| View previous topic :: View next topic |
| Author |
Message |
rbelyell
 Joined: 13 Oct 2009 Posts: 4269 Location: somewhere in the mountains of central NY
Expire: 2014-01-31
|
 Posted: Tue Oct 27, 2009 4:06 pm Post subject: helios 44 question |
|
 Posted: Tue Oct 27, 2009 4:06 pm Post subject: helios 44 question |
|
|
rbelyell wrote:
after reading some good things in this forum, i've been thinking of getting a helios 44, but there seem to be many versions of this lens:
44-2; 44-4; 44-4m; 44-6mc! are there qualitative differences among these? thanks! _________________ Epson RD1 + Elmarit 21/2.8; Summarit 50/1.5; Summarit 75/2.5; Elmar-c 90/4; Sankyo Komura 135/2.8, Hektor 135/4.5; Braun Paxina 29 6x6; Photax Boyer Paris; Holga 120 Pano
GREAT STUFF FOR SALE:
Contax T
Hasselblad XPan + 45/4, 90/4
Kodak Retina Reflex IV + full set of Schneider Krueznach lenses
Mercury 2 half frame 35mm
Kodak Pro slr/n
Fuji GM670+100/3.5+65/8!
Praktisix 6x6 medium format + ZeissBiometar 120/2.8
Bessa T 101 Anniversary Edition in Navy Blue
Mamiya Six Folder with Zuiko 75/3.5
Adaptall: Tamron SP 28-85 macro
Cameras: Canon IX
PM for more complete descriptions/pix. All in great shape!
_________________________
'buy me a drink, sing me a song,
take me as i come 'cause i can't stay long' |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Attila
 Joined: 24 Feb 2007 Posts: 57978
Expire: 2025-11-18
|
 Posted: Tue Oct 27, 2009 4:18 pm Post subject: |
|
 Posted: Tue Oct 27, 2009 4:18 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Attila wrote:
Generally all good lenses, I prefer oldest over new ones. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Poolhall
 Joined: 25 Feb 2008 Posts: 1296
|
 Posted: Tue Oct 27, 2009 5:16 pm Post subject: |
|
 Posted: Tue Oct 27, 2009 5:16 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Poolhall wrote:
Some think 44-3 is best, others claim 44-7 is sharpest but I think they are all pretty similar. It depends to some extent on Soviet Quality Control, which can be variable. Personally I like the m39 Helios 44, but I had good results from the 44-2, 44-3 and 44k-4, so pay your money and take your choice, they can all be got relatively cheaply and all worth a go.  |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
rbelyell
 Joined: 13 Oct 2009 Posts: 4269 Location: somewhere in the mountains of central NY
Expire: 2014-01-31
|
 Posted: Tue Oct 27, 2009 5:55 pm Post subject: |
|
 Posted: Tue Oct 27, 2009 5:55 pm Post subject: |
|
|
rbelyell wrote:
thank you both much appreciated!
tony _________________ Epson RD1 + Elmarit 21/2.8; Summarit 50/1.5; Summarit 75/2.5; Elmar-c 90/4; Sankyo Komura 135/2.8, Hektor 135/4.5; Braun Paxina 29 6x6; Photax Boyer Paris; Holga 120 Pano
GREAT STUFF FOR SALE:
Contax T
Hasselblad XPan + 45/4, 90/4
Kodak Retina Reflex IV + full set of Schneider Krueznach lenses
Mercury 2 half frame 35mm
Kodak Pro slr/n
Fuji GM670+100/3.5+65/8!
Praktisix 6x6 medium format + ZeissBiometar 120/2.8
Bessa T 101 Anniversary Edition in Navy Blue
Mamiya Six Folder with Zuiko 75/3.5
Adaptall: Tamron SP 28-85 macro
Cameras: Canon IX
PM for more complete descriptions/pix. All in great shape!
_________________________
'buy me a drink, sing me a song,
take me as i come 'cause i can't stay long' |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Sven
 Joined: 02 Aug 2008 Posts: 818 Location: Linköping Sweden
Expire: 2011-12-29
|
 Posted: Tue Oct 27, 2009 6:03 pm Post subject: |
|
 Posted: Tue Oct 27, 2009 6:03 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Sven wrote:
I have two 44-2 and one 44M-4. I can't see any major differencies in picture quality, but I haven't done a real comparison.
