MFlenses - A new life in a digital age
MFLenses 2026

Manual Focus Lenses Forum

Explore the world of vintage lenses through repair notes, real test shots, and detailed archive threads packed with images.

Explore the world of vintage lenses through repair notes, real test shots, and detailed archive threads packed with images.
DiskFreeVault safely moves Mac apps and data to external storage.
Spotlight

Featured partner placement for the forum front page.

helios 44 question
View previous topic :: View next topic  


Reply

after reading some good things in this forum, i've been thinking of getting a helios 44, but there seem to be many versions of this lens:
44-2; 44-4; 44-4m; 44-6mc! are there qualitative differences among these? thanks!


Reply

Generally all good lenses, I prefer oldest over new ones.


Reply

Some think 44-3 is best, others claim 44-7 is sharpest but I think they are all pretty similar. It depends to some extent on Soviet Quality Control, which can be variable. Personally I like the m39 Helios 44, but I had good results from the 44-2, 44-3 and 44k-4, so pay your money and take your choice, they can all be got relatively cheaply and all worth a go. Very Happy


Reply

thank you both much appreciated!
tony


Reply

I have two 44-2 and one 44M-4. I can't see any major differencies in picture quality, but I haven't done a real comparison.
I like the 44-2 better for the pre-set function. The automatic f-stop version doesn't work on my DSLR so I have to jam the mechanism i order to stop down.


Reply

I have the 44-2 and the 44M and also the Biotar that these were based on. IQ-wise there's not much between all the range. I do prefer the preset on the 44-2 for ease on DSLR. Next would be the 44M as the A/M switch can be used to stop the lens down.

Later models have better coatings, whereas earlier models have more iris blades. If I had to chose from the range I would go for 44, 44-2 or 44M as these are cheaper and need no jamming of stopdown pin to function correctly. The same can be said for the 44-3, but these are rare and prices reflect this.


Reply

I got a 44-3 MC ( apparantly is rare ) coming in by mail any day now! Then I can test it together with a 44-2 Zebra, 44M and a Biotar. Can't wait.


Reply

I've got an older zebra 44-2 and a 44-3. I've done a few small tests in the field, and I'd be hard pressed to point out the difference in any of my photos. They're both perfect, though. Based on my experience and other comments, I would look for an older 44-2 or a 44-3. But, really, they're so inexpensive that you wouldn't go broke buying one of each. Smile


Reply

Poolhall wrote:
Some think 44-3 is best, others claim 44-7 is sharpest but I think they are all pretty similar.

Helios-44-7 - A regular objective of cameras of line Zenit-7.
And you likely told about MC Helios-44M-7.
http://animal.zenit.istra.ru/archive/lenses/helios-44.html


Reply

You are correct Sergey, Helios 44m-7 was what I meant to say Embarassed


Reply

I have a 44-3 and 44M-7.

I like the 44-3 very much.

My copy of the 44M-7 lost the particular bokeh of the 44-3. It 's more similar to the "normals" 50 mm, and in this league my takumar, pancolar, hexanon and pentacon beat it.

The 44-3 is a different lens. Similar to the 44-2 but it's MC. Nice image with particular bokeh (as you know).

If you have a good 50/58 mm, perhaps the 44-2 or MC 44-3 can be the option.

Rino.


Reply

I have 44-6 and it's so-so. Maybe I got a so-so copy one with so-so luck.


Reply

It is possible to think of Helios-77 Smile


Reply

thank you everyone for all the help and information! let me ask you all, as between the best helios of your choice and the zeiss biotar, which would you choose?

also, per rino above, it seems the 44-3 has some unusual bokeh characteristics the others lack--is that agreed? i read that in some helios you have to jam the pin to make it work on dslr; how does the 44-3 work in this regard?
thanks again!
tony


Reply

The Helios 44-3 is pre-set lens it has no pin, it should fit ok with the right adapter. Sergey has a point with the Helios-77m it is basically a 50mm rather than 58mm Helios , also worth considering are the f2/50mm Zenitars they are a modernised Helios 44 and are very sharp and simple lenses. I have both the m42 and k-mount versions of this lens and would highly recommend them, I did post some samples on the forum in the past. Very Happy


Reply

thanks. i have a 50mm zeiss pancolar, so i was thinking of something that had some unusual character, like the 44-3....or the biotar?
tony


Reply

What would be the most probable camera the 44-3 would be found on? Maybe it is worth looking for whole camera-lens assemblies.

Eugen


Reply

You can often find the 44-3 on Belomo or MMZ Zenits, Like the Zenit ET especially the plastic body types- that's how I got mine, but they are not that common. Still its a good idea to look for one that way.
rbelyell- cant help with the Biotar I never used one, but would recommend the 44-3 as a lens with character, or try a 44-2 they are much cheaper and easier to find and are similar in type. Very Happy