View previous topic :: View next topic |
Author |
Message |
ManualFocus-G
Joined: 29 Dec 2008 Posts: 6622 Location: United Kingdom
Expire: 2014-11-24
|
Posted: Thu Aug 26, 2010 6:51 am Post subject: Canon EOS 60D |
|
|
ManualFocus-G wrote:
As expected, the new model was announced today. 18MP from the 7D, but auto focus system from the 50D (auto what?!), smaller plastic body, but retains the thumbwheel and higher ISO capability (above the 550D).
http://www.dpreview.com/news/1008/10082620canoneos60d.asp
http://www.dpreview.com/previews/canoneos60d/ _________________ Graham - Moderator
Shooter of choice: Fujifilm X-T20 with M42, PB and C/Y lenses
See my Flickr photos at http://www.flickr.com/photos/manualfocus-g |
|
Back to top |
|
|
rawhead
Joined: 09 Feb 2009 Posts: 1525 Location: Boston, MA
Expire: 2014-04-29
|
Posted: Thu Aug 26, 2010 6:59 am Post subject: |
|
|
rawhead wrote:
In other words, nothing at all whatsoever exciting about it _________________ Sony α7R, Pentax 67II, Kiev-60, Hasselblad 203FE, 903SWC, Graflex Norita 66, Mamiya M645 1000s, Burke & James 8x10, Graflex Pacemaker Speed Graphic (4x5 and 3x4), Century Graphic (2x3), R.B. Graflex Seried D, Rolleiflex SL66E, Rolleiflex 2.8C Xenotar, Mamiya C330f, a few M42, six P6, three OM, four Hasselblad, two Pentax 67, two Mamiya 645, one Noritar, and a sprinkle of EF. Oh, and an Aero Ektar and Leica Noctilux |
|
Back to top |
|
|
ManualFocus-G
Joined: 29 Dec 2008 Posts: 6622 Location: United Kingdom
Expire: 2014-11-24
|
Posted: Thu Aug 26, 2010 7:10 am Post subject: |
|
|
ManualFocus-G wrote:
rawhead wrote: |
In other words, nothing at all whatsoever exciting about it |
Well I'm not swapping my 40D for it, put it that way! But I'm sure the other consumers will love the 720p recording etc.
Bring on the 5D MkIII, I want the 5D MK II prices to come down _________________ Graham - Moderator
Shooter of choice: Fujifilm X-T20 with M42, PB and C/Y lenses
See my Flickr photos at http://www.flickr.com/photos/manualfocus-g |
|
Back to top |
|
|
ylyad
Joined: 01 Jun 2010 Posts: 476 Location: Zentralschweiz
Expire: 2013-12-05
|
Posted: Thu Aug 26, 2010 8:27 am Post subject: |
|
|
ylyad wrote:
I'm really happy having bought a 50D two months ago _________________
Camera: Fuji X-E2, Fuji X100T
MF: Canon nFD 50/1.4, Canon nFD 100/2.8, Tokina RMC 135/2.8
Tamron SP 24-48/3.5-3.8
http://www.flickr.com/derdide/
|
|
Back to top |
|
|
gcrimmins
Joined: 31 Mar 2008 Posts: 146 Location: Moscow, Idaho, USA
|
Posted: Thu Aug 26, 2010 10:46 pm Post subject: |
|
|
gcrimmins wrote:
It sounds like a nice camera for MF lenses. The swiveling LCD would be nice for shooting with the camera overhead or at ground level. And the infrared flash slave is nice. But I wouldn't buy it to use with AF lenses because of the lack of AF microadjust. In some ways this is step backwards from the 50D. I guess Canon has replaced the 50D with two cameras, the 7D and the 60D. One is a step above and the other is a step below the 50D. |
|
Back to top |
|
|
Attila
Joined: 24 Feb 2007 Posts: 57865 Location: Hungary
Expire: 2025-11-18
|
Posted: Thu Aug 26, 2010 11:17 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Attila wrote:
ManualFocus-G wrote: |
rawhead wrote: |
In other words, nothing at all whatsoever exciting about it |
Well I'm not swapping my 40D for it, put it that way! But I'm sure the other consumers will love the 720p recording etc.
