Posted: Wed Jun 24, 2009 7:49 am Post subject: Helios MC 44M-6 2/58mm vr. TESSAR Carl Zeiss Jena 2.8/50mm |
|
|
ReiLord wrote:
The test was performed very quickly because of the lack of time but i'll provide more information and photos in the next week.
The EXIF is available in the full size photos, so if You need any additional info, please download the file and see the EXIF info. What You may not find in the EXIF is the aperture, the Helios photo is ~f/2.4 and CZJ f/2.8.
The conclusion: i think that i have great Helios exemplar and the bad one Tessar. I've read that the Helios reaches ~38 lines and this Tessar even ~76 lines but in this comparison we can see that the details and sharpness are definitely better on the photos taken using Helios (lok on the "roof" texture). As i said before, i still think that CZJ should be better and the CZ exemplar is one of the bad one if it's possible.
To be continued...
Helios MC 44M-6 2/58mm
TESSAR Carl Zeiss Jena 2.8/50mm
_________________ Sony DSLR-A200 + Minolta Dynax 700si + Minolta Dynax 3xi
MIR-1B 37/2,8 + TESSAR Carl Zeiss Jena 50/2.8 + MC Helios-44M-6 58mm + Sony 18-70mm + TAIR-11A 135mm + Jupiter-37A 135mm + Tair 3S 300mm + Soligor Teleconverter X2 + Pinhole "lens"
SIGMA EF-500 DG SUPER
http://translax.eu/; http://www.m-j.translax.eu; http://www.m-j.translax.eu/forum; http://www.into-localization.com - localizacja, globalizacja, internationalizacja, DTP..... |