View previous topic :: View next topic |
Author |
Message |
Big Dawg
Joined: 28 Jan 2009 Posts: 2530 Location: Thach Alabama
|
Posted: Sat Jul 03, 2010 10:44 pm Post subject: A New species of Humming Bird. Auto-Takumar 55 f/1.8 |
|
|
Big Dawg wrote:
Hand held and then Cropped. Very unusual around here to see a Downy Woodpecker do this. He is back every day and many times a day. Weird to see it and a humming bird feeding on opposite sides at the same time.
_________________ Big Dawg |
|
Back to top |
|
|
Boomer Depp
Joined: 08 Oct 2009 Posts: 552 Location: Kingston,Washighton
Expire: 2011-12-04
|
Posted: Sat Jul 03, 2010 10:55 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Boomer Depp wrote:
Ha!...that's a riot....cool shot! _________________ Trust that little voice in your head that says "Wouldn't it be interesting if...." And then do it. |
|
Back to top |
|
|
symphonic
Joined: 23 May 2010 Posts: 550 Location: SE Europe, Croatia
|
Posted: Sun Jul 04, 2010 9:08 am Post subject: |
|
|
symphonic wrote:
Hehe, that's really cool. _________________ Toni,
EOS 450D
CZJ Sonnar 135/3.5 MC | Pancolar 50/1.8 MC
Contax Planar 50/1.4 AEJ | Contax Sonnar 135/2.8 AEJ
Yashica ML 28/2.8 | Zuiko 28/3.5
Vivitar Series1 105/2.5 OM
AF: Tokina 12-24 |
|
Back to top |
|
|
fish4570
Joined: 06 Jan 2010 Posts: 4514 Location: At the confluence of the Locust Fork of the Warrior River and Black Creek, Alabama
Expire: 2012-03-21
|
Posted: Sun Jul 04, 2010 1:14 pm Post subject: |
|
|
fish4570 wrote:
That is odd. Woodpeckers do love suet, which can be sweet ... _________________ Paul
I chase Light
http://blackcreekjournal.blogspot.com/ |
|
Back to top |
|
|
Attila
Joined: 24 Feb 2007 Posts: 57865 Location: Hungary
Expire: 2025-11-18
|
Posted: Sun Jul 04, 2010 1:32 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Attila wrote:
symphonic wrote: |
Hehe, that's really cool. |
+1 _________________ -------------------------------
Items on sale on Ebay
Sony NEX-7 Carl Zeiss Planar 85mm f1.4, Minolta MD 35mm f1.8, Konica 135mm f2.5, Minolta MD 50mm f1.2, Minolta MD 250mm f5.6, Carl Zeiss Sonnar 180mm f2.8
|
|
Back to top |
|
|
Big Dawg
Joined: 28 Jan 2009 Posts: 2530 Location: Thach Alabama
|
Posted: Sun Jul 04, 2010 6:18 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Big Dawg wrote:
Thanks everyone. Gave me a chance to exercise my Auto Takumar 50 F/1.8. _________________ Big Dawg |
|
Back to top |
|
|
revers
Joined: 13 May 2010 Posts: 574 Location: In the country just north of Toronto Canada
|
Posted: Sun Jul 04, 2010 11:33 pm Post subject: |
|
|
revers wrote:
But I do not see the hummer in the same shot.
Very unusual methinks.
I will send a link to this post to a published bird photographer I know & see what she thinks of it. _________________ Ron
Olympus OM-D E-M5, 14-42 & 45/1.8.
Panasonic G1, GF1, 14-45, 45-200 & various legacy lenses.
Canon S5, Sony 1.7 Tele-converter & Raynox DCR 150 Macro converter. |
|
Back to top |
|
|
Blue
Joined: 26 Jul 2008 Posts: 304
|
Posted: Mon Jul 05, 2010 3:36 am Post subject: |
|
|
Blue wrote:
That's the rare humming pecker! _________________ Pentax: K, H2, H3, S3, SV (late & early), SV black, Spot F, K2 chrome, K2 black, ME F, SuperProgram, 6x7, Auto 110, Asahiflex IIB late
Pentax "modern": MZ-3, *istD, K200d, K20d
Mamiya: C3 TLR, NC1000
Canon: EOS 10s, AE-1
Chinon: CP-7m
IKON: Contax D, Praktiflex FX & Victar 50mm f2.9
Contessa-Nettel Piccolette - 7.5 cm Tessar & Compur shutter
Rangefinders: Argus C4 and Ricoh Five-One-Nine |
|
Back to top |
|
|
Big Dawg
Joined: 28 Jan 2009 Posts: 2530 Location: Thach Alabama
|
Posted: Mon Jul 05, 2010 3:24 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Big Dawg wrote:
Blue wrote: |
That's the rare humming pecker! |
Thanks Scott. Good name blue. _________________ Big Dawg |
|
Back to top |
|
|
keltzar
Joined: 22 Apr 2010 Posts: 70
|
Posted: Tue Jul 06, 2010 3:48 am Post subject: |
|
|
keltzar wrote:
A few months ago I put several takumars side-by-side:
early Takumar 105/2.8 (1950s)
Late Takumar 105/2.8 (1960s)
Super Takumar 105/2.8
SMC takumar 105/2.8
.. all shooting into an incadescent bulb.