Bring on the 5D MkIII, I want the 5D MK II prices to come down |
+1 _________________ -------------------------------
Items on sale on Ebay
Sony NEX-7 Carl Zeiss Planar 85mm f1.4, Minolta MD 35mm f1.8, Konica 135mm f2.5, Minolta MD 50mm f1.2, Minolta MD 250mm f5.6, Carl Zeiss Sonnar 180mm f2.8
|
|
Back to top |
|
|
hexi
Joined: 01 Jul 2009 Posts: 1631 Location: France
Expire: 2011-11-18
|
Posted: Fri Aug 27, 2010 8:59 am Post subject: |
|
|
hexi wrote:
ManualFocus-G wrote: |
Bring on the 5D MkIII, I want the 5D MK II prices to come down |
Same here Oh well the 5D is a good beast, i'll keep it even if i afford the M2. _________________ Happy owner and user of :
SLR's > Contax Aria - RX
DSLR > Canon 5D
Lenses : C/Y Planar 1.4/50 - Distagon 2.8/35 - Planar 1.4/85
http://www.flickr.com/photos/sonnar85 |
|
Back to top |
|
|
Nikos
Joined: 17 May 2010 Posts: 1077 Location: Greece
Expire: 2015-01-02
|
Posted: Fri Aug 27, 2010 12:58 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Nikos wrote:
I think the 8-15mm f/4 Zoom Fisheye was a more interesting announcement form Canon than the 60D.
Both full-frame and circular fisheye. You choice...
Saw no price tags however... _________________ Νίκος • www.diafragma.gr
Cameras: Canon EOS 5D Mark II, Sony α7R, Sony NEX-5N
MF lenses:
SLR:
Canon TS-E 17mm f/4, Zeiss 2.8/21 ZE, Zeiss 2/28 Contax, Zeiss 2/35 ZE, Zeiss 1.4/50 Contax, Zeiss 1.4/85 Contax, Zeiss Makro 2/100 ZE,
Zeiss 2/135 Contax, Zeiss 2.8/135 Contax, Zeiss Vario-Sonnar 35-70 Contax, Zeiss Vario-Sonnar 100-300 Contax, Zeiss F-Distagon Rollei, Canon FD 24mm f2, Minolta MD Rokkor 35mm f2.8
Rangefinder:
Zeiss 4.5/21 C Biogon ZM, Zeiss 2/35 Biogon ZM, Voigtländer 15mm f/4.5 Heliar L39, Leica Tele-Elmarit 2.8/90mm, Zeiss 2/45 Contax G, Zeiss 2.8/90 Contax G, Canon 50mm 1.8 LTM
AF lenses: Canon 15mm f/2.8 Fisheye, Canon 24-70 f/2.8 L, Canon 70-200 f/2.8 L IS II, Canon 70-200 f/4 L, Canon 300 f/4 L IS, Canon 100 f/2.8 macro
|
|
Back to top |
|
|
cheve
Joined: 31 Mar 2009 Posts: 182
Expire: 2011-12-06
|
Posted: Wed Sep 01, 2010 11:33 am Post subject: |
|
|
cheve wrote:
gcrimmins wrote: |
It sounds like a nice camera for MF lenses. The swiveling LCD would be nice for shooting with the camera overhead or at ground level. And the infrared flash slave is nice. But I wouldn't buy it to use with AF lenses because of the lack of AF microadjust. In some ways this is step backwards from the 50D. I guess Canon has replaced the 50D with two cameras, the 7D and the 60D. One is a step above and the other is a step below the 50D. |
I like the swiveling LCD...I hope it will become a standard feature for all the future xxxD, xxD or xD _________________ Adaptall-2: 17/3.5(51B),80-210/3.8-4(103A),60-300/3.8-5.4(23A) C/Y: CZ 35-70/3.4,RMC Tokian 80-200/4.5
EXk: Topcor Re Auto 35/2.8(broken),135/3.5, Steinheil Culminar 135/4.5 Leitz-R: 50/2,90/2,180/4,180/3.4,Angenieux 35-70/2.5-3.3
M42: pentacon 135/2.8,135/2.8(preset),Super-Takumar 55/1.8,Meyer-Optik 50/1.8 FD: Voigtlander 125/2.5 SL
K: smc 50/1.2, porst 55/1.2, Takumar(Bayonet) 135/2.5 Minolta: rokker 58/1.4,58/1.2 nikkon: Nikkor H Auto 300/4.5
OM: 21/2,21/3.5,28/3.5,50/1.2,300/4.5,500/8,35-70/3.6, viv 17/3.5,viv 28/1.9,viv 135/2.3
Rollei: Voigtlander Color-Ultron 55/1.4 AR T: Tele-Astranar 135/3.5
EF: 30/1.4(Sigma),50/1.8,28-70L,80-200L,24-105L,70-300DO,18-200OS(Sigma)
|
|
Back to top |
|
|
symphonic
Joined: 23 May 2010 Posts: 550 Location: SE Europe, Croatia
|
Posted: Wed Sep 01, 2010 11:57 am Post subject: |
|
|
symphonic wrote:
nkanellopoulos wrote: |
I think the 8-15mm f/4 Zoom Fisheye was a more interesting announcement form Canon than the 60D.
