| View previous topic :: View next topic |
| Author |
Message |
francotirador
Joined: 17 Sep 2009
Posts: 894
|
 Posted: Mon Aug 09, 2010 2:28 am Post subject: Tokina RMC 5.6/100-300 or AT X f4? |
 |
|
francotirador wrote:
Someone who knows these lenses and tell me differences.
Thank you very much.
_________________
Canon 5D II-Sony nex 6
Canon L 80-200 f 2.8 - Canon L 135 f2 - Canon FD 135/2.5 convert to EOS - Yashica 50 1.4 ML - Canon FD 50 1.2 - Distagon 35mm 2.8 T AEJ - Minolta MC 24mm f 2.8 - Canon LTM 85 1.9- Canon LTM 85mm 1.9 convert to EOS - Rodenstock Heligon 50 1.9 - Color Skopar 50 2.8 & MAte Box & filters 4X4
Contax RTS II y Minolta SRT 303 - 28-135 3.6 Tokina - Minolta MD 45 f2.0 - Minolta Zoom 80 200 4.5 (Leica)
www.isgleasphoto.com
The life is more easy with this forum .... |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
dnas
Joined: 14 Nov 2008
Posts: 488
Location: Japan
|
| Posted: Mon Aug 09, 2010 3:19 am Post subject: |
|
|
dnas wrote:
I'm not familiar with the RMC 5.6, but I have the AT-X 100-300mm F4.
It is big and heavy, but as with most of the AT-X series, it is a very good performer.
You may be interested to read this:
http://www.rokkorfiles.com/100-300mm.htm |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
dnas
Joined: 14 Nov 2008
Posts: 488
Location: Japan
|
| Posted: Mon Aug 09, 2010 10:58 am Post subject: |
|
|
dnas wrote:
| dnas wrote: |
I'm not familiar with the RMC 5.6, but I have the AT-X 100-300mm F4.
It is big and heavy, but as with most of the AT-X series, it is a very good performer.
You may be interested to read this:
http://www.rokkorfiles.com/100-300mm.htm |
Here's my AT-X 100-300mm F4
It's big !!!!!!!!! |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
cooltouch
Joined: 15 Jan 2009
Posts: 9096
Location: Houston, Texas
|
| Posted: Mon Aug 09, 2010 2:21 pm Post subject: |
|
|
cooltouch wrote:
The AT-X 100-300 f/4 is a stop faster, big and heavy as dnas mentions and shows, It also has at least one low-dispersion glass element (hence the SD designation) that helps in correcting chromatic aberration. A good lens. I owned one briefly years ago and wish I never would have sold it.
_________________
Michael
My Gear List: http://michaelmcbroom.com/photo/gear.html
My Gallery: http://michaelmcbroom.com/gallery3/index.php/
My Flickr Page: https://www.flickr.com/photos/11308754@N08/albums
My Music: https://soundcloud.com/michaelmcbroom/albums
My Blog: http://michaelmcbroom.com/blogistan/ |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
francotirador
Joined: 17 Sep 2009
Posts: 894
|
| Posted: Mon Aug 09, 2010 3:42 pm Post subject: |
|
|
francotirador wrote:
Thank you very much.
I will see one, FD mount and I think it is not SD. The CA may be more problematic. For the images I saw taken with this lens is very good. Almost like a Prime.
_________________
Canon 5D II-Sony nex 6
Canon L 80-200 f 2.8 - Canon L 135 f2 - Canon FD 135/2.5 convert to EOS - Yashica 50 1.4 ML - Canon FD 50 1.2 - Distagon 35mm 2.8 T AEJ - Minolta MC 24mm f 2.8 - Canon LTM 85 1.9- Canon LTM 85mm 1.9 convert to EOS - Rodenstock Heligon 50 1.9 - Color Skopar 50 2.8 & MAte Box & filters 4X4
Contax RTS II y Minolta SRT 303 - 28-135 3.6 Tokina - Minolta MD 45 f2.0 - Minolta Zoom 80 200 4.5 (Leica)
www.isgleasphoto.com
The life is more easy with this forum .... |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
cooltouch
Joined: 15 Jan 2009
Posts: 9096
Location: Houston, Texas
|
| Posted: Mon Aug 09, 2010 5:47 pm Post subject: |
|
|
cooltouch wrote:
| francotirador wrote: |
Thank you very much.
I will see one, FD mount and I think it is not SD. The CA may be more problematic. For the images I saw taken with this lens is very good. Almost like a Prime. |
If it's the AT-X 100-300 f/4, it's SD. They didn't make non-SD AT-X 100-300s.
_________________
Michael
My Gear List: http://michaelmcbroom.com/photo/gear.html
My Gallery: http://michaelmcbroom.com/gallery3/index.php/
My Flickr Page: https://www.flickr.com/photos/11308754@N08/albums
My Music: https://soundcloud.com/michaelmcbroom/albums
My Blog: http://michaelmcbroom.com/blogistan/ |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
cooltouch
Joined: 15 Jan 2009
Posts: 9096
Location: Houston, Texas
|
| Posted: Mon Aug 09, 2010 5:48 pm Post subject: |
|
|
cooltouch wrote:
| francotirador wrote: |
Thank you very much.
