| View previous topic :: View next topic |
| Author |
Message |
PapadakosPanagiotis
Joined: 11 Apr 2007
Posts: 106
Location: Greece
|
 Posted: Thu Oct 02, 2008 6:18 pm Post subject: MC W.Rokkor NL 21mm 2.8 |
 |
|
PapadakosPanagiotis wrote:
Thanks to kind sunshine, I have gotten a Rokkor 21mm for 100$ from the USA. Unfortunately its condition was not the best, (front barrel was
loose, aperture was not working correctly), but I was able to fix these
problems. One problem which still exists, is that it seems it can't focus
correctly to infinity but I think that I can also fix this.
So until I have some time to take some pictures with my X500, I did
a small home test using the Yashica ML 21mm 3.5 and the Rokkors,
21mm and 20mm, both at 2.8. Both are wide open. I think that the Rokkor is not focusing correctly though. Photos from my cropx2 Olympus,
from raw, no sharpening, contrast, etc, just conversion, and scaling.
Rokkor 21mm first, Yashica 21mm second, Rokkor 20mm last
Rokkor 21mm 2.8
Yashica ML 21mm 3.5
Rokkor 20mm 2.8
100% crop
Rokkor 21mm 2.8
Yashica ML 21mm 3.5
Rokkor 20mm 2.8
What do you think?
_________________
Minolta x500, x700 and Olympus E-510 and many manual lenses
https://www.flickr.com/photos/papadako/
Last edited by PapadakosPanagiotis on Sun Oct 05, 2008 11:47 am; edited 5 times in total |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
kds315*
Joined: 12 Mar 2008
Posts: 16593
Location: Weinheim, Germany
Expire: 2021-03-09
|
| Posted: Thu Oct 02, 2008 6:21 pm Post subject: |
|
|
kds315* wrote:
get a 3.5/21 Olympus!!
_________________
Klaus - Admin
"S'il vient a point, me souviendra" [Thomas Bohier (1460-1523)]
http://www.macrolenses.de for macro and special lens info
http://www.pbase.com/kds315/uv_photos for UV Images and lens/filter info
https://www.flickr.com/photos/kds315/albums my albums using various lenses
http://photographyoftheinvisibleworld.blogspot.com/ my UV BLOG
http://www.travelmeetsfood.com/blog Food + Travel BLOG
https://galeriafotografia.com Architecture + Drone photography
Currently most FAV lens(es):
X80QF f3.2/80mm
Hypergon f11/26mm
ELCAN UV f5.6/52mm
Zeiss UV-Planar f4/60mm
Zeiss UV-Planar f2/62mm
Lomo Уфар-12 f2.5/41mm
Lomo Зуфар-2 f4.0/350mm
Lomo ZIKAR-1A f1.2/100mm
Nikon UV Nikkor f4.5/105mm
Zeiss UV-Sonnar f4.3/105mm
CERCO UV-VIS-NIR f1.8/45mm
CERCO UV-VIS-NIR f4.1/94mm
CERCO UV-VIS-NIR f2.8/100mm
Steinheil Quarzobjektiv f1.8/50mm
Pentax Quartz Takumar f3.5/85mm
Carl Zeiss Jena UV-Objektiv f4/60mm
NYE OPTICAL Lyman-Alpha II f1.1/90mm
NYE OPTICAL Lyman-Alpha I f2.8/200mm
COASTAL OPTICS f4/60mm UV-VIS-IR Apo
COASTAL OPTICS f4.5/105mm UV-Micro-Apo
Pentax Ultra-Achromatic Takumar f4.5/85mm
Pentax Ultra-Achromatic Takumar f5.6/300mm
Rodenstock UV-Rodagon f5.6/60mm + 105mm + 150mm
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
PapadakosPanagiotis
Joined: 11 Apr 2007
Posts: 106
Location: Greece
|
| Posted: Thu Oct 02, 2008 6:27 pm Post subject: |
|
|
PapadakosPanagiotis wrote:
| kds315* wrote: |
| get a 3.5/21 Olympus!! |
Hmmm.... I don't think this is an answer!
