Home

Please support mflenses.com if you need any graphic related work order it from us, click on above banner to order!

SearchSearch MemberlistMemberlist RegisterRegister ProfileProfile Log in to check your private messagesLog in to check your private messages Log inLog in

Good offer? Some M42 lenses
View previous topic :: View next topic  


PostPosted: Thu Apr 22, 2010 3:11 pm    Post subject: Good offer? Some M42 lenses Reply with quote

Hi there my lens-friends (I like this language, it's so easy to make some nice wordplays or rhymes Very Happy ),

just as promised, my first real thread Smile

I found a guy who sells some of his stuff over the Internet, and I'm thinking about buying it - but not before I'm shure that it is worth it.

The package contains a "PORST compact reflex" camera (I'm not really into analog photography), some filters (POL, Sky, Macro, some stepp/-down rings), a tele-converter (2x by Hama) and a camerabag. But, more interesting, some lenses:

MC 1,7/50mm (actually I don't know the brand, I think it's a Porst, too)
Porst Weitwinkel MC 2,8/35mm auto
Porst 2,8/135mm auto
Revuenon Weitwinkel 2,8/35mm
Beroflex Auto-Zoom 70-140 mm (don't know the f-stop)

He wants to give away the whole package for about 120€ (~160$/104£) plus shipping (about 5 to 7€). But, I can try to chaffer a bit.
You think it's worth it?
I'm mostly interested to use those lenses with my Canon EOS, and I'm primary interested in the 50mm, 35mm and 135mm. I think on eBay I'd pay at least 100€, if not more, for three of this kind.
But are that good lenses? I searched on http://m42.artlimited.net, but didn't got much results (also, the site seems to be down at the moment).

"Weitwinkel" is simply the german term for "wide angle", I saw it in some lens-names, so I thought of copying it like this.
What means "auto" on a M42 lens? Can I use it on my Adapter?

Also, I don't know the exact conditions. He send me his phone number, but I don't wanted to call before I ask my lens-telligent friends on here Smile

Regards!


PostPosted: Thu Apr 22, 2010 3:41 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Those can be either crap and good one depend from it's maker. If you are unsure pass them. Buy well known lens instead.


PostPosted: Thu Apr 22, 2010 3:44 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Hi Atilla,

how can I get to know the maker? Is Porst some kind of "Reseller"?

What would be well known lenses? I saw some Zeiss on eBay, I would think they are good, but exprensive too. As I'm a student, I don't have that much money :/

Regards!


PostPosted: Thu Apr 22, 2010 4:05 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

CameraRick wrote:
Hi Atilla,

how can I get to know the maker? Is Porst some kind of "Reseller"?

What would be well known lenses? I saw some Zeiss on eBay, I would think they are good, but exprensive too. As I'm a student, I don't have that much money :/

Regards!


Porst is mail order brand marketed by Quelle Germany. Identify them is not so easy. Buy well known Russian and East German glasses, they are fit into your budget and all of them come at least good image quality.

Let me know what focal length do you need and we will help in selections.
What camera do you have ?


PostPosted: Thu Apr 22, 2010 4:27 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Hi Atilla,

that's very kind, thanks Smile
I know Quelle, I had an Alpha 200 from them. I think they are no more, closed last year or so.

I'm interested in 28, 35, 50, 135 (I heard they make great results), maybe 85 and below 28 (it's hard to find anything good, but with the crop of my cam 28 is no real wide angle). I wanted to have at least f2.8, maybe f1.8 at 50mm. I want to have great depth of field while filming.

I'm using a Canon EOS 550D (Rebel T2i in some regions), my M42 Adapter just arrived today (it's one without a chip).

Best Regards!


PostPosted: Thu Apr 22, 2010 4:46 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

My low budget lenses in this line are next.

Pentacon 29mm f2.8
Carl Zeiss Jena Flektogon 35mm f2.8
Pentacon 50mm f1.8
Helios-44 ~50mm
Mir-1 B 35mm f2.8
Pentacon 135mm f2.8
Jupiter-9 85mm f2
Kaleinar 100mm f2.8
meyer-orestegor 100mm f2.8
pentacon 100mm f2.8
Carl Zeiss Jena Sonnar 135mm f3.5 or f4
Carl Zeiss Jena Flektogon 25mm f4 or 20mm f4

Also think about other mounts like Olympus OM and Nikon .

There is many excellent lens going so cheap.

Like Olympus 28mm f3.5 , Olympus 135mm f3.5 basically all Olympus OM and Nikon are very nice lens and you can find many what is fit into your budget. Also don't forget Takumars many of them low priced and excellent ones.


