View previous topic :: View next topic |
Author |
Message |
myers
Joined: 29 May 2009 Posts: 12
|
Posted: Fri Dec 04, 2009 7:49 pm Post subject: Nikkor-S.C Auto 1:1.4 f=50 |
|
|
myers wrote:
Hi!
Bought a Nikkor-S.C Auto 1:1.4 f=50 and everything loks good, except one thing, the aperture works good on 1.4 and 2 but won't close more on 4 or even higher...
Is there a chance to get this one running?
Thanks for your help and sorry for my bad english, I am no native speaker! |
|
Back to top |
|
|
ChrisLilley
Joined: 01 Jan 2008 Posts: 1767 Location: Nice, France
|
Posted: Fri Dec 04, 2009 10:07 pm Post subject: |
|
|
ChrisLilley wrote:
Your English is fine, don't worry about it.
When you look at the aperture blades, do they seem to have oil on them? When set to f/2, if you move the aperture lever at the back of the lens, do the blades move freely? _________________ Camera (ˈkæ mə rə), n. Device for taking pictures in bright light
There are 10 kinds of people in the world: those who understand binary, and those who don’t. Key: Ai-P, Ai, Ai'ed, AiS
Camera: Nikon D90, D40, DK-21M eyepiece, ML-3 remote MF lenses: Nikkor 20mm f/4 K, AI'ed | N.K. Nikkor-N 24mm f/2.8 | Nikkor-N.C 24mm f/2.8 | Nikkor 28mm f/2.8 AiS late model | Арсенал (Arsenal) Мир-24Н (Mir-24N) 35mm f/2 | Cosina Voigtländer Ultron SL II 40mm f/2.0 | Micro-Nikkor 55mm f/2.8 AiS | Zoom-Nikkor 80-200 f/4.5 Ai | ЛЗОС (LZOS) Юпитер-9 (Jupiter-9) 85mm f/2 | Cosina Voigtländer APO-Lanthar 90mm f/3.5 SL | Nikkor-P 105mm f/2.5 pre-Ai, Ai'ed | Micro-Nikkor 105mm f/4 | Schneider Kreuznach Componon 105mm f/5.6 | Nikkor 135mm f/2.8, Ai'ed 1976 model | Nikkor 180mm f/2.8 ED AiS | Арсенал (Arsenal) ТЕЛЕАР-Н (Telear-n) 200mm f/3.5 | Nikkor 300 mm f/4.5 Ai (full equipment list) |
|
Back to top |
|
|
myers
Joined: 29 May 2009 Posts: 12
|
Posted: Sat Dec 05, 2009 6:54 am Post subject: |
|
|
myers wrote:
Thx.
The blades are free of oil and move like they should do to 2.0, as I noticed later yesterday only to 2.0 and 1.4... |
|
Back to top |
|
|
larsr
Joined: 25 Jun 2009 Posts: 272 Location: Helsinki, Finland
|
Posted: Sat Dec 05, 2009 10:52 am Post subject: |
|
|
larsr wrote:
It could also be lack of oil or lubrication on the blades - ie. they are jamming up ?
Otherwise I would say it's been dropped and the blades misaligned because of that. Depending on what you paid for the lens a repair might set you off much more, unfortunately - unless you are willing to take on the challenge and try and repair the lens yourself :) _________________ Lars
Bodies:
DSLR: Nikon D200
SLR: Nikon FA, Pentax Spotmatic SPII, Zeiss Ikon Icarex 35TM
35mm: Voigtl�nder Vitoret
Nikkor MF
24/2.8K AI'd, 28/2.8 AIS, 35/2 AIS, 50/1.4 AIS, 50/1.8 AIS, 50/2 AI, 55/2.8 Micro, 35-70/3.5 AIS, 85/1.8K AI'd, 100/2.8 Series E, 105/2.5 AI, 105/2.5 AIS, 135/3.5 AI, Nikkor 180/2.8 ED AIS, 200/4-Q AI'd, 300/4.5-H AI'd
M42
Misc: Vivitar 28/2.5, Chinon 28/2.8, Cosina Auto Cosinon 50/1.8, Revue Auto Revuenon 50/1.8, Mamiya 50/2, Auto Flex 55/1.7, Cosina Cosinon 135/2.8 MC, Vivitar 135/2.8, Petri 200/3.5 CC Auto
Zeiss: Carl Zeiss (Ikon) Tessar 50/2.8, CZJ Tessar 50/2.8, CZJ Pancolar Electric 50/1.8 MC, CZJ Biotar 58/2 T, CZJ Sonnar MC S 135/3.5
Asahi-Pentax: SMC-Takumar 55/1.8, Super-Takumar 105/2.8, SMC-Takumar 135/3.5
USSR: Mir-1 37/2.8 (1958 GP), Helios 44-2 58/2
Pentacon/Meyer: Pentacon 29/2.8 MC, Pentacon 50/1.8 MC Electric, Meyer G�rlitz Oreston 50/1.8, Meyer G�rlitz Orestor 135/2.8, Pentacon 200/4
Nikkor AF
50/1.8 D, 60/2.8 Micro, 55-200/4-5.6 G VR, 70-300/4-5.6 ED, 18-70/3.5-4.5 G
Wantlist
Nikkor 105/1.8, Nikkor 135/2
|
|
Back to top |
|
|
martinsmith99
Joined: 31 Aug 2008 Posts: 6950 Location: S Glos, UK
Expire: 2013-11-18
|
Posted: Sat Dec 05, 2009 12:13 pm Post subject: |
|
|
martinsmith99 wrote:
I had one and decided to sell within hours of owning it. A 1.8/55 Takumar gives much better images and costs less. As does a Helios and Pentacon.
I'd just list it on ebay and see what you can get for it. Not one of the better Nikons. _________________ Casual attendance these days |
|
Back to top |
|
|
myers
Joined: 29 May 2009 Posts: 12
|
Posted: Sat Dec 05, 2009 12:35 pm Post subject: |
|
|
myers wrote:
I didn't paid that much an the lens, so I will look for a repair.
Has anybody tried this kind of repair as a DIY? Is ist very difficult? |
|
Back to top |
|
|
hk300
Joined: 30 Oct 2008 Posts: 1041 Location: Hong Kong
|
Posted: Sun Dec 06, 2009 2:24 am Post subject: |
|
|
hk300 wrote:
myers wrote: |
I didn't paid that much an the lens, so I will look for a repair.
Has anybody tried this kind of repair as a DIY? Is ist very difficult? |
I think the repair will not be easy for someone who never repaired a lens. Most people will start will cleaning dust / fungus etc...
If you want to clean / repair more lenses in the near future, getting some tools is necessary. You need a spanner and perhaps some rubbers (which i happen to sell on the forum), which may cost you $50+
However, if you are impatient, you may easily scratch lenses, and even if you manage to open the lenses, it takes a lot of time to really clean the glass, very often the glass become even more dirty
_________________ No longer member , please don't try to contact to him |
|
Back to top |
|
|
myers
Joined: 29 May 2009 Posts: 12
|
Posted: Mon Dec 07, 2009 9:58 pm Post subject: |
|
|
myers wrote:
Just removed a screw, moved some things left to right, fixed the screw and now it works!
Thanks for your help guys! |
|
Back to top |
|
|
|
|
You cannot post new topics in this forum You cannot reply to topics in this forum You cannot edit your posts in this forum You cannot delete your posts in this forum You cannot vote in polls in this forum
|