View previous topic :: View next topic |
Author |
Message |
yadisl
Joined: 03 Dec 2009 Posts: 180 Location: the Netherlands
|
Posted: Sat Dec 05, 2009 8:10 pm Post subject: Moon Shot with Minolta MD Rokkor 200/4 on Oly E510 |
|
|
yadisl wrote:
I think I need a longer focal length, although 200 mm becomes 400 mm equiv. on 2x crop factor - the moon is still so small.
Quater Moon
_________________ Tell me what you love, I will tell you who you are (Proust)
TLR yashica 635, 124
Canon canonet 1.9
Olympus E500
KM Dynax 7D
Sigma DP1
Rokkor MD 200/4, MD 50/1.4, MC PF 50/1.4, MD 135/3.5, Pentax SMC-M 50/4 macro, Takumar 105/2.8, Jena DDR 135/3.5, Porst 135/2.8, Prinzgalaxy 300/4, Mamiya ZE 300/4, Jena Tessar 50/2.8, Pancolar 50/1.8, CZJ Flektogon 4/20, Helios 58/2, Konica Hexar AR 50/1.4, Wollensak Velostigmat 90/4.5, Voigtlander Heliar 18 cm / 4.5, Heliar 15 cm / 4.5, APO Lanthar 15 cm / 4.5, Zeiss Tessar 105/3.5, Zeiss Opton 75/3.5, Mamiya 55/2.8, ZD 14-42, Minolta 17-35/2.8-4 D, Petri 35/3.5, Leica-R 35/2.8, Minolta 70-210/4, Minolta 35-70/4, Minolta 50/1.7. |
|
Back to top |
|
|
yadisl
Joined: 03 Dec 2009 Posts: 180 Location: the Netherlands
|
Posted: Sat Dec 05, 2009 8:11 pm Post subject: |
|
|
yadisl wrote:
Half Moon
_________________ Tell me what you love, I will tell you who you are (Proust)
TLR yashica 635, 124
Canon canonet 1.9
Olympus E500
KM Dynax 7D
Sigma DP1
Rokkor MD 200/4, MD 50/1.4, MC PF 50/1.4, MD 135/3.5, Pentax SMC-M 50/4 macro, Takumar 105/2.8, Jena DDR 135/3.5, Porst 135/2.8, Prinzgalaxy 300/4, Mamiya ZE 300/4, Jena Tessar 50/2.8, Pancolar 50/1.8, CZJ Flektogon 4/20, Helios 58/2, Konica Hexar AR 50/1.4, Wollensak Velostigmat 90/4.5, Voigtlander Heliar 18 cm / 4.5, Heliar 15 cm / 4.5, APO Lanthar 15 cm / 4.5, Zeiss Tessar 105/3.5, Zeiss Opton 75/3.5, Mamiya 55/2.8, ZD 14-42, Minolta 17-35/2.8-4 D, Petri 35/3.5, Leica-R 35/2.8, Minolta 70-210/4, Minolta 35-70/4, Minolta 50/1.7. |
|
Back to top |
|
|
cooltouch
Joined: 15 Jan 2009 Posts: 9096 Location: Houston, Texas
|
Posted: Sat Dec 05, 2009 8:26 pm Post subject: |
|
|
cooltouch wrote:
Okay, you posted another shot when I was writing the following note. Some adjustments were made to it as a result.
Looks pretty good, really. I like the color of the first one. I would have to drive for miles in order to find a place to shoot the moon close to the horizon in order to get that color. I suppose I could always photoshop it, but I prefer the real thing. A few questions:
Did you try your camera's equivalent of Live View for focusing accuracy? Some (all) of the MFTs have a zoom feature with their EVF, don't they?
I ask because I suspect the image could have been a bit sharper. I've found that sometimes some of my shots will be sharper than others, even though nothing in the setup has changed. This is due to atmospheric turbulence, so I'll usually take a bunch of shots, hoping to get a few keepers.
What is the percent factor of the image you posted? 100%? If so, that's still pretty good for a 200mm. I see some pixelation in the second shot.
