View previous topic :: View next topic |
Author |
Message |
aleksanderpolo
Joined: 24 Jan 2010 Posts: 684
|
Posted: Fri Aug 13, 2010 4:54 pm Post subject: Testing of three macro (not by me) |
|
|
aleksanderpolo wrote:
Stumbled upon this:
http://slrlensreview.com/web/benchmarks-resources-131/134-macro-challenge/521-macro-challenge-part-1.html
Does it look right from your experience? And should we expect a massive price drop of the Apo Lanthar ? |
|
Back to top |
|
|
calvin83
Joined: 12 Apr 2009 Posts: 7555 Location: Hong Kong
|
Posted: Fri Aug 13, 2010 5:05 pm Post subject: |
|
|
calvin83 wrote:
The non APO lens beats the APO lens in the CA test??!! _________________ https://lensfever.com/
https://www.instagram.com/_lens_fever/
The best lens is the one you have with you. |
|
Back to top |
|
|
poilu
Joined: 26 Aug 2007 Posts: 10472 Location: Greece
Expire: 2019-08-29
|
Posted: Fri Aug 13, 2010 5:17 pm Post subject: |
|
|
poilu wrote:
Quote: |
And should we expect a massive price drop of the Apo Lanthar |
I guess so _________________ T* |
|
Back to top |
|
|
kds315*
Joined: 12 Mar 2008 Posts: 16631 Location: Weinheim, Germany
Expire: 2021-03-09
|
Posted: Fri Aug 13, 2010 6:01 pm Post subject: |
|
|
kds315* wrote:
I don't know how they were testing the CA of lenses (certainly not the longitudinal CA!!),
since I sold my ZF 2/100m because it had horrible OOF CA which for me made it unuseable
for serious macro work.
The Leitz Apo and CV Apo are indeed close to each other IMHO, yet the CV125mm has more
neutral colors. Maybe I'm biased since I have teh latter one _________________ Klaus - Admin
"S'il vient a point, me souviendra" [Thomas Bohier (1460-1523)]
http://www.macrolenses.de for macro and special lens info
http://www.pbase.com/kds315/uv_photos for UV Images and lens/filter info
https://www.flickr.com/photos/kds315/albums my albums using various lenses
http://photographyoftheinvisibleworld.blogspot.com/ my UV BLOG
http://www.travelmeetsfood.com/blog Food + Travel BLOG
https://galeriafotografia.com Architecture + Drone photography
Currently most FAV lens(es):
X80QF f3.2/80mm
Hypergon f11/26mm
ELCAN UV f5.6/52mm
Zeiss UV-Planar f4/60mm
Zeiss UV-Planar f2/62mm
Lomo Уфар-12 f2.5/41mm
Lomo Зуфар-2 f4.0/350mm
Lomo ZIKAR-1A f1.2/100mm
Nikon UV Nikkor f4.5/105mm
Zeiss UV-Sonnar f4.3/105mm
CERCO UV-VIS-NIR f1.8/45mm
CERCO UV-VIS-NIR f4.1/94mm
CERCO UV-VIS-NIR f2.8/100mm
Steinheil Quarzobjektiv f1.8/50mm
Pentax Quartz Takumar f3.5/85mm
Carl Zeiss Jena UV-Objektiv f4/60mm
NYE OPTICAL Lyman-Alpha II f1.1/90mm
NYE OPTICAL Lyman-Alpha I f2.8/200mm
COASTAL OPTICS f4/60mm UV-VIS-IR Apo
COASTAL OPTICS f4.5/105mm UV-Micro-Apo
Pentax Ultra-Achromatic Takumar f4.5/85mm
Pentax Ultra-Achromatic Takumar f5.6/300mm
Rodenstock UV-Rodagon f5.6/60mm + 105mm + 150mm
|
|
Back to top |
|
|
aleksanderpolo
Joined: 24 Jan 2010 Posts: 684
|
Posted: Fri Aug 13, 2010 6:09 pm Post subject: |
|
|
aleksanderpolo wrote:
kds315* wrote: |
I don't know how they were testing the CA of lenses (certainly not the longitudinal CA!!),
since I sold my ZF 2/100m because it had horrible OOF CA which for me made it unuseable
for serious macro work.
The Leitz Apo and CV Apo are indeed close to each other IMHO, yet the CV125mm has more
neutral colors. Maybe I'm biased since I have teh latter one |
Um... perhaps they are testing on a flat chart that doesn't show LoCA then? |
|
Back to top |
|
|
kds315*
Joined: 12 Mar 2008 Posts: 16631 Location: Weinheim, Germany
Expire: 2021-03-09
|
Posted: Fri Aug 13, 2010 6:19 pm Post subject: |
|
|
kds315* wrote:
Most likely. Only a few testers had the guts to show that Zeiss problem!
Would you like that (1:1 crop, shot fully open)?
