View previous topic :: View next topic |
Author |
Message |
DikkieDick
Joined: 18 Nov 2009 Posts: 63 Location: Groningen, Netherlands
|
Posted: Sat Dec 05, 2009 9:54 am Post subject: What year is my Vivitar 135:2.8 from (and my Kiron-lenses)? |
|
|
DikkieDick wrote:
Hi,
For Nikkor-lenses there is a great site with a lot of information: http://www.photosynthesis.co.nz/nikon/lenses.html
For Vivitar I found: http://www.cameraquest.com/VivLensManuf.htm
According to this the first 2 digits are the manufacturer, the 3rd digit is the year, where 8 can mean 1978 or 1988, 4th/5th weeknumber etc. Well, the 4th and 5th digit of my Vivitar 135:2.8 are 74, so that would be a strange weeknumber. Complete serial is 28774781 28 would mean Komine and 7 mean 1977 or 1987.
My 2 Kironlenses have the following serialno's :
Kiron 70-210:4 zoomlock: 25915349
Kiron 80-200:4.5 : 47037799.
If the same is valid as for the Vivitar-series then here you can find normal weeknumbers.
Anyone a clue about the Vivitar 135:2.8? I was just curious, if it would be over 20 or over 30 years old. Same for the others, which might then be from 1979/80 or 1989/90. _________________ Greetings, Dick
Nikon D300 & Nikon D70, bunch of AF-glass, SB-800-flash and a Jinbei D180 Delicacy Kit
MF-glass (all Nikon-mount):
Kiron 70-210:4 Zoomlock, 80-200:4.5
Peleng 8mm:3.5 fisheye
Sigma 24mm:2.8 Super Wide II
Vivitar 135mm:2.8 (Komine made)
Vivitar 200mm:3.5 (Komine made)
M42-mount:
Helios 44M 58/2 (with Zenit-TTL-camera attached)
Helios 135/2.8 (not Russian, with Chinon CE3 Memotron-camera)
Pentacon 50/1.8 (with Praktica LTL3-camera)
|
|
Back to top |
|
|
scsambrook
Joined: 29 Mar 2009 Posts: 2167 Location: Glasgow Scotland
Expire: 2011-11-18
|
Posted: Sat Dec 05, 2009 10:25 am Post subject: |
|
|
scsambrook wrote:
I just looked at the Cameraquest link in Dickiedick's post. The article seems to be talking ONLY about Series 1 lenses and I find myself wondering whether the numbering-identity applies to all the other lenses under the Vivitar brand. My own knowledge of 'who made what' is very limited, so I may be ignorant of other confirmed sources of information. However, it would be good to know what those confirmed source/s might be. _________________ Stephen
Equipment: Pentax DSLR for casual shooting, Lumix G1 and Fuji XE-1 for playing with old lenses, and Leica M8 because I still like the optical rangefinder system. |
|
Back to top |
|
|
hasan
Joined: 12 Mar 2007 Posts: 313
|
Posted: Sat Dec 05, 2009 1:06 pm Post subject: |
|
|
hasan wrote:
Maybe it's this way: 28774781: 28-Komine, 77-Year, 47-Week, 81-Manufacturing serial no.
