View previous topic :: View next topic |
Author |
Message |
Big Dawg
Joined: 28 Jan 2009 Posts: 2530 Location: Thach Alabama
|
Posted: Fri Feb 12, 2010 9:52 pm Post subject: New old lens but big problems. |
|
|
Big Dawg wrote:
I just got a lens off Ebay. It is a Vivitar 135mm f/3.5 preset lens with 15 iris blades. Brand new in a shop worn box. Never been on a camera. A T mount that came with a Minolta adapter...that is for sale if someone needs one PM me. It will be cheap as I can't use it.
Any way being a 1960's lens that has never been used the iris blade are stuck. Someone before I received the lens tried the Aperture rings and caused several of the blades to jump out of the holder rings and bend....Now I have a brand new 135mm that is useless...Oh well off to Vphoto of Atlanta for a repair. Makes my lens cost 3 times what I wanted to pay......My luck was not so good.
http://cgi.ebay.com/ws/eBayISAPI.dll?ViewItem&item=170429229746&ssPageName=STRK:MEWNX:IT _________________ Big Dawg |
|
Back to top |
|
|
fish4570
Joined: 06 Jan 2010 Posts: 4514 Location: At the confluence of the Locust Fork of the Warrior River and Black Creek, Alabama
Expire: 2012-03-21
|
Posted: Fri Feb 12, 2010 10:05 pm Post subject: |
|
|
fish4570 wrote:
you will come out ahead somehow, bd ... _________________ Paul
I chase Light
http://blackcreekjournal.blogspot.com/ |
|
Back to top |
|
|
Big Dawg
Joined: 28 Jan 2009 Posts: 2530 Location: Thach Alabama
|
Posted: Fri Feb 12, 2010 10:16 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Big Dawg wrote:
fish4570 wrote: |
you will come out ahead somehow, bd ... |
Yeah...I'll own a new 1960's lens that cost more than the 2010 dollar value . LOL _________________ Big Dawg |
|
Back to top |
|
|
tkbslc
Joined: 02 Jul 2009 Posts: 194 Location: Utah, USA
|
Posted: Fri Feb 12, 2010 10:47 pm Post subject: |
|
|
tkbslc wrote:
I'd just toss it. There are plenty of good 135mm lenses out there. _________________ Canon 30D + some AF and MF lenses |
|
Back to top |
|
|
Attila
Joined: 24 Feb 2007 Posts: 57865 Location: Hungary
Expire: 2025-11-18
|
Posted: Fri Feb 12, 2010 10:53 pm Post subject: Re: New old lens but big problems. |
|
|
Attila wrote:
Big Dawg wrote: |
I just got a lens off Ebay. It is a Vivitar 135mm f/3.5 preset lens with 15 iris blades. Brand new in a shop worn box. Never been on a camera. A T mount that came with a Minolta adapter...that is for sale if someone needs one PM me. It will be cheap as I can't use it.
Any way being a 1960's lens that has never been used the iris blade are stuck. Someone before I received the lens tried the Aperture rings and caused several of the blades to jump out of the holder rings and bend....Now I have a brand new 135mm that is useless...Oh well off to Vphoto of Atlanta for a repair. Makes my lens cost 3 times what I wanted to pay......My luck was not so good.