_________________
Minolta x500, x700 and Olympus E-510 and many manual lenses
https://www.flickr.com/photos/papadako/ |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
F16SUNSHINE
Joined: 20 Aug 2007
Posts: 5486
Location: Left Coast
Expire: 2011-11-18
|
| Posted: Thu Oct 02, 2008 7:18 pm Post subject: |
|
|
F16SUNSHINE wrote:
Well
The Rokkors both have better contrast and seem sharper.
The 20mm is it!
I did not know you have the 20mm rokkor.
Can you show some sample from it used in the sunshine?
_________________
Moderator |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
estudleon
Joined: 15 May 2008
Posts: 3754
Location: Argentina
|
| Posted: Thu Oct 02, 2008 7:23 pm Post subject: |
|
|
estudleon wrote:
The 20 rokkor.
For me, the flekt 4/20. Unsharp? Not much, but the sharpness isn't all. Quality image is important too. 
Nice pics. Rino.
_________________
Konica 2,8/100
CZJ: 4/20, 2,4/35, 1,8/50 aus jena, 3,5/135MC, Pentacon 1,8/50
Pentax S-M-C-1,4/50
Helios 44-3
Mamiya 2,8/135
Misc. : jupiter 9
Stuff used:
A) SRL
Alpa 10 D - kern macro Switar 1,9/50 -black, Kilffit apochromat 2/100.
Asahi pentax spotmatic super takumar 1,4/50
Contaflex super B tessar 2,8/50 Pro-tessar 115
Leica R3 electronic summicron 2/50 elmarit 2,8/35
Konica Autoreflex 3 (2 black and chrome one), TC, T4. 2,8/24, 3,5/28 not MC and MC, 1,8/40, 1,4/50, 1,7/50 MC and not MC, 1,8/85, 3,2/135, 3,5/135, 4/200
Minolta XG9 2,8/35, 2/45, 3,5/135
Nikkormat FTn 1,4/50, 2,8/135
Fujica ST 801, 605, 705n. 3,5/19, 1,4/50, 1,8/55, 4/85, 3,5/135.
Praktica MTL 5 and a lot of M42 lenses.
Voigtlander. Bessamatic m, bessamatix de luxe, bessamatic cs, ultramatic and ultramatic cs.
Skoparex 3,5/35, skopagon 2/40, skopar 2,8/50, skopar X 2,8/50, super lanthar (out of catalogue) 2,8/50, dinarex 3,4/90, dinarex 4,8/100, super dinarex 4/135, super dinarex 4/200, zoomar 2,8/36-83, portrait lens 0, 1 and 2. Curtagon 4/28 and 2,8/35
Canon AV1, 1,8/50
Rolleiflex SL35 and SL35 E. 2,8/35 angulon, 2,8/35 distagon, 1,4/55 rolleinar, 1,8/50 planar, 4/135 tessar, 2,8/135 rolleinar, x2 rollei, M42 to rollei adap.
Etc.
RF
Yashica Minister III
Voightlander Vito, vitomatic I, Vito C, etc.
Leica M. M2, M3 (d.s.) and M4. Schenider 3,4/21, 2/35 summaron 2,8/35 (with eyes). Summicron 2/35 (8 elements with eyes), 2/35 chrome, 2/35 black, 1,4/35 pre asph and aspheric - old -, 2/40 summicron, 2,8/50 elmar, 2/50 7 elements, 2/50 DR, 2/50 - minolta version, 1,4/50 summilux 1966 version, 1,4/75 summilux, 2/90 large version, 2/90 reduced version of 1987, 2,8/90 elmarit large version, 4/135 elmar. |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
PapadakosPanagiotis
Joined: 11 Apr 2007
Posts: 106
Location: Greece
|
| Posted: Thu Oct 02, 2008 7:28 pm Post subject: |
|
|
PapadakosPanagiotis wrote:
| F16SUNSHINE wrote: |
Well
The Rokkors both have better contrast and seem sharper.
