Jan 14, 2010 8:23 pm Post subject: Colour of this picture |
 |
|
beat2beat wrote:
http://www.flickr.com/photos/itssg/3525023759/in/set-72157617985166333/
As you can see, the colour of this picture is kind of yellow, and it looks like an old photo. Is this the effect of the glass? or is this photoshop-ed?
Cheers. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
cooltouch
Joined: 15 Jan 2009
Posts: 9098
Location: Houston, Texas
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
beat2beat
Joined: 12 Jan 2010
Posts: 10
|
| Posted: Thu Jan 14, 2010 11:39 pm Post subject: |
|
|
beat2beat wrote:
well im quite a beginner in photography, but based on the EXIF data, it seems like this kind of effect are made in photoshop. am i right?
if im wrong please point it out. Cheers. |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
Esox lucius
Joined: 26 Aug 2008
Posts: 2441
Location: Helsinki, Finland
Expire: 2011-11-18
|
| Posted: Thu Jan 14, 2010 11:54 pm Post subject: Re: Colour of this picture |
|
|
Esox lucius wrote:
| beat2beat wrote: |
| colour of this picture is kind of yellow, and it looks like an old photo. Is this the effect of the glass? or is this photoshop-ed? |
Based on EXIF lens is (Nikkor?) 80-200/2.8 and if it's the Nikkor then there are 5 different version of it: http://www.photosynthesis.co.nz/nikon/serialno.html#70-xxPro
Doesn't look like out of camera color at all. Look at the next photo: same setting, same lens, same model - normal color and saturation.
_________________
Vilhelm
Nikon DSLR: D4, D800, Nikon D3, D70
Nikon SLR: Nikon F100, Nikon FM2n
Nikkor MF: 20/2.8 Ai-S, 24/2 Ai-S, 24/2.8 Ai-S, 28/2 Ai-S, 28/2.8 Ai-S, 35/1.4 AIS, 35/2 Ai-S, 45/2.8 GN, 50/1.2 Ai, 50/1.2 Ai-S, 50/1.4 Ai, 50/1.4 Ai-S, 50/1.8 AI-S "long", 50/1.8 AI-S "short", 55/1.2 Ai, 85/1.4 Ai-S, 85/1.8H, 105/2.5 Ai, 135/2.8Q, 135/3.5 Ai, 180/2.8 Ai-S ED
Nikkor AF/AF-S FX: 14-24/2.8G, 16/2.8D Fisheye, 16-35/4G VR, 17-35/2.8D, 24/1.4G, 24/3.5D PC-E, 24/2.8D, 24-70/2.8G, 28/1.4D, 28/1.8G, 35/1.4G, 35/2D, 50/1.4D, 50/1.4G, 50/1.8G, 60/2.8 Micro, 60/2.8G Micro, 70-200/2.8G VR, 70-200/2.8G VR II, 80-400/4.5-5.6D VR, 85/1.4G, 85/2.8D PC-E Micro, 105/2D DC, 105/2.8G VR Micro, 135/2D DC, 200/2G VR, 200-400/4G VR, 300/2.8G VR, 300/4D ED, 400/2.8G VR, 800/5.6E VR
Nikkor AF/AF-S DX: 10.5/2.8G Fisheye, 12-24/4G, 18-70/3.5-4.5G
Topcor: Auto-Topcor 58/1.4,
Voigtländer SL: 40/2 Ultron, 58/1.4 Nokton, 75/2.5 Color-Heliar, 90/3.5 APO-Lanthar, 125/2.5 APO-Lanthar, 180/4 APO-Lanthar
Zeiss ZF: Planar T* 85/1.4 ZF
M42 SLR: Voigtländer Bessaflex TM
M42: Flektogon 20/4, Flektogon 35/2.4, Tessar 50/2.8 T, Super-Takumar 55/1.8, Biotar 58/2 T, Pentacon 135/2.8, Sonnar 135/3.5
Medium format: several Zeiss Super Ikonta 532/16 Opton-Tessar 80mm f/2.8, Zeiss Ikonta 524/16 Opton-Tessar 75mm f/3.5
Leica: R7, M4, Super-Angulon-R 4/21, Elmarit-R 2.8/28, Summicron-R 2/35, Summicron-M 2/35, Summicron-M 2/50, Elmarit-R 2,8/180 |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
Dr.AK
Joined: 06 Jan 2010
Posts: 122
Location: Bedburg, NRW, Germany
|
| Posted: Fri Jan 15, 2010 6:57 am Post subject: |
|
|
Dr.AK wrote:
That looks like it was digitally crossprocessed.
http://www.photoshopsupport.com/tutorials/or/cross-processing.html |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
itssg
Joined: 28 Sep 2010
Posts: 1
Location: Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia
|
| Posted: Tue Sep 28, 2010 9:06 am Post subject: |
|
|
itssg wrote:
 You should ask me in the flickr....
only 3 photographs was taken by Helios 44M. Which are
The photograph effect which you were asking was PP (Post Processed) in PhotoShop. And that photograph was taken by using Nikon AF-S 80-200mm f2.8
_________________
www.flickr.com\photos\itssg |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
|
|
|
You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot vote in polls in this forum
|
Search
Memberlist
Register
Profile
Log in to check your private messages
Log in
