View previous topic :: View next topic |
Author |
Message |
Lazzaros
Joined: 15 Jul 2008 Posts: 975
|
Posted: Sat Dec 19, 2009 10:30 pm Post subject: Who would like to get the Canon 7 + Canon 50mm f/0.95? |
|
|
Lazzaros wrote:
One local shop is selling this amazing set. I don't know the price yet but I'm sure I can't afford it.
The set looks great and work 100%. I already talked with the shop owner but he didn't get me the final price for it...
I saw some price on bay and only the lens could reach more than 1200€...
I'd love to use this on one Leica M8 or M9 for example...
(this one is not converted to M mount) |
|
Back to top |
|
|
scsambrook
Joined: 29 Mar 2009 Posts: 2167 Location: Glasgow Scotland
Expire: 2011-11-18
|
Posted: Sat Dec 19, 2009 11:59 pm Post subject: |
|
|
scsambrook wrote:
Used one of these back in the 1970s - huge and very impressive lens but even at the time you could get better quality with an f1.4 or f1.5 lens and push-processing B&W film. However, today's fashions are rather different and the lens now finds uses that the designer(s) probably never imagined. The Canon 7 is a very nice camera, even by today's standards it's a good rangefinder design - assuming it's in good order.
Prices have skyrocketed in recent times. Hard to believe there was a time when dealers in secondhand cameras would offer maybe £50-60 as a trade-in and almost give a sigh of relief if the customer turned down the offer ... about the same time that we were saying "Ah, sorry, don't really want to buy another Leica M3 with a 50mm Elmar, I've already got three I can't sell." Things have indeed changed.
I too would like to try the lens again, this time on my M8 - digital cameras and image processing software seem to handle extreme lenses better than film. Somehow, though, I doubt that I'll get the chance _________________ Stephen
Equipment: Pentax DSLR for casual shooting, Lumix G1 and Fuji XE-1 for playing with old lenses, and Leica M8 because I still like the optical rangefinder system. |
|
Back to top |
|
|
metallaro1980
Joined: 10 Sep 2009 Posts: 385 Location: West Emilia - Fidenza (PR) 43036 - Italy
|
Posted: Sun Dec 20, 2009 12:10 am Post subject: |
|
|
metallaro1980 wrote:
it depends from the scanner used ....
if a drum scanner is used then the slide/negative film it's still valid ! _________________
Olympus OM: 28 2.8, 35 2.8, 50 1.8 Made in Japan
Contax: 50 1.4, 85 1.4
Zeiss: 135 2.0 Apo-Sonnar ZE
Leica-R: 180 3.4 Apo-Telyt-R (Leitax)
Rollei QBM: 135 2.8 Rolleinar (Leitax), 50 1.4 HFT
Canon: 50 1.8, 40 2.8
M42: Helios 50 2.0, Jupiter-37A, Jupiter-21 200 4.0
Binocular: Hensoldt & Wetzlar DF 8x30
http://andreaverdi.altervista.org/ Vivaldi lives in my lenses.... |
|
Back to top |
|
|
Lazzaros
Joined: 15 Jul 2008 Posts: 975
|
Posted: Sun Dec 20, 2009 12:57 am Post subject: |
|
|
Lazzaros wrote:
If I could afford it I'd use with film. Just because I can't afford any M8 or M9 or even the Epson Rd-1.
I think this lens can create magic pictures for sure. It is not easy to use I know but afeter we know it better we can get all that "dream look".
I which I could buy it. As I can't I'd like to help someone who wants it.
It is in Lisbon and I take do what is needed to get it to the buyer.
I can receive the payment, do the deal and ship the package. I already did some deals here and you know guys, I'm a trustable guy.
|
|
Back to top |
|
|
lulalake
Joined: 22 Apr 2007 Posts: 1191 Location: Near Austin Texas
Expire: 2011-11-18
|
Posted: Sun Dec 20, 2009 1:18 am Post subject: |
|
|
lulalake wrote:
Have you seen many pictures taken with the lens? open to 0.95 there is lots of distortion so if it's image quality you are desiring, it might be best to choose something else however if you are collecting . .that's a different story.