I will see one, FD mount and I think it is not SD. The CA may be more problematic. For the images I saw taken with this lens is very good. Almost like a Prime. |
If it's the AT-X 100-300 f/4, it's SD. They didn't make non-SD AT-X 100-300s -- at least not ones with the constant f/4 aperture.
_________________
Michael
My Gear List: http://michaelmcbroom.com/photo/gear.html
My Gallery: http://michaelmcbroom.com/gallery3/index.php/
My Flickr Page: https://www.flickr.com/photos/11308754@N08/albums
My Music: https://soundcloud.com/michaelmcbroom/albums
My Blog: http://michaelmcbroom.com/blogistan/ |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
dnas
Joined: 14 Nov 2008
Posts: 488
Location: Japan
|
| Posted: Mon Aug 09, 2010 10:19 pm Post subject: |
|
|
dnas wrote:
| cooltouch wrote: |
| francotirador wrote: |
Thank you very much.
I will see one, FD mount and I think it is not SD. The CA may be more problematic. For the images I saw taken with this lens is very good. Almost like a Prime. |
If it's the AT-X 100-300 f/4, it's SD. They didn't make non-SD AT-X 100-300s -- at least not ones with the constant f/4 aperture. |
That's correct!!! You can't see on the front of the lens on that picture, but it says "SD" on it. |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
PBFACTS
Joined: 24 Dec 2008
Posts: 568
|
| Posted: Sat Aug 28, 2010 3:06 pm Post subject: |
|
|
PBFACTS wrote:
| francotirador wrote: |
Thank you very much.
I will see one, FD mount and I think it is not SD. The CA may be more problematic. For the images I saw taken with this lens is very good. Almost like a Prime. |
I have the 5.6 version
VERY handy lens : lightweight / small size / 1:2.3 macro at 300mm !
CA is not a problem
_________________
OM USER .. I KEEP/USE:
Om2 sp + T32 (grip/filter/zoom) + T8
+ Zuiko 16mm 3.5 / 55mm 1.2 / 65-200 4/ x1.4
+ Sigma 8mm 4.0 / 14mm 3.5 / 18-35 3.5-4.5
+ Tamron 35/105 2.8
+Tokina 150/500 5.6
+ Kiron 105/2.8 macro 1:1
+ Vivitar S1 90/180 falst field macro
+ 2x Doubler HR7
>>I SELL: OM10 + OM4ti
+ i sell: OM Md1 + Md 2 + Grip PowerPack + charger
+ i sell: OM Zuiko 24mm 2.8 / 28mm 3.5 / 50mm 1.8 / 50mm 1.4 / 50mm 3.5 macro / 35-70 3.6 / 35-105 3.5-4.5 / 75-150 4 / 500mm / 2xA
+ i sell: OM Kiron 28/105 3.2-4.5 / 1.5 converter
+ i sell: OM Makinon reflex 5.6/300 + Spector reflex (makinon) 500mm
+ i sell: OM Macro panagor extender 1:1
+ i sell: OM Sigma 16mm 2.8 fisheye (last version) / 21-35 3.5-4.2 ot/ 28-70 2.8 /1000mm mirror
+ i sell: Tamron 28-70 3.5-4.5 / 28-80 sp 3.5-4.2 / 28-135 sp 4-4.5 / /28-200 3.5 / 35-135 3..5-4.5 / 90mm sp macro 1:1 2.8
+ i sell: OM Soligor 2x doubler / x3 converte
+ i sell: Soligor FisheEye x0.15
+ i sell: OM Tokina 28/135 4-4.6 / 70/210 3.5 (= vivitar S1 v2)
+ i sell: OM Vivitar 28-70 3.5-4.8 / 28-90 s1 2.8-3.5 / 35-70 2.8-3.8 / 55/2.8 Macro 1:1 (komine) / 70-150 3.8 ot (kiron) / 75-150 ot 3.8 (tokina + 2x matched)
+ i sell : OM cosina 100-500 5.6/8 |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
francotirador
Joined: 17 Sep 2009
Posts: 894
|
| Posted: Sat Aug 28, 2010 3:37 pm Post subject: |
|
|
francotirador wrote:
Thanks for your answer.
Greetings
_________________
Canon 5D II-Sony nex 6
Canon L 80-200 f 2.8 - Canon L 135 f2 - Canon FD 135/2.5 convert to EOS - Yashica 50 1.4 ML - Canon FD 50 1.2 - Distagon 35mm 2.8 T AEJ - Minolta MC 24mm f 2.8 - Canon LTM 85 1.9- Canon LTM 85mm 1.9 convert to EOS - Rodenstock Heligon 50 1.9 - Color Skopar 50 2.8 & MAte Box & filters 4X4
Contax RTS II y Minolta SRT 303 - 28-135 3.6 Tokina - Minolta MD 45 f2.0 - Minolta Zoom 80 200 4.5 (Leica)
www.isgleasphoto.com
The life is more easy with this forum .... |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
|
|
|
You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot vote in polls in this forum
|
Search
Memberlist
Register
Profile
Log in to check your private messages
Log in