http://cgi.ebay.com/ws/eBayISAPI.dll?ViewItem&item=170429229746&ssPageName=STRK:MEWNX:IT |
If it was forced 99% blades or it's holder are damaged and almost un-fixable. I have same case with my rare Konishiroku 200mm pre-set lens. Lens looks brand new , but blades has same serious damage need to reproduce small sticks what are keep blades in holder. Better too look another one. _________________ -------------------------------
Items on sale on Ebay
Sony NEX-7 Carl Zeiss Planar 85mm f1.4, Minolta MD 35mm f1.8, Konica 135mm f2.5, Minolta MD 50mm f1.2, Minolta MD 250mm f5.6, Carl Zeiss Sonnar 180mm f2.8
|
|
Back to top |
|
|
woodrim
Joined: 14 Jan 2010 Posts: 4060 Location: Charleston
|
Posted: Sat Feb 13, 2010 1:11 am Post subject: |
|
|
woodrim wrote:
Return to seller. _________________ Regards,
Woodrim |
|
Back to top |
|
|
visualopsins
Joined: 05 Mar 2009 Posts: 10956 Location: California
Expire: 2025-04-11
|
Posted: Sat Feb 13, 2010 3:04 am Post subject: |
|
|
visualopsins wrote:
this fellow used a piece of copper wire to fix a broken aperture "stick" in his PENTACON:
http://forum.manualfocus.org/viewtopic.php?id=15783 _________________ ☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮ like attracts like! ☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮
Cameras: Sony ILCE-7RM2, Spotmatics II, F, and ESII, Nikon P4
Lenses:
M42 Asahi Optical Co., Takumar 1:4 f=35mm, 1:2 f=58mm (Sonnar), 1:2.4 f=58mm (Heliar), 1:2.2 f=55mm (Gaussian), 1:2.8 f=105mm (Model I), 1:2.8/105 (Model II), 1:5.6/200, Tele-Takumar 1:5.6/200, 1:6.3/300, Macro-Takumar 1:4/50, Auto-Takumar 1:2.3 f=35, 1:1.8 f=55mm, 1:2.2 f=55mm, Super-TAKUMAR 1:3.5/28 (fat), 1:2/35 (Fat), 1:1.4/50 (8-element), Super-Multi-Coated Fisheye-TAKUMAR 1:4/17, Super-Multi-Coated TAKUMAR 1:4.5/20, 1:3.5/24, 1:3.5/28, 1:2/35, 1:3.5/35, 1:1.8/85, 1:1.9/85 1:2.8/105, 1:3.5/135, 1:2.5/135 (II), 1:4/150, 1:4/200, 1:4/300, 1:4.5/500, Super-Multi-Coated Macro-TAKUMAR 1:4/50, 1:4/100, Super-Multi-Coated Bellows-TAKUMAR 1:4/100, SMC TAKUMAR 1:1.4/50, 1:1.8/55
M42 Carl Zeiss Jena Flektogon 2.4/35
Contax Carl Zeiss Vario-Sonnar T* 28-70mm F3.5-4.5
Pentax K-mount SMC PENTAX-A ZOOM 1:3.5 35~105mm, SMC PENTAX ZOOM 1:4 45~125mm
Nikon Micro-NIKKOR-P-C Auto 1:3.5 f=55mm, NIKKOR-P Auto 105mm f/2.5 Pre-AI (Sonnar), Micro-NIKKOR 105mm 1:4 AI, NIKKOR AI-S 35-135mm f/3,5-4,5
Tamron SP 17mm f/3.5 (51B), Tamron SP 17mm f/3.5 (151B), SP 500mm f/8 (55BB), SP 70-210mm f/3.5 (19AH)
Vivitar 100mm 1:2.8 MC 1:1 Macro Telephoto (Kiron)
|
|
Back to top |
|
|
eeyore_nl
Joined: 09 Nov 2008 Posts: 837 Location: Netherlands
|
Posted: Sat Feb 13, 2010 7:19 am Post subject: Re: New old lens but big problems. |
|
|
eeyore_nl wrote:
His shipping costs are $41 to send something to Europe
Anyway, I think you didn't get what was sold to you. I hope you paid with Paypal. If the seller refuses to take back the lens, raise a claim with them.
Good luck! _________________ Fujifilm X-Pro2 / Fujifilm X-T1 / some Sonnar & Takumar lenses |
|
Back to top |
|
|
Rolf
Joined: 02 May 2009 Posts: 4123 Location: NRW/Germany
Expire: 2015-12-26
|
Posted: Sat Feb 13, 2010 8:15 am Post subject: |
|
|
Rolf wrote:
See the "Question and Answer section" of this auction. I´m sure that the seller knew the problem
_________________ Rolf |
|
Back to top |
|
|
magnet-2009
Joined: 22 Apr 2009 Posts: 505 Location: Greece, Athens
|
Posted: Sat Feb 13, 2010 8:19 am Post subject: |
|
|
magnet-2009 wrote:
Q: you have another picture of item ? you have picture that take by item ?
A: Lens is new! Why would you need another picture? And if I was tking pictures with it, it would no longer be new.
Clever reply by the seller knowing the problem of his item.
Discuss the problem with the seller, mention that new item means new condition + perfect working order. Ask for sending the lens back. No response or no agreement? Just a claim.
edit: I've just read your reply Rolf and you are right.
CHOOSE A RELIABLE MAIL COMPANY IF YOU HAVE TO SEND THE ITEM BACK WITH RELIABLE "TRACK AND TRACE" AND "SIGNED FOR", PAY INSURANCE [a few bucks for that price but totally may be much more than 24 bucks ]. Sorry for the capitals _________________ My flickr___ My Wix___ RailPictures |
|
Back to top |
|
|
Big Dawg
Joined: 28 Jan 2009 Posts: 2530 Location: Thach Alabama
|
Posted: Sat Feb 13, 2010 3:14 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Big Dawg wrote:
magnet-2009 wrote: |
Q: you have another picture of item ? you have picture that take by item ?