Cheers
Jules |
|
Back to top |
|
|
Nelson
Joined: 06 Jan 2008 Posts: 618 Location: close to Paris, France
|
Posted: Sun Dec 20, 2009 1:25 am Post subject: |
|
|
Nelson wrote:
there is one for 1000e
http://www.leboncoin.fr/vi/84727270.htm?ca=12_s _________________ DSLR : EOS 350D, 300D, 7D, 5D
Pentacon 50 f1.8, 135 f2.8, 200 f4;
TAIR 3S
Helios 44/2
Meyer Optik Orestegor 200mm f4 Orestegor 300mm f4
Tamron 24mm f2.5 01B, 300mm f5.6 670Au, 75 250, 300mm f5.6 SP 54B, 500mm f8 SP 55B, SP 70 210 3.5, SP 60 300
my MF lenses
EF 50 1.8 I, EF 100macro f2.8, EF 70-200 F4 L is, EFS 17-55 f2.8 is, Sigma 10-20 EX, 18-50 2.8 EX, 300 f4 hsm, 400 5.6 hsm |
|
Back to top |
|
|
Lazzaros
Joined: 15 Jul 2008 Posts: 975
|
Posted: Sun Dec 20, 2009 1:46 am Post subject: |
|
|
Lazzaros wrote:
I saw some pictures from in on M bodies. It is far away to be the "perfect lens" but it is a "dream" lens for sure. I don't want to know about being super sharp or 100% no CA, etc... It has that magic and we could use it in the perfect moment.
Some samples here: http://www.rangefinderforum.com/forums/showthread.php?t=62992
|
|
Back to top |
|
|
Mike Deep
Joined: 25 Oct 2008 Posts: 319 Location: Upstate New York
|
Posted: Sun Dec 20, 2009 10:13 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Mike Deep wrote:
Related link - This one's trapped under a smashed filter!
http://shopgoodwill.com/auctions/Canon-Model--Camera-w50mm-Lens-5616696.html _________________ Rocket Launch Photography
Olympus: 24/2.8 MC, 28/3.5, 28/2.8 MC, 35/2.8, 50/3.5, 50/1.8 MC, 50/1.4 MC, 35-70/3.6, 75-150/4
Nikon: C 24/2.8, AI-S 28/2.8, K 35/2, K 35/2.8, F 55/3.5, C 55/1.2, AI 85/2, 105/2.5 (5/3), 105/2.5 (5/4), F 135/2.8, F 200/4, No. 5T
Pentax: 28/3.5, 35/3.5, 50/1.4 (8/6), 50/1.4 (7/6), M 50/1.4, SMC 55/1.8, 105/2.8, SMC 135/3.5, 150/4
Tamron: SP 17/3.5 151B, 28/2.5, 135/2.8 T-135, SP 300/2.8 60B, SP 35-80/2.8-3.8 01A, 80-210/3.8-4 103A, SP 1.4x TC 140F, SP 2x TC 01F
Vivitar: 24/2 (Kino), 28/2 (Kino), 50/1.4 (Cosina), S1 90/2.5 (Tokina), S1 28-80/2.8-3.5 (Kino), 70-150/3.8 (Kino), S1 70-210/3.5 (Kino), 2x Macro TC
Etc: Yashica 3.5cm/2.8, Fujinon 50/1.4, Yashica ML 50/1.4, Tomioka Yashinon 55/1.2, Mamiya/Sekor 55/1.7, Sigma 90/2.8
That's a lot of 50s. |
|
Back to top |
|
|
scsambrook
Joined: 29 Mar 2009 Posts: 2167 Location: Glasgow Scotland
Expire: 2011-11-18
|
Posted: Mon Dec 21, 2009 10:59 am Post subject: |
|
|
scsambrook wrote:
That one's maybe more of a "nightmare" than a dream
Has your local dealer fixed a price? Just curious, that's all.
A more practical lens is Canon's 50mm f1.2 - certainly a lot smaller and practically speaking not much slower. Never used one, but I did have a 50mm Canon f1.4 rf lens that was very, very good indeed. Not much differerent to a Leitz 50 Summilux ("2nd version") and much, much cheaper. I foolishly parted with it, one of my many photographic regrets. _________________ Stephen
Equipment: Pentax DSLR for casual shooting, Lumix G1 and Fuji XE-1 for playing with old lenses, and Leica M8 because I still like the optical rangefinder system. |
|
Back to top |
|
|
Lazzaros
Joined: 15 Jul 2008 Posts: 975
|
Posted: Mon Dec 21, 2009 11:55 am Post subject: |
|
|
Lazzaros wrote:
He talked with my about 1200€ lens and body.
It looks really good and works 100%.
I won't buy it because Distagon T* 35/1.4 and Makro-Planar T* 100/2.8 are comming...
If not I would go for it hehe. |
|
Back to top |
|
|
|
|
You cannot post new topics in this forum You cannot reply to topics in this forum You cannot edit your posts in this forum You cannot delete your posts in this forum You cannot vote in polls in this forum
|