The 20mm is it!
I did not know you have the 20mm rokkor.
Can you show some sample from it used in the sunshine? |
Some samples from the Olympus are loaded in http://www.mflenses.com/gallery/v/mfl_club_members/PapadakosPanagiotis/Minolta_Rokkors/MDWRokkorX20mm_f28/
I still need to scan some slides I have with the 20mm, so I will load more samples in the future. By the way the 20mm is much sharper, but it probably has worse distortions.
_________________
Minolta x500, x700 and Olympus E-510 and many manual lenses
https://www.flickr.com/photos/papadako/ |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
F16SUNSHINE
Joined: 20 Aug 2007
Posts: 5486
Location: Left Coast
Expire: 2011-11-18
|
| Posted: Thu Oct 02, 2008 7:34 pm Post subject: |
|
|
F16SUNSHINE wrote:
| Quote: |
| By the way the 20mm is much sharper, but it probably has worse distortions. |
Oh I see
So is it a case like with the two fleks when thinking about the two Rokkors?
_________________
Moderator |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
PapadakosPanagiotis
Joined: 11 Apr 2007
Posts: 106
Location: Greece
|
| Posted: Thu Oct 02, 2008 7:37 pm Post subject: |
|
|
PapadakosPanagiotis wrote:
| F16SUNSHINE wrote: |
| Quote: |
| By the way the 20mm is much sharper, but it probably has worse distortions. |
Oh I see
So is it a case like with the two fleks when thinking about the two Rokkors? |
Well I have no flek in my collection, so I can say anything. The nice thing
about the 20mm rokkor, except sharpness is that it is a pretty small beast....
_________________
Minolta x500, x700 and Olympus E-510 and many manual lenses
https://www.flickr.com/photos/papadako/ |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
F16SUNSHINE
Joined: 20 Aug 2007
Posts: 5486
Location: Left Coast
Expire: 2011-11-18
|
| Posted: Thu Oct 02, 2008 7:41 pm Post subject: |
|
|
F16SUNSHINE wrote:
Well I should explain my question 
Many find the Flek 4/20 to be free from distortion, a little bit less sharp and lower contrast. A very good architecture lens.
The Flek on the other hand2.8/20 is sharper with better contrast and flare control (MC) but not as good in distortion control. More a nature and landscape lens.
_________________
Moderator |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
PapadakosPanagiotis
Joined: 11 Apr 2007
Posts: 106
Location: Greece
|
| Posted: Thu Oct 02, 2008 7:43 pm Post subject: |
|
|
PapadakosPanagiotis wrote:
| F16SUNSHINE wrote: |
Well I should explain my question
Many find the Flek 4/20 to be free from distortion, a little bit less sharp and lower contrast. A very good architecture lens.
The Flek on the other hand2.8/20 is sharper with better contrast and flare control (MC) but not as good in distortion control. More a nature and landscape lens. |
Probably yes. Although I have to compare full frame photos from both.
_________________
Minolta x500, x700 and Olympus E-510 and many manual lenses
https://www.flickr.com/photos/papadako/ |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
F16SUNSHINE
Joined: 20 Aug 2007
Posts: 5486
Location: Left Coast
Expire: 2011-11-18
|
| Posted: Thu Oct 02, 2008 7:50 pm Post subject: |
|
|
F16SUNSHINE wrote:
This one confuses my eyes 
http://www.mflenses.com/gallery/v/mfl_club_members/PapadakosPanagiotis/Minolta_Rokkors/MDWRokkorX20mm_f28/rokkor_20mm_f28_III.jpg.html
It looks distorted in a strange way but is actually the brick work right?
