Home

Please support mflenses.com if you need any graphic related work order it from us, click on above banner to order!

SearchSearch MemberlistMemberlist RegisterRegister ProfileProfile Log in to check your private messagesLog in to check your private messages Log inLog in

Has anyone seen one of these?
View previous topic :: View next topic  


PostPosted: Mon Jan 18, 2010 11:18 am    Post subject: Has anyone seen one of these? Reply with quote

135mm f/2.8 screw mount Vivitar with a chrome band around the front.
http://cgi.ebay.com/ws/eBayISAPI.dll?ViewItem&item=130358115081&ssPageName=STRK:MEWAX:IT


PostPosted: Mon Jan 18, 2010 12:53 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Hi,

I've got one of these myself, also in M42. After I bought it - cheaply - I went looking for additional information about it, and stumbled on this interesting discussion.

These seem to pop up a few times a year on eBay - always the 135/2.8, and always, I seem to remember, with the "10" serial number. I don't believe I've ever seen this styling in a Vivitar of a different focal length.

I also recall seeing a photo of a very similar lens - also a 135/2.8 - with a "6" serial code, which would have made it an Olympus-manufactured lens (assuming, of course, that it falls within the proper production-year window). But I couldn't tell, on the basis of that photo, whether it was identical to this one.

I'm sorry to say that this is one of the lenses I haven't yet done any serious shooting with, so I can't report on IQ. I can say that the few quick snaps I took when it arrived looked rather promising.

Cheers,

Jon


PostPosted: Mon Jan 18, 2010 3:43 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Thanks Jon. That was the type of hope filled info I was looking for. This one was not as cheap as I would have liked but it was so unique I thought it a great addition to my collection. I'll get back with some photos after it arrives. Thanks again.


PostPosted: Mon Jan 18, 2010 3:54 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

I looked in on that discussion and That is the lens alright. I believe it is a Tokina as the ribbing is almost identical to all my TX and T4 Tokina made lens. Thanks again my friend..my knowledge has increased.


PostPosted: Mon Jan 18, 2010 5:47 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

What a beauty!


PostPosted: Mon Jan 18, 2010 6:02 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

I have one of these too. They are uncommon, but I would not say they are rare.

I have also seen different focal lengths in this series, including a 35mm, a 200mm and even a 250mm, all of which I lost unfortunately.

My theory is that they are pre-1970, or early enough in the 1970's to have missed the serial number code. The maker is of course mysterious, but I suspect either Komine or Kiron, outside guess Sun. They certainly are quality products.

The ribbed style was part of the Vivitar corporate style, and common to most earlier Vivitar lenses. It was easy for a major distributor like Vivitar to order lenses with particular cosmetics. The Vivitar T4 Tokinas for instance, are different from the same models of Tokina-made Soligors in exactly this way (among others). Tokina supplied them with different style knurling to different clients.


PostPosted: Mon Jan 18, 2010 6:39 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

The colour scheme reminds me of the Tamron adaptamatics but the actual shape and build are much too different.


PostPosted: Mon Jan 18, 2010 9:38 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Wow, someone really got a beauty of a lens for quite cheap!

However, I do wonder - wouldn't the chrome ring (in strong sunlight, and at an angle, anyway) produce and project unwanted reflections on the lens surface?


PostPosted: Mon Jan 18, 2010 9:50 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Interesting stuff.

I've also seen a somewhat similar silver-and-black mystery Vivitar 250mm, but it was (I recall) slightly different in some details; it had a cutout "window" through which the selected aperture was visible, in the manner of the Adapt-A-Matics or some of the Yashinon M42 lenses. Nice to know that there are other focal lengths out there with this very attractive styling.

(Oh, and I freely admit that it was the lens's looks that induced me to buy it.)

Cheers,

Jon


PostPosted: Mon Jan 18, 2010 10:11 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Was fortunate enough to receive one of these [serial number 105761] as part of a bundle of kit I won about 6 months ago - mostly junk apart from this and another Auto-Vivitar 2.8/135 [all black body with similar grooved focus/aperture rings, 378009118 serial number].

They nearly always rear their heads when it comes to me clearing out lenses, but they always get to stay at home. They both look and feel more expensive than they are, and are difficult to let go of Smile





PostPosted: Mon Jan 18, 2010 11:20 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Thanks everyone for their input...But...any photos taken with those lenses? I must say they are good lookin'.


PostPosted: Fri Jan 29, 2010 2:42 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Univer wrote:

...snip...
I also recall seeing a photo of a very similar lens - also a 135/2.8 - with a "6" serial code, which would have made it an Olympus-manufactured lens (assuming, of course, that it falls within the proper production-year window). But I couldn't tell, on the basis of that photo, whether it was identical to this one.
...snip...

Just reviving this thread (and quoting myself, which is probably poor form) to say that there's one of the "6" serial-number versions - an f/3.5 rather than a 2.8 - on eBay right now. And I still can't tell whether it's completely identical in styling to the "10" serial-number lenses, although it looks mighty similar.

Click here to see on Ebay

Cheers,

Jon


PostPosted: Sun Jan 31, 2010 1:46 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

Univer wrote:
Univer wrote:

...snip...
I also recall seeing a photo of a very similar lens - also a 135/2.8 - with a "6" serial code, which would have made it an Olympus-manufactured lens (assuming, of course, that it falls within the proper production-year window). But I couldn't tell, on the basis of that photo, whether it was identical to this one.
...snip...

Just reviving this thread (and quoting myself, which is probably poor form) to say that there's one of the "6" serial-number versions - an f/3.5 rather than a 2.8 - on eBay right now. And I still can't tell whether it's completely identical in styling to the "10" serial-number lenses, although it looks mighty similar.

Click here to see on Ebay

Cheers,

Jon

Thanks Jon but that one is not quite the same as there is no chrome on the front of the lens. Nice looking older lens though....yesss...should I or shouldn't I?.........no...no........................................................................................................................OK I'll just watch it for a while....YES...THAT"S WHAT I'll DO!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

AHHHH Well I looked again and it has the wrong mount for me...


PostPosted: Sun Jan 31, 2010 10:01 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Here is a 28mm with the same build.
http://cgi.ebay.com/ws/eBayISAPI.dll?ViewItem&item=390150281365&ssPageName=STRK:MEWAX:IT

Too bad for me it has a Canon mount.


PostPosted: Sun Jan 31, 2010 10:27 pm    Post subject: Re: Has anyone seen one of these? Reply with quote

Big Dawg wrote:
135mm f/2.8 screw mount Vivitar with a chrome band around the front.
http://cgi.ebay.com/ws/eBayISAPI.dll?ViewItem&item=130358115081&ssPageName=STRK:MEWAX:IT


No, but I picked up a dinky little, black, preset Vivitar 135mm f2.8 that has a lovely fifteen blade iris!...And it only cost me £2!! Very Happy


PostPosted: Sun Jan 31, 2010 11:58 pm    Post subject: Re: Has anyone seen one of these? Reply with quote

DSG wrote:
Big Dawg wrote:
135mm f/2.8 screw mount Vivitar with a chrome band around the front.
http://cgi.ebay.com/ws/eBayISAPI.dll?ViewItem&item=130358115081&ssPageName=STRK:MEWAX:IT


No, but I picked up a dinky little, black, preset Vivitar 135mm f2.8 that has a lovely fifteen blade iris!...And it only cost me £2!! Very Happy


Great buy! I've got 2 of those. Liked the first one so well I wanted a backup! LOL