View previous topic :: View next topic |
Author |
Message |
scsambrook
Joined: 29 Mar 2009 Posts: 2167 Location: Glasgow Scotland
Expire: 2011-11-18
|
Posted: Tue Jul 08, 2014 12:57 pm Post subject: Minolta 135mm lenses - three generations |
|
|
scsambrook wrote:
I recently spent some money buying Minolta 135mm lenses on eBay. My total outlay came to around the same as buying three fancy coffees and three small cakes in Starbucks or somewhere similar . . .
I bought a 135mm f 4 TC Rokkor - preset iris, three elements, the 'classic Cooke triplet', with an almost circular iris which has so many blades neither my wife nor I can be sure what the total actually is; a 135mm f3.5 MD Rokkor - the heavy all-metal body version, not the later lightweight one; and a 135/2.8 MC Rokkor PF - the one with six elements in five components. That one came with free fungus, despite having been inspected by a professional. I'm not sure what profession the inspector follows but he ought to see an optician before too long.
I think the 135 TC is rather good given its simple design. I must try it some more to see if it gives Bubbly Bokey or Swirley-Wirleys. And I suppose I should go looking for its 100mm pre-set companion, the one that the UK importers used to give away with SRT-101s back in the early 1970s.
Rokkor 135/4 TC (pls ignore typo, I forgot my comupter specs this morgnig)
Another one . . .
Rokkor 135/3.5 MD ( a breeze was blowing when I took this)
Rokkor PF 135/2.8 MC - this has a really nice spider-web fungus growth on the inside of the rear component
_________________ Stephen
Equipment: Pentax DSLR for casual shooting, Lumix G1 and Fuji XE-1 for playing with old lenses, and Leica M8 because I still like the optical rangefinder system. |
|
Back to top |
|
|
Minolfan
Joined: 30 Dec 2008 Posts: 3439 Location: Netherlands
|
Posted: Tue Jul 08, 2014 1:57 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Minolfan wrote:
Nice samples!
The Rokkor TC 135mm 4.0 in bellows model was my first extra lens in the sixties, used it on small foldable bellows; I still like it. |
|
Back to top |
|
|
Igor
Joined: 13 Jan 2014 Posts: 519 Location: United States and Ukraine, Europe
|
Posted: Wed Jul 09, 2014 9:23 am Post subject: |
|
|
Igor wrote:
all Rokkors are great ! very nice samples, TFS. |
|
Back to top |
|
|
iangreenhalgh1
Joined: 18 Mar 2011 Posts: 15679
Expire: 2014-01-07
|
Posted: Wed Jul 09, 2014 10:28 am Post subject: |
|
|
iangreenhalgh1 wrote:
I have the early 100mm, not tried it yet due to stuck aperture, but it is otherwise in nice condition.
Are you sure the 4/135 is a triplet? I thought it was a 4/3 tessar type. The head can be removed to use for macro work on bellows. _________________ I don't care who designed it, who made it or what country it comes from - I just enjoy using it! |
|
Back to top |
|
|
scsambrook
Joined: 29 Mar 2009 Posts: 2167 Location: Glasgow Scotland
Expire: 2011-11-18
|
Posted: Wed Jul 09, 2014 12:19 pm Post subject: |
|
|
scsambrook wrote:
Ian - I've always understood it to be a 'simple' triplet. Minolta's two-letter suffix indicates number of components and then number of elements. The first letter stands for the number in Greek, I think, but can't be sure now. The second for the order of letters in the alphabet - so PF is 5 components (penta) and 6 elements (f being 6th letter of alphabet). So whatever the T in TC actually stands for, C indicates 3 elements.
As for the bellows lens head, was there also a different one to the TC? Or was it the 100mm I'm thinking of? Further info welcome ! _________________ Stephen
Equipment: Pentax DSLR for casual shooting, Lumix G1 and Fuji XE-1 for playing with old lenses, and Leica M8 because I still like the optical rangefinder system. |
|
Back to top |
|
|
mo
Joined: 27 Aug 2009 Posts: 8979 Location: Australia
Expire: 2016-07-30
|
Posted: Wed Jul 09, 2014 1:01 pm Post subject: |
|
|
mo wrote:
On Keh at the moment there are two TC 135/4 s, one is for bellows only and the other is for the camera.So I gather two different lenses? not sure on the internals though ...had a look at the specs and they say 3 elements in 3 groups. _________________ Moira, Moderator
Fuji XE-1,Pentax K-01,Panasonic G1,Panasonic G5,Pentax MX
Ricoh Singlex TLS,KR-5,KR-5Super,XR-10
Lenses
Auto Rikenon's 55/1.4, 1.8, 2.8... 50/1.7 Takumar 2/58 Preset Takumar 2.8/105 Auto Takumar 2.2/55, 3.5/35 Super Takumar 1.8/55...Macro Takumar F4/50... CZJ Biotar ALU M42 2/58 CZJ Tessar ALU M42 2.8/50
CZJ DDR Flektogon Zebra M42 2.8/35 CZJ Pancolar M42 2/50 CZJ Pancolar Exakta 2/50
Auto Mamiya/Sekor 1.8/55 ...Auto Mamiya/Sekor 2/50 Auto Mamiya/Sekor 2.8/50 Auto Mamiya/Sekor 200/3.5 Tamron SP500/8 Tamron SP350/5.6 Tamron SP90/2.5
Primoplan 1.9/58 Primagon 4.5/35 Telemegor 5.5/150 Angenieux 3.5/28 Angenieux 3,5/135 Y 2
Canon FL 58/1.2,Canon FL85/1.8,Canon FL 100/3.5,Canon SSC 2.8/100 ,Konica AR 100/2.8, Nikkor P 105/2.5
|
|
Back to top |
|
|
iangreenhalgh1
Joined: 18 Mar 2011 Posts: 15679
Expire: 2014-01-07
|
Posted: Wed Jul 09, 2014 3:07 pm Post subject: |
|
|
iangreenhalgh1 wrote:
So it's a triplet then.
Same lens Mo, just one is without the helicoid/tube. _________________ I don't care who designed it, who made it or what country it comes from - I just enjoy using it! |
|
Back to top |
|
|
|
|
You cannot post new topics in this forum You cannot reply to topics in this forum You cannot edit your posts in this forum You cannot delete your posts in this forum You cannot vote in polls in this forum
|