_________________
Moderator |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
estudleon
Joined: 15 May 2008
Posts: 3754
Location: Argentina
|
| Posted: Thu Oct 02, 2008 7:54 pm Post subject: |
|
|
estudleon wrote:
| F16SUNSHINE wrote: |
Well I should explain my question
Many find the Flek 4/20 to be free from distortion, a little bit less sharp and lower contrast. A very good architecture lens.
The Flek on the other hand2.8/20 is sharper with better contrast and flare control (MC) but not as good in distortion control. More a nature and landscape lens. |
I'm one of your "many" 
The 4/20 Flek is free distortion. I propose don't be so structured (for me too). I see a lot of landscapes with the F/4 and they are magnificents.
Rino.
_________________
Konica 2,8/100
CZJ: 4/20, 2,4/35, 1,8/50 aus jena, 3,5/135MC, Pentacon 1,8/50
Pentax S-M-C-1,4/50
Helios 44-3
Mamiya 2,8/135
Misc. : jupiter 9
Stuff used:
A) SRL
Alpa 10 D - kern macro Switar 1,9/50 -black, Kilffit apochromat 2/100.
Asahi pentax spotmatic super takumar 1,4/50
Contaflex super B tessar 2,8/50 Pro-tessar 115
Leica R3 electronic summicron 2/50 elmarit 2,8/35
Konica Autoreflex 3 (2 black and chrome one), TC, T4. 2,8/24, 3,5/28 not MC and MC, 1,8/40, 1,4/50, 1,7/50 MC and not MC, 1,8/85, 3,2/135, 3,5/135, 4/200
Minolta XG9 2,8/35, 2/45, 3,5/135
Nikkormat FTn 1,4/50, 2,8/135
Fujica ST 801, 605, 705n. 3,5/19, 1,4/50, 1,8/55, 4/85, 3,5/135.
Praktica MTL 5 and a lot of M42 lenses.
Voigtlander. Bessamatic m, bessamatix de luxe, bessamatic cs, ultramatic and ultramatic cs.
Skoparex 3,5/35, skopagon 2/40, skopar 2,8/50, skopar X 2,8/50, super lanthar (out of catalogue) 2,8/50, dinarex 3,4/90, dinarex 4,8/100, super dinarex 4/135, super dinarex 4/200, zoomar 2,8/36-83, portrait lens 0, 1 and 2. Curtagon 4/28 and 2,8/35
Canon AV1, 1,8/50
Rolleiflex SL35 and SL35 E. 2,8/35 angulon, 2,8/35 distagon, 1,4/55 rolleinar, 1,8/50 planar, 4/135 tessar, 2,8/135 rolleinar, x2 rollei, M42 to rollei adap.
Etc.
RF
Yashica Minister III
Voightlander Vito, vitomatic I, Vito C, etc.
Leica M. M2, M3 (d.s.) and M4. Schenider 3,4/21, 2/35 summaron 2,8/35 (with eyes). Summicron 2/35 (8 elements with eyes), 2/35 chrome, 2/35 black, 1,4/35 pre asph and aspheric - old -, 2/40 summicron, 2,8/50 elmar, 2/50 7 elements, 2/50 DR, 2/50 - minolta version, 1,4/50 summilux 1966 version, 1,4/75 summilux, 2/90 large version, 2/90 reduced version of 1987, 2,8/90 elmarit large version, 4/135 elmar. |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
bawang
Joined: 26 Mar 2008
Posts: 548
Location: Indiana, USA
|
| Posted: Thu Oct 02, 2008 9:48 pm Post subject: |
|
|
bawang wrote:
I stared at this for a while. I don't think it's the structure, the distortion is too 'consistent' on both half of the picture. It has to be the lens. |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
estudleon
Joined: 15 May 2008
Posts: 3754
Location: Argentina
|
| Posted: Thu Oct 02, 2008 9:59 pm Post subject: |
|
|
estudleon wrote:
| bawang wrote: |
I stared at this for a while. I don't think it's the structure, the distortion is too 'consistent' on both half of the picture. It has to be the lens. |
I agree. For this reason I put the distortion in the upper place of the virtues that the superwide lens must have. CZJ 4/20 is perhaps the best in this question.
