View previous topic :: View next topic |
Author |
Message |
eccs19
Joined: 15 May 2010 Posts: 118
|
Posted: Sun Jul 11, 2010 1:46 am Post subject: Yet another shot from my Takumar 100mm F4 Macro |
|
|
eccs19 wrote:
Taken a couple of days ago.
_________________ Camera(s) - Pentax *istD & K7
Takumar Lenses - 28mm f3.5, 55mm f1.8, 100mm f4.0 1:2 macro, 105mm f2.8, 200mm f3.5, 85-210 Zoom f4.5
Tamron - 300mm f5.6, 500mm mirror f8
Pentax 50mm f2.0 |
|
Back to top |
|
|
Himself
Joined: 01 Mar 2007 Posts: 3240 Location: Montreal
Expire: 2013-05-30
|
Posted: Sun Jul 11, 2010 3:15 am Post subject: |
|
|
Himself wrote:
Oh yeah, one of a kind, 2 butterflies.
First time I thought it's something wrong with my eyes.
If I were you, I'd put the butterflies horizontally. |
|
Back to top |
|
|
poilu
Joined: 26 Aug 2007 Posts: 10472 Location: Greece
Expire: 2019-08-29
|
Posted: Sun Jul 11, 2010 7:14 am Post subject: |
|
|
poilu wrote:
congrats, beautiful capture! I'd also put them horizontally _________________ T* |
|
Back to top |
|
|
AhamB
Joined: 22 Jun 2008 Posts: 733 Location: Germany
|
Posted: Sun Jul 11, 2010 12:02 pm Post subject: |
|
|
AhamB wrote:
Himself wrote: |
Oh yeah, one of a kind, 2 butterflies.
First time I thought it's something wrong with my eyes.
If I were you, I'd put the butterflies horizontally. |
You don't recognize the tree they're sitting on?
Last edited by AhamB on Sun Jul 11, 2010 2:21 pm; edited 1 time in total |
|
Back to top |
|
|
Attila
Joined: 24 Feb 2007 Posts: 57865 Location: Hungary
Expire: 2025-11-18
|
Posted: Sun Jul 11, 2010 12:05 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Attila wrote:
Nice clear shoot! _________________ -------------------------------
Items on sale on Ebay
Sony NEX-7 Carl Zeiss Planar 85mm f1.4, Minolta MD 35mm f1.8, Konica 135mm f2.5, Minolta MD 50mm f1.2, Minolta MD 250mm f5.6, Carl Zeiss Sonnar 180mm f2.8
|
|
Back to top |
|
|
kds315*
Joined: 12 Mar 2008 Posts: 16628 Location: Weinheim, Germany
Expire: 2021-03-09
|
Posted: Sun Jul 11, 2010 12:30 pm Post subject: |
|
|
kds315* wrote:
A great shot indeed from a well known performing lens.