I like the 44-2 better for the pre-set function. The automatic f-stop version doesn't work on my DSLR so I have to jam the mechanism i order to stop down. _________________ DSLR: Nikon D200, Pentax *istDL, Nikon D100 IR converted
SLR: Pentax Spotmatic, Pentax ME,
Nikkor:N 2.8/24 H 3.5/28, 2/35, 2/50, 1.4/50 1.8/85, 3.5/50-135, E 2.8/100, P C 2.5/105, 2.8/135, 2.8/180 ED, 4/200,
M42: Pentacon 4/200, S Takumar 1.8/55, Meyer Orestor 2.8/135, CZJ Flektogon 2.4/35, CZJ Pancolar 1.8/50, CZJ Sonnar 3.5/135
AF Lenses: Nikkor 1.8/50, Pentax 18-55
Flickr http://www.flickr.com/photos/29261959@N08/
Website http://www.hundbilder.nu/ |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
martinsmith99
 Joined: 31 Aug 2008 Posts: 7000 Location: S Glos, UK
Expire: 2013-11-18
|
 Posted: Tue Oct 27, 2009 7:27 pm Post subject: |
|
 Posted: Tue Oct 27, 2009 7:27 pm Post subject: |
|
|
martinsmith99 wrote:
I have the 44-2 and the 44M and also the Biotar that these were based on. IQ-wise there's not much between all the range. I do prefer the preset on the 44-2 for ease on DSLR. Next would be the 44M as the A/M switch can be used to stop the lens down.
Later models have better coatings, whereas earlier models have more iris blades. If I had to chose from the range I would go for 44, 44-2 or 44M as these are cheaper and need no jamming of stopdown pin to function correctly. The same can be said for the 44-3, but these are rare and prices reflect this. _________________ Casual attendance these days |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
JWH
 Joined: 26 Aug 2009 Posts: 120 Location: Netherlands
|
 Posted: Tue Oct 27, 2009 10:43 pm Post subject: |
|
 Posted: Tue Oct 27, 2009 10:43 pm Post subject: |
|
|
JWH wrote:
I got a 44-3 MC ( apparantly is rare ) coming in by mail any day now! Then I can test it together with a 44-2 Zebra, 44M and a Biotar. Can't wait. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
haley
 Joined: 26 May 2009 Posts: 154
|
 Posted: Wed Oct 28, 2009 4:48 am Post subject: |
|
 Posted: Wed Oct 28, 2009 4:48 am Post subject: |
|
|
haley wrote:
I've got an older zebra 44-2 and a 44-3. I've done a few small tests in the field, and I'd be hard pressed to point out the difference in any of my photos. They're both perfect, though. Based on my experience and other comments, I would look for an older 44-2 or a 44-3. But, really, they're so inexpensive that you wouldn't go broke buying one of each.  |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Kamerer
 Joined: 24 Jun 2008 Posts: 389 Location: Russia Moscow
|
 Posted: Wed Oct 28, 2009 12:10 pm Post subject: |
|
 Posted: Wed Oct 28, 2009 12:10 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Kamerer wrote:
| Poolhall wrote: |
| Some think 44-3 is best, others claim 44-7 is sharpest but I think they are all pretty similar. |
Helios-44-7 - A regular objective of cameras of line Zenit-7.
And you likely told about MC Helios-44M-7.
http://animal.zenit.istra.ru/archive/lenses/helios-44.html _________________
Sony NEX-3 + NEX C3
MC Helios-44M-4
VMC Vivitar 28-90/2.8-3.5 Ser1
Pentakta 2/30
My texts are translated by the electronic translator. Best regards, Sergey.
|
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Poolhall
 Joined: 25 Feb 2008 Posts: 1296
|
 Posted: Thu Oct 29, 2009 1:07 pm Post subject: |
|
 Posted: Thu Oct 29, 2009 1:07 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Poolhall wrote:
You are correct Sergey, Helios 44m-7 was what I meant to say  |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
estudleon
 Joined: 15 May 2008 Posts: 3754 Location: Argentina
|
 Posted: Thu Oct 29, 2009 1:22 pm Post subject: |
|
 Posted: Thu Oct 29, 2009 1:22 pm Post subject: |
|
|
estudleon wrote:
I have a 44-3 and 44M-7.
I like the 44-3 very much.
My copy of the 44M-7 lost the particular bokeh of the 44-3. It 's more similar to the "normals" 50 mm, and in this league my takumar, pancolar, hexanon and pentacon beat it.
The 44-3 is a different lens. Similar to the 44-2 but it's MC. Nice image with particular bokeh (as you know).
If you have a good 50/58 mm, perhaps the 44-2 or MC 44-3 can be the option.
Rino. _________________ Konica 2,8/100
CZJ: 4/20, 2,4/35, 1,8/50 aus jena, 3,5/135MC, Pentacon 1,8/50
Pentax S-M-C-1,4/50
Helios 44-3
Mamiya 2,8/135
Misc. : jupiter 9
Stuff used:
A) SRL
Alpa 10 D - kern macro Switar 1,9/50 -black, Kilffit apochromat 2/100.