My Vivitar 135mm 2.8 CF reads 28700899: 28 - 70 - 08 - 99 (Assuming, that here year 1970 is possible. It has M/SR mount, which were around those years )
My Vivitar 90mm/2.8 Macro reads 28801014
I agree with scsambrook, that cameraquest is talking about Vivitar Series 1 lenses. _________________ Pentax Z20 |Pentax K100D |SMC K35/3.5 |SMC K50/1.4 |SMC A50/1.4
|SMC K135/2.5 |SMC DA18-55 |SMC FA80-320 |AR 135/2.8(Chinon) |AR 55/1.4(M42)
|Sigma MF 90/2.8 |Sigma 28-80/3.5-5.6 |Exakta 24/2.8 |Vivitar 2x Macro Focusing TC
Last edited by hasan on Sat Dec 05, 2009 1:10 pm; edited 2 times in total |
|
Back to top |
|
|
casualcollector
Joined: 01 Aug 2008 Posts: 749 Location: Spaced out on Florida's Space Coast
|
Posted: Sat Dec 05, 2009 1:08 pm Post subject: |
|
|
casualcollector wrote:
The Vivitar numbering system seems to have been phased in about 1970 to 71 and abandoned in the 90s. The system covers most of the lenses you are likely to encounter, series one and regular Vivitars. _________________ In Search Of "R" Serial Soligors
Found: 135/2.8 #R407660, 200/4 #R405526, 300/5.5 #R411127 |
|
Back to top |
|
|
Screamin Scott
Joined: 13 Oct 2007 Posts: 1014 Location: Dallas, Georgia USA
|
Posted: Sat Dec 05, 2009 1:17 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Screamin Scott wrote:
If you post a photo, it might be easier to discern as there were cosmetic changes between lenses from one decade to another... _________________ Cameras-Nikon D300, D7100,D610,FE2,FTN ,FT2,N90s, Olympus Pen EP-3 & Olympus OM-D E-M10
Nikkor AF Zooms=28-105/3.5D,28-70/3.5D,35-135/3.5, et al
Nikkor AF //50/1.8,//Nikkor MF//50/2ai,50/1.8ais 50/1.4ai,24/2.8ais,28/2.8ai,28/3.5ai,55microAis/2.8,105/2.5ai,200/4ai,300/4.5ai35-135/3.5Ais,et al
Kiron /Kino made lenses//70-210/4ai,28-105/3.2ai,30-80/3.5ai,Viv 28/2ai,35-85/2.8aiVivS1,105/2.8Ais Dine,24-48/3.8ai VivS1,50-150/3.8aiViv,28-85/2.8aiViv,100/2.8Nai Viv,70-210/3.5Nai Viv,28/2.5ai Viv Komine made Viv//24/2Ais,135/2.8aiCF,28-50/3.5ai,28-90/2.8ai Viv S1,80-200/4.5aiCosina made Viv 19/3.8 Ais...Also Sigma 24/2.8 Ais Tokina made24/2.8ai VivAF Sigma 21-35/3.5,& other lenses... A link to some of my Flickr albums...
https://www.flickr.com/photos/screaminscott/albums |
|
Back to top |
|
|
estudleon
Joined: 15 May 2008 Posts: 3754 Location: Argentina
|
Posted: Sat Dec 05, 2009 3:17 pm Post subject: |
|
|
estudleon wrote:
casualcollector wrote: |
The Vivitar numbering system seems to have been phased in about 1970 to 71 and abandoned in the 90s. The system covers most of the lenses you are likely to encounter, series one and regular Vivitars. |
+1
The site says: "A former Vivitar executive provided this info. Vivitar used this lens numbering coding system from about 1970 to 1990, for ALL their 35mm lenses."
Rino. _________________ Konica 2,8/100
CZJ: 4/20, 2,4/35, 1,8/50 aus jena, 3,5/135MC, Pentacon 1,8/50
Pentax S-M-C-1,4/50
Helios 44-3
Mamiya 2,8/135
Misc. : jupiter 9
Stuff used:
A) SRL
Alpa 10 D - kern macro Switar 1,9/50 -black, Kilffit apochromat 2/100.
Asahi pentax spotmatic super takumar 1,4/50
Contaflex super B tessar 2,8/50 Pro-tessar 115
Leica R3 electronic summicron 2/50 elmarit 2,8/35
Konica Autoreflex 3 (2 black and chrome one), TC, T4. 2,8/24, 3,5/28 not MC and MC, 1,8/40, 1,4/50, 1,7/50 MC and not MC, 1,8/85, 3,2/135, 3,5/135, 4/200
Minolta XG9 2,8/35, 2/45, 3,5/135
Nikkormat FTn 1,4/50, 2,8/135
Fujica ST 801, 605, 705n. 3,5/19, 1,4/50, 1,8/55, 4/85, 3,5/135.
Praktica MTL 5 and a lot of M42 lenses.
Voigtlander. Bessamatic m, bessamatix de luxe, bessamatic cs, ultramatic and ultramatic cs.