That tree should be an Acacia tree estimated from that bark. _________________ Klaus - Admin
"S'il vient a point, me souviendra" [Thomas Bohier (1460-1523)]
http://www.macrolenses.de for macro and special lens info
http://www.pbase.com/kds315/uv_photos for UV Images and lens/filter info
https://www.flickr.com/photos/kds315/albums my albums using various lenses
http://photographyoftheinvisibleworld.blogspot.com/ my UV BLOG
http://www.travelmeetsfood.com/blog Food + Travel BLOG
https://galeriafotografia.com Architecture + Drone photography
Currently most FAV lens(es):
X80QF f3.2/80mm
Hypergon f11/26mm
ELCAN UV f5.6/52mm
Zeiss UV-Planar f4/60mm
Zeiss UV-Planar f2/62mm
Lomo Уфар-12 f2.5/41mm
Lomo Зуфар-2 f4.0/350mm
Lomo ZIKAR-1A f1.2/100mm
Nikon UV Nikkor f4.5/105mm
Zeiss UV-Sonnar f4.3/105mm
CERCO UV-VIS-NIR f1.8/45mm
CERCO UV-VIS-NIR f4.1/94mm
CERCO UV-VIS-NIR f2.8/100mm
Steinheil Quarzobjektiv f1.8/50mm
Pentax Quartz Takumar f3.5/85mm
Carl Zeiss Jena UV-Objektiv f4/60mm
NYE OPTICAL Lyman-Alpha II f1.1/90mm
NYE OPTICAL Lyman-Alpha I f2.8/200mm
COASTAL OPTICS f4/60mm UV-VIS-IR Apo
COASTAL OPTICS f4.5/105mm UV-Micro-Apo
Pentax Ultra-Achromatic Takumar f4.5/85mm
Pentax Ultra-Achromatic Takumar f5.6/300mm
Rodenstock UV-Rodagon f5.6/60mm + 105mm + 150mm
|
|
Back to top |
|
|
eccs19
Joined: 15 May 2010 Posts: 118
|
Posted: Sun Jul 11, 2010 12:54 pm Post subject: |
|
|
eccs19 wrote:
Horizontal may look good, but as others have noted, they were on a tree, and that's they were posed. Thanks for the comments. _________________ Camera(s) - Pentax *istD & K7
Takumar Lenses - 28mm f3.5, 55mm f1.8, 100mm f4.0 1:2 macro, 105mm f2.8, 200mm f3.5, 85-210 Zoom f4.5
Tamron - 300mm f5.6, 500mm mirror f8
Pentax 50mm f2.0 |
|
Back to top |
|
|
Himself
Joined: 01 Mar 2007 Posts: 3240 Location: Montreal
Expire: 2013-05-30
|
Posted: Sun Jul 11, 2010 1:40 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Himself wrote:
Yes, I know, it's been discussed too many times, here and on other forums " technicalities, purism, I wouldn't touch the pic with a ten inch pole because that's the way it was", etc, etc, etc.
I made the suggestion for the sake of our eyes and with an artistic point of view in mind.
And I said " if I were you ".
But I'm not. |
|
Back to top |
|
|
AhamB
Joined: 22 Jun 2008 Posts: 733 Location: Germany
|
Posted: Sun Jul 11, 2010 2:24 pm Post subject: |
|
|
AhamB wrote:
@Klaus: Good eye.
@Himself: I'm not a purist per se, but I just see two butterflies on a tree and it doesn't look wrong to me in any way. |
|
Back to top |
|
|
eccs19
Joined: 15 May 2010 Posts: 118
|
Posted: Sun Jul 11, 2010 3:39 pm Post subject: |
|
|
eccs19 wrote:
Himself wrote: |
Yes, I know, it's been discussed too many times, here and on other forums " technicalities, purism, I wouldn't touch the pic with a ten inch pole because that's the way it was", etc, etc, etc.
I made the suggestion for the sake of our eyes and with an artistic point of view in mind.
And I said " if I were you ".
But I'm not. |
Don't worry, I wasn't arguing any point, as I've rotated pictures before, and as you hinted, and I've said a million times, "It's just a matter of opinion". Everyone sees things differently. Sometimes comments give me ideas for future things, so I always enjoy hearing others opinions. _________________ Camera(s) - Pentax *istD & K7
Takumar Lenses - 28mm f3.5, 55mm f1.8, 100mm f4.0 1:2 macro, 105mm f2.8, 200mm f3.5, 85-210 Zoom f4.5
Tamron - 300mm f5.6, 500mm mirror f8
Pentax 50mm f2.0 |
|
Back to top |
|
|
Himself
Joined: 01 Mar 2007 Posts: 3240 Location: Montreal
Expire: 2013-05-30
|
Posted: Sun Jul 11, 2010 4:41 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Himself wrote:
AhamB wrote: |
@Himself: I'm not a purist per se, but I just see two butterflies on a tree and it doesn't look wrong to me in any way. |
I was talking with the OP. |
|
Back to top |
|
|
|
|
You cannot post new topics in this forum You cannot reply to topics in this forum You cannot edit your posts in this forum You cannot delete your posts in this forum You cannot vote in polls in this forum
|