A: Lens is new! Why would you need another picture? And if I was tking pictures with it, it would no longer be new.
Clever reply by the seller knowing the problem of his item.
Discuss the problem with the seller, mention that new item means new condition + perfect working order. Ask for sending the lens back. No response or no agreement? Just a claim.
edit: I've just read your reply Rolf and you are right.
CHOOSE A RELIABLE MAIL COMPANY IF YOU HAVE TO SEND THE ITEM BACK WITH RELIABLE "TRACK AND TRACE" AND "SIGNED FOR", PAY INSURANCE [a few bucks for that price but totally may be much more than 24 bucks ]. Sorry for the capitals |
For a lens above $50 dollars US I would return for my money...as it is I plan on finding another of the same build but worn out. This way I can send both to the repair shop and salvage the new one. Course this means scrapping the worn lens but that is the best solution for me. The extra cost is one way to punish myself for not doing a thorough enough job in asking questions. I learn from these each time something happens. The money is irrelevant at this price. _________________ Big Dawg |
|
Back to top |
|
|
estudleon
Joined: 15 May 2008 Posts: 3754 Location: Argentina
|
Posted: Sat Feb 13, 2010 3:54 pm Post subject: |
|
|
estudleon wrote:
Somebody says in the forum that the "new" old lens probably never used 'cos it's bad mechanically and/or optically.
And he is right. I bought, years ago, a "new" pentacon 2,8/29 and it was a desaster - misaligned element -. A good used lens, can be bad too. But when somebody sees a lens like new, he waits a real "like new" mechanical and optically. And almost always isn't.
Rino. _________________ Konica 2,8/100
CZJ: 4/20, 2,4/35, 1,8/50 aus jena, 3,5/135MC, Pentacon 1,8/50
Pentax S-M-C-1,4/50
Helios 44-3
Mamiya 2,8/135
Misc. : jupiter 9
Stuff used:
A) SRL
Alpa 10 D - kern macro Switar 1,9/50 -black, Kilffit apochromat 2/100.
Asahi pentax spotmatic super takumar 1,4/50
Contaflex super B tessar 2,8/50 Pro-tessar 115
Leica R3 electronic summicron 2/50 elmarit 2,8/35
Konica Autoreflex 3 (2 black and chrome one), TC, T4. 2,8/24, 3,5/28 not MC and MC, 1,8/40, 1,4/50, 1,7/50 MC and not MC, 1,8/85, 3,2/135, 3,5/135, 4/200
Minolta XG9 2,8/35, 2/45, 3,5/135
Nikkormat FTn 1,4/50, 2,8/135
Fujica ST 801, 605, 705n. 3,5/19, 1,4/50, 1,8/55, 4/85, 3,5/135.
Praktica MTL 5 and a lot of M42 lenses.
Voigtlander. Bessamatic m, bessamatix de luxe, bessamatic cs, ultramatic and ultramatic cs.
Skoparex 3,5/35, skopagon 2/40, skopar 2,8/50, skopar X 2,8/50, super lanthar (out of catalogue) 2,8/50, dinarex 3,4/90, dinarex 4,8/100, super dinarex 4/135, super dinarex 4/200, zoomar 2,8/36-83, portrait lens 0, 1 and 2. Curtagon 4/28 and 2,8/35
Canon AV1, 1,8/50
Rolleiflex SL35 and SL35 E. 2,8/35 angulon, 2,8/35 distagon, 1,4/55 rolleinar, 1,8/50 planar, 4/135 tessar, 2,8/135 rolleinar, x2 rollei, M42 to rollei adap.
Etc.
RF
Yashica Minister III
Voightlander Vito, vitomatic I, Vito C, etc.