Regards, Rino.
_________________
Konica 2,8/100
CZJ: 4/20, 2,4/35, 1,8/50 aus jena, 3,5/135MC, Pentacon 1,8/50
Pentax S-M-C-1,4/50
Helios 44-3
Mamiya 2,8/135
Misc. : jupiter 9
Stuff used:
A) SRL
Alpa 10 D - kern macro Switar 1,9/50 -black, Kilffit apochromat 2/100.
Asahi pentax spotmatic super takumar 1,4/50
Contaflex super B tessar 2,8/50 Pro-tessar 115
Leica R3 electronic summicron 2/50 elmarit 2,8/35
Konica Autoreflex 3 (2 black and chrome one), TC, T4. 2,8/24, 3,5/28 not MC and MC, 1,8/40, 1,4/50, 1,7/50 MC and not MC, 1,8/85, 3,2/135, 3,5/135, 4/200
Minolta XG9 2,8/35, 2/45, 3,5/135
Nikkormat FTn 1,4/50, 2,8/135
Fujica ST 801, 605, 705n. 3,5/19, 1,4/50, 1,8/55, 4/85, 3,5/135.
Praktica MTL 5 and a lot of M42 lenses.
Voigtlander. Bessamatic m, bessamatix de luxe, bessamatic cs, ultramatic and ultramatic cs.
Skoparex 3,5/35, skopagon 2/40, skopar 2,8/50, skopar X 2,8/50, super lanthar (out of catalogue) 2,8/50, dinarex 3,4/90, dinarex 4,8/100, super dinarex 4/135, super dinarex 4/200, zoomar 2,8/36-83, portrait lens 0, 1 and 2. Curtagon 4/28 and 2,8/35
Canon AV1, 1,8/50
Rolleiflex SL35 and SL35 E. 2,8/35 angulon, 2,8/35 distagon, 1,4/55 rolleinar, 1,8/50 planar, 4/135 tessar, 2,8/135 rolleinar, x2 rollei, M42 to rollei adap.
Etc.
RF
Yashica Minister III
Voightlander Vito, vitomatic I, Vito C, etc.
Leica M. M2, M3 (d.s.) and M4. Schenider 3,4/21, 2/35 summaron 2,8/35 (with eyes). Summicron 2/35 (8 elements with eyes), 2/35 chrome, 2/35 black, 1,4/35 pre asph and aspheric - old -, 2/40 summicron, 2,8/50 elmar, 2/50 7 elements, 2/50 DR, 2/50 - minolta version, 1,4/50 summilux 1966 version, 1,4/75 summilux, 2/90 large version, 2/90 reduced version of 1987, 2,8/90 elmarit large version, 4/135 elmar. |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
F16SUNSHINE
Joined: 20 Aug 2007
Posts: 5486
Location: Left Coast
Expire: 2011-11-18
|
| Posted: Thu Oct 02, 2008 10:07 pm Post subject: |
|
|
F16SUNSHINE wrote:
I don't know guys.
If you look at the door frame and the door you see no distortion.
Also the outer door jam that meets the brick is not as wide at the top as the bottom.
I hope Panagiotis can help us understand. It is a funny illusion 
_________________
Moderator |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
sichko
Joined: 20 Jun 2008
Posts: 2475
Location: South West UK
|
| Posted: Thu Oct 02, 2008 10:13 pm Post subject: |
|
|
sichko wrote:
Look at the edges of the banners/flags either side of the doorway.
_________________
John |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
PapadakosPanagiotis
Joined: 11 Apr 2007
Posts: 106
Location: Greece
|
| Posted: Thu Oct 02, 2008 10:18 pm Post subject: |
|
|
PapadakosPanagiotis wrote:
| F16SUNSHINE wrote: |
I don't know guys.
If you look at the door frame and the door you see no distortion.