Asahi pentax spotmatic super takumar 1,4/50
Contaflex super B tessar 2,8/50 Pro-tessar 115
Leica R3 electronic summicron 2/50 elmarit 2,8/35
Konica Autoreflex 3 (2 black and chrome one), TC, T4. 2,8/24, 3,5/28 not MC and MC, 1,8/40, 1,4/50, 1,7/50 MC and not MC, 1,8/85, 3,2/135, 3,5/135, 4/200
Minolta XG9 2,8/35, 2/45, 3,5/135
Nikkormat FTn 1,4/50, 2,8/135
Fujica ST 801, 605, 705n. 3,5/19, 1,4/50, 1,8/55, 4/85, 3,5/135.
Praktica MTL 5 and a lot of M42 lenses.
Voigtlander. Bessamatic m, bessamatix de luxe, bessamatic cs, ultramatic and ultramatic cs.
Skoparex 3,5/35, skopagon 2/40, skopar 2,8/50, skopar X 2,8/50, super lanthar (out of catalogue) 2,8/50, dinarex 3,4/90, dinarex 4,8/100, super dinarex 4/135, super dinarex 4/200, zoomar 2,8/36-83, portrait lens 0, 1 and 2. Curtagon 4/28 and 2,8/35
Canon AV1, 1,8/50
Rolleiflex SL35 and SL35 E. 2,8/35 angulon, 2,8/35 distagon, 1,4/55 rolleinar, 1,8/50 planar, 4/135 tessar, 2,8/135 rolleinar, x2 rollei, M42 to rollei adap.
Etc.
RF
Yashica Minister III
Voightlander Vito, vitomatic I, Vito C, etc.
Leica M. M2, M3 (d.s.) and M4. Schenider 3,4/21, 2/35 summaron 2,8/35 (with eyes). Summicron 2/35 (8 elements with eyes), 2/35 chrome, 2/35 black, 1,4/35 pre asph and aspheric - old -, 2/40 summicron, 2,8/50 elmar, 2/50 7 elements, 2/50 DR, 2/50 - minolta version, 1,4/50 summilux 1966 version, 1,4/75 summilux, 2/90 large version, 2/90 reduced version of 1987, 2,8/90 elmarit large version, 4/135 elmar. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
djmike
 Joined: 01 Apr 2009 Posts: 930 Location: Taiwan
|
 Posted: Thu Oct 29, 2009 1:47 pm Post subject: |
|
 Posted: Thu Oct 29, 2009 1:47 pm Post subject: |
|
|
djmike wrote:
I have 44-6 and it's so-so. Maybe I got a so-so copy one with so-so luck. _________________
DSLR: Canon 400D
SLR: Nikon FM2 + Canon A-1 + Canon AE1-P + Praktica MTL-5B + Pentax Spotmatic F + Fujica ST801 + Voigtlander Bassematic + Voigtlander Vito + Rollei 35S + Rolleiflex SL35 ME + Canon QL17 GIII + Olympus Pen EE-3
Lenses
M42: CZJ Flektogon 35/2.4 + CZJ Flektogon Zebra 35/2.8 + CZJ Pancolar 50/1.8 + CZJ Sonnar 135/3.5 + CZJ Tessar 50/2.8 Chrome + Pentacon 135/2.8 + Pentacon 50/1.8 + SMC Takumar 50/1.4 + SMC Takumar 55/2 + SMC Takumar 135/3.5 + Fujinon 55/1.8 + Jupiter-9 85/2 + Jupiter-37A 135/3.5 + Helios 44-6 58/2
Nikor: Nikkor 50/1.4 + Nikkor 28/3.5 + Nikkor 35-105 Zoom + 36-72 Series E Zoom
Canon: Canon FD + 28/2.8 + 50/1.8 + Canon 35-105 Macro Zoom
Other: Rollei Planar HFT 50/1.8
|
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Kamerer
 Joined: 24 Jun 2008 Posts: 389 Location: Russia Moscow
|
 Posted: Fri Oct 30, 2009 9:30 am Post subject: |
|
 Posted: Fri Oct 30, 2009 9:30 am Post subject: |
|
|
Kamerer wrote:
It is possible to think of Helios-77  _________________
Sony NEX-3 + NEX C3
MC Helios-44M-4
VMC Vivitar 28-90/2.8-3.5 Ser1
Pentakta 2/30
My texts are translated by the electronic translator. Best regards, Sergey.
