Posted: Sun Oct 18, 2009 10:27 pm Post subject: |
|
|
dnas wrote:
qwerty3557 wrote: |
Which leads to me another question why is it that Nikon F mount lenses can fit on EOS EF bodies without corrective optics?
The flange focal distance on a nikon is 46.50 mm and a canon EOS is 44.00 mm. An adaptor of 2.50mm can be used and works to infinity.
The flange focal distance on a 4/3rds is 38.67 mm and canon FD is 42.00mm...
so an adaptor of 3.33mm could be used to reach infinity....
so why are there no slim adaptors like th F - EF mount for FD - 4/3rds? |
There is a good reason.
Firstly, the Nikon mount has a small diameter, while the Canon EF/EOS has a large diameter. PART of the Nikon mount fits inside the Canon EF mount, so this makes it easy to produce an adapter with a difference in flange distance of 2.5mm. (a thickness of 2.5mm)
On the other hand, the Canon FL/FD mount has a large diameter breech lock mount. That mechanism adds about 4mm to the distance. e.g. The flange is 42.00mm on the FL/FD, but the back of the breech lock adds around 4mm of distance, so that the lens unmodified, cannot even be pressed flush to a 4/3 mount.
Added to this, the breech lock mount had a large diameter, so NONE of the lens fits paritally inside the 4/3 mount. |