PostPosted: Thu Apr 22, 2010 6:25 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Hi there,

looks nice to me - where I live I can get many Porst, Revuenon, sometimes Pentacon (but they aren't that cheap). Revuenon ist not that good?

What makes me curious is that you mention the Pentacon 29mm f2.8. In an other forum I read that this would not be original Pentacon, and that this seems to be not a good lens. Can you deny that?

Regards


PostPosted: Thu Apr 22, 2010 6:32 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

CameraRick wrote:
Hi there,

looks nice to me - where I live I can get many Porst, Revuenon, sometimes Pentacon (but they aren't that cheap). Revuenon ist not that good?

What makes me curious is that you mention the Pentacon 29mm f2.8. In an other forum I read that this would not be original Pentacon, and that this seems to be not a good lens. Can you deny that?

Regards


Porst, Revuenon same thing just brand name maker can be very different.

Look Ebay.de there is plenty of choice and inland shipping is very reasonable. Pentacon 29mm f2.8 have very mixed reports due not all piece is same they very cheap lenses without strong quality control. I think none of them bad lens just some of them better than others. They are real East German made lenses if comes with M42 mount.


PostPosted: Thu Apr 22, 2010 6:59 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Hi there Atilla,

that's kinda nasty, I just wanted to get some nice lenses in one shot Very Happy
But I think then I get them one by one, thanks for advice.

What would be other good Products besides Pentacon, Zeiss? Vivitar, Practika?

eBay.de got plenty, but I don't like ebay that much. But hey, I'll give it (another) try Smile

Regards

ps.:
What about Revue? A local store has a M42 50mm f1.8 Revue für 29€, would this be a good buy?


PostPosted: Thu Apr 22, 2010 7:17 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

I bought a Porst package on eBay a couple years ago. Porst was a sales badge, not a lens-maker; their reputation is shaky, not quite as good as similar Vivitar. My Weitwinkel 35/2.8 is good; my 135/2.8 is fogged; my Color Reflex 55/2.8 is a problem, as it is auto only.

Auto on M42 means the aperture will stop-down on an M42 body, but NOT with any mount adapter that I know of. To use a M42 lens on a dSLR, it must either be preset (no auto); or have an M/A switch to allow stop-down; or, if auto-only, the pin needs to be stuck closed. Be careful about using superglue for this last, because you may never be able to un-stick it, making the lens fairly worthless for film work.

I agree with others above who are negative about this deal. While *bad* 28's, 35's, 50-55's, and 135's are not common, they do exist, mostly due to age and disease. You might do better to look for Takumar lenses (which aren't so cheap now), Mamiya, Ricoh (including Sears, Focal, Access), Vivitar (with care), and Russian/Ukraine glass. I think this Porst package is overpriced. Good luck!


PostPosted: Thu Apr 22, 2010 7:21 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Hi there,

when they are "auto", it's not interesting. I want a full manual lens, so I can use it as good as possible.
So I think Revue isn't good at all, hm? Many brands you post here I didn't even hear before, or are very hard to find.

Regards


PostPosted: Thu Apr 22, 2010 7:30 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

CameraRick wrote:
Hi there,

when they are "auto", it's not interesting. I want a full manual lens, so I can use it as good as possible.
So I think Revue isn't good at all, hm? Many brands you post here I didn't even hear before, or are very hard to find.

Regards


I say last time Ebay.de


PostPosted: Thu Apr 22, 2010 7:52 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Attila wrote:


I say last time Ebay.de

Hi there Atilla,

I don't wanted to bother you - it was more "talking to myself" then beeing sissy about what you said, sorry if you got me wrong Embarassed
I really appreciate your comments.

Regards!


PostPosted: Thu Apr 22, 2010 8:11 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

I wish to push you take seriously Ebay as lens source easier to find there than in local shops and no risk if you buy from reliable sellers.


PostPosted: Thu Apr 22, 2010 8:23 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

There are some M42 adapters with a flange that pushes the auto-pin.

Alex (member HK300) was selling some. The one I have from him for Pentax K works very well and is my favorite adapter now. Needs a little bit of filing though.


PostPosted: Thu Apr 22, 2010 8:57 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Hi there guys,

I'm taking ebay seriously, don't get me wrong Smile but there are always other places - I just want to get a picture Smile
I like local traders because I can see and test things. But I actual don't know where I should look at directly.

Sadly, I have just a normal Adapter, I think:



When a lense is called "electric", it means the same than "auto", right? I saw a Pancolar electric 50 f1.8 for 12€, but I don't know if I could use it.