_________________ Klaus - Admin
"S'il vient a point, me souviendra" [Thomas Bohier (1460-1523)]
http://www.macrolenses.de for macro and special lens info
http://www.pbase.com/kds315/uv_photos for UV Images and lens/filter info
https://www.flickr.com/photos/kds315/albums my albums using various lenses
http://photographyoftheinvisibleworld.blogspot.com/ my UV BLOG
http://www.travelmeetsfood.com/blog Food + Travel BLOG
https://galeriafotografia.com Architecture + Drone photography
Currently most FAV lens(es):
X80QF f3.2/80mm
Hypergon f11/26mm
ELCAN UV f5.6/52mm
Zeiss UV-Planar f4/60mm
Zeiss UV-Planar f2/62mm
Lomo Уфар-12 f2.5/41mm
Lomo Зуфар-2 f4.0/350mm
Lomo ZIKAR-1A f1.2/100mm
Nikon UV Nikkor f4.5/105mm
Zeiss UV-Sonnar f4.3/105mm
CERCO UV-VIS-NIR f1.8/45mm
CERCO UV-VIS-NIR f4.1/94mm
CERCO UV-VIS-NIR f2.8/100mm
Steinheil Quarzobjektiv f1.8/50mm
Pentax Quartz Takumar f3.5/85mm
Carl Zeiss Jena UV-Objektiv f4/60mm
NYE OPTICAL Lyman-Alpha II f1.1/90mm
NYE OPTICAL Lyman-Alpha I f2.8/200mm
COASTAL OPTICS f4/60mm UV-VIS-IR Apo
COASTAL OPTICS f4.5/105mm UV-Micro-Apo
Pentax Ultra-Achromatic Takumar f4.5/85mm
Pentax Ultra-Achromatic Takumar f5.6/300mm
Rodenstock UV-Rodagon f5.6/60mm + 105mm + 150mm
|
|
Back to top |
|
|
aleksanderpolo
Joined: 24 Jan 2010 Posts: 684
|
Posted: Fri Aug 13, 2010 6:39 pm Post subject: |
|
|
aleksanderpolo wrote:
That is really bad, does it improve stopping down and do you know if the 50/2 makro have the same problem? |
|
Back to top |
|
|
kds315*
Joined: 12 Mar 2008 Posts: 16631 Location: Weinheim, Germany
Expire: 2021-03-09
|
Posted: Fri Aug 13, 2010 6:42 pm Post subject: |
|
|
kds315* wrote:
I have heard that the ZF 2/50mm does not have that issue, but I have no proof for or against. _________________ Klaus - Admin
"S'il vient a point, me souviendra" [Thomas Bohier (1460-1523)]
http://www.macrolenses.de for macro and special lens info
http://www.pbase.com/kds315/uv_photos for UV Images and lens/filter info
https://www.flickr.com/photos/kds315/albums my albums using various lenses
http://photographyoftheinvisibleworld.blogspot.com/ my UV BLOG
http://www.travelmeetsfood.com/blog Food + Travel BLOG
https://galeriafotografia.com Architecture + Drone photography
Currently most FAV lens(es):
X80QF f3.2/80mm
Hypergon f11/26mm
ELCAN UV f5.6/52mm
Zeiss UV-Planar f4/60mm
Zeiss UV-Planar f2/62mm
Lomo Уфар-12 f2.5/41mm
Lomo Зуфар-2 f4.0/350mm
Lomo ZIKAR-1A f1.2/100mm
Nikon UV Nikkor f4.5/105mm
Zeiss UV-Sonnar f4.3/105mm
CERCO UV-VIS-NIR f1.8/45mm
CERCO UV-VIS-NIR f4.1/94mm
CERCO UV-VIS-NIR f2.8/100mm
Steinheil Quarzobjektiv f1.8/50mm
Pentax Quartz Takumar f3.5/85mm
Carl Zeiss Jena UV-Objektiv f4/60mm
NYE OPTICAL Lyman-Alpha II f1.1/90mm
NYE OPTICAL Lyman-Alpha I f2.8/200mm
COASTAL OPTICS f4/60mm UV-VIS-IR Apo
COASTAL OPTICS f4.5/105mm UV-Micro-Apo
Pentax Ultra-Achromatic Takumar f4.5/85mm
Pentax Ultra-Achromatic Takumar f5.6/300mm
Rodenstock UV-Rodagon f5.6/60mm + 105mm + 150mm
|
|
Back to top |
|
|
AhamB
Joined: 22 Jun 2008 Posts: 733 Location: Germany
|
Posted: Sat Aug 14, 2010 7:24 am Post subject: |
|
|
AhamB wrote:
aleksanderpolo wrote: |
That is really bad, does it improve stopping down and do you know if the 50/2 makro have the same problem? |
Yes and no. But you can't really compare a 100/2 and 50/2 of course. |
|
Back to top |
|
|
|
|
You cannot post new topics in this forum You cannot reply to topics in this forum You cannot edit your posts in this forum You cannot delete your posts in this forum You cannot vote in polls in this forum
|