View previous topic :: View next topic |
Author |
Message |
trev
Joined: 30 Jun 2010 Posts: 580 Location: North Wales - UK
|
Posted: Sat Aug 07, 2010 11:28 am Post subject: Best Yashica M42 lenses |
|
|
trev wrote:
I have a yashinon auto DS-M 50mm f1.7 lens. Is this better than their ML lenses and what Yashinon *** are the best? _________________ Fuji X10, X-A1 and Samsung nx 20 |
|
Back to top |
|
|
aoleg
Joined: 22 Feb 2008 Posts: 1387 Location: Berlin, DE
|
Posted: Sun Aug 08, 2010 12:08 am Post subject: |
|
|
aoleg wrote:
ML series were the best produced by Yashica. I've seen reports that some DS-M designs were pretty close though. _________________ List of lenses |
|
Back to top |
|
|
Attila
Joined: 24 Feb 2007 Posts: 57865 Location: Hungary
Expire: 2025-11-18
|
Posted: Sun Aug 08, 2010 12:38 am Post subject: |
|
|
Attila wrote:
aoleg wrote: |
ML series were the best produced by Yashica. I've seen reports that some DS-M designs were pretty close though. |
+1
Yashica DS-M 135mm f2.8 wide open
http://www.mflenses.com/gallery/v/japenese/yashica/auto-yashinon-ds-m-135mm-f2-8/Yashica_135mm_f2_8_M42-100.jpg.html _________________ -------------------------------
Items on sale on Ebay
Sony NEX-7 Carl Zeiss Planar 85mm f1.4, Minolta MD 35mm f1.8, Konica 135mm f2.5, Minolta MD 50mm f1.2, Minolta MD 250mm f5.6, Carl Zeiss Sonnar 180mm f2.8
|
|
Back to top |
|
|
trev
Joined: 30 Jun 2010 Posts: 580 Location: North Wales - UK
|
Posted: Sun Aug 08, 2010 8:20 am Post subject: |
|
|
trev wrote:
What I've seen of my little Yash 50mm so far - its quite good _________________ Fuji X10, X-A1 and Samsung nx 20 |
|
Back to top |
|
|
dsmlogger
Joined: 14 Apr 2010 Posts: 178 Location: Athens, Greece
|
Posted: Sun Aug 08, 2010 12:50 pm Post subject: |
|
|
dsmlogger wrote:
I think Yashica only made good lenses.
The ML series was C/Y mount and DS & DX for M42.
I currently own 2 Yashica lenses, DX 200mm f4 and ML 50mm f1.9 and they are both excellent.
But from what I've read and seen, all yashica lenses were of high optical quality. |
|
Back to top |
|
|
LucisPictor
Joined: 26 Feb 2007 Posts: 17633 Location: Oberhessen, Germany / Maidstone ('95-'96)
Expire: 2013-12-03
|
Posted: Sun Aug 08, 2010 1:08 pm Post subject: |
|
|
LucisPictor wrote:
dsmlogger wrote: |
But from what I've read and seen, all yashica lenses were of high optical quality. |
I agree. I have sold almost all my Yashis, but not because I did not like them, rather because I did not want to open another collection field.
I still have one, very old Yashica 2/50 and even this one produces great results. _________________ Personal forum activity on pause every now and again (due to job obligations)!
Carsten, former Moderator
Things ON SALE
Carsten = "KAPCTEH" = "Karusutenu" | T-shirt?.........................My photos from Emilia: http://www.schouler.net/emilia/emilia2011.html
My gear: http://retrocameracs.wordpress.com/ausrustung/
Old list: http://forum.mflenses.com/viewtopic.php?t=65 (Not up-to-date, sorry!) | http://www.lucispictor.de | http://www.alensaweek.wordpress.com |
http://www.retrocamera.de |
|
Back to top |
|
|
Attila
Joined: 24 Feb 2007 Posts: 57865 Location: Hungary
Expire: 2025-11-18
|
Posted: Sun Aug 08, 2010 1:53 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Attila wrote:
dsmlogger wrote: |
I think Yashica only made good lenses.
The ML series was C/Y mount and DS & DX for M42.
I currently own 2 Yashica lenses, DX 200mm f4 and ML 50mm f1.9 and they are both excellent.
But from what I've read and seen, all yashica lenses were of high optical quality. |
+1 this is my personal experience too, I had a Yashica ML 135mm marked with C (means made by Cosina) this lens was an exception , lens was pretty average or bad. ) _________________ -------------------------------
Items on sale on Ebay
Sony NEX-7 Carl Zeiss Planar 85mm f1.4, Minolta MD 35mm f1.8, Konica 135mm f2.5, Minolta MD 50mm f1.2, Minolta MD 250mm f5.6, Carl Zeiss Sonnar 180mm f2.8
|
|
Back to top |
|
|
aoleg
Joined: 22 Feb 2008 Posts: 1387 Location: Berlin, DE
|
Posted: Mon Aug 09, 2010 12:14 am Post subject: |
|
|
aoleg wrote:
Attila wrote: |
+1 this is my personal experience too, I had a Yashica ML 135mm marked with C (means made by Cosina) this lens was an exception , lens was pretty average or bad. ) |
I have the first model, non-"c" Yashica ML 135/2.8 (55mm filter thread), and it's a pretty average 135mm as well. I am selling mine now by the way. The rest that I own it pretty good: 24/2.8 (superb! reportedly better than Distagon 25/2., 28/2.8 (a very, very nice lens, close to Distagon 28/2., all 50's from 1.4 to 2.0 (all of them great except for 50/1.7 which I find to be decent but nothing special, and the all-plastic 50/1.9 'c' which has mediocre build quality), 100/3.5 macro (superb lens), and Reflex ML 500/8 (a great mirror lens - better than Tokina and Tamron SP). _________________ List of lenses |
|
Back to top |
|
|
|
|
You cannot post new topics in this forum You cannot reply to topics in this forum You cannot edit your posts in this forum You cannot delete your posts in this forum You cannot vote in polls in this forum
|