Also the outer door jam that meets the brick is not as wide at the top as the bottom.
I hope Panagiotis can help us understand. It is a funny illusion |
Well, it is the lens. This is a picture that also make me feel strange! But I think there is an explanation. The distortion is not consistent, and the reason is that simply the lens was not looking the door at 90 degrees but a bit more, because the road was going upwards and also the door was on the top of 4 stairs. Keep in mind also that the door was not so far away. If you look at the other samples you can see that they handle distortions
much better. Last but not least just take also into consideration that this
samples are on a cropx2 camera which makes distortions more evident!
By the way I have 2 copies of the 20mm and I can let one go. The lens has some cleaning marks (like small scratches) at the front and a coating mark at the back, but I have not found any evidence that they appear in the images (The samples in the gallery are from this lens).
_________________
Minolta x500, x700 and Olympus E-510 and many manual lenses
https://www.flickr.com/photos/papadako/ |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
PapadakosPanagiotis
Joined: 11 Apr 2007
Posts: 106
Location: Greece
|
| Posted: Thu Oct 02, 2008 10:54 pm Post subject: |
|
|
PapadakosPanagiotis wrote:
By the way the Flek 20mm f4 in the gallery also show some distortion
and also the left side seems a bit problematic like in
http://www.mflenses.com/gallery/v/german/zeiss/flektogon/flektogon_20mm_f4/czj_flektogon_20mm_f4-23.jpg.html?g2_imageViewsIndex=1
Probably the adaptor or lens is problematic? Anyone knows on which camera these were taken? Attilas E-1?
Again with the 20mm f2.8 in this on the right side http://www.mflenses.com/gallery/v/german/zeiss/flektogon/carl_zeiss_jena_flektogon_20mm_f2_8_MC_M42/czj_flektogon_20mm_f2_8_mc-01.jpg.html?g2_imageViewsIndex=1
_________________
Minolta x500, x700 and Olympus E-510 and many manual lenses
https://www.flickr.com/photos/papadako/ |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
estudleon
Joined: 15 May 2008
Posts: 3754
Location: Argentina
|
| Posted: Thu Oct 02, 2008 11:21 pm Post subject: |
|
|
estudleon wrote:
It's seems to me that is the imposibility of positioning the camera at 90 ° to the floor. The objets of pics were very great height. To pics them probably were necessary to incline the cam.
Rino.
_________________
Konica 2,8/100
CZJ: 4/20, 2,4/35, 1,8/50 aus jena, 3,5/135MC, Pentacon 1,8/50
Pentax S-M-C-1,4/50
Helios 44-3
Mamiya 2,8/135
Misc. : jupiter 9
Stuff used:
A) SRL
Alpa 10 D - kern macro Switar 1,9/50 -black, Kilffit apochromat 2/100.
Asahi pentax spotmatic super takumar 1,4/50
Contaflex super B tessar 2,8/50 Pro-tessar 115
Leica R3 electronic summicron 2/50 elmarit 2,8/35
Konica Autoreflex 3 (2 black and chrome one), TC, T4. 2,8/24, 3,5/28 not MC and MC, 1,8/40, 1,4/50, 1,7/50 MC and not MC, 1,8/85, 3,2/135, 3,5/135, 4/200
Minolta XG9 2,8/35, 2/45, 3,5/135
Nikkormat FTn 1,4/50, 2,8/135
Fujica ST 801, 605, 705n. 3,5/19, 1,4/50, 1,8/55, 4/85, 3,5/135.
Praktica MTL 5 and a lot of M42 lenses.
Voigtlander. Bessamatic m, bessamatix de luxe, bessamatic cs, ultramatic and ultramatic cs.