Leica M. M2, M3 (d.s.) and M4. Schenider 3,4/21, 2/35 summaron 2,8/35 (with eyes). Summicron 2/35 (8 elements with eyes), 2/35 chrome, 2/35 black, 1,4/35 pre asph and aspheric - old -, 2/40 summicron, 2,8/50 elmar, 2/50 7 elements, 2/50 DR, 2/50 - minolta version, 1,4/50 summilux 1966 version, 1,4/75 summilux, 2/90 large version, 2/90 reduced version of 1987, 2,8/90 elmarit large version, 4/135 elmar. |
|
Back to top |
|
|
Big Dawg
Joined: 28 Jan 2009 Posts: 2530 Location: Thach Alabama
|
Posted: Sat Feb 13, 2010 11:42 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Big Dawg wrote:
Thanks Rino. This truly was an untouched lens except for someone exercising their curiosity and working the Aperture ring. Still and all it will in the future become what it should be...a used lens..LOL...I will get it fixed my friend. _________________ Big Dawg |
|
Back to top |
|
|
estudleon
Joined: 15 May 2008 Posts: 3754 Location: Argentina
|
Posted: Sun Feb 14, 2010 1:55 pm Post subject: |
|
|
estudleon wrote:
Well done !! Revive it !!
Rino. _________________ Konica 2,8/100
CZJ: 4/20, 2,4/35, 1,8/50 aus jena, 3,5/135MC, Pentacon 1,8/50
Pentax S-M-C-1,4/50
Helios 44-3
Mamiya 2,8/135
Misc. : jupiter 9
Stuff used:
A) SRL
Alpa 10 D - kern macro Switar 1,9/50 -black, Kilffit apochromat 2/100.
Asahi pentax spotmatic super takumar 1,4/50
Contaflex super B tessar 2,8/50 Pro-tessar 115
Leica R3 electronic summicron 2/50 elmarit 2,8/35
Konica Autoreflex 3 (2 black and chrome one), TC, T4. 2,8/24, 3,5/28 not MC and MC, 1,8/40, 1,4/50, 1,7/50 MC and not MC, 1,8/85, 3,2/135, 3,5/135, 4/200
Minolta XG9 2,8/35, 2/45, 3,5/135
Nikkormat FTn 1,4/50, 2,8/135
Fujica ST 801, 605, 705n. 3,5/19, 1,4/50, 1,8/55, 4/85, 3,5/135.
Praktica MTL 5 and a lot of M42 lenses.
Voigtlander. Bessamatic m, bessamatix de luxe, bessamatic cs, ultramatic and ultramatic cs.
Skoparex 3,5/35, skopagon 2/40, skopar 2,8/50, skopar X 2,8/50, super lanthar (out of catalogue) 2,8/50, dinarex 3,4/90, dinarex 4,8/100, super dinarex 4/135, super dinarex 4/200, zoomar 2,8/36-83, portrait lens 0, 1 and 2. Curtagon 4/28 and 2,8/35
Canon AV1, 1,8/50
Rolleiflex SL35 and SL35 E. 2,8/35 angulon, 2,8/35 distagon, 1,4/55 rolleinar, 1,8/50 planar, 4/135 tessar, 2,8/135 rolleinar, x2 rollei, M42 to rollei adap.
Etc.
RF
Yashica Minister III
Voightlander Vito, vitomatic I, Vito C, etc.
Leica M. M2, M3 (d.s.) and M4. Schenider 3,4/21, 2/35 summaron 2,8/35 (with eyes). Summicron 2/35 (8 elements with eyes), 2/35 chrome, 2/35 black, 1,4/35 pre asph and aspheric - old -, 2/40 summicron, 2,8/50 elmar, 2/50 7 elements, 2/50 DR, 2/50 - minolta version, 1,4/50 summilux 1966 version, 1,4/75 summilux, 2/90 large version, 2/90 reduced version of 1987, 2,8/90 elmarit large version, 4/135 elmar. |
|
Back to top |
|
|
Boomer Depp
Joined: 08 Oct 2009 Posts: 552 Location: Kingston,Washighton
Expire: 2011-12-04
|
Posted: Sun Feb 14, 2010 4:36 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Boomer Depp wrote:
People who sell lenses in a deceptive way like this seller should be taken to task and dealt with,so your compensated and so he doesn't try to pull these tricks on other unsuspecting buyers.
Three times in the past year the seller mistakenly or dishonestly misrepresented a lens and that's after I inquired about a working aperture,focus or zoom rings,fungus,etc...In each case I asked for and received compensation,in one case the seller returned my money and told me to keep the lens.
I believe this seller was deliberately dishonest and you should be compensated no matter how trivial the price or he will continue his dishonest practices on unsuspecting buyers. _________________ Trust that little voice in your head that says "Wouldn't it be interesting if...." And then do it. |
|
Back to top |
|
|
pat donnelly
Joined: 19 Jan 2010 Posts: 666 Location: Brisbane, Australia
|
Posted: Fri Feb 19, 2010 5:12 am Post subject: Agreement is best |
|
|
pat donnelly wrote:
I doubt he will want the lens back. Ask him for a part refund?
