View previous topic :: View next topic |
Author |
Message |
enzodm
Joined: 11 Sep 2010 Posts: 350 Location: Italy
|
Posted: Tue Mar 26, 2013 11:01 am Post subject: Lens suggestion |
|
|
enzodm wrote:
Yesterday evening my finger slipped over a button in an Ebay auction and, hem, soon I'll own a E-P1 .
I already ordered an EOS to m4/3 adapter to reuse my current collection of lenses, however do you have any suggestions for a compact lens sufficiently wide to be used for general purpose (24,28, up to 35mm)?
Alternatively, even if not so wide, a fancy lens nice to see in front of it
Thanks. _________________
Canon 60D, Tamron 17-50VC, Canon 55-250IS, Sigma 50-150/2.8 plus:
Wide: Mir 20/3.5, Kenlock 24/2.8, Tamron 28/2.5, Yashikor 35/2.8, Mir 37/2.8
Fifties: Voigtländer Color Ultron 50/1.8, Pentacon 50/1.8, Zenitar 50/1.9, Leica Summicron 50/2, CZJ Pancolar 50/2, CZJ Tessar 50/2.8, Industar 50/3.5 , Rikenon 55/1.4, Petri 55/1.8, Helios 58/2
In the middle: Cyclop 85/1.5, Nikon 100/2.8
135s: Tamron 135/2.5, CZJ Sonnar 135/3.5, Jupiter 135/3.5, CZJ Triotar 135/4, Tamron Twin Tele 135-225
Tele: Soligor 200/2.8, Pentax Super Takumar 200/4, Hanimex 400/6.3, Makinon 500/8
Various: Schneider-Kreuznach Componar 135/4.5, Tominon 105/4.5, Vest Pocket Kodak meniscus, Wray Supar 2"/4.5
Sony Nex 6 plus:
Industar 69 28/2.8, Fujian 35/1.7, Rokkor 50/1.4, Jupiter 50/2, Cosmicar 50/2.8, Industar-22 50/3.5, Leitz Elmar 90/4, Canon Serenar 100/4
|
|
Back to top |
|
|
SXR_Mark
Joined: 12 Jun 2010 Posts: 506 Location: England
|
Posted: Thu Mar 28, 2013 9:28 pm Post subject: |
|
|
SXR_Mark wrote:
For 24mm consider:
Nikon 24mm f2.8 (not very compact though)
Olympus Zuiko OM 24mm f2.8 (this is compact)
Sigma Super-Wide II 24mm f2.8 ( a cheaper alternative, size between Nikon and Zuiko)
For 28mm, try the Olympus Zuiko OM 28mm f2.8, which is compact and a stellar performer.
For 35mm, consider the MIR 24-N 35mm f2. Whilst this is not especially compact, it is fast and very good wide open.
A point to note is that all 35mm SLR lenses will be a lot less compact than might at first be thought when the size of the adapter is factored in. (Consider rangefinder or Olympus Pen-F lenses for true compactness).
If you want a truly compact m4/3 lens, you should consider the Panasonic pancake lenses (14mm f2.5 and 20mm f1.7).
Mark _________________ Olympus OM-D E-M1 for everything |
|
Back to top |
|
|
enzodm
Joined: 11 Sep 2010 Posts: 350 Location: Italy
|
Posted: Fri Mar 29, 2013 8:35 pm Post subject: |
|
|
enzodm wrote:
Thank you, actually I have some M42 lenses, and I imagine the adapter will add about 25mm length (behind a Industar 50/3.5 could also be reasonable... but too tele). Before this new acquisition I never took into account size (In those size I have a noname 24/2.8, a Tamron 28/2.5, a Yashica 35/2..
In fact I was trying to understand whether there are lenses I could consider that before I never considered due to registration distance (on the cheap side).
I saw there is an Industar M39 that unfortunately has some infinity focus issue, Pentax 110 and Oly Pen, and rangefinder wideangles but the latter seem in general expensive, if available. I saw also a mad Olympus 15/8... _________________
Canon 60D, Tamron 17-50VC, Canon 55-250IS, Sigma 50-150/2.8 plus:
Wide: Mir 20/3.5, Kenlock 24/2.8, Tamron 28/2.5, Yashikor 35/2.8, Mir 37/2.8
Fifties: Voigtländer Color Ultron 50/1.8, Pentacon 50/1.8, Zenitar 50/1.9, Leica Summicron 50/2, CZJ Pancolar 50/2, CZJ Tessar 50/2.8, Industar 50/3.5 , Rikenon 55/1.4, Petri 55/1.8, Helios 58/2
In the middle: Cyclop 85/1.5, Nikon 100/2.8
135s: Tamron 135/2.5, CZJ Sonnar 135/3.5, Jupiter 135/3.5, CZJ Triotar 135/4, Tamron Twin Tele 135-225
Tele: Soligor 200/2.8, Pentax Super Takumar 200/4, Hanimex 400/6.3, Makinon 500/8
Various: Schneider-Kreuznach Componar 135/4.5, Tominon 105/4.5, Vest Pocket Kodak meniscus, Wray Supar 2"/4.5
Sony Nex 6 plus:
Industar 69 28/2.8, Fujian 35/1.7, Rokkor 50/1.4, Jupiter 50/2, Cosmicar 50/2.8, Industar-22 50/3.5, Leitz Elmar 90/4, Canon Serenar 100/4
|
|
Back to top |
|
|
std
Joined: 09 Feb 2010 Posts: 1826 Location: Bulgaria
|
Posted: Fri Mar 29, 2013 9:39 pm Post subject: |
|
|
std wrote:
Congrats on the e-p1 it's a classic camera - metal body and good ergonomic.