Skoparex 3,5/35, skopagon 2/40, skopar 2,8/50, skopar X 2,8/50, super lanthar (out of catalogue) 2,8/50, dinarex 3,4/90, dinarex 4,8/100, super dinarex 4/135, super dinarex 4/200, zoomar 2,8/36-83, portrait lens 0, 1 and 2. Curtagon 4/28 and 2,8/35
Canon AV1, 1,8/50
Rolleiflex SL35 and SL35 E. 2,8/35 angulon, 2,8/35 distagon, 1,4/55 rolleinar, 1,8/50 planar, 4/135 tessar, 2,8/135 rolleinar, x2 rollei, M42 to rollei adap.
Etc.
RF
Yashica Minister III
Voightlander Vito, vitomatic I, Vito C, etc.
Leica M. M2, M3 (d.s.) and M4. Schenider 3,4/21, 2/35 summaron 2,8/35 (with eyes). Summicron 2/35 (8 elements with eyes), 2/35 chrome, 2/35 black, 1,4/35 pre asph and aspheric - old -, 2/40 summicron, 2,8/50 elmar, 2/50 7 elements, 2/50 DR, 2/50 - minolta version, 1,4/50 summilux 1966 version, 1,4/75 summilux, 2/90 large version, 2/90 reduced version of 1987, 2,8/90 elmarit large version, 4/135 elmar. |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
PapadakosPanagiotis
Joined: 11 Apr 2007
Posts: 106
Location: Greece
|
| Posted: Fri Oct 03, 2008 12:32 am Post subject: |
|
|
PapadakosPanagiotis wrote:
| estudleon wrote: |
It's seems to me that is the imposibility of positioning the camera at 90 ° to the floor. The objets of pics were very great height. To pics them probably were necessary to incline the cam.
Rino. |
I don't think so. Something is wrong probably with the adapter.
_________________
Minolta x500, x700 and Olympus E-510 and many manual lenses
https://www.flickr.com/photos/papadako/ |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
estudleon
Joined: 15 May 2008
Posts: 3754
Location: Argentina
|
| Posted: Fri Oct 03, 2008 12:49 am Post subject: |
|
|
estudleon wrote:
I pay more attention! Yes, you're probably right. Don't be missaligned element because the right side is OK.
Regards, Rino.
_________________
Konica 2,8/100
CZJ: 4/20, 2,4/35, 1,8/50 aus jena, 3,5/135MC, Pentacon 1,8/50
Pentax S-M-C-1,4/50
Helios 44-3
Mamiya 2,8/135
Misc. : jupiter 9
Stuff used:
A) SRL
Alpa 10 D - kern macro Switar 1,9/50 -black, Kilffit apochromat 2/100.
Asahi pentax spotmatic super takumar 1,4/50
Contaflex super B tessar 2,8/50 Pro-tessar 115
Leica R3 electronic summicron 2/50 elmarit 2,8/35
Konica Autoreflex 3 (2 black and chrome one), TC, T4. 2,8/24, 3,5/28 not MC and MC, 1,8/40, 1,4/50, 1,7/50 MC and not MC, 1,8/85, 3,2/135, 3,5/135, 4/200
Minolta XG9 2,8/35, 2/45, 3,5/135
Nikkormat FTn 1,4/50, 2,8/135
Fujica ST 801, 605, 705n. 3,5/19, 1,4/50, 1,8/55, 4/85, 3,5/135.
Praktica MTL 5 and a lot of M42 lenses.
Voigtlander. Bessamatic m, bessamatix de luxe, bessamatic cs, ultramatic and ultramatic cs.
Skoparex 3,5/35, skopagon 2/40, skopar 2,8/50, skopar X 2,8/50, super lanthar (out of catalogue) 2,8/50, dinarex 3,4/90, dinarex 4,8/100, super dinarex 4/135, super dinarex 4/200, zoomar 2,8/36-83, portrait lens 0, 1 and 2. Curtagon 4/28 and 2,8/35
Canon AV1, 1,8/50
Rolleiflex SL35 and SL35 E. 2,8/35 angulon, 2,8/35 distagon, 1,4/55 rolleinar, 1,8/50 planar, 4/135 tessar, 2,8/135 rolleinar, x2 rollei, M42 to rollei adap.
