View previous topic :: View next topic |
Author |
Message |
eeyore_nl
Joined: 09 Nov 2008 Posts: 837 Location: Netherlands
|
Posted: Tue Dec 08, 2009 10:03 pm Post subject: Zenit 11 experiment |
|
|
eeyore_nl wrote:
I loaded the Zenit 11 with a roll of Kodak 200, to see how well it still performed. No light leaks
Both pictures were made around Vleuten, Netherlands
Helios-44M |
|
Back to top |
|
|
themoleman342
Joined: 21 Oct 2007 Posts: 2190 Location: East Coast (CT), U.S.A.
Expire: 2013-01-24
|
Posted: Wed Dec 09, 2009 12:13 am Post subject: |
|
|
themoleman342 wrote:
Good to hear! The 11 has the advantage of having a black top which cuts down on any potential internal reflections. I've had to flock the inside of all my Es and Bs to get that.
~Marc |
|
Back to top |
|
|
Laurence
Joined: 26 Mar 2007 Posts: 4809 Location: Western Washington State
Expire: 2016-06-19
|
Posted: Wed Dec 09, 2009 1:41 am Post subject: |
|
|
Laurence wrote:
Very nice! I also use Kodak200 for my test images. It's hard to scan the negatives (for me), and I can usually see the "worst" results, and thus get an opinion. Not very scientific! _________________
Assent, and you are sane;
Demur,—you ’re straightway dangerous,
And handled with a chain.
Emily Dickinson
Cameras and Lenses in Use:
Yashica Mat 124 w/ Yashinon 80/3.5,
CV Apo-Lanthar 90/3.5SL, (Thank you Klaus),
Pentax 645,
Flek 50,
Pentax-A 150
Pentax-A 120 Macro
Voigtlander Vitomatic I w/Color Skopar 50/2.8
Konica TC and zoom lenses (thanks Carsten)
Contax AX
Yashica ML 50/2
Yashica ML 35/2.8
Carl Zeiss Contax 50/1.4
Tamron Adaptall SP 17/3.5
Tamron Adaptall 28/2.5
Tamron Adaptall SP 300/2.8 LD (IF)
|
|
Back to top |
|
|
eeyore_nl
Joined: 09 Nov 2008 Posts: 837 Location: Netherlands
|
Posted: Fri Dec 11, 2009 7:07 am Post subject: |
|
|
eeyore_nl wrote:
Laurence wrote: |
Very nice! I also use Kodak200 for my test images. It's hard to scan the negatives (for me), and I can usually see the "worst" results, and thus get an opinion. Not very scientific! |
These are scanned prints. I don't have a scanner for negatives. |
|
Back to top |
|
|
shauttra
Joined: 17 Nov 2009 Posts: 778 Location: Latvia
|
Posted: Fri Dec 11, 2009 4:30 pm Post subject: |
|
|
shauttra wrote:
Not bad!! I have Zenit TTL, still working with very good built in lightmeter. _________________ Mto-1000, Tair-3, Auto Exaktar 135mm 2,8, Samyang 14mm 2.8,
Jupiter 37A, Carl Zeiss Sonnar 135/3.5,
Helios-44, Mir-1, Revuenon 50/1.4,
Carl Zeiss Pancolar 50/1.8, Samyang 24/1.4, Auto Vivitar 35/2.8
www.radosi.lv
http://shauttra.blogspot.com |
|
Back to top |
|
|
|
|
You cannot post new topics in this forum You cannot reply to topics in this forum You cannot edit your posts in this forum You cannot delete your posts in this forum You cannot vote in polls in this forum
|