Shared experience can make friendships, it is all a question of how you both deal with it.
Correcting the lens sounds best but a wide open lens may be all that it is worth, given the cost of repair? A few test shots may help you to decide if it is a keeper or sell it on, describing its condition fully, and allowing someone to sharpen their repair skills?
If you get much from resale it will help determine the size of the refund. The vendor may learn to tell the full truth too! _________________ ---------------------------------
EP-1, E-410, E-300, D100, D1,
C-Mt: 25mm 1.9, 75mm 1.4, 75mm 1.3, 75mm 1.9, Ultra wides, one inch sensor, 20+ c-mount zooms
OM 350mm f2.8, Nikkor 180 f2.8, Exa 180 f2.8,
Tamrons: 90mm f2.5, 500mm f8 x3, 135 f2.5, 200 f3.5, 24mm 2.5, 28mm 2.5 x8,
FD 500mm mirror lens |
|
Back to top |
|
|
DSG
Joined: 04 Mar 2007 Posts: 544 Location: London, UK.
|
Posted: Fri Feb 19, 2010 7:06 pm Post subject: Re: New old lens but big problems. |
|
|
DSG wrote:
Big Dawg wrote: |
I just got a lens off Ebay. It is a Vivitar 135mm f/3.5 preset lens with 15 iris blades. Brand new in a shop worn box. Never been on a camera. A T mount that came with a Minolta adapter...that is for sale if someone needs one PM me. It will be cheap as I can't use it.
Any way being a 1960's lens that has never been used the iris blade are stuck. Someone before I received the lens tried the Aperture rings and caused several of the blades to jump out of the holder rings and bend....Now I have a brand new 135mm that is useless...Oh well off to Vphoto of Atlanta for a repair. Makes my lens cost 3 times what I wanted to pay......My luck was not so good.
http://cgi.ebay.com/ws/eBayISAPI.dll?ViewItem&item=170429229746&ssPageName=STRK:MEWNX:IT |
I have a Vivitar 135mm f2.8 thats looks exactly the same as your f3.5 version and it has 15 iris blades too...I paid just £2 ($3) for mine! |
|
Back to top |
|
|
fatdeeman
Joined: 13 Jun 2009 Posts: 780 Location: UK
|
Posted: Fri Feb 19, 2010 9:57 pm Post subject: |
|
|
fatdeeman wrote:
Two can play at pretending to be innocent,
Message the seller and do your best to sound angelic and sincere, explain that you are grateful for the lens and appreciate his quick delivery etc and then go on to explain that the aperture is not functioning and that this is not acceptable as the lens was described as new, a fact that was further re-enforced by his answer to another buyers enquiry.
Regardless of if he was aware of the fault, any seller worth his salt or at least protective of his reputation will make an effort to rectify the situation, I have bought many lenses in the past that have not met the expectations set by the item description. We all tend to bid based on the apparent quality and condition of a product and when I find an item to not be as described I will ask for a partial refund either as a contribution towards a repair or to simply bring the price of the item more in proportion with it's quality. The important point being that I would have not bid as much in the first place if I had been aware of the faults.
Many sellers will ask you to return an item at your own expense which is unfair and benefits only them. I usually reply stating that I wanted that specific item and that's why I bid on it in the first place and that a partial refund will go some way towards bringing the overall price in line with the condition of the item.
As a last resort a threat of negative (but accurate) feedback often helps motivate unhelpful sellers. Whilst it can be frustrating as a seller being unable to leave a buyer negative feedbacks it does allow buyers to be more honest and not fear false retaliation feedback from disgruntled sellers.
