| View previous topic :: View next topic |
| Author |
Message |
Big Dawg
Joined: 28 Jan 2009
Posts: 2530
Location: Thach Alabama
|
 Posted: Fri Aug 06, 2010 7:12 am Post subject: Vivitar 200mm shoot out..F/5.6 |
 |
|
Big Dawg wrote:
These were shot at f/5.6.
T4 with tripod mount
200mm Bright Band.
T4 without tripod mount
series 1 f/3
Komine with rubber focus grip
Kiron with metal focus grip
Komine with metal focus grip
_________________
Big Dawg
Last edited by Big Dawg on Sat Aug 07, 2010 2:20 pm; edited 1 time in total |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
aoleg
Joined: 22 Feb 2008
Posts: 1387
Location: Berlin, DE
|
| Posted: Fri Aug 06, 2010 8:32 am Post subject: |
|
|
aoleg wrote:
I'd say Series 1 has an edge here, followed by Komine and then the rest of the pack. Interesting...
_________________
List of lenses |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
Minolfan
Joined: 30 Dec 2008
Posts: 3438
Location: Netherlands
|
| Posted: Fri Aug 06, 2010 8:45 am Post subject: |
|
|
Minolfan wrote:
Did you keep the shuttertime equal and are the differenties in exposure caused by differeties in effective aperture (or transparancy)? |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
Big Dawg
Joined: 28 Jan 2009
Posts: 2530
Location: Thach Alabama
|
| Posted: Fri Aug 06, 2010 2:24 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Big Dawg wrote:
| aoleg wrote: |
| I'd say Series 1 has an edge here, followed by Komine and then the rest of the pack. Interesting... |
Sort of the way I'm seeing it too. I have no prejudices here as I like all of these lens.
_________________
Big Dawg |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
Big Dawg
Joined: 28 Jan 2009
Posts: 2530
Location: Thach Alabama
|
| Posted: Fri Aug 06, 2010 2:28 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Big Dawg wrote:
| Minolfan wrote: |
| Did you keep the shuttertime equal and are the differenties in exposure caused by differeties in effective aperture (or transparancy)? |
Most are shot in aperture priority so the camera is doing the exposure changing not me. Saying that the difference in exposure was not a problem for what I wanted. I wanted to see the sharpness and contrast.
_________________
Big Dawg |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
cooltouch
Joined: 15 Jan 2009
Posts: 9096
Location: Houston, Texas
|
| Posted: Fri Aug 06, 2010 4:29 pm Post subject: |
|
|
cooltouch wrote:
Actually, I'm rather surprised at how close they all are. But these images aren't 100% crops are they? It isn't really possible for me to evaluate lens quality with any confidence without viewing 100% crops.
_________________
Michael
My Gear List: http://michaelmcbroom.com/photo/gear.html
My Gallery: http://michaelmcbroom.com/gallery3/index.php/
My Flickr Page: https://www.flickr.com/photos/11308754@N08/albums
My Music: https://soundcloud.com/michaelmcbroom/albums
My Blog: http://michaelmcbroom.com/blogistan/ |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
Big Dawg
Joined: 28 Jan 2009
Posts: 2530
Location: Thach Alabama
|
| Posted: Sat Aug 07, 2010 4:46 am Post subject: |
|
|
Big Dawg wrote:
| cooltouch wrote: |
| Actually, I'm rather surprised at how close they all are. But these images aren't 100% crops are they? It isn't really possible for me to evaluate lens quality with any confidence without viewing 100% crops. |
Crops coming up next. f/8 and f/11 at 35-40 feet distance.
_________________
Big Dawg |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
|
|
|
You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot vote in polls in this forum
|
Search
Memberlist
Register
Profile
Log in to check your private messages
Log in