Also I saw a Cosinon 55mm f1.4, maybe this is worth a shot? I searched on the forum, many said it would be a nice lens.

Don't get me wrong, I love your help. I'm leaning so much about optics right know, and there are SO many of them, so I just want to get the nicest I can get (Zeiss for example are pretty expensive here, I think it's because everyone thinks Zeiss is the best they can get)

Regards


PostPosted: Thu Apr 22, 2010 9:36 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

CameraRick wrote:
when they are "auto", it's not interesting. I want a full manual lens, so I can use it as good as possible.


ANY M42 lens used on a dSLR will be totally manual in all ways: aperture, focus, where to point it, etc. AUTO on an M42 lens refers ONLY to how the aperture can stop down on most M42 bodies. An M42 lens that is AUTO-ONLY will only work with the aperture wide open, unless its aperture pin is glued down or removed or otherwise fixed.

Quote:
When a lense is called "electric", it means the same than "auto", right? I saw a Pancolar electric 50 f1.8 for 12€, but I don't know if I could use it.


Here, 'electric' means that it transmits aperture information to certain Praktica cameras. Using it on any other camera just means that such information is not given to the camera; it's just another totally manual lens.

I can't comment on your lens adapter without knowing what camera you use. If you use Pentax, I'd call that a non-infinity-focus adapter, quite cheap and safe and useful on 1) long teles or other lenses that focus past infinity, and 2) lenses you use for close-up or macro work, where you don't *want* infinity focus.


PostPosted: Thu Apr 22, 2010 9:56 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Hi there RioRico,

so that's whats going on.
This "auto"-thing just confuses me, sorry Smile si die Pancolar f1.8 50mm would be very pretty, I think. Maybe I'll give it a shot.
I didn't thought I got any auto-features, I mean I don't want any lens that requires auto-features. I'm sorry, as I'm not native english sometimes I just don't get it right.

As metioned, I'm using a Canon EOS 550D - when I bought it (on ebay) it said it could focus on infinity, so I think I'm safe with that.

Regards


PostPosted: Fri Apr 23, 2010 12:23 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

CameraRick wrote:
This "auto"-thing just confuses me, sorry Smile si die Pancolar f1.8 50mm would be very pretty, I think. Maybe I'll give it a shot.
I didn't thought I got any auto-features, I mean I don't want any lens that requires auto-features. I'm sorry, as I'm not native english sometimes I just don't get it right.


Like I said, ANY M42 lens will be totally manual on your camera. AUTO or ELECTRIC only mean auto-aperture on the right M42 camera.

Quote:
As metioned, I'm using a Canon EOS 550D - when I bought it (on ebay) it said it could focus on infinity, so I think I'm safe with that.


Yes, that looks right. And it looks like it will hold in the aperture pin on an AUTO-only M42 lens, so you should have no problems. Have fun!


PostPosted: Fri Apr 23, 2010 12:56 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

So I have only to be aware of "auto only" lenses, right?
Now I have a picture, thank you Smile

Beroflex isn't a very good brand, isn't it? I can find many lenses, but not very much information about it.

Regards!


PostPosted: Fri Apr 23, 2010 1:05 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

CameraRick wrote:
So I have only to be aware of "auto only" lenses, right?
Now I have a picture, thank you Smile

Beroflex isn't a very good brand, isn't it? I can find many lenses, but not very much information about it.

Regards!


Yes, very average. I had a 135mm lens, lenses were plastic like new AF lenses.
If a lens has not much information mostly means lens is crappy and owners like to sell them so they not publish anything about them.

http://www.mflenses.com/gallery/v/japenese/othermaker/autoberoflex135/


PostPosted: Fri Apr 23, 2010 1:44 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Haha, I see.
So I guess finding good lenses (for good prices) isn't that easy as I thought Smile

But hey, that's not a problem. Tomorrow there are some jag fairs (is this the right word?) in town, I think I'll go over there and search for some cheap, good stuff.
So long, I'll take a look on eBay and stuff - seems that the Pancolar electric 50mm f1.8 isn't such a great lens, too.

Regards


PostPosted: Fri Apr 23, 2010 1:46 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Wrong, Pancolars are one of the best lenses!


PostPosted: Fri Apr 23, 2010 1:58 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Yeah, I heard that.
But why are there Pancolars 50mm f1.8 sold for 10$? Even in this forum, that makes me curious - or are they simply "cheap and good"?

Regards


PostPosted: Fri Apr 23, 2010 2:05 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

That lens had faulty or seller had no clue or you mix with Pentacon.