| View previous topic :: View next topic |
| Author |
Message |
Tyrung
Joined: 15 Oct 2009
Posts: 1
|
 Posted: Sat Mar 06, 2010 5:38 pm Post subject: PORST TELE 1.2.8/135 mm |
 |
|
Tyrung wrote:
I found 2 cheap lens. They are very similar but one of them "X-M" . what is it mean ? Is better MC version?
And how about sharpness? I hear its a cheap good lens. They are only 45$ is it worth?
1) PORST TELE 1.2.8/135 mm X-M LENS
2) 1:2,8- 135 mm auto-e porst tele |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
woodrim
Joined: 14 Jan 2010
Posts: 4060
Location: Charleston
|
| Posted: Mon Mar 08, 2010 6:42 pm Post subject: |
|
|
woodrim wrote:
I have no experience with Porst, but wonder myself. I know of a 135mm f/1.8 for sale. Anyone know of this lens?
_________________
Regards,
Woodrim |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
supahmario
Joined: 18 Mar 2009
Posts: 615
Location: Berlin, Germany
|
| Posted: Mon Mar 08, 2010 7:08 pm Post subject: |
|
|
supahmario wrote:
@woodrim
you mean this one, right?
http://forum.mflenses.com/its-huge-porst-135-1-8-t24111,highlight,porst.html
@tyrung
welcome to the forum!
i think you mean 1:2.8/135, right?
and i think that "X-M" stands for the "Fujica X-Bajonett" which porst also used with his CR-series. x-bajonett lenses can not be adapted to any current crop or full frame slr because of it's very short register without loosing infinity focus. i don't know if conversion is possible.
but the price seems to be quite high! you will get similar lenses for 5€ per lens if your search the bay.
_________________
EOS 5D, EOS 30
Leica-R: Summicron 2/50
QBM: Distagon 2.8/35
PK: Tokina 3.5/17, Porst 1.2/55
M42: S-M-C Takumar 3.5/24, S-M-C Takumar 1.8/55, CZJ MC Sonnar 3.5/135, Jupiter 21M 4/200
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
woodrim
Joined: 14 Jan 2010
Posts: 4060
Location: Charleston
|
| Posted: Mon Mar 08, 2010 7:46 pm Post subject: |
|
|
woodrim wrote:
Yes, That's it. I tend to like lenses with character. Think it's worth a go? Any idea what a good/appropriate price would be? M42, of course.
_________________
Regards,
Woodrim |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
ManualFocus-G
Joined: 29 Dec 2008
Posts: 6622
Location: United Kingdom
Expire: 2014-11-24
|
| Posted: Mon Mar 08, 2010 8:25 pm Post subject: |
|
|
ManualFocus-G wrote:
I wouldn't pay more than £10.00 / $20.00 for that lens 
_________________
Graham - Moderator 
Shooter of choice: Fujifilm X-T20 with M42, PB and C/Y lenses
See my Flickr photos at http://www.flickr.com/photos/manualfocus-g |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
woodrim
Joined: 14 Jan 2010
Posts: 4060
Location: Charleston
|
| Posted: Mon Mar 08, 2010 9:51 pm Post subject: |
|
|
woodrim wrote:
Can't find many lenses at £10.00 / $20.00
_________________
Regards,
Woodrim |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
ManualFocus-G
Joined: 29 Dec 2008
Posts: 6622
Location: United Kingdom
Expire: 2014-11-24
|
| Posted: Mon Mar 08, 2010 10:15 pm Post subject: |
|
|
ManualFocus-G wrote:
| woodrim wrote: |
| Can't find many lenses at £10.00 / $20.00 |
Lots on ebay and at smaller photographic sellers 
The 135/1.8 is quite rare and sells for a lot It is found under several sellers' names including Soligor.
_________________
Graham - Moderator
Shooter of choice: Fujifilm X-T20 with M42, PB and C/Y lenses
See my Flickr photos at http://www.flickr.com/photos/manualfocus-g |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
supahmario
Joined: 18 Mar 2009
Posts: 615
Location: Berlin, Germany
|
| Posted: Tue Mar 09, 2010 11:23 am Post subject: |
|
|
supahmario wrote:
| Shrek wrote: |
| It is found under several sellers' names including Soligor. |
and "Weltblick"
but never saw one going for 20€.
_________________
EOS 5D, EOS 30
Leica-R: Summicron 2/50
QBM: Distagon 2.8/35
PK: Tokina 3.5/17, Porst 1.2/55
M42: S-M-C Takumar 3.5/24, S-M-C Takumar 1.8/55, CZJ MC Sonnar 3.5/135, Jupiter 21M 4/200
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
woodrim
Joined: 14 Jan 2010
Posts: 4060
Location: Charleston
|
| Posted: Tue Mar 09, 2010 3:19 pm Post subject: |
|
|
woodrim wrote:
I was thinking I could probably but it for under $100. No sense though if it doesn't offer anything out of the ordinary in terms of performance. I have a Vivitar standard 135mm f/2.8 that is quite good. Have been watching the Series 1 lenses as replacement, but haven't purchased one yet. Thought this might be like the Series 1.
_________________
Regards,
Woodrim |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
|
|
|
You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot vote in polls in this forum
|
Search
Memberlist
Register
Profile
Log in to check your private messages
Log in