|
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
rbelyell
 Joined: 13 Oct 2009 Posts: 4269 Location: somewhere in the mountains of central NY
Expire: 2014-01-31
|
 Posted: Fri Oct 30, 2009 1:01 pm Post subject: |
|
 Posted: Fri Oct 30, 2009 1:01 pm Post subject: |
|
|
rbelyell wrote:
thank you everyone for all the help and information! let me ask you all, as between the best helios of your choice and the zeiss biotar, which would you choose?
also, per rino above, it seems the 44-3 has some unusual bokeh characteristics the others lack--is that agreed? i read that in some helios you have to jam the pin to make it work on dslr; how does the 44-3 work in this regard?
thanks again!
tony _________________ Epson RD1 + Elmarit 21/2.8; Summarit 50/1.5; Summarit 75/2.5; Elmar-c 90/4; Sankyo Komura 135/2.8, Hektor 135/4.5; Braun Paxina 29 6x6; Photax Boyer Paris; Holga 120 Pano
GREAT STUFF FOR SALE:
Contax T
Hasselblad XPan + 45/4, 90/4
Kodak Retina Reflex IV + full set of Schneider Krueznach lenses
Mercury 2 half frame 35mm
Kodak Pro slr/n
Fuji GM670+100/3.5+65/8!
Praktisix 6x6 medium format + ZeissBiometar 120/2.8
Bessa T 101 Anniversary Edition in Navy Blue
Mamiya Six Folder with Zuiko 75/3.5
Adaptall: Tamron SP 28-85 macro
Cameras: Canon IX
PM for more complete descriptions/pix. All in great shape!
_________________________
'buy me a drink, sing me a song,
take me as i come 'cause i can't stay long' |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Poolhall
 Joined: 25 Feb 2008 Posts: 1296
|
 Posted: Fri Oct 30, 2009 5:17 pm Post subject: |
|
 Posted: Fri Oct 30, 2009 5:17 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Poolhall wrote:
The Helios 44-3 is pre-set lens it has no pin, it should fit ok with the right adapter. Sergey has a point with the Helios-77m it is basically a 50mm rather than 58mm Helios , also worth considering are the f2/50mm Zenitars they are a modernised Helios 44 and are very sharp and simple lenses. I have both the m42 and k-mount versions of this lens and would highly recommend them, I did post some samples on the forum in the past.  |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
rbelyell
 Joined: 13 Oct 2009 Posts: 4269 Location: somewhere in the mountains of central NY
Expire: 2014-01-31
|
 Posted: Fri Oct 30, 2009 7:17 pm Post subject: |
|
 Posted: Fri Oct 30, 2009 7:17 pm Post subject: |
|
|
rbelyell wrote:
thanks. i have a 50mm zeiss pancolar, so i was thinking of something that had some unusual character, like the 44-3....or the biotar?
tony _________________ Epson RD1 + Elmarit 21/2.8; Summarit 50/1.5; Summarit 75/2.5; Elmar-c 90/4; Sankyo Komura 135/2.8, Hektor 135/4.5; Braun Paxina 29 6x6; Photax Boyer Paris; Holga 120 Pano
GREAT STUFF FOR SALE:
Contax T
Hasselblad XPan + 45/4, 90/4
Kodak Retina Reflex IV + full set of Schneider Krueznach lenses
Mercury 2 half frame 35mm
Kodak Pro slr/n
Fuji GM670+100/3.5+65/8!
Praktisix 6x6 medium format + ZeissBiometar 120/2.8
Bessa T 101 Anniversary Edition in Navy Blue
Mamiya Six Folder with Zuiko 75/3.5
Adaptall: Tamron SP 28-85 macro
Cameras: Canon IX
PM for more complete descriptions/pix. All in great shape!
_________________________
'buy me a drink, sing me a song,
take me as i come 'cause i can't stay long' |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Eugen Mezei
 Joined: 17 May 2008 Posts: 267
|
 Posted: Sun Nov 01, 2009 5:19 am Post subject: |
|
 Posted: Sun Nov 01, 2009 5:19 am Post subject: |
|
|
Eugen Mezei wrote:
What would be the most probable camera the 44-3 would be found on? Maybe it is worth looking for whole camera-lens assemblies.
Eugen |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Poolhall
 Joined: 25 Feb 2008 Posts: 1296
|
 Posted: Sun Nov 01, 2009 8:38 am Post subject: |
|
 Posted: Sun Nov 01, 2009 8:38 am Post subject: |
|
|
Poolhall wrote:
You can often find the 44-3 on Belomo or MMZ Zenits, Like the Zenit ET especially the plastic body types- that's how I got mine, but they are not that common. Still its a good idea to look for one that way.
rbelyell- cant help with the Biotar I never used one, but would recommend the 44-3 as a lens with character, or try a 44-2 they are much cheaper and easier to find and are similar in type.  |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
|
|