Interestingly enough, with the exception of the earliest takumar which flared ... the rest were remarkably close ... telling me that the SMC is not leagues ahead as some (and the prices) would suggest.
Seeing your mention of the auto-takumar just reminded me. The 105mm is a takumar design that remained largely unchanged even into the days of PK. |
|
Back to top |
|
|
revers
Joined: 13 May 2010 Posts: 574 Location: In the country just north of Toronto Canada
|
Posted: Tue Jul 06, 2010 1:32 pm Post subject: |
|
|
revers wrote:
For your information, here is the reply I got:
"Hi Ron,
Yes, very common behavior for Downys and sapsuckers as well. The ones here are at the oriole feeder just as soon as the oriole family leave. The orioles are more aggressive though and have first dibs!
I've also had chickadees stop by for a sip too. I'm pretty sure I posted photos of both on the old forum at one time or another. I'm sure most people find it surprising the first time they see it happening-lol. " _________________ Ron
Olympus OM-D E-M5, 14-42 & 45/1.8.
Panasonic G1, GF1, 14-45, 45-200 & various legacy lenses.
Canon S5, Sony 1.7 Tele-converter & Raynox DCR 150 Macro converter. |
|
Back to top |
|
|
revers
Joined: 13 May 2010 Posts: 574 Location: In the country just north of Toronto Canada
|
Posted: Tue Jul 06, 2010 10:54 pm Post subject: |
|
|
revers wrote:
Well, by chance or not, she posted a similar pic today. You may see it @ this link:
http://www.canadiangardening.com/forum/viewtopic.php?f=4&t=21749 _________________ Ron
Olympus OM-D E-M5, 14-42 & 45/1.8.
Panasonic G1, GF1, 14-45, 45-200 & various legacy lenses.
Canon S5, Sony 1.7 Tele-converter & Raynox DCR 150 Macro converter. |
|
Back to top |
|
|
Big Dawg
Joined: 28 Jan 2009 Posts: 2530 Location: Thach Alabama
|
Posted: Wed Jul 07, 2010 5:14 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Big Dawg wrote:
Thanks Ron. Yes it was a surprise to me for the first time. No orioles here but several different Downies are sipping the sugar water now. _________________ Big Dawg |
|
Back to top |
|
|
Blue
Joined: 26 Jul 2008 Posts: 304
|
Posted: Wed Jul 07, 2010 7:40 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Blue wrote:
keltzar wrote: |
A few months ago I put several takumars side-by-side:
early Takumar 105/2.8 (1950s)
Late Takumar 105/2.8 (1960s)
Super Takumar 105/2.8
SMC takumar 105/2.8
.. all shooting into an incadescent bulb.
Interestingly enough, with the exception of the earliest takumar which flared ... the rest were remarkably close ... telling me that the SMC is not leagues ahead as some (and the prices) would suggest.
Seeing your mention of the auto-takumar just reminded me. The 105mm is a takumar design that remained largely unchanged even into the days of PK. |
Actually, the early pre-set Tak 105mm and Auto-Tak 105mm have 4 elements in 5 groups and the late pre-set, Super Tak and S-M-C Super Tak 105mm lenses have 5 elements in 4 groups. Also, the late runs of the Super Taks and early runs of the S-M-C lenses may have the same coating.
The late version of the preset which is obvious due to its all black body was actually released about the same time as the 1st version of the Super Tak and was produced until 1968. There were 2 versions of the Super Takumar 105mm and both had the 5 elements in 4 groups and can't tell you what the difference is other than the 1st version has 350 on the A-M switch and the later one has 43501. You may also encounter 738 on the switch which was put on sample of both versions. _________________ Pentax: K, H2, H3, S3, SV (late & early), SV black, Spot F, K2 chrome, K2 black, ME F, SuperProgram, 6x7, Auto 110, Asahiflex IIB late
Pentax "modern": MZ-3, *istD, K200d, K20d
Mamiya: C3 TLR, NC1000
Canon: EOS 10s, AE-1
Chinon: CP-7m
IKON: Contax D, Praktiflex FX & Victar 50mm f2.9
Contessa-Nettel Piccolette - 7.5 cm Tessar & Compur shutter
Rangefinders: Argus C4 and Ricoh Five-One-Nine |
|
Back to top |
|
|
|
|
You cannot post new topics in this forum You cannot reply to topics in this forum You cannot edit your posts in this forum You cannot delete your posts in this forum You cannot vote in polls in this forum
|