Some may argue that a seller may be novice and not really know if the item they are selling works or not and as such should not be approached for a refund but I believe this kind of attitude just allows people to sell any old junk with no comebacks, likewise if an item only fetches a very low price I don't see how this makes a faulty item any more acceptable, when buying something from a shop even a very cheap item will be returned if it is no good, no matter the cost it's money that would not have been spent if the item was known to be faulty. _________________ - Dave
www.lensporn.net
www.flickr.com/photos/fatdeeman/
DSLR: Canon EOS 60D, Samsung GX-1S (Pentax *ist DS2)
Mirrorless: Panasonic DMC-G1, Sony NEX-5N
Compact: Canon PowerShot G3
Lenses:
Wide: Tokina RMC 28mm F/2.8, Tamron Adaptall 2 28mm F/2.5, Sun Optical 28mm F/2.5, Super paragon 28mm F/2.8, Sigma filtermatic 24mm F/2.8, Fujinon 35mm F/2.8, Sun Optical 35mm F/2.8
Standard: Industar 50-2, Helios 44-2, Helios 44M, Helios 44M-3, Pentax-M 50mm F/1.4, Pentax-M 50mm F/1.7, Pentax-M 50mm F/2, Ricoh 50mm F/1.7, Chinon 50mm F/1.7
Tele: Pentacon 135mm F/2.8, Pentacon 200mm F/3.5, Optomax 200mm f/3.5, Sun Optical 135mm F/3.5, Soligor 350mm F/5.6
Zoom: Tokina 28-70mm f/3.5-4.5 SZ-X270 SD, Sigma Zoom Pi 35-200mm F4-5.6, Sun Optical 28-80mm F/3.5-4.5, Sunagor 80-205mm F/3.8, Tokina RMC 80-200mm F/4, Vivitar 70-150mm F/3.8, Tamron 95-205mm F/6.3, Tamron Adaptall 28-200mm F/3.8-5.6 LD Aspherical, Tokina RMC 70-210mm F/3.5
Mirror: Falcon (Samyang) 800mm F/8, MTO-11CA 1000mm F/10, Tamron Adaptall 2 500mm F/8
|
|
Back to top |
|
|
Big Dawg
Joined: 28 Jan 2009 Posts: 2530 Location: Thach Alabama
|
Posted: Sat Feb 20, 2010 5:07 am Post subject: Re: New old lens but big problems. |
|
|
Big Dawg wrote:
DSG wrote: |
Big Dawg wrote: |
I just got a lens off Ebay. It is a Vivitar 135mm f/3.5 preset lens with 15 iris blades. Brand new in a shop worn box. Never been on a camera. A T mount that came with a Minolta adapter...that is for sale if someone needs one PM me. It will be cheap as I can't use it.
Any way being a 1960's lens that has never been used the iris blade are stuck. Someone before I received the lens tried the Aperture rings and caused several of the blades to jump out of the holder rings and bend....Now I have a brand new 135mm that is useless...Oh well off to Vphoto of Atlanta for a repair. Makes my lens cost 3 times what I wanted to pay......My luck was not so good.
http://cgi.ebay.com/ws/eBayISAPI.dll?ViewItem&item=170429229746&ssPageName=STRK:MEWNX:IT |
You got a good deal then.
I have a Vivitar 135mm f2.8 thats looks exactly the same as your f3.5 version and it has 15 iris blades too...I paid just £2 ($3) for mine! |
Thanks to everyone's opinions and comments. I'm going to find a worn out version of this lens then send both off to the repair shop so they can swap the iris blades out. _________________ Big Dawg |
|
Back to top |
|
|
hk300
Joined: 30 Oct 2008 Posts: 1041 Location: Hong Kong
|
Posted: Sat Feb 20, 2010 8:48 am Post subject: |
|
|
hk300 wrote:
as stated by fatdeeman ... just give the seller a negative feedback and summarize what the issues are.
Very often sellers will then offer returns.
Also, i would not put too much effort in trying to repair the current lens, a repair man will cost more than the current value of the vivitar 135 lens.
Perhaps it is an idea to post a WTB 135mm lens in the Marketplace section ... i guess some members will have some cheap idle 135mm lens available. _________________ No longer member , please don't try to contact to him |
|
Back to top |
|
|
peterqd
Joined: 28 Feb 2007 Posts: 7448 Location: near High Wycombe, UK
Expire: 2014-01-04
|
Posted: Sat Feb 20, 2010 12:40 pm Post subject: |
|
|
peterqd wrote:
Boomer Depp wrote: |
I believe this seller was deliberately dishonest and you should be compensated no matter how trivial the price or he will continue his dishonest practices on unsuspecting buyers. |
I totally agree. Buyers have more power these days BigD. I ALWAYS ask for a refund for faulty or badly described items. I've always got my money back and 9 times out of 10 I get to keep the item.
Start a Paypal dispute straight away. communicate with the seller via the dispute system, telling him the lens is useless and you want a refund, and only agree to return the lens if he pays the postage. Give him 7 days to refund and if he doesn't comply, escalate it to a claim. And whatever you do, don't give any feedback until the matter is closed. _________________ Peter - Moderator |
|
Back to top |
|
|
|