View previous topic :: View next topic |
Author |
Message |
bogolisk
Joined: 20 Dec 2009 Posts: 448
Expire: 2011-11-18
|
Posted: Sun Jan 10, 2010 1:24 am Post subject: 135mm/270mm and zoom. |
|
|
bogolisk wrote:
Hi,
I heard that generally 135mm MF lenses are mostly excellent and some of them like the vivitar can be found cheap on evilBay. What make it hard to build a bad 135mm?
I have a 2x-crop body (e-p1). What would one use the efl of 270mm for?
til now, for MF legacy lenses, I only stick to primes. Are the old 70-210mm lenses are generally good? |
|
Back to top |
|
|
Attila
Joined: 24 Feb 2007 Posts: 57865 Location: Hungary
Expire: 2025-11-18
|
Posted: Sun Jan 10, 2010 10:38 am Post subject: |
|
|
Attila wrote:
Zooms are difficult lenses so not good as generally like 135mm primes.
In all lenses brand names are generally pretty good no matter is zoom or primes like Nikon, Leica , Contax etc. Third party makers quality is very vary and generally not good in zooms. Cheap and good zooms in this range Tamron zooms especially Tamron SP lines one of them good as any primes this is Tamron SP 70-210mm f3.5 constants aperture zoom. _________________ -------------------------------
Items on sale on Ebay
Sony NEX-7 Carl Zeiss Planar 85mm f1.4, Minolta MD 35mm f1.8, Konica 135mm f2.5, Minolta MD 50mm f1.2, Minolta MD 250mm f5.6, Carl Zeiss Sonnar 180mm f2.8
|
|
Back to top |
|
|
fatdeeman
Joined: 13 Jun 2009 Posts: 780 Location: UK
|
Posted: Sun Jan 10, 2010 10:59 am Post subject: |
|
|
fatdeeman wrote:
You can use the 270mm for whatever you like!
You can use it for long range portraits and street photography, you can use it for nature shots, aeroplanes, transport such as cars and ships and you can use it for selective landscapes where you pick out interesting areas in a landscape and use the 270mm to capture those areas without any or their surroundings.
At the risk of sounding cheesy, the only limit is your imagination.
Just take the lens out with you and see what happens. _________________ - Dave
www.lensporn.net
www.flickr.com/photos/fatdeeman/
DSLR: Canon EOS 60D, Samsung GX-1S (Pentax *ist DS2)
Mirrorless: Panasonic DMC-G1, Sony NEX-5N
Compact: Canon PowerShot G3
Lenses:
Wide: Tokina RMC 28mm F/2.8, Tamron Adaptall 2 28mm F/2.5, Sun Optical 28mm F/2.5, Super paragon 28mm F/2.8, Sigma filtermatic 24mm F/2.8, Fujinon 35mm F/2.8, Sun Optical 35mm F/2.8
Standard: Industar 50-2, Helios 44-2, Helios 44M, Helios 44M-3, Pentax-M 50mm F/1.4, Pentax-M 50mm F/1.7, Pentax-M 50mm F/2, Ricoh 50mm F/1.7, Chinon 50mm F/1.7
Tele: Pentacon 135mm F/2.8, Pentacon 200mm F/3.5, Optomax 200mm f/3.5, Sun Optical 135mm F/3.5, Soligor 350mm F/5.6
Zoom: Tokina 28-70mm f/3.5-4.5 SZ-X270 SD, Sigma Zoom Pi 35-200mm F4-5.6, Sun Optical 28-80mm F/3.5-4.5, Sunagor 80-205mm F/3.8, Tokina RMC 80-200mm F/4, Vivitar 70-150mm F/3.8, Tamron 95-205mm F/6.3, Tamron Adaptall 28-200mm F/3.8-5.6 LD Aspherical, Tokina RMC 70-210mm F/3.5
Mirror: Falcon (Samyang) 800mm F/8, MTO-11CA 1000mm F/10, Tamron Adaptall 2 500mm F/8
|
|
Back to top |
|
|
Excalibur
Joined: 19 Jul 2009 Posts: 5017 Location: UK
Expire: 2014-04-21
|
Posted: Sun Jan 10, 2010 11:11 am Post subject: |
|
|
Excalibur wrote:
***Are the old 70-210mm lenses are generally good?***
Ones recommended on forums like this are very good. I've posted quite a few shots on forums in comparison with primes, and on a computer screen you can't see the difference for sharpness.
A digital camera might be able to show the difference more in a crop, as using film it depends on the quality of the scan, but using my very good Epson scanner have proved to myself some of my old zooms (at their sweetspots) can equal some of my well known primes e.g Canon, Pentax...... _________________ Canon A1, AV1, T70 & T90, EOS 300 and EOS300v, Chinon CE and CP-7M. Contax 139, Fuji STX-2, Konica Autoreflex TC, FS-1, FT-1, Minolta X-700, X-300, XD-11, SRT101b, Nikon EM, FM, F4, F90X, Olympus OM2, Pentax S3, Spotmatic, Pentax ME super, Praktica TL 5B, & BC1, , Ricoh KR10super, Yashica T5D, Bronica Etrs, Mamiya RB67 pro AND drum roll:- a Sony Nex 3
.........past gear Tele Rolleiflex and Rollei SL66.
Many lenses from good to excellent. |
|
Back to top |
|
|
Helios
Joined: 05 Jan 2008 Posts: 537 Location: East of France
|
Posted: Sun Jan 10, 2010 2:28 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Helios wrote:
I use only (time to time) a couple of MF zoom lenses : Tokina (35-105, 75-260),Vivitar (75-205 f/3, , a Soligor CD 28-80, a Variozenitar 25-45, and Tamron 70-210,60-300,200-500.They are really good. I kept other zoom lenses only for collection's sake, such as Russian Granit 80-200, "noname" (really !) 80-200, 28-70 tamron, "old" 35/105 Rokkor (Tokina made) 16 elements in MC/MD mount . This last one gave me stunning results on film !
In few words, with Tamron lenses , you won't never disappointed. |
|
Back to top |
|
|
|
|
You cannot post new topics in this forum You cannot reply to topics in this forum You cannot edit your posts in this forum You cannot delete your posts in this forum You cannot vote in polls in this forum
|