Both full-frame and circular fisheye. You choice...
Saw no price tags however... |
Canon press release
Quote: |
The Canon EF 8-15mm f/4L Fisheye USM lens is expected to be available in January of 2011 for an approximate retail price of $1,400. |
Seems nice as all the other new lenses announced, but as always with Canon L-s it's a steep price... _________________ Toni,
EOS 450D
CZJ Sonnar 135/3.5 MC | Pancolar 50/1.8 MC
Contax Planar 50/1.4 AEJ | Contax Sonnar 135/2.8 AEJ
Yashica ML 28/2.8 | Zuiko 28/3.5
Vivitar Series1 105/2.5 OM
AF: Tokina 12-24 |
|
Back to top |
|
|
rawhead
Joined: 09 Feb 2009 Posts: 1525 Location: Boston, MA
Expire: 2014-04-29
|
Posted: Thu Sep 02, 2010 3:29 am Post subject: |
|
|
rawhead wrote:
nkanellopoulos wrote: |
I think the 8-15mm f/4 Zoom Fisheye was a more interesting announcement form Canon than the 60D.
Both full-frame and circular fisheye. You choice...
Saw no price tags however... |
Frankly, that was the biggest WTF announcement for me.
There have been fisheye zooms before; specifically the Pentax/Tokina 10-16mm. Those made sense because they were designed to be used on APS-C, and acted as a diagonal fisheye on the wide end (10mm) and from there you could zoom in to 16mm on the tele end, all the while getting super wideangle (albeit highly distorted) image.
This 8-15mm was designed for FF––I mean, it is an "L" lens, isn't it?––and it's a circular fisheye on one end and diagonal fisheye on the other end.
Uh, so, what's in between? I'll tell you. Between 8mm and 15mm you are going to get a super distorted image circle that never covers the entire frame, always leaving four dark corners.
I.e., unless there is some ultra specific thing you need to do... say you're only going to use it as a pano stiching tool, and for some reason, you want to have a perfect balance between image resolution and the smallest number of shots required to complete a 360˚ spherical panorama @ precisely 12mm focal length––you are going to use this lens *only* at the two ends, 8mm and 15mm.
The question of course is "why make it a zoom in the first place"??? It's insane. You go the trouble of designing something as complex as an 8-15mm circular/diagonal fisheye zoom, which has little value of it being a "zoom", except maybe to save a lens slot in your bag. Of course, you had to make it an L lens; how else could you justify such craftsmanship? The price will be a gazillion dollars.
Why not purchase two fixed focal length fisheyes? You can buy the Sigma 8mm circular fisheye (f3.5) AND the Sigma 15mm diagonal fisheye (f2.8!), and still have plenty of change in your pocket for the price of this lens. (The 8-15mm has a MSRP of 150,000 yen, currently about 1,780USD, and an expected street price of 127,000 yen, about 1,500USD)
The EF, being an L lens might have the upper hand optically, but it's also a zoom, while the two Sigmas are fixed focal length.
