| View previous topic :: View next topic |
| Author |
Message |
Rolf
Joined: 02 May 2009
Posts: 4123
Location: NRW/Germany
Expire: 2015-12-26
|
 Posted: Sun May 30, 2010 9:14 am Post subject: Comparison between Elmarit 2.8/180 & G Vario 45-200 |
 |
|
Rolf wrote:
Hi,
was with my son yesterday evening for a boxing event. My son had a GF1 with G Vario 4-5.6/45-200mm and myself a G1 with Leica Elmarit 2.8/180mm.
The first one fully manual with adapter Leica to m4/3 (thank you Alex hk300) at ISO 1600 & f:2.8 at 1/500 sec. The other one fully automatic wit iA (intelligent automatic) at ISO 800 & f:5.6 at 1/125 sec.
Leica
Panasonic
As you can see the Pana Vario lens made a very good job. The conditions were at the limit with such cams (and lenses) due to light and distance.
Few more pics from this event you will find within this thread
http://forum.mflenses.com/last-night-event-t28875.html
_________________
Rolf |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
revers
Joined: 13 May 2010
Posts: 574
Location: In the country just north of Toronto Canada
|
| Posted: Sun May 30, 2010 11:13 am Post subject: |
|
|
revers wrote:
The Elmarit looks sharper to me, possibly motion blur in the 45-200 shot.
_________________
Ron
Olympus OM-D E-M5, 14-42 & 45/1.8.
Panasonic G1, GF1, 14-45, 45-200 & various legacy lenses.
Canon S5, Sony 1.7 Tele-converter & Raynox DCR 150 Macro converter. |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
Hari
Joined: 29 Nov 2009
Posts: 1790
Expire: 2015-05-27
|
| Posted: Mon May 31, 2010 9:49 am Post subject: |
|
|
Hari wrote:
And the colors of the Elmarit look richer to me
_________________
Analogue Rangefinders: Leica M5, Leica M6 Titanium classic 0.72, Leica M7 0.58, Leica M7 0.85
Digital Rangefinder: Leica M9, Leica Monochrom, Leica M240
SLR: Leica R3 electronic, Canon AE1P
DSLR: Canon 5D MK2
M mount Lenses: Super-Wide Heliar 15/f4.5 ASPH. + Leica 24/f3.8 ASPH + Leica 28/f2 ASPH. + Leica 35/f1.4 ASPH. FLE + Leica Noctilux 50/f0.95 + Leica Noctilux 50/f1 + Canon 50/f1.2 LTM + Leica 50/f1.4 ASPH. + Leica 50/f1.5 + Zeiss ZM Sonnar 50/f1.5 + Leica APO Summicron 50/f2 + Leica Summitar 50/f2 + Leica Rigid Summicron 50/f2 + Zeiss ZM Planar 50/f2 + Leica 50/f2.8 E39 + Leica 75/f1.4 + Leica APO 75/f2 ASPH. + Voigtlander 75/f2.5 + Leica Summarex 85/f1.5 + Leica APO 90/f2 ASPH. + Leica 90/f2 E55 + Leica 90/f2.8 + Leica APO 135/f3.4
Leica R mount Lenses: Leica-R 60/2.8 E55 + Leica-R 80/1.4 E67 + Leica-R 180/4
EF mount Lenses: Canon 50/1.8 II
M42 mount Lenses: Too many
My pictures: http://www.flickr.com/photos/dementedjesus/ |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
pat donnelly
Joined: 19 Jan 2010
Posts: 666
Location: Brisbane, Australia
|
| Posted: Tue Jun 01, 2010 1:43 pm Post subject: Comparison |
|
|
pat donnelly wrote:
I am unable to tell the prime from the zoom! Are you playing with us?
Both pics seem close to identical rendering.
An amazing acheivement from Panasonic. I assume that OIS was on?
Good shots, too!
_________________
---------------------------------
EP-1, E-410, E-300, D100, D1,
C-Mt: 25mm 1.9, 75mm 1.4, 75mm 1.3, 75mm 1.9, Ultra wides, one inch sensor, 20+ c-mount zooms
OM 350mm f2.8, Nikkor 180 f2.8, Exa 180 f2.8,
Tamrons: 90mm f2.5, 500mm f8 x3, 135 f2.5, 200 f3.5, 24mm 2.5, 28mm 2.5 x8,
FD 500mm mirror lens |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
Rolf
Joined: 02 May 2009
Posts: 4123
Location: NRW/Germany
Expire: 2015-12-26
|
| Posted: Tue Jun 01, 2010 1:49 pm Post subject: Re: Comparison |
|
|
Rolf wrote:
| pat donnelly wrote: |
I am unable to tell the prime from the zoom! Are you playing with us?
Both pics seem close to identical rendering.
An amazing acheivement from Panasonic. I assume that OIS was on?
Good shots, too! |
No, I don´t play with you 
My son owns a GF1 with 14-45 kit lens and 45-200. I´m always impressed when I see the results. This was a good example for same results under very bad condition. Ok - OIS was on and works perfect.
_________________
Rolf |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
cheve
Joined: 31 Mar 2009
Posts: 182
Expire: 2011-12-06
|
| Posted: Tue Jun 01, 2010 2:06 pm Post subject: |
|
|
cheve wrote:
Is it possible to show the centre crop at 100% from both?
_________________
Adaptall-2: 17/3.5(51B),80-210/3.8-4(103A),60-300/3.8-5.4(23A) C/Y: CZ 35-70/3.4,RMC Tokian 80-200/4.5
EXk: Topcor Re Auto 35/2.8(broken),135/3.5, Steinheil Culminar 135/4.5 Leitz-R: 50/2,90/2,180/4,180/3.4,Angenieux 35-70/2.5-3.3
M42: pentacon 135/2.8,135/2.8(preset),Super-Takumar 55/1.8,Meyer-Optik 50/1.8 FD: Voigtlander 125/2.5 SL
K: smc 50/1.2, porst 55/1.2, Takumar(Bayonet) 135/2.5 Minolta: rokker 58/1.4,58/1.2 nikkon: Nikkor H Auto 300/4.5
OM: 21/2,21/3.5,28/3.5,50/1.2,300/4.5,500/8,35-70/3.6, viv 17/3.5,viv 28/1.9,viv 135/2.3
Rollei: Voigtlander Color-Ultron 55/1.4 AR T: Tele-Astranar 135/3.5
EF: 30/1.4(Sigma),50/1.8,28-70L,80-200L,24-105L,70-300DO,18-200OS(Sigma)
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
Anu
Joined: 14 Apr 2009
Posts: 879
|
| Posted: Tue Jun 01, 2010 2:23 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Anu wrote:
Sorry to spoil the fun, but images that have been downsized that much for the web, do not tell much anything about sharpness of a lens. Mostly bokeh quality and distortions may be compared from photos of such downsizing. There isn't much bokeh and the zoom may benefit from in-camera distortion correction... 
For quality analysis crops would be beneficial.
Of course, if you intended to show us, that when making shots like this it doesn't really matter if one is using an expensive Leica or less expensive Lomo, then the inteltion was fulfilled to perfection
Anyhow, interesting to see one can bring big guns into a boxing match without being arrested or anything |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
|
|
|
You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot vote in polls in this forum
|
Search
Memberlist
Register
Profile
Log in to check your private messages
Log in