Skoparex 3,5/35, skopagon 2/40, skopar 2,8/50, skopar X 2,8/50, super lanthar (out of catalogue) 2,8/50, dinarex 3,4/90, dinarex 4,8/100, super dinarex 4/135, super dinarex 4/200, zoomar 2,8/36-83, portrait lens 0, 1 and 2. Curtagon 4/28 and 2,8/35
Canon AV1, 1,8/50
Rolleiflex SL35 and SL35 E. 2,8/35 angulon, 2,8/35 distagon, 1,4/55 rolleinar, 1,8/50 planar, 4/135 tessar, 2,8/135 rolleinar, x2 rollei, M42 to rollei adap.
Etc.
RF
Yashica Minister III
Voightlander Vito, vitomatic I, Vito C, etc.
Leica M. M2, M3 (d.s.) and M4. Schenider 3,4/21, 2/35 summaron 2,8/35 (with eyes). Summicron 2/35 (8 elements with eyes), 2/35 chrome, 2/35 black, 1,4/35 pre asph and aspheric - old -, 2/40 summicron, 2,8/50 elmar, 2/50 7 elements, 2/50 DR, 2/50 - minolta version, 1,4/50 summilux 1966 version, 1,4/75 summilux, 2/90 large version, 2/90 reduced version of 1987, 2,8/90 elmarit large version, 4/135 elmar. |
|
Back to top |
|
|
cooltouch
Joined: 15 Jan 2009 Posts: 9096 Location: Houston, Texas
|
Posted: Sat Dec 05, 2009 3:54 pm Post subject: |
|
|
cooltouch wrote:
scsambrook wrote: |
I just looked at the Cameraquest link in Dickiedick's post. The article seems to be talking ONLY about Series 1 lenses and I find myself wondering whether the numbering-identity applies to all the other lenses under the Vivitar brand. |
No, as others before me mentioned, the numbering system appears to apply to Vivitar lenses in general. I own three non-series 1 Vivitars, two made by Komine, and one by Tokina.
Looking at the dating method used, however, one of my Komines appears to be an exception also. Both Komines have the same exterior design and finish (one's a 200mm f/3.5 and the other's a 35mm f/1.9): both have grooved metal focusing rings with aperture rings that have matching grooving. And since they are Canon FD, even the breech lock ring has the same matching grooves as the focusing ring and the aperture ring. But since they have metal focusing rings with no rubberized grip, I peg their production time frame as the early 1970s.
The 200's s/n is 2829650, whereas the 35's s/n is 28406970, one extra digit than the 200. The 35's date coding works fine: year 1974, week 06, 970th lens of the production run that week. If we apply the date coding to the 200 though, it doesn't work. Year 1972, but week 96? It does work, however, if we consider it to be week 9. My Tokina-made lens is much later made, and fits with the recognized coding for dates.
I suspect -- and this suspicion is based on an extremely small sample obviously -- that for the first few years of using this system perhaps Vivitar did not add zeros to the front of the numbers for weeks with a count less than 10. This would mean, however, that for the first few years, the s/n's number of digits would shrink by a column at the start of the next year. This seems unlikely, but it's the only answer I can come up with.
I also own two Vivitar S1 lenses, and they both have s/n's that conform with the accepted methods.
Another explanation is possible -- perhaps for the non S1 lenses, Vivitar kept the manufacturer code only, and just let the s/n fall wherever. Since I and hasan and DikkieDick all own exceptions to this numbering system, this last explanation seems to be probable. _________________ Michael
My Gear List: http://michaelmcbroom.com/photo/gear.html
My Gallery: http://michaelmcbroom.com/gallery3/index.php/
My Flickr Page: https://www.flickr.com/photos/11308754@N08/albums
My Music: https://soundcloud.com/michaelmcbroom/albums
My Blog: http://michaelmcbroom.com/blogistan/ |
|
Back to top |
|
|
|
|
You cannot post new topics in this forum You cannot reply to topics in this forum You cannot edit your posts in this forum You cannot delete your posts in this forum You cannot vote in polls in this forum
|