| View previous topic :: View next topic |
| Author |
Message |
Bob van Sikorski
Joined: 12 Jan 2009
Posts: 287
Location: Czech Republic
|
 Posted: Tue Jul 06, 2010 11:16 am Post subject: comparison: fotolab in 1999 vs 2010 scan |
 |
|
Bob van Sikorski wrote:
i have my brothers epson V500 scanner for probably unlimited time, so i have finally opportunity to compare quality of photo in 1999 (scan from 13x9cm photo from typical lab in those times) and today scan in 3200dpi.
1999:
2010:
(bigger size downsized to 50% from scan, 1MB jpeg).
PS: look at the levels, colors, crop, details. V500+epson scan is not good choice for scanning, lot of you knows very well, that V7x0 plus vuescan produces much more better scans. but even V500 can show HUGE difference.
btw, source is konica VX200, shooted in super-cheap compact camera from carena (plastic body, probably also plastic very smal lens)
PPS: its from our high-school graduation 
_________________
Rokkor (MD 45/2.0, MC PF 50/1.7), Porst Color Reflex MC Auto 55/1.2, Jupiter 135/3.5
Minolta X-700, Minolta Dynax 4, Flexaret IIa (later version), Flexaret VI
Voigtländer Avus 9x12 (1927-1935 version)
Epson V500 + VueScan/Linux + RawTherapee 4.x + GIMP/wavelett sharpen plugin
Meopta Magnifax III (up to 6x9) + Opemus III (up to 6x6), Rodenstock Rodagon 50/2.8, Meopta Anaret 105/4.5
Proud user of czech films! company homepage: foma.cz, buy here: fomafoto.com |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
LucisPictor
Joined: 26 Feb 2007
Posts: 17633
Location: Oberhessen, Germany / Maidstone ('95-'96)
Expire: 2013-12-03
|
| Posted: Tue Jul 06, 2010 11:29 am Post subject: |
|
|
LucisPictor wrote:
That really shows the big influence that the lab has on the results.
_________________
Personal forum activity on pause every now and again (due to job obligations)!
Carsten, former Moderator 
Things ON SALE
Carsten = "KAPCTEH" = "Karusutenu" | T-shirt?.........................My photos from Emilia: http://www.schouler.net/emilia/emilia2011.html
My gear: http://retrocameracs.wordpress.com/ausrustung/
Old list: http://forum.mflenses.com/viewtopic.php?t=65 (Not up-to-date, sorry!) | http://www.lucispictor.de | http://www.alensaweek.wordpress.com |
http://www.retrocamera.de |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
Excalibur
Joined: 19 Jul 2009
Posts: 5017
Location: UK
Expire: 2014-04-21
|
| Posted: Wed Jul 07, 2010 7:05 am Post subject: |
|
|
Excalibur wrote:
Well I'm confused with your post....the V500 scan looks superior to the 1999 scan and if you think the colours of the V500 scan are not very good, it is easy to put them back using a program like Photoshop or even Epson software.
_________________
Canon A1, AV1, T70 & T90, EOS 300 and EOS300v, Chinon CE and CP-7M. Contax 139, Fuji STX-2, Konica Autoreflex TC, FS-1, FT-1, Minolta X-700, X-300, XD-11, SRT101b, Nikon EM, FM, F4, F90X, Olympus OM2, Pentax S3, Spotmatic, Pentax ME super, Praktica TL 5B, & BC1, , Ricoh KR10super, Yashica T5D, Bronica Etrs, Mamiya RB67 pro AND drum roll:- a Sony Nex 3
.........past gear Tele Rolleiflex and Rollei SL66.
Many lenses from good to excellent. |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
Bob van Sikorski
Joined: 12 Jan 2009
Posts: 287
Location: Czech Republic
|
| Posted: Wed Jul 07, 2010 7:55 am Post subject: |
|
|
Bob van Sikorski wrote:
you dont understand. colours of scan are ok, colours of 1999 print arent. and ofcourse, i can correct it from scan software directly, thats no problem.
_________________
Rokkor (MD 45/2.0, MC PF 50/1.7), Porst Color Reflex MC Auto 55/1.2, Jupiter 135/3.5
Minolta X-700, Minolta Dynax 4, Flexaret IIa (later version), Flexaret VI
Voigtländer Avus 9x12 (1927-1935 version)
Epson V500 + VueScan/Linux + RawTherapee 4.x + GIMP/wavelett sharpen plugin
Meopta Magnifax III (up to 6x9) + Opemus III (up to 6x6), Rodenstock Rodagon 50/2.8, Meopta Anaret 105/4.5
Proud user of czech films! company homepage: foma.cz, buy here: fomafoto.com |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
Excalibur
Joined: 19 Jul 2009
Posts: 5017
Location: UK
Expire: 2014-04-21
|
| Posted: Wed Jul 07, 2010 5:33 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Excalibur wrote:
| Bob van Sikorski wrote: |
| you dont understand. colours of scan are ok, colours of 1999 print arent. and ofcourse, i can correct it from scan software directly, thats no problem. |
Oh well, but you did say:- "V500+epson scan is not good choice for scanning".........but IMO using the V500 gave a better result than a 1999 print from a LAB.
_________________
Canon A1, AV1, T70 & T90, EOS 300 and EOS300v, Chinon CE and CP-7M. Contax 139, Fuji STX-2, Konica Autoreflex TC, FS-1, FT-1, Minolta X-700, X-300, XD-11, SRT101b, Nikon EM, FM, F4, F90X, Olympus OM2, Pentax S3, Spotmatic, Pentax ME super, Praktica TL 5B, & BC1, , Ricoh KR10super, Yashica T5D, Bronica Etrs, Mamiya RB67 pro AND drum roll:- a Sony Nex 3
.........past gear Tele Rolleiflex and Rollei SL66.
Many lenses from good to excellent. |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
Bob van Sikorski
Joined: 12 Jan 2009
Posts: 287
Location: Czech Republic
|
| Posted: Wed Jul 07, 2010 5:39 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Bob van Sikorski wrote:
oh i see. sorry, my mistake, i mean "good" -> "best" 
_________________
Rokkor (MD 45/2.0, MC PF 50/1.7), Porst Color Reflex MC Auto 55/1.2, Jupiter 135/3.5
Minolta X-700, Minolta Dynax 4, Flexaret IIa (later version), Flexaret VI
Voigtländer Avus 9x12 (1927-1935 version)
Epson V500 + VueScan/Linux + RawTherapee 4.x + GIMP/wavelett sharpen plugin
Meopta Magnifax III (up to 6x9) + Opemus III (up to 6x6), Rodenstock Rodagon 50/2.8, Meopta Anaret 105/4.5
Proud user of czech films! company homepage: foma.cz, buy here: fomafoto.com |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
|
|
|
You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot vote in polls in this forum
|
Search
Memberlist
Register
Profile
Log in to check your private messages
Log in