Etc.
RF
Yashica Minister III
Voightlander Vito, vitomatic I, Vito C, etc.
Leica M. M2, M3 (d.s.) and M4. Schenider 3,4/21, 2/35 summaron 2,8/35 (with eyes). Summicron 2/35 (8 elements with eyes), 2/35 chrome, 2/35 black, 1,4/35 pre asph and aspheric - old -, 2/40 summicron, 2,8/50 elmar, 2/50 7 elements, 2/50 DR, 2/50 - minolta version, 1,4/50 summilux 1966 version, 1,4/75 summilux, 2/90 large version, 2/90 reduced version of 1987, 2,8/90 elmarit large version, 4/135 elmar. |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
tootalew
Joined: 30 Sep 2008
Posts: 1
Location: Rockford, IL
|
| Posted: Fri Oct 03, 2008 1:22 am Post subject: |
|
|
tootalew wrote:
What camera are using with the rokkors? If digital, what adapter? I don't have experiance with it yet, but from conversations with others and the little info on the web, this lense should be a steller performer. I am not much of a wide shooter, but I have my mind set to convert at least 1 rokkor of each focal legnth to EOS. Ultra wides are last on the list. So far I have done:
58 1.2
85 1.7
100 2.5
200 3.5
Currently working on the 50 1.7 and have the following en route
24 2.8
50 1.4
135 2.8
after these will either be the 35 1.8 or 2.8 or the 28 2.0
all of these are mc rokkor-x with the rokkor-x in yellow.
Call me crazy, but I like what I see all these lenses. |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
PapadakosPanagiotis
Joined: 11 Apr 2007
Posts: 106
Location: Greece
|
| Posted: Fri Oct 03, 2008 1:30 am Post subject: |
|
|
PapadakosPanagiotis wrote:
| tootalew wrote: |
What camera are using with the rokkors? If digital, what adapter? I don't have experiance with it yet, but from conversations with others and the little info on the web, this lense should be a steller performer. I am not much of a wide shooter, but I have my mind set to convert at least 1 rokkor of each focal legnth to EOS. Ultra wides are last on the list. So far I have done:
58 1.2
85 1.7
100 2.5
200 3.5
Currently working on the 50 1.7 and have the following en route
24 2.8
50 1.4
135 2.8
after these will either be the 35 1.8 or 2.8 or the 28 2.0
all of these are mc rokkor-x with the rokkor-x in yellow.
Call me crazy, but I like what I see all these lenses. |
I use an Olympus E-510, which is the only digital camera that can
use a simple adapter with no lens for the rokkors. 35mm 1.8 is a
very nice lens...
_________________
Minolta x500, x700 and Olympus E-510 and many manual lenses
https://www.flickr.com/photos/papadako/ |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
bawang
Joined: 26 Mar 2008
Posts: 548
Location: Indiana, USA
|
| Posted: Sun Oct 05, 2008 8:30 pm Post subject: |
|
|
bawang wrote:
On both of these, my best guess is misalignment caused by the adapter or some loose/wrongly aligned glass. Having seen how knowledgeable Attila is with his lens. I am more inclined to say it's the adapter. But I can be completely wrong
I should check my adapter to see if similar probles exist with my Flek 4/20. |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
dwainasaurus
Joined: 08 Jan 2010
Posts: 14
Location: University Place, WA, USA
|
| Posted: Fri Jan 08, 2010 4:47 pm Post subject: |
|
|
dwainasaurus wrote:
PapadakosPanagiotis's original post mentioned a 'loose barrel'. I just purchased a 21mm MC Rokkor-NL 1:2.8 and may have the same issue. Until reading this post I assumed this looseness was normal and part of the 'floating element' thing. How do I tighten this?
_________________
Lens reviews at www.camerology.com |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
|
|
Search
Memberlist
Register
Profile
Log in to check your private messages
Log in