I see you already have some lenses to try and EOS adapter makes sense - i have it too.
I have tried the Pentax A110 lenses - they are tiny and nice. Well they are always on f2.8 but are good already on this aperture.
the feel and pictures are not that impressive - more like on toy side.
if you need small and nice lenses you may consider rangefinder lenses. There are some cheap 50mm Russian ones in L39 - like collapsible Industar-22 3.5/50mm and Jupiter-8 2/50mm - but wider than 50mm can be quite expensive.
Voigtlander have few moderately priced lenses in M mount ($400-500 range) and available new - Color-Skopars: 2.5/35mm 4/25mm, 21/4mm and Super-Wide Heliar 4.5/15mm.
Also you may consider Contax G Zeiss primes ( Planar 2/35mm or Biogon 2.8/28mm) which are outstanding and top quality both optically and mechanically. The drawback is that they require special adapter with focusing ring.
If you want AF lens - the Panasonic 14mm lens is very compact similar to size as the 2.8/17mm m Zuiko but better corrected. _________________ Stefan
My lens list:
SLR MD: Rokkor 1,7/50 Exakta: Kilfitt-Makro-Kilar E 3.5/4cm; CZJ 2/50 Pancolar;M42: CZJ 2.8/50 Tessar; Mir-1B 2.8/37; Jupiter-9 2/85 T-mount: Tamron 5.9/200; Tamron 6.9/300; Tamron 7.5/400 C-mount: Cosmicar 1.8/50 Y/S: Sun 3.5/38-90, Sun 4/70-210 RF Contax RF: Jupiter-8 2/50; Contax G:CZ 2,8/21 Biogon T; CZ 2,8/28 Biogon T; CZ 2/35 Planar T; CZ 2/45 Planar T; CZ 2,8/90 Sonnar T |
|
Back to top |
|
|
Olivier
Joined: 18 Feb 2009 Posts: 5084 Location: France
Expire: 2015-08-06
|
Posted: Sat Mar 30, 2013 11:14 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Olivier wrote:
If AF lens, +1 for the Panasonic 14mm f2.5.
I like it very much on the Pen E-P2. _________________ Olivier - Moderator
Dslr : Olympus Pen E-P2 - Fujifilm X-Pro2 - Canon 5D MkII.
SLr and MF lenses : for feedback and helping people, cameras and lenses I own : full list here http://forum.mflenses.com/viewtopic,p,1442740.html#1442740 |
|
Back to top |
|
|
enzodm
Joined: 11 Sep 2010 Posts: 350 Location: Italy
|
Posted: Wed Apr 03, 2013 11:07 am Post subject: |
|
|
enzodm wrote:
thank you for suggestions. I should say I bought this body, for relatively few money, only to tinker with lenses I cannot use on Canon, while remaining on the cheap side... which is unfortunately not easy if looking for RF wideangles
By the way, while waiting for the adapter, in a rainy Easter I dismantled a disposable camera and recycled its lens in front of my Oly _________________
Canon 60D, Tamron 17-50VC, Canon 55-250IS, Sigma 50-150/2.8 plus:
Wide: Mir 20/3.5, Kenlock 24/2.8, Tamron 28/2.5, Yashikor 35/2.8, Mir 37/2.8
Fifties: Voigtländer Color Ultron 50/1.8, Pentacon 50/1.8, Zenitar 50/1.9, Leica Summicron 50/2, CZJ Pancolar 50/2, CZJ Tessar 50/2.8, Industar 50/3.5 , Rikenon 55/1.4, Petri 55/1.8, Helios 58/2
In the middle: Cyclop 85/1.5, Nikon 100/2.8
135s: Tamron 135/2.5, CZJ Sonnar 135/3.5, Jupiter 135/3.5, CZJ Triotar 135/4, Tamron Twin Tele 135-225
Tele: Soligor 200/2.8, Pentax Super Takumar 200/4, Hanimex 400/6.3, Makinon 500/8
Various: Schneider-Kreuznach Componar 135/4.5, Tominon 105/4.5, Vest Pocket Kodak meniscus, Wray Supar 2"/4.5
Sony Nex 6 plus:
Industar 69 28/2.8, Fujian 35/1.7, Rokkor 50/1.4, Jupiter 50/2, Cosmicar 50/2.8, Industar-22 50/3.5, Leitz Elmar 90/4, Canon Serenar 100/4
|
|
Back to top |
|
|
memetph
Joined: 01 Dec 2013 Posts: 940 Location: Poland
|
Posted: Thu Dec 26, 2013 7:05 am Post subject: |
|
|
memetph wrote:
I am coming late , sorry.
For something cheap and good , I recommend the Sigma 19mm 2,8. It is very sharp and have nice colours.
You can use MF easily compared to the pancakes.
I use mainly AF zooms with my Panas but when I want prime lenses ,I take this sigma and a 50mm from my legacy lenses. |
|
Back to top |
|
|
|
|
You cannot post new topics in this forum You cannot reply to topics in this forum You cannot edit your posts in this forum You cannot delete your posts in this forum You cannot vote in polls in this forum
|