Home

Please support mflenses.com if you need any graphic related work order it from us, click on above banner to order!

SearchSearch MemberlistMemberlist RegisterRegister ProfileProfile Log in to check your private messagesLog in to check your private messages Log inLog in

Which 50mm ?
View previous topic :: View next topic  


PostPosted: Sat Aug 21, 2010 7:41 pm    Post subject: Which 50mm ? Reply with quote

I "need" a fast (i.e. 1.4) 50mm lens.
(Why carry one lens when you can cary 5 or more??)

I try to decide between a Zeiss 50mm Contax and alternatives like SMC Takumars.
The alternatives seem cheaper. Are they as good?

One thing I dislike about the Zeiss is its six-blade aperture.
How does it render OOF highlights?

Oh! I just realised this is the perfect flame-bait Twisted Evil


PostPosted: Sat Aug 21, 2010 7:52 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Bear in mind that the Takumar 50/1.4 doesn't work on Canon full frame without a shave Wink

I love the Planar for it's 3D qualities and sharpness at f2.8, but the bokeh isn't for everyone Smile


PostPosted: Sat Aug 21, 2010 7:52 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

I am pleased with my Minolta 50/1.4.

You might find this thread interesting.


http://forum.mflenses.com/four-50s-compared-t28276.html


PostPosted: Sat Aug 21, 2010 8:06 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

If you can afford it always pick-up Contax nothing else, just look Orio, Poilu etc

I have good experience with Olympus OM 1.4 too , cheap as Takumar. Nikon AIS 1.4 another one I think better than Oly or Tak.


PostPosted: Sat Aug 21, 2010 8:19 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Sure you can find in my flickr stream some examples of how does the Planar renders OOF highlights.
As for me I would not hesitate. Zeiss Planar, what else ?!


PostPosted: Sat Aug 21, 2010 8:26 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Leica Summilux 1.4/50mm near #3.000.000 and you will forget the rest... Very Happy

A Planar 1.4/50mm is also a good choice..

If you look for a real fast one.. take a converted Canon FD 1.2/55mm SSC..
@1.4 its a great oponent to the Summilux..
...
but if you look for a cheap one... take the Olympus above #serial 1.100.000
or a SMC - M Pentax..


Cheers
Henry


PostPosted: Sat Aug 21, 2010 9:13 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

OK. I got the Planar.
This is my 4th Zeiss since May...
Seems in perfect condition.



PostPosted: Sat Aug 21, 2010 9:15 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

hinnerker wrote:
Leica Summilux 1.4/50mm near #3.000.000 and you will forget the rest... Very Happy


I do not own a house to sell Very Happy


PostPosted: Sat Aug 21, 2010 9:16 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Congrats!


PostPosted: Sat Aug 21, 2010 9:30 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Bah - too late. I was going to suggest an EBC Fujinon, if you could have lived with 55m instead of 50mm and f1.8 instead of f1.4

I'll still post the piccies - i love this lens





PostPosted: Sat Aug 21, 2010 9:41 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Yay! Another Planarer!

Pete - that Fujinon looks very good as well Shocked


PostPosted: Sat Aug 21, 2010 9:48 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

I agree MFG - and was VERY cheap..£40 ( GBP )

beautiful lens, but then so is that Planar