I think that lens would only be potentially interesting if lens tests show that optically, it destroys both of the Sigma lenses. Even then I don't know if I could forgive them for making a zoom lens that is, for 90% of everybody (that will use fisheyes, which is a very small niche to begin with), is only useful at the two ends of the zoom range. What a waste _________________ Sony α7R, Pentax 67II, Kiev-60, Hasselblad 203FE, 903SWC, Graflex Norita 66, Mamiya M645 1000s, Burke & James 8x10, Graflex Pacemaker Speed Graphic (4x5 and 3x4), Century Graphic (2x3), R.B. Graflex Seried D, Rolleiflex SL66E, Rolleiflex 2.8C Xenotar, Mamiya C330f, a few M42, six P6, three OM, four Hasselblad, two Pentax 67, two Mamiya 645, one Noritar, and a sprinkle of EF. Oh, and an Aero Ektar and Leica Noctilux |
|
Back to top |
|
|
ylyad
Joined: 01 Jun 2010 Posts: 476 Location: Zentralschweiz
Expire: 2013-12-05
|
Posted: Thu Sep 02, 2010 8:01 am Post subject: |
|
|
ylyad wrote:
About the 8-15, Canon posted a video using this zoom (shot with a 5DMkII): http://cpn.canon-europe.com/content/news/zooming_fisheye.do
The best comment I've seen so far: rent it, try it a full day, give it back - you'll have plenty of fun and you'll never need it again _________________
Camera: Fuji X-E2, Fuji X100T
MF: Canon nFD 50/1.4, Canon nFD 100/2.8, Tokina RMC 135/2.8
Tamron SP 24-48/3.5-3.8
http://www.flickr.com/derdide/
|
|
Back to top |
|
|
SkedAddled
Joined: 19 Oct 2008 Posts: 1443 Location: Michigan, USA
Expire: 2021-08-12
|
Posted: Sat Sep 04, 2010 2:34 am Post subject: |
|
|
SkedAddled wrote:
I'm happy to see such a large articulating LCD display on this camera, as I really miss the same feature from my former PowerShot S3IS. Makes for a very welcome feature when shooting low to the ground.
However, using LiveView on a 40D is cumbersome and awkward, and perhaps just as ungainly with later Canon models. So until they make it an easier-to-use feature on their DSLR cameras, I probably won't be storming the stores to make a purchase any time soon. _________________ Craig
Of course I'm all right! Why? What have you heard!?
Canon Digital EOS 5D Mk IV, EOS 50D, Powershot S3 iS
Vivitar 28 f/2.8 OM - Zuiko 50 f/1.8 OM - Tamron SP 28-80 f/3.5 AD2[Favorite!] - Hanimar 135 f/3.5 M42 - Soligor 135 f/2.8 T4 - Tamron SP 60-300 f/3.8 AD2 - Soligor 75-260 f/4.5 M42 - Soligor 400 f/6.3 T4 - Soligor 500 f/8 T2 Cat + Matched 2X TC - Addiction Growing!
This is us -- We drive these -- We're named these |
|
Back to top |
|
|
symphonic
Joined: 23 May 2010 Posts: 550 Location: SE Europe, Croatia
|
Posted: Sat Sep 04, 2010 7:41 am Post subject: |
|
|
symphonic wrote:
SkedAddled wrote: |
However, using LiveView on a 40D is cumbersome and awkward, and perhaps just as ungainly with later Canon models. So until they make it an easier-to-use feature on their DSLR cameras, I probably won't be storming the stores to make a purchase any time soon. |
Well, the newer Canon DSLR-s have a high res screen (900k dots and more). My 450D doesn't have it so I can't comment it, but I've read a couple of times from others that it helps significantly with LiveView focusing... Maybe someone here can tell their experience? _________________ Toni,
EOS 450D
CZJ Sonnar 135/3.5 MC | Pancolar 50/1.8 MC
Contax Planar 50/1.4 AEJ | Contax Sonnar 135/2.8 AEJ
Yashica ML 28/2.8 | Zuiko 28/3.5
Vivitar Series1 105/2.5 OM
AF: Tokina 12-24 |
|
Back to top |
|
|
|