What was your lens aperture setting? For moon shots, you definitely want to be shooting within your lens's 'sweet spot'. I'm thinking that, based on the EXIF data of your first shot, you probably had your lens stopped down quite a ways. If you prefer shooting at ISO 400, next time try 1/400-1/500 @ f/8. Correct exposure for the moon at ISO 100 is 1/125 @ f/11 for the full moon, f/8 otherwise. _________________ Michael
My Gear List: http://michaelmcbroom.com/photo/gear.html
My Gallery: http://michaelmcbroom.com/gallery3/index.php/
My Flickr Page: https://www.flickr.com/photos/11308754@N08/albums
My Music: https://soundcloud.com/michaelmcbroom/albums
My Blog: http://michaelmcbroom.com/blogistan/ |
|
Back to top |
|
|
yadisl
Joined: 03 Dec 2009 Posts: 180 Location: the Netherlands
|
Posted: Sun Dec 06, 2009 1:39 pm Post subject: |
|
|
yadisl wrote:
Michael,
The moon shot is heavily cropped. You are looking at 100% pixel view. I sharpened it a bit in PS. I did not change the color, the quarter moon was taken in a quite cloudy day. The speed is a bit slow, 1/20 or 1/60 with ISO 100 and f/11 I guess. The half moon was taken with greater ISO (probably 200 or 400) and WB = sunny (or AWB?). And the camera is 4/3, that's why you see all the grain
By the way I didn't use any tripod, it was all handheld with in-body Image Stabilizers ON. I was in sniper mode when pushing the button _________________ Tell me what you love, I will tell you who you are (Proust)
TLR yashica 635, 124
Canon canonet 1.9
Olympus E500
KM Dynax 7D
Sigma DP1
Rokkor MD 200/4, MD 50/1.4, MC PF 50/1.4, MD 135/3.5, Pentax SMC-M 50/4 macro, Takumar 105/2.8, Jena DDR 135/3.5, Porst 135/2.8, Prinzgalaxy 300/4, Mamiya ZE 300/4, Jena Tessar 50/2.8, Pancolar 50/1.8, CZJ Flektogon 4/20, Helios 58/2, Konica Hexar AR 50/1.4, Wollensak Velostigmat 90/4.5, Voigtlander Heliar 18 cm / 4.5, Heliar 15 cm / 4.5, APO Lanthar 15 cm / 4.5, Zeiss Tessar 105/3.5, Zeiss Opton 75/3.5, Mamiya 55/2.8, ZD 14-42, Minolta 17-35/2.8-4 D, Petri 35/3.5, Leica-R 35/2.8, Minolta 70-210/4, Minolta 35-70/4, Minolta 50/1.7. |
|
Back to top |
|
|
cooltouch
Joined: 15 Jan 2009 Posts: 9096 Location: Houston, Texas
|
|
Back to top |
|
|
yadisl
Joined: 03 Dec 2009 Posts: 180 Location: the Netherlands
|
Posted: Mon Dec 07, 2009 9:05 am Post subject: |
|
|
yadisl wrote:
Sorry I made mistake with the EXIF,
I just check it again and realized that the quarter moon was shot with ISO 400 and 1/20 sec while the half moon is with ISO 100 and 1/60 sec. _________________ Tell me what you love, I will tell you who you are (Proust)
TLR yashica 635, 124
Canon canonet 1.9
Olympus E500
KM Dynax 7D
Sigma DP1
Rokkor MD 200/4, MD 50/1.4, MC PF 50/1.4, MD 135/3.5, Pentax SMC-M 50/4 macro, Takumar 105/2.8, Jena DDR 135/3.5, Porst 135/2.8, Prinzgalaxy 300/4, Mamiya ZE 300/4, Jena Tessar 50/2.8, Pancolar 50/1.8, CZJ Flektogon 4/20, Helios 58/2, Konica Hexar AR 50/1.4, Wollensak Velostigmat 90/4.5, Voigtlander Heliar 18 cm / 4.5, Heliar 15 cm / 4.5, APO Lanthar 15 cm / 4.5, Zeiss Tessar 105/3.5, Zeiss Opton 75/3.5, Mamiya 55/2.8, ZD 14-42, Minolta 17-35/2.8-4 D, Petri 35/3.5, Leica-R 35/2.8, Minolta 70-210/4, Minolta 35-70/4, Minolta 50/1.7. |
|
Back to top |
|
|
|
|
You cannot post new topics in this forum You cannot reply to topics in this forum You cannot edit your posts in this forum You cannot delete your posts in this forum You cannot